[ANN] TeamRedMiner - Old Thread

[todxx]

Please post in our primary thread.
Due to reduced activity for many algos, we have merged both of our threads into the above thread.  This thread will no longer be active.

[1714206692]

1714206692

[acith]

I update teamredviwer on my ethos 1.3.2 but speed is same as tdxminer 0.2.2 about 3.51 Mhz.  

This command to run

 /opt/miners/tdxminer/teamredminer -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://alien-mining-pool.com:4560 -u CTRMseqndNj5txpaYT8RWX5eJqMvdqfV5n.tongEth -p x

https://www.img.live/images/2018/09/13/ethor_teamredminer.png

Why? 

[N2DCRYPT]

Kerney666! I was wondering how long you'd stay mining Lyra2z under the radar 

Everyone is still waiting for Windows support due to the reduced power draw opportunities with the PPT registry mods. Doing this is Linux is still a nightmare.

Profitability has gone down a lot though; lots of hashrate migration from other coins, as you predicted. Which is probably why you've reappeared and have your name on a release 

I know you previously mentioned concern with GPL licenses or what not. The dev of MKXminer apparently doesn't have any such concern, and he just released a lyra2z mod of his miner. Your previously mentioned hashrates are much more competitive, but he will have some draw simply because his is available for Windows.

[kerney666]

@acith: I apologize, we could have been much more transparent in this regard. The only difference is the much higher clocks in the benchmark to match what (in our experience) people are actually running with. There has been no work on the lyra2z kernel in this release, the addition of phi2 is the main change. Sorry if this was misleading.

@N2DCRYPT: we will be releasing a Windows version with these kernels shortly. This miner is written completely from scratch, not violating a single license, which is also why it's lacking some of the standard features you would expect. The mkxminer release is a mystery. In my analysis, his lyra2z kernel run at 7.4 MH/s _before_ dev fee, then he uses sgminer's load balancing for his dev pool, but no one gets the numbers he has posted. It seems to me he is running with 15-20% dev fee and the numbers he posted are rather the raw numbers.

[N2DCRYPT]

@acith: I apologize, we could have been much more transparent in this regard. The only difference is the much higher clocks in the benchmark to match what (in our experience) people are actually running with. There has been no work on the lyra2z kernel in this release, the addition of phi2 is the main change. Sorry if this was misleading.

@N2DCRYPT: we will be releasing a Windows version with these kernels shortly. This miner is written completely from scratch, not violating a single license, which is also why it's lacking some of the standard features you would expect. The mkxminer release is a mystery. In my analysis, his lyra2z kernel run at 7.4 MH/s _before_ dev fee, then he uses sgminer's load balancing for his dev pool, but no one gets the numbers he has posted. It seems to me he is running with 15-20% dev fee and the numbers he posted are rather the raw numbers.

@kerney666

Wonderful! I'm excited to put it to the test and will keep tabs on this thread. There are enough other tools in windows to make up for any standard features in miner (such as temp monitoring, core and mem clocking, etc.), so don't think that's as much of a concern for windows miners, and I hope you won't delay any release because of that.

That makes sense in regard to MKX; his prior Lyra2rev2 miner had lower apparent hashrate in the miner because the rest was going to devfee. If he accidently posted the real numbers, the difference is probably also going to dev fee (which makes for a pretty high devfee %!).

Also, I have to ask, and not trying to tread on any toes, just seeking clarity: on your prior thread you mentioned the possibility of Vega 64's with up to 10.5 MH/s using your GCN ASM kernel. Are the currently lower posted numbers due to: 1. devfee for future windows release actually being >3%; 2. current kernel used is not as powerful as your prior kernel; 3. numbers posted will be updated in the future for a possibly faster assembly kernel?? (hope it's 3  )

Thanks for responding, good to see you in the forum again! 

[todxx]

New release v0.3.1 posted!

Anyone running phi2 should switch to the new release as soon as possible.

This release addresses problems with phi2 that resulted in rejected shares and low pool-side hashrate.
Unfortunately the fix also resulted in slightly lower performance for phi2 by a few percent.

[dragonmike]

The mkxminer release is a mystery. In my analysis, his lyra2z kernel run at 7.4 MH/s _before_ dev fee, then he uses sgminer's load balancing for his dev pool, but no one gets the numbers he has posted. It seems to me he is running with 15-20% dev fee and the numbers he posted are rather the raw numbers.

Annoying as well is the fact he drops his (buggy) miner onto the forums, and the hashrate people achieve is quite a bit off what he claims... and then he disappears.

[schriss]

Eagerly waiting for Windows Support, hoping to get similar speeds as Linux miners on my Vegas 64.

[edwinosky]

doing tests with this miner, here I leave the results
GPU0 Asus rogstrix evo rx560 4gb
GPU1 MSI gaming rx580 4gb
GPU2 MSI armor rx480 4gb
GPU3 MSI Armor rx470 4gb
GPU4 MSI Amor 570 8gb

these are the results when extracting LUXCOIN

[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 0 - phi2: 2.220Mh/s (2.216Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 1 - phi2: 4.766Mh/s (4.752Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 2 - phi2: 4.355Mh/s (4.346Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 3 - phi2: 4.279Mh/s (4.274Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats GPU 4 - phi2: 4.223Mh/s (4.274Mh/s) 
[2018-09-14 10:38:29] Stats Total - phi2: 19.844Mh/s (19.861Mh/s)

but if I try to extract other coins from the something phi2 throws an error

Pool eu.bsod.pw successfully subscribed.
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw authorization succeeded.
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw set difficulty to 1.000000
[2018-09-14 10:50:51] Pool eu.bsod.pw failed to parse server rpc: {"id":null,"method":"mining.notify","params":["910","17747d5c843cbfa080ced42945ff11a0db3b1d54e64124b210228d4600000000","01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff1b02aa3b04a6ca9b5b08","62736f642e736f6c6f00000000000232c4eb0b000000001976a914f47f5396f1b4e8e662d1fad73 07b32805d84994788ac4ba6e111000000001976a9148810a5dac6c6216192420ae23f6f48a4fdf6 6b9188ac00000000",["6e42aeaebc5e15d6bd3f7fabb4d6f84addeb526e424b78376f274a9f16297cc4"],"20000000","1c123e5a","5b9bcaa6",true]}

[kerney666]

@edwinosky To the best of my knowledge there is only one phi2 coin, LUX. The stratum data in your error message does not look like LUX, it's missing two fields for the extended headers. Can you provide your full command line when you get that error message? I'm guessing you are mining some other algo on BSOD than phi2. I've tested against both ports 6667 and 11518 on eu.bsod.pw for phi2, seems to work fine.

[edwinosky]

./teamredminer -a phi2 -o stratum+tcp://eu.bsod.pw:2436 -u AX8iyvLTQL16DLSSm95ry8cKwfqvorTpfs -p c=MIA

I try to extract MixAir to take advantage of the low difficulty but I throw that error, I have already tried in other pools and also the same...

[fluxy12]

Please can you do a custom miner on hiveos ?

[kerney666]

@edwinosky

Ah, look at that, another phi2 coin. Ok, so we need to release a new version that supports both 80 bytes and 144 bytes block header for phi2 in order to support MIA. Will keep you posted.

[PKBO]

Nice to see you back td.

[edwinosky]

@kerney666 thank you friend, I'll be attentive to updates

[SigiSinatra]

Seems like MCLK is irrelevant for phi2 just like for lyra2z ?

[kerney666]

@SigiSinatra

Memclk is a tad more important for phi2, but really not much. You could potentially lose a few pct points by downclocking it too much. On the other hand, a few saved watts might be the better choice, YMMV. Testing on your own cards with a wattmeter and knowing your $/kwh price is probably the best way to go.

[5BTC]

Are you guys planning on optimizing lyra2z any further in this miner?

[Blazin]

Nice to have you back, todxx. I thought you had abandoned your miner.

My Vega 64 gets 6.5 MH. I also have performance intentionally restricted to make it run cooler (any significant amount of fan noise just annoys everyone in my house), so that number is probably lower than what other people get.

[Dima05]

Nice to have you back, todxx. I thought you had abandoned your miner.

My Vega 64 gets 6.5 MH. I also have performance intentionally restricted to make it run cooler (any significant amount of fan noise just annoys everyone in my house), so that number is probably lower than what other people get.

can I have something with my hands.
but my speed has remained the same. 580-4gb = 3.3-3.5
single + phi