[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision

[alevlaslo]

https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/bjec1e/bsv_is_about_proof_of_work_not_just_in_mining_but/

BSV is about Proof of Work, not just in mining, but in all aspects. Other chains want to change the rules because they know that in time they cannot compete with or outwork the true Bitcoin. BSV is the only blockchain in the arena.


Recently I was thinking about this famous quotation by Theodore Roosevelt , his "Man in the Arena" speech:

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."

It makes me think of BitcoinSV. The critics are the ABC and Core losers that never put in work, never attempt, never fail, never try and try again, never fall short, but also never succeed, never triumph, and never change the world. They are the cold and timid souls on the sidelines, the ones with the NO2X hats, happy to strangle Bitcoin and destroy the original vision for a short term pump and dump narrative. They are the Chris Pacia's of the world that tell us 22MB blocks are impossible, and needle us about "6 block reorgs" even though no chain was ever more than 2 blocks behind. They make lies that big blocks will result in complete centralization and spread lies that big blocks take 41 minutes to propagate the network. They tell us about "poison blocks" and that big blocksizes are too dangerous. But BSV marches on and proves the world wrong again and again with world record 128MB blocks mined that dwarf that of any other public blockchain.

Its not perfect, sometimes we fall short, sometimes we err, sometimes we fail, but we learn from those failures, and learn from our mistakes and shortcomings. And we improve, and grow, and become stronger. For there is no effort without shortcomings. There is no improvement without trial and error. And who is even competing against us? The other loser chains are afraid to compete. They are afraid to enter the arena. They cannot compete, and they never could, that is why ABC were so critical of the early stress tests done by the BSV community. The only thing they have is to criticize BSV and Craig on social media, because they are doing nothing, they do not know how to work. The only work they seem to be doing is dedicating 90% of their life to obsessing about BSV and Craig. We now know Greg Maxwell of BlockStream is /u/contrarian__, the main defamation troll cult leader critic of Craig and BSV. When you spend all your work and time on being a critic you are not actually doing work. You are just being a critic on the sidelines, and you are not in the arena. You are attacking someone else's work because you don't know how to do real work. They are shitlord degenerate weirdos that can't even properly groom themselves, exercise, or wash their hoodies or clown shirts in a timely manner. You can smell their laziness from a mile away.

The ShamBitcoins have the illusion of work, while BSV does the real work. BSV does so much work that it gets captured and stolen by the fake Bitcoin chains. They steal the network effect, they steal the market cap, they steal the brand, they steal the merchants, they steal the ticker, they steal the subreddits that people like me and others worked hard to build, they steal our following, they steal the fiat onramps and exchanges. That is all they can do. All they know how to do is steal things and then try to rest on their laurels. This is why so many of them prefer POS, so they can become the oligarchs of the system.

It is the same in BTC-Core's Lightning, Jihan/ABC's Avalanche/POS plans, and ETH's plans for POS. These are all forms of POS and rent seeking, where the systems degrade into oligarchy. The oligarchs don't want to work, they don't want POW. BSV on the other hand is entirely about POW, and putting in work, in all aspects. We just march on and continue building and competing. The parasites are on our back sucking our blood and weakening us, but the honey badger continues on. The subreddit continues here, the chain continues with 128MB and 2GB in July, the building and infrastructure continues with moneybutton and unwriter's tools, and large op-return data sizes, and metanet. Parasites freak out and try to delist us because they realize the day of reckoning is approaching. They know in their gut they have stolen everything they ever had. The ShamBitcoin chains are dying, literally. When the reward halving runs out their chains will lose all of their hashing security. BSV is the only ledger that will persist because it can actually generate utility and fees on its gigantic blocksizes. The critics know they cannot compete on work, so they seek to change the rules of the game.

BSV is learning to swim on its own, exercising its mining muscles. We get stronger every day. We have mined world record 128MB blocks. While the other chains mining muscles are atrophied. They couldn't mine bigger blocks if they tried. They are wearing swim floaties on their skinny arms that lose half of their air every 4 years. Core and the Blue Matt are even giving presentations about how mining is bad and we need to get rid of mining altogether because they know they have already failed. Peter Todd is advocating inflation. They have failed to put in the work needed to scale.

So yes we are the ones in the arena, our faces marred with dust and sweat and blood. We are the ones working. We strive valiantly, and if we fail, at least we fail while daring greatly. At least we pushed the limits of what is possible, at least we were not cowards that lay down and give up, or try to steal others work and rest on their laurels. At least we were not just troll critics on the sideline who can only point out where the strong man stumbles. We in BSV at times may experience shortfalls, but we also are able to achieve great triumphs, for you can't have the latter without the former. So remember it is not the critics that count, and its not the trolls that count. Its us that count. We are the irate tireless minority that stands up for what is right. We are the ones that preserve Bitcoin for future generations. BSV is about changing the world, and if you want to change the world you better get off the sidelines and get in the arena.

[1714102428]

1714102428

[1714102428]

1714102428

[1714102428]

1714102428

[1714102428]

1714102428

[1714102428]

1714102428

[hv_]

Shitcoins incl segshit and shitchanges gonna implode soon?

https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/tether/feds-justice-hsbc-account-bitfinex-seized/

[alevlaslo]

[jamespastagueule]

Excellent!

[Meta_Report]

Craig Wright and Calvin Ayre make nice with a crypto exchange
A week after BSV was delisted from multiple exchanges, the cryptocurrency’s champions invest in one. Building BSV as an enterprise platform is the goal.

Calvin Ayre, Craig Wright and the Bitcoin SV cryptocurrency they champion are popular with at least one exchange. Ayre’s Coingeek has teamed up with Drive Markets, a new institutional and individual crypto exchange, and will make a multimillion-dollar investment in the company. Wright’s nChain will supply blockchain consulting services and access to its intellectual property.

As Modern Consensus reported, Wright and Ayre earned the animosity of much of the cryptocurrency community last week after threatening to sue, and in at least one case actually suing, people who have called Wright’s claim to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto a lie. As a result, Bitcoin SV (BSV) was delisted from several major exchanges, including Binance.

At the same time it disclosed the investment, Drive Markets’ announced that its Drive Pay, a real-time remittance and settlement network for crypto and fiat currencies, will be run on a Bitcoin SV (BSV) ledger, and will use BSV coins as a bridge currency for liquidity, according to a press release. The company said that Drive Pay is a cross-blockchain platform targeting traders in capital markets and the foreign exchange market. It has its own utility token, Drive Coin (DRV), launched on April 3.

Drive’s release makes clear that the investment and partnership is all about boosting BSV as an enterprise (or permissioned) blockchain platform, at least for Ayre and Wright. In fact, it flat-out says it: “Ayre… expects the undisclosed investment which is in the multiple seven figures, to provide a significant boost to BSV enterprise usage and transaction volume.”

Drive says its support of BSV is because of its scalability. The release also takes several swipes at Bitcoin (BTC) in its Bitcoin Core appellation in this regard, noting that BSV just created a pair of 128 MB blocks which can handle more than 800 transactions per second. And, apparently, is preparing for gigabyte and terabyte blocks. “For comparison, Bitcoin Core BTC has a small 1MB block cap,” it added.

Ayre is quoted as saying “Drive recognizes the original Bitcoin vision, now back in the form of Bitcoin SV, works at a massive scale. I look forward to seeing the Drive Pay network process huge amounts of transactions on the BSV blockchain, and further unleash the true power of Bitcoin.”

Drive has partnered with MetaTrader, which has a trading platform popular with forex traders, and First Data, a database provider and consulting firm focused on the finance, technology and energy markets. Drive Markets promises, “a crypto trading experience synonymous with forex trading.”

Source By Leo Jakobson: https://modernconsensus.com/cryptocurrencies/bitcoin/craig-wright-calvin-ayre-drive-markets/

[alevlaslo]

@bitfinex, @HuobiGlobal and @Poloniex - very good levels of support on the exchanges, the most reliable coin to buy, the price will not go lower

[ðºÞæ]

New Bottle browser release today! (Codename: BITCOM)  With this release, Bitcom has become the Operating System of Bottle.
https://bottle.bitdb.network/

Edit:
the latest interview
https://youtu.be/Jayzse5l-BU

and links
https://bsvlinks.com/

[alevlaslo]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1123946538131251200.html

[falconpunch]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1123946538131251200.html

oh nice. thanks

[ðºÞæ]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1123946538131251200.html

BSV  a database for "proof of lies". A lot of things being preserved via bistagram or etched right now.
Whole websites, twitter posts,... uploaded to the blockchain for eternity.

[jamespastagueule]

Craig Wright’s side of the courtcase.

https://imgur.com/m1hex0k
https://imgur.com/Fse8k3q
https://imgur.com/yZsntND

Those who don’t believe Craig need to assume, Craig emailed Louis Kleiman (father of Dave), to tell him his son Dave was involved in the creation of Bitcoin, because he needed Dave to be part of his story coming out as Satoshi.......
In emails between Kleiman and Craig, Craig offers them 12 million dollars and a share in the company exchange, he also offers help to get to the Bitcoins that Dave may have on his harddisk.
The harddisk are encrypted so they are obviously pissed off they can’t get to it.
The only legit reason for Craig to come out as Satoshi other than that he is Satoshi is that people think he needed money, as his businesses were failing. So we have to assume Craig lied to the father of his best dead friend, lied about 12 million dollars and lied about
the shares the Kleimans would get or at least they would be useless shares. Now think about this for a second.

Why would Craig promise things to his best friends family when it is impossible to make true this promise. Ie. he had to either have the money back then, or
he would be completely insane to get them involved and promise them complete bullshit, which would come out either way, 1.5 years earlier before he came out as Satoshi.

But he had those businesses, he also had intellectual property, so he always had a way to get out of debt?
The assumptions that are made for Craig not being Satoshi are ridiculous, they don’t add up at all. The fake pgp keys, the fake posts etc... can all be waved away, if Craig didn’t want to be known as Satoshi, which it looks like.
He never wanted a seperate Bitcoin he protected BTC against segwit as can be seen here.

https://pastebin.com/UFq0DcNq

He wanted to have the protocol locked down as per Satoshi.
https://youtu.be/jIDmKc_jWAI

Decentral means powerless money! Not developers ruling over Bitcoin and some democratic voting fest that allows people to vote on changing the protocol! That is called “central”, people are central as they want power over money.
Bitcoin solves this!

Now we also have to assume Craig after doing this really weird fraud with his best friends family that seems extremely unlikely and illogical 1.5 years ahead of coming out as Satoshi, which he clearly didn’t want to do.
We also have to assume that
he somehow completely went apeshit on Bitcoin and studied it inside out. Creating hundreds of patents which cost about 50k$ each if not more. We have to assume Nchain who runs 50 people and companies before that were all run to somehow come out as Satoshi in case they failed.
We have to assume that Stefan Martin, Ian Gregg, Calvin Ayre, Gavin Andersen, His wife, Ex wife and some more are all lying completely. That Craig somehow was happy to get an interviewer in for 7 months as he knew he was able con them..........
We now also have to assume Craig is happy to invite Peter McKormack, vitalik, holdonaut and Adam into court, because it is in the Uk and Craig thinks he can get away with it........
And most of all we have to assume that this madman even though he didn’t want a split in 2017, then decided to stay in BCH until it turned out that they also were planning change the protocol.
We have to assume that Craig somehow planned this, to then create his own shitcoin
Which turns out to be the exact Bitcoin Satoshi delivered to us, set in stone, simple secure and somehow it looks like it can do indeed anything.
So this madman somehow is clever enough to run a team of 50 people and make the original work, scale and do anything you can think of
I didn’t mention he has written hundreds of articles, mentioned Bitcoin is a small world graph, economically incentivised which also happens to fit in with Craig Wrights past, as a cybersecurity specialist he got into massive fights as he had the controversial vision of
security being an economic issue.

Now guess what solved the double spending problem/ selfish mining?

Indeed: economic security, happy coincidence right?
Is it also a coincidence that BSV after ten years is capable of running 128 mb bloks, aiming for gigabyte blocks soon after?

I think we all know Craig is off really well, he doesn’t have to work. He has staff, a lambo. Perhaps that is all fake huh?
Just like his doctorates his master degrees, his background as a lecturer on computing and math. His grandfather teaching him C and the fact that he worked for the airforce on f-18’s and f-111’s. Which happen to run Forth script. which is exactly what Bitcoin script is based on.

https://imgur.com/eLYRHpR

https://imgur.com/tBbXRer

Here Satoshi answers with it is good enough, ie he wasn’t looking for perfect security, it is all based on economic security.
Ie the chances are it is to expensive for anyone trying to do double spendinf.

https://imgur.com/5kHUbc7

2010 he wrote this book, again Craig writes about software and trust and economics of security

https://imgur.com/gYJmWHy

This book also happens to quote the book:”Mythical man” which has a famous remark in it with not going to sea with 1 or 2 chronometers.
This quote is in the code of v0.1
Bitcoin was supposed to be set in stone, Satoshi replied this to Gavin when he was contemplating all the changes he could make and when he asked why script was used.

In this post to Ray Dillinger again he talks about locking it up.
Satoshi designed Bitcoin for years such that

https://imgur.com/0u174Gx

any transactions can be added in the future without having to change the protocol. Only miners are nodes and they get to choose what they mine. But they can not change the protocol, nobody can!
Cash shouldn’t change and the whole point of Bitcoin is people do not get to choose
what Bitcoin is!

https://imgur.com/VEy6v9a

“Part of why i fucking disappeared was to have things not controlled, and I have to come back to control things, to get it fucking not controlled, that’s the friggin irony of this shit.”
- Dr Craig S Wright
“Part of why i fucking disappeared was to have things not controlled, and I have to come back to control things, to get it fucking not controlled, that’s the friggin irony of this shit.”
- Dr Craig S Wright
Here Satoshi mentions there are only two possible templates right now for transactions any other sort of transaction that can be worked out could simply be added through templates, allowing the protocol to remain the same.

https://imgur.com/S8JrcYX

Satoshi left in 2011 onto other things. Did he really just hop on a bicycle and ride it into the sunset? After all that work? Or would he have stuck around like Craig did?

Here in 2015 a Satoshi that was either a fake one, but to me it shows someone is protecting the original!

https://imgur.com/5opoZ6R

It is describing exactly what is happening in BTC. Developers having power over the future of Bitcoin in a fake democracy where users get to scratch their heads over what Segwit means and whether they need to use it or not. Bitcoin is not democratic, Bitcoin is Bitcoin

https://imgur.com/eiOLxKp

https://imgur.com/H0Chg5w

the reply to Gavin! Clearly reacting firmly the core design is set in stone and he talks about people realising the importance of staying with the OFFICIAL version.

https://imgur.com/b0jA4Ea

Clearly stating he has technical reasons for Bitcoin not to fork. Segwit is a User Activated Soft Fork... this is why Craig was fighting for it to get it rejected.

https://pastebin.com/UFq0DcNq

https://youtu.be/eQwTmvg5F4g

Gavin:”He signed in my presence the private key from block 1, on a computer I am convinced to not be tempered with, on software I am convinced to not be tempered with, a message of my choosing”
That sealed the deal for me, convincing me he does have that private key.

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a?source=linkShare-d9e51daabdc-1556808712&_branch_match_id=642489273830581613
>>>>How I Met Satoshi
Go to the profile of Jon Matonis
Jon Matonis
May 2, 2016
My relationship with the individual known as Satoshi Nakamoto started in early March 2010 when I received an email from Satoshi pointing me to the published Bitcoin white paper and encouraging me to investigate the system and to begin promoting the network by transacting and mining. At the time, I managed a digital currency blog and this was an email relationship with some brief correspondence.

Then, on June 4th 2015 during a conference, I arranged to meet fellow Bitcoin advocate, Craig Steven Wright, for a cup of coffee at the top floor of the AMP headquarters building in Sydney, Australia. After discussing many technical and economic aspects of the current Bitcoin protocol debates, I returned to my hotel room after an exhausting day. I remember saying to my wife that I had this weird feeling of having just met Satoshi. Of course, I continued the dialogue with Craig in the months after returning from Sydney and leading up to a private proof session in late March 2016.

The reality of an extraordinary event is rarely what you imagine and I am now pleased to know the creator of the Bitcoin protocol and the author of the Bitcoin white paper, Craig Steven Wright. Bitcoin in itself is a brilliant accomplishment. Dr Wright’s substantial academic works merit further attention. I believe that the scale of his achievement, especially the original design of chaining blocks to achieve Nakamoto consensus, has far-reaching implications for our world beyond just a single vertical industry.

During the London proof sessions, I had the opportunity to review the relevant data along three distinct lines: cryptographic, social, and technical. Based on what I witnessed, it is my firm belief that Craig Steven Wright satisfies all three categories. For cryptographic proof in my presence, Craig signed and verified a message using the private key from block #1 newly-generated coins and from block #9 newly-generated coins (the first transaction to Hal Finney). The social evidence, including his unique personality, early emails that I received, and early drafts of the Bitcoin white paper, points to Craig as the creator. I also received satisfactory explanations to my questions about registering the bitcoin.org domain and the various time-of-day postings to the BitcoinTalk forum. Additionally, Craig’s technical working knowledge of public key cryptography, Bitcoin’s addressing system, and proof-of-work consensus in a distributed peer-to-peer environment is very strong.

According to me, the proof is conclusive and I have no doubt that Craig Steven Wright is the person behind the Bitcoin technology, Nakamoto consensus, and the Satoshi Nakamoto name.

This story and its work are far from over.

Directly or indirectly, the work of Satoshi has already provided employment opportunities for tens of thousands of people around the globe and created over $7 billion of new blockchain wealth. The forthcoming research work from Dr Craig Wright can only be described as voluminous and highly technical.

At its essence, Bitcoin displaces the intermediary, or trusted third party, and there will be no sacred cows along the way. It will be methodical, scientific, and unforgiving in its ascent.

Going forward from here, Bitcoin-company board rooms and others throughout the financial ecosystem will be recalibrating business models as these applied developments realign the prevailing orthodoxy. Expect radically-new solutions that address specialized nodes and on-chain scalability, smart contracts that exploit a Turing complete Bitcoin, the impotence of tokenless blockchains, and a systematic decline in the quantity and value of alt-coins.

Of course, overall scalability of the Bitcoin network will continue to evolve and improve, with a decided bias towards efficient on-chain scaling as further advancements in mining and node specialisation are realized. Moreover, this will be possible without compromising or degrading the current optimal levels for mining decentralisation or node decentralisation.

Programmable transactions, or smart contracts, will emerge for various suitable use cases. Much of the proposed functionality in Ethereum-like scripting solutions can be accomplished with the existing Bitcoin network through the use of multiple digital signatures and metadata storage techniques.

Computational power and security of the distributed network will continue to increase beyond the exahash per second rates achieved to date since proof-of-work mining is a zero-sum game. The “second” strongest distributed blockchain will always be less secure than a centralised data center.
 
 Indeed, hashrate matters and will continue to matter.

Technological advances in user-friendly privacy and coin fungibility will progress to maturity for the average user and outpace competing efforts to thwart financial privacy. Bitcoin’s built-in consumer protections include protection from financial surveillance, protection from confiscation, protection from government-sponsored inflation, protection from payment blockades, and protection from identity theft.

As the separation of money and State accelerates in real time, Bitcoin will continue to keep the monetary revolution peaceful. Coins in large volume will not be dropped onto the market, thereby strengthening bitcoin’s essential store-of-value element and ultimately benefitting its medium-of-exchange and unit-of-account properties.

We must remember that bitcoin is not the byproduct of a blockchain — the blockchain is the byproduct of bitcoin. Private, permissioned blockchains and distributed ledgers serve only to erect barriers and advance the interests of restrictive cartels whereas the public Bitcoin blockchain works to disrupt, not enable, financial incumbents.

In this new post-legal tender era, it is the central banks not the commercial banks that have the most to lose. We don’t need kings to coin our money and Bitcoin will outlive political institutions. It already has. Consequently, this will have severe transformative implications for governments’ fiscal policy and monetary policy.
 
I believe that the massive tidal wave of decentralisation and future Bitcoin advancements will start to occur more rapidly now, setting the stage for society to realize the plethora of currently imagined innovations. However, at the center of all of this incredible progress will be the unwavering and critical value of the humble digital bearer token known as bitcoin.<<<<

Jon Matonis!

Calvin Ayre mentions an old friend Stefan Martin ex colleague of Craig was shown the whitepaper of Bitcoin, Craig asked him for help, he declined.
Realising later
he was shown the whitepaper of Bitcoin.

Here we can see Satoshi wanted to not lead with anonymous although he did use anonymous and privacy as being similar things.
It also somewhat shows he did not see Bitcoin as being out of reach of government. At least how I read it.

https://imgur.com/itkt7Ge

If you had any doubts how Bitcoin is supposed to work, read the whitepaper it mentions miners are nodes only. There are no full nodes.
The ide was Blocks would grow miners would compete, SPV wallets would simply be wallets.

If we were to model that, it would become

https://imgur.com/NI8gGGw

a giant network node surrounded by spv’s. Which is what they call a small world graph.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1093443325892415489
https://twitter.com/TweetyBirdbrain/status/1093443325892415489

In the whitepaper it says, Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system. This is peer to peer. Alice to Bob in effectively less than two hops.

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Miners in competition are as per the whitepaper incentivised to interconnect, if your miner has too many orphans, this signals you to reinvest in the data line or hardware, which incentivises miners to keep the network in a high state of efficiency and security.
The original Bitcoin has a network distance of 1.32, facebook 4.6, lightning 12-80 (as money flows from Alice to Peter to Edgar to 12-80 others before reaching Bob)

Any network that has more than 3 hops has a bigger attack vector for sybil attacks.

https://imgur.com/cYtdHfw

Will BSV work? Is like asking will Bitcoin work? We don’t know we never really tried. It looks like it works. There are some legal aspects like saving data on chain, which is a novelty I guess. Commercial operators have more protection then home user nodes.
And through double hashing Craig mentions they are able to stop certain content from distributing, and moving certain parts of the mining process into countries where laws are strict.

Bitcoin has a script system which works like a predicate system.

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123426819389177856
Ryan X. Charles @ryanxcharles
Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

Examples:

- instant transactions: pay for it.
- smart contracts: pay for it.
- storage: pay for it.
- computation: pay for it.
- transfer: pay for it.

...pay for it...

...WITH BITCOIN.


https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123243865266323456
Features that are not included in the base protocol can be programmed into autonomous agents that you pay to solve problems. They price things in Bitcoin and you pay them in Bitcoin. Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123299981849497600
Because you can unroll loops, you can create arbitrarily sophisticated scripts. But you don't necessarily need long scripts. Instead, you can have many small scripts in parallel or series to do complicated things. Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

These functions can be done in script, using the dual stack. Bitcoin script doesn’t loop but you can extend it with external languages like forth or even Ethereum to loop.
Bitcoin is like a global computer that can store functions and run them in parallel.

https://imgur.com/3cjc3G8

It allows a new way of global trade brings people closer then ever before and could become the new way of storing immutable privacy data, have a way to access your devices by storing your username on the blockchain and combine smart cards with cryptographic keys such that
you alone can access your device when you have the smartcard, keys and perhaps fingerprint authentication.

It is like ELA except better........
Data needs to be valued for it to become information, it was never free, we pay with our privacy, with our time.
with microfees 4 services, new business models arise, more honest. Data becomes a competitive good. As Craig mentions:”Data wants to be valued, just like u and me”

Bitcoin at scale can do anything, we just need it to scale, we need rules, we need to keep it stable and locked down, we need to understand what that means.
We need enough datacenters to compete. We need everything on Bitcoin!
Bitcoin could give us powerless globall money,
forcing governments to stay honest about their monetary policies, as people can flee into Bitcoin when required.
It needs to be used, it offers those in poor African countries to take part in open global trade.
Like the internet it brings people closer, but in a more secure way. It could create a value internet.

I did not write this for anyone to invest in BSV the original Bitcoin, I want people to look at Craig’s side of the story and make your own decision.

Investing in crypto is risky! Governments can shut it down, new technical projects have a high risk of failure!


Source: Now "engraved in stone" and especially in the BSV blockchain accessible 24/24 | 7/7.
https://memo.sv/post/8c1493b704b1c14f1bd3b216cfaf0879248a4aa0820ee2ec1147947f63cd793e

[pinpins]

 
 You can mine BitcoinSV at  autoexchange mining pool Zergpool.com at 0.5% fee. Please use following commands for different mining options
 
 Option 1 Auto coin switch by profitability within algorithm with payment to wallet

Code:

 -o stratum+tcp://sha256.mine.zergpool.com:3333 -u <YOURBTCWALLET> -p c=BTC 

 Option 2 Direct coin mining to coin wallet

Code:

 -o stratum+tcp://sha256.mine.zergpool.com:3333 -u <YOURBSVWALLET> -p c=BSV,mc=BSV

 Option 3 Direct coin mining with autoexchange to specified coin wallet

Code:

 -o stratum+tcp://sha256.mine.zergpool.com:3333 -u <YOURBTCWALLET> -p c=BTC,mc=BSV

 Please note mc stands for mining coin symbol, c stand for payout coin symbol
 
 Autoexchange to BTC, LTC, DASH or any other currency we mine
 Happy mining,
  cheers pinpin

[jamespastagueule]

Not reading the rest of your novel.

Slacker.
No wonder you're so stupid.

[DMDCreeper]

Why all trading volumes are mostly in BSV/USDT market? Isn't USDT proven to be a complete scam with recent news?
Or all this volumes are just fake?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/#markets

[hv_]

Great wrap up

https://vimeo.com/314392830

[ðºÞæ]

Why all trading volumes are mostly in BSV/USDT market? Isn't USDT proven to be a complete scam with recent news?
Or all this volumes are just fake?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/#markets

Lots of better sides exits besides coinmarketcap on of them is Openmarketcap

others are
athcoinindex
Bitinfocharts
Coincheckup
Coincodex
Coingecko
Coincap
Coinlib
Cryptocompare

Besides Bitcoin is all whats needed look at xrp for example. It is a pure "Fool seeking bigger Fool" environment. Buying in hope to dump on someone else at a later date.
Real world usage can only happen with the ability to scale. Anything operating with a cheap raspberry pi or equivalent cant move up easy.

[alevlaslo]

Why all trading volumes are mostly in BSV/USDT market? Isn't USDT proven to be a complete scam with recent news?
Or all this volumes are just fake?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv/#markets

CoinMarketCap admits to Publishing Fake Crypto Volume for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple and other Altcoins is on https://www.cryptonewsz.com/coinmarketcap-admits-to-publishing-fake-crypto-volume-for-bitcoin-ethereum-ripple-and-other-altcoins/12697/
https://cointelegraph.com/news/coinmarketcap-will-alter-listing-metrics-after-latest-fake-volume-research
CoinMarketCap provides all information as is. You understand that you are using any and all information available here at your own risk. on https://coinmarketcap.com/disclaimer/

It also seems that the FloatSV exchanger is not yet included, so the information on this site does not seem very credible.

 It is necessary to look at the orders, not by volume

[Don_Crypton]

Bitcoin SV

Original Satoshi Vision

Charts
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-sv
https://www.coingecko.com/coins/bitcoin-sv

Code
https://www.github.com/bitcoin-sv

Wallets
https://electrumsv.io
https://atomicwallet.io
https://www.bitaddress.org
https://bitpie.com
https://www.cashpay.solutions/wallet
https://centbee.com
https://www.coinomi.com
https://edge.app
https://guarda.co
https://handcash.io
https://hodler.tech
https://nextcash.tech
http://pixelwallet.icu
https://simply.cash

Block Explorers
http://whatsonchain.com
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin-sv
http://bestminingpool.net/explorer/bchSV
https://svblox.com
https://hugeblock.info
https://bchsv.tokenview.com
https://bchsvexplorer.com
https://bitfire.io/blocks
https://bsvexplorer.io
https://www.bitcoinsvexplorer.com
https://bsvexplorer.info
https://testnet.bitcoincloud.net

Exchanges
https://www.bitasiaex.com
https://www.bitcoin.de
https://bittylicious.com
https://changelly.com
https://coinify.com
https://www.hbg.com
https://www.poloniex.com
https://raisex.io
https://ShapeShift.io
https://simpleswap.io

Roadmap
https://bitcoinsv.io/roadmap

"[BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision" - Is it just that text  " Original Satoshi Vision " makes me laugh? Was it Satoshi who told the creators of this shitkoin that their shitproject matches his vision? There is only 1 real bitcoin and this is not bitcoin SV or bitcoin cash. This is simply called Bitcoin.

[Mountain_Crew]

Craig Wright’s side of the courtcase.

https://imgur.com/m1hex0k
https://imgur.com/Fse8k3q
https://imgur.com/yZsntND

Those who don’t believe Craig need to assume, Craig emailed Louis Kleiman (father of Dave), to tell him his son Dave was involved in the creation of Bitcoin, because he needed Dave to be part of his story coming out as Satoshi.......
In emails between Kleiman and Craig, Craig offers them 12 million dollars and a share in the company exchange, he also offers help to get to the Bitcoins that Dave may have on his harddisk.
The harddisk are encrypted so they are obviously pissed off they can’t get to it.
The only legit reason for Craig to come out as Satoshi other than that he is Satoshi is that people think he needed money, as his businesses were failing. So we have to assume Craig lied to the father of his best dead friend, lied about 12 million dollars and lied about
the shares the Kleimans would get or at least they would be useless shares. Now think about this for a second.

Why would Craig promise things to his best friends family when it is impossible to make true this promise. Ie. he had to either have the money back then, or
he would be completely insane to get them involved and promise them complete bullshit, which would come out either way, 1.5 years earlier before he came out as Satoshi.

But he had those businesses, he also had intellectual property, so he always had a way to get out of debt?
The assumptions that are made for Craig not being Satoshi are ridiculous, they don’t add up at all. The fake pgp keys, the fake posts etc... can all be waved away, if Craig didn’t want to be known as Satoshi, which it looks like.
He never wanted a seperate Bitcoin he protected BTC against segwit as can be seen here.

https://pastebin.com/UFq0DcNq

He wanted to have the protocol locked down as per Satoshi.
https://youtu.be/jIDmKc_jWAI

Decentral means powerless money! Not developers ruling over Bitcoin and some democratic voting fest that allows people to vote on changing the protocol! That is called “central”, people are central as they want power over money.
Bitcoin solves this!

Now we also have to assume Craig after doing this really weird fraud with his best friends family that seems extremely unlikely and illogical 1.5 years ahead of coming out as Satoshi, which he clearly didn’t want to do.
We also have to assume that
he somehow completely went apeshit on Bitcoin and studied it inside out. Creating hundreds of patents which cost about 50k$ each if not more. We have to assume Nchain who runs 50 people and companies before that were all run to somehow come out as Satoshi in case they failed.
We have to assume that Stefan Martin, Ian Gregg, Calvin Ayre, Gavin Andersen, His wife, Ex wife and some more are all lying completely. That Craig somehow was happy to get an interviewer in for 7 months as he knew he was able con them..........
We now also have to assume Craig is happy to invite Peter McKormack, vitalik, holdonaut and Adam into court, because it is in the Uk and Craig thinks he can get away with it........
And most of all we have to assume that this madman even though he didn’t want a split in 2017, then decided to stay in BCH until it turned out that they also were planning change the protocol.
We have to assume that Craig somehow planned this, to then create his own shitcoin
Which turns out to be the exact Bitcoin Satoshi delivered to us, set in stone, simple secure and somehow it looks like it can do indeed anything.
So this madman somehow is clever enough to run a team of 50 people and make the original work, scale and do anything you can think of
I didn’t mention he has written hundreds of articles, mentioned Bitcoin is a small world graph, economically incentivised which also happens to fit in with Craig Wrights past, as a cybersecurity specialist he got into massive fights as he had the controversial vision of
security being an economic issue.

Now guess what solved the double spending problem/ selfish mining?

Indeed: economic security, happy coincidence right?
Is it also a coincidence that BSV after ten years is capable of running 128 mb bloks, aiming for gigabyte blocks soon after?

I think we all know Craig is off really well, he doesn’t have to work. He has staff, a lambo. Perhaps that is all fake huh?
Just like his doctorates his master degrees, his background as a lecturer on computing and math. His grandfather teaching him C and the fact that he worked for the airforce on f-18’s and f-111’s. Which happen to run Forth script. which is exactly what Bitcoin script is based on.

https://imgur.com/eLYRHpR

https://imgur.com/tBbXRer

Here Satoshi answers with it is good enough, ie he wasn’t looking for perfect security, it is all based on economic security.
Ie the chances are it is to expensive for anyone trying to do double spendinf.

https://imgur.com/5kHUbc7

2010 he wrote this book, again Craig writes about software and trust and economics of security

https://imgur.com/gYJmWHy

This book also happens to quote the book:”Mythical man” which has a famous remark in it with not going to sea with 1 or 2 chronometers.
This quote is in the code of v0.1
Bitcoin was supposed to be set in stone, Satoshi replied this to Gavin when he was contemplating all the changes he could make and when he asked why script was used.

In this post to Ray Dillinger again he talks about locking it up.
Satoshi designed Bitcoin for years such that

https://imgur.com/0u174Gx

any transactions can be added in the future without having to change the protocol. Only miners are nodes and they get to choose what they mine. But they can not change the protocol, nobody can!
Cash shouldn’t change and the whole point of Bitcoin is people do not get to choose
what Bitcoin is!

https://imgur.com/VEy6v9a

“Part of why i fucking disappeared was to have things not controlled, and I have to come back to control things, to get it fucking not controlled, that’s the friggin irony of this shit.”
- Dr Craig S Wright
“Part of why i fucking disappeared was to have things not controlled, and I have to come back to control things, to get it fucking not controlled, that’s the friggin irony of this shit.”
- Dr Craig S Wright
Here Satoshi mentions there are only two possible templates right now for transactions any other sort of transaction that can be worked out could simply be added through templates, allowing the protocol to remain the same.

https://imgur.com/S8JrcYX

Satoshi left in 2011 onto other things. Did he really just hop on a bicycle and ride it into the sunset? After all that work? Or would he have stuck around like Craig did?

Here in 2015 a Satoshi that was either a fake one, but to me it shows someone is protecting the original!

https://imgur.com/5opoZ6R

It is describing exactly what is happening in BTC. Developers having power over the future of Bitcoin in a fake democracy where users get to scratch their heads over what Segwit means and whether they need to use it or not. Bitcoin is not democratic, Bitcoin is Bitcoin

https://imgur.com/eiOLxKp

https://imgur.com/H0Chg5w

the reply to Gavin! Clearly reacting firmly the core design is set in stone and he talks about people realising the importance of staying with the OFFICIAL version.

https://imgur.com/b0jA4Ea

Clearly stating he has technical reasons for Bitcoin not to fork. Segwit is a User Activated Soft Fork... this is why Craig was fighting for it to get it rejected.

https://pastebin.com/UFq0DcNq

https://youtu.be/eQwTmvg5F4g

Gavin:”He signed in my presence the private key from block 1, on a computer I am convinced to not be tempered with, on software I am convinced to not be tempered with, a message of my choosing”
That sealed the deal for me, convincing me he does have that private key.

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a?source=linkShare-d9e51daabdc-1556808712&_branch_match_id=642489273830581613
>>>>How I Met Satoshi
Go to the profile of Jon Matonis
Jon Matonis
May 2, 2016
My relationship with the individual known as Satoshi Nakamoto started in early March 2010 when I received an email from Satoshi pointing me to the published Bitcoin white paper and encouraging me to investigate the system and to begin promoting the network by transacting and mining. At the time, I managed a digital currency blog and this was an email relationship with some brief correspondence.

Then, on June 4th 2015 during a conference, I arranged to meet fellow Bitcoin advocate, Craig Steven Wright, for a cup of coffee at the top floor of the AMP headquarters building in Sydney, Australia. After discussing many technical and economic aspects of the current Bitcoin protocol debates, I returned to my hotel room after an exhausting day. I remember saying to my wife that I had this weird feeling of having just met Satoshi. Of course, I continued the dialogue with Craig in the months after returning from Sydney and leading up to a private proof session in late March 2016.

The reality of an extraordinary event is rarely what you imagine and I am now pleased to know the creator of the Bitcoin protocol and the author of the Bitcoin white paper, Craig Steven Wright. Bitcoin in itself is a brilliant accomplishment. Dr Wright’s substantial academic works merit further attention. I believe that the scale of his achievement, especially the original design of chaining blocks to achieve Nakamoto consensus, has far-reaching implications for our world beyond just a single vertical industry.

During the London proof sessions, I had the opportunity to review the relevant data along three distinct lines: cryptographic, social, and technical. Based on what I witnessed, it is my firm belief that Craig Steven Wright satisfies all three categories. For cryptographic proof in my presence, Craig signed and verified a message using the private key from block #1 newly-generated coins and from block #9 newly-generated coins (the first transaction to Hal Finney). The social evidence, including his unique personality, early emails that I received, and early drafts of the Bitcoin white paper, points to Craig as the creator. I also received satisfactory explanations to my questions about registering the bitcoin.org domain and the various time-of-day postings to the BitcoinTalk forum. Additionally, Craig’s technical working knowledge of public key cryptography, Bitcoin’s addressing system, and proof-of-work consensus in a distributed peer-to-peer environment is very strong.

According to me, the proof is conclusive and I have no doubt that Craig Steven Wright is the person behind the Bitcoin technology, Nakamoto consensus, and the Satoshi Nakamoto name.

This story and its work are far from over.

Directly or indirectly, the work of Satoshi has already provided employment opportunities for tens of thousands of people around the globe and created over $7 billion of new blockchain wealth. The forthcoming research work from Dr Craig Wright can only be described as voluminous and highly technical.

At its essence, Bitcoin displaces the intermediary, or trusted third party, and there will be no sacred cows along the way. It will be methodical, scientific, and unforgiving in its ascent.

Going forward from here, Bitcoin-company board rooms and others throughout the financial ecosystem will be recalibrating business models as these applied developments realign the prevailing orthodoxy. Expect radically-new solutions that address specialized nodes and on-chain scalability, smart contracts that exploit a Turing complete Bitcoin, the impotence of tokenless blockchains, and a systematic decline in the quantity and value of alt-coins.

Of course, overall scalability of the Bitcoin network will continue to evolve and improve, with a decided bias towards efficient on-chain scaling as further advancements in mining and node specialisation are realized. Moreover, this will be possible without compromising or degrading the current optimal levels for mining decentralisation or node decentralisation.

Programmable transactions, or smart contracts, will emerge for various suitable use cases. Much of the proposed functionality in Ethereum-like scripting solutions can be accomplished with the existing Bitcoin network through the use of multiple digital signatures and metadata storage techniques.

Computational power and security of the distributed network will continue to increase beyond the exahash per second rates achieved to date since proof-of-work mining is a zero-sum game. The “second” strongest distributed blockchain will always be less secure than a centralised data center.
 
 Indeed, hashrate matters and will continue to matter.

Technological advances in user-friendly privacy and coin fungibility will progress to maturity for the average user and outpace competing efforts to thwart financial privacy. Bitcoin’s built-in consumer protections include protection from financial surveillance, protection from confiscation, protection from government-sponsored inflation, protection from payment blockades, and protection from identity theft.

As the separation of money and State accelerates in real time, Bitcoin will continue to keep the monetary revolution peaceful. Coins in large volume will not be dropped onto the market, thereby strengthening bitcoin’s essential store-of-value element and ultimately benefitting its medium-of-exchange and unit-of-account properties.

We must remember that bitcoin is not the byproduct of a blockchain — the blockchain is the byproduct of bitcoin. Private, permissioned blockchains and distributed ledgers serve only to erect barriers and advance the interests of restrictive cartels whereas the public Bitcoin blockchain works to disrupt, not enable, financial incumbents.

In this new post-legal tender era, it is the central banks not the commercial banks that have the most to lose. We don’t need kings to coin our money and Bitcoin will outlive political institutions. It already has. Consequently, this will have severe transformative implications for governments’ fiscal policy and monetary policy.
 
I believe that the massive tidal wave of decentralisation and future Bitcoin advancements will start to occur more rapidly now, setting the stage for society to realize the plethora of currently imagined innovations. However, at the center of all of this incredible progress will be the unwavering and critical value of the humble digital bearer token known as bitcoin.<<<<

Jon Matonis!

Calvin Ayre mentions an old friend Stefan Martin ex colleague of Craig was shown the whitepaper of Bitcoin, Craig asked him for help, he declined.
Realising later
he was shown the whitepaper of Bitcoin.

Here we can see Satoshi wanted to not lead with anonymous although he did use anonymous and privacy as being similar things.
It also somewhat shows he did not see Bitcoin as being out of reach of government. At least how I read it.

https://imgur.com/itkt7Ge

If you had any doubts how Bitcoin is supposed to work, read the whitepaper it mentions miners are nodes only. There are no full nodes.
The ide was Blocks would grow miners would compete, SPV wallets would simply be wallets.

If we were to model that, it would become

https://imgur.com/NI8gGGw

a giant network node surrounded by spv’s. Which is what they call a small world graph.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1093443325892415489
https://twitter.com/TweetyBirdbrain/status/1093443325892415489

In the whitepaper it says, Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic cash system. This is peer to peer. Alice to Bob in effectively less than two hops.

https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

Miners in competition are as per the whitepaper incentivised to interconnect, if your miner has too many orphans, this signals you to reinvest in the data line or hardware, which incentivises miners to keep the network in a high state of efficiency and security.
The original Bitcoin has a network distance of 1.32, facebook 4.6, lightning 12-80 (as money flows from Alice to Peter to Edgar to 12-80 others before reaching Bob)

Any network that has more than 3 hops has a bigger attack vector for sybil attacks.

https://imgur.com/cYtdHfw

Will BSV work? Is like asking will Bitcoin work? We don’t know we never really tried. It looks like it works. There are some legal aspects like saving data on chain, which is a novelty I guess. Commercial operators have more protection then home user nodes.
And through double hashing Craig mentions they are able to stop certain content from distributing, and moving certain parts of the mining process into countries where laws are strict.

Bitcoin has a script system which works like a predicate system.

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123426819389177856
Ryan X. Charles @ryanxcharles
Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

Examples:

- instant transactions: pay for it.
- smart contracts: pay for it.
- storage: pay for it.
- computation: pay for it.
- transfer: pay for it.

...pay for it...

...WITH BITCOIN.


https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123243865266323456
Features that are not included in the base protocol can be programmed into autonomous agents that you pay to solve problems. They price things in Bitcoin and you pay them in Bitcoin. Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/ryanxcharles/status/1123299981849497600
Because you can unroll loops, you can create arbitrarily sophisticated scripts. But you don't necessarily need long scripts. Instead, you can have many small scripts in parallel or series to do complicated things. Every problem with Bitcoin can be solved with Bitcoin.

These functions can be done in script, using the dual stack. Bitcoin script doesn’t loop but you can extend it with external languages like forth or even Ethereum to loop.
Bitcoin is like a global computer that can store functions and run them in parallel.

https://imgur.com/3cjc3G8

It allows a new way of global trade brings people closer then ever before and could become the new way of storing immutable privacy data, have a way to access your devices by storing your username on the blockchain and combine smart cards with cryptographic keys such that
you alone can access your device when you have the smartcard, keys and perhaps fingerprint authentication.

It is like ELA except better........
Data needs to be valued for it to become information, it was never free, we pay with our privacy, with our time.
with microfees 4 services, new business models arise, more honest. Data becomes a competitive good. As Craig mentions:”Data wants to be valued, just like u and me”

Bitcoin at scale can do anything, we just need it to scale, we need rules, we need to keep it stable and locked down, we need to understand what that means.
We need enough datacenters to compete. We need everything on Bitcoin!
Bitcoin could give us powerless globall money,
forcing governments to stay honest about their monetary policies, as people can flee into Bitcoin when required.
It needs to be used, it offers those in poor African countries to take part in open global trade.
Like the internet it brings people closer, but in a more secure way. It could create a value internet.

I did not write this for anyone to invest in BSV the original Bitcoin, I want people to look at Craig’s side of the story and make your own decision.

Investing in crypto is risky! Governments can shut it down, new technical projects have a high risk of failure!


Source: Now "engraved in stone" and especially in the BSV blockchain accessible 24/24 | 7/7.
https://memo.sv/post/8c1493b704b1c14f1bd3b216cfaf0879248a4aa0820ee2ec1147947f63cd793e

All this news is enriching, it must have taken a lot of time to gather everything together? I wonder what the main person concerned thinks about it? not to do his trial here, quite the contrary. I hope he will have the right things back in order. This concentration of information allows me to refine my opinion, so I thank you for it.

Well, there is a lot of work and research here. I am happy to be able to read something so positive, as underlines Do_zzze I wonder also that thinks in the main interested. I hope he will take the time to read this whole investigation

[Mountain_Crew]

Kronoverse gaming company, CryptoFights players battle and investor its main Calvin Ayre, who combined the SV (BSV) bitcoin blockchain

Kronoverse, an independent game development company behind the popular 3D fighting game CryptoFights on the blockchain, has secured a leading investment fund from online game entrepreneur Ayre Group and CoinGeek founder Calvin Aire. This investment follows last month's announcement that Kronoverse would use an SV blockchain (BSV) to drive the network layer of the CryptoFights game. I am a financial sponsor and key funder of BSV's financing through my investment, media and CoinGeek activities. I am very excited about the investment that will significantly increase the use and volume of BSV blockchain.

The Kronoverse team ambitiously introduces blockchain technology into the game for the benefit of all players. Installs an old mysterious stadium to run CryptoFights games with blockchain technology, and allows players to engage in dreadful challenges ranging from one-to-three matches against three on Android, iOS and PC. Kronoverse used the special features of the BSV blockchain as auditable data books and auditable data storage networks. The CryptoFights game will use BSV blockchains in different ways:

● The game uses BSV blockchains within the network layer.
● The platform records online game battles in the BSV blockchain and recordings are permanently accessible.
● Kronoverse develops a custom block explorer to examine previous games and live games ("Battle Explorer" is better). Players can use the data from the BSV blockchain to play games they have played before. You can see him again.
● It is based on a digital signature string very similar to bit wedge, and the game will use a digital signature string because it must connect the player's movements to generate a permanent audit trail of the game.

"Satoshi Vision", named after Satoshi Nakamoto, founder of Bitcoin, restores the original protocol used for coins, maintains it stable and allows for large-scale use. Like Kronoverse, BSV has a scalable roadmap that allows online games to use blockchains in innovative ways. In the past, BSV's block channel has set the world's largest record of 128 MB, not just one of two public block channels. (In comparison, Bitcoin core BTC has a small block block of 1 MB.) With a 128 MB block, BSV can record more than 800 transactions per second, demonstrate its ability to record large amounts of data files (e. g. game videos and high definition photos) and perform massive bit-based chain scaling. In addition, the SV Bit Coin will prepare a terabyte block (1MB) ready to be used per gigabyte (1,000 MB) and capable of handling millions of billing transactions per second and even larger data files over time. As well as global data for all industries.

Adam Klinger, President of Kronoverse, explains: "We learned about BSV and we worked on different block chain platforms until we saw that what we needed was implemented in BSV, I just wanted to investigate. BSV has a large-scale scaling plan that can manage large amounts of data files for the data records we want to use, excellent development tools designed by the community and audit trails. Thanks to Calvin Aire's investment, we are able to make CryptoFights even more powerful with the BSV blockchain. "Thanks to the innovation in block game, Kronoverse can also manage electronic sports. Blockchain - The available movement tracking allows for unlimited match play by analyzing the movements of all players registered in the blockchain. Blockchain technology will create the effect of eradicating cheaters, as it will allow players to be honest, transparent, responsive and playable. This feature will allow CryptoFights to dominate its competitors and innovate in the e-sport sector.

Calvin Ayre added: "I like online games and beating coins. It's really impressive that Kronoverse combined these two. I was impressed by the fact that the company quickly recognized that the original Bitcoin was returning to the current version of the Bitcoin SV, which could do a lot of scaling. I am convinced that Kronoverse will bring a big explosion and that other online gaming companies are also encouraged to rely on Bitcoin SV. "

Iire's investment is part of a large-scale collaboration. nChain, a global leader in blockchain technology consulting, research and development, will provide Kronoverse with technical consulting services and a broad portfolio of intellectual property portfolios. Like Ier's work on CoinGeek, nChain is another key financial sponsor of Bitcoin SV. Jimmy Nguyen, founding president of the  Bitcoin Association (Bitcoin SV's leading global economic ecosystem) and Chairman of nChain's Strategy Advisory Board, said:

"Kronoverse is a. As a good player, the company uses the BSV blockchain creatively to move to the next level. We look forward to working with Kronoverse to showcase BSV technology for online gaming in the future and would like to invite more companies to BitCoin SV, the only high-capacity, scalable blockchain. "

Source: https://coingeek.com/news/

Do you know when this product will be available and on which operating platform?

The available information is "soon" and it seems that this game is on PC and Mac not on console PS4 XbOX, to be confirmed.