🚀[ANN] Invech Token IEO - Licensed Crypto Exchange & Blockchain Smart City🚀

[Voevodin]

For any project, two important components are marketing and technical component.

There are many components, but today, marketing should be in the first place, as the competition is simply enormous.

[Umkar]

It is necessary to understand that if the project will be successful, then the whole world will start using this example and the cryptocurrency as a whole. If the project fails, the world will be even more afraid of the cryptocurrency industry.

90% of projects that use blockchain are failures, but I do not think that they somehow affect the popularity of cryptocurrencies in General.

I prefer not to worry about those 90% of unsuccessful projects, because the remaining 10% are the ones that have succeeded, have gone through a number of difficulties and have great growth potential. By the way, in the real world in business, in exactly the same way, out of ten launched projects in a year there will be only one that continues to exist and bring profit to its investors.

[ytaevv]

I prefer not to worry about those 90% of unsuccessful projects, because the remaining 10% are the ones that have succeeded, have gone through a number of difficulties and have great growth potential. By the way, in the real world in business, in exactly the same way, out of ten launched projects in a year there will be only one that continues to exist and bring profit to its investors.

And does not the crypto-currency business belong to the real one? I think it's the same thing.

[kolnides]

It is necessary to understand that if the project will be successful, then the whole world will start using this example and the cryptocurrency as a whole. If the project fails, the world will be even more afraid of the cryptocurrency industry.

90% of projects that use blockchain are failures, but I do not think that they somehow affect the popularity of cryptocurrencies in General.

I prefer not to worry about those 90% of unsuccessful projects, because the remaining 10% are the ones that have succeeded, have gone through a number of difficulties and have great growth potential. By the way, in the real world in business, in exactly the same way, out of ten launched projects in a year there will be only one that continues to exist and bring profit to its investors.

80% of investors invest in the project only because they would speculate with tokens after official sales. This must be remembered and sometimes everybody need return  to the real world.

[kolnides]

I prefer not to worry about those 90% of unsuccessful projects, because the remaining 10% are the ones that have succeeded, have gone through a number of difficulties and have great growth potential. By the way, in the real world in business, in exactly the same way, out of ten launched projects in a year there will be only one that continues to exist and bring profit to its investors.

And does not the crypto-currency business belong to the real one? I think it's the same thing.

The main difference between a cryptocurrency business and a real one is different in risks and paperwork, rent on housing, warehouses, offices.

[Ngemmeng]

It is necessary to understand that if the project will be successful, then the whole world will start using this example and the cryptocurrency as a whole. If the project fails, the world will be even more afraid of the cryptocurrency industry.

90% of projects that use blockchain are failures, but I do not think that they somehow affect the popularity of cryptocurrencies in General.

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

[Wedhus123]

It is necessary to understand that if the project will be successful, then the whole world will start using this example and the cryptocurrency as a whole. If the project fails, the world will be even more afraid of the cryptocurrency industry.

90% of projects that use blockchain are failures, but I do not think that they somehow affect the popularity of cryptocurrencies in General.

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

Even though the funds collected can be said to be quite large but why the project still fails what made it fail I myself am still confused as to how this can happen but even though it is better we trust the team alone

[ytaevv]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

This is true, so a novice investor needs to be doubly careful, the risks are great, but the profit can be great.

[Umkar]

I prefer not to worry about those 90% of unsuccessful projects, because the remaining 10% are the ones that have succeeded, have gone through a number of difficulties and have great growth potential. By the way, in the real world in business, in exactly the same way, out of ten launched projects in a year there will be only one that continues to exist and bring profit to its investors.

And does not the crypto-currency business belong to the real one? I think it's the same thing.

Crypto startups do not always have an offline business, it all depends on the subject of the project and what exactly the project idea is focused on. That is why I pay attention to projects that combine cryptocurrency and the implementation of ideas in the real economy, not only in the virtual sphere.

[DmitFomin]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

The problem is that the entire crypto market has been stagnant for a long time, so it’s quite clear that even those projects that have managed to collect large sums are not actively developing.

[Untomabur]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

The problem is that the entire crypto market has been stagnant for a long time, so it’s quite clear that even those projects that have managed to collect large sums are not actively developing.

It is also true that what you say is indeed that until now the entire crypto market can be said to be stagnant and this is certainly not good, so that projects that have collected large amounts of funds are not actively developing

[nutildah]

Warning: this project is a scam. It has a plagiarized white paper and is hiring a bumping service used to promote other scams. All of the conversation in this thread is fake and investors are warned to stay away from it.

[Rustamm]

For any project, two important components are marketing and technical component.

There are many components, but today, marketing should be in the first place, as the competition is simply enormous.

Well, when marketing is an interesting project that can be called promising and which will be useful. Over the sea of ​​advertising is difficult to consider such a project, so I believe that every project should, in addition to marketing, emphasize the utility that it can give to the investor.

[Zhenka]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

The problem is that the entire crypto market has been stagnant for a long time, so it’s quite clear that even those projects that have managed to collect large sums are not actively developing.

The problem is not that projects do not want to grow.  They have nothing to do.  The team collected 10 million dollars, spent 400 thousand on development, marketing and other expenses, and took the rest for themselves.  It is necessary to introduce a scheme in which the money collected on ico or ieo was held by the regulator and entered into the development only for specific purposes.

[nimiqshitcoin]

Warning: this project is a scam. It has a plagiarized white paper and is hiring a bumping service used to promote other scams. All of the conversation in this thread is fake and investors are warned to stay away from it.

I see you like RED BIG FONTS as well. You cunt

[kolnides]

It is necessary to understand that if the project will be successful, then the whole world will start using this example and the cryptocurrency as a whole. If the project fails, the world will be even more afraid of the cryptocurrency industry.

90% of projects that use blockchain are failures, but I do not think that they somehow affect the popularity of cryptocurrencies in General.

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

  You want to say that all 100% of projects are unsuccessful? I know a lot of project which are successful and comes from ICO. And many from them are exchanges.

[A7373]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

The problem is that the entire crypto market has been stagnant for a long time, so it’s quite clear that even those projects that have managed to collect large sums are not actively developing.

The problem is not that projects do not want to grow.  They have nothing to do.  The team collected 10 million dollars, spent 400 thousand on development, marketing and other expenses, and took the rest for themselves.  It is necessary to introduce a scheme in which the money collected on ico or ieo was held by the regulator and entered into the development only for specific purposes.

I need to agree with you. There is no reason to hide something from community, it would be really better to stay tuned and make a little steps in future.

[kolnides]

The project does not have to justify itself to the community and investors if they see that the project is live and the team is working. Now I see that the team is retreating from the roadmap without comment for us.

[DmitFomin]

bullshit, even the remaining 10% are not fully successful. lately there have been very many projects that have failed even though they have raised considerable funds.

The problem is that the entire crypto market has been stagnant for a long time, so it’s quite clear that even those projects that have managed to collect large sums are not actively developing.

The problem is not that projects do not want to grow.  They have nothing to do.  The team collected 10 million dollars, spent 400 thousand on development, marketing and other expenses, and took the rest for themselves.  It is necessary to introduce a scheme in which the money collected on ico or ieo was held by the regulator and entered into the development only for specific purposes.

Of course, regulation should be necessary to avoid misuse of funds. Many projects failed precisely because they did not distribute the funds correctly.

[Vektrum]

That is why the first thing you need to pay attention to who is in the project team. A professional team is more likely to be able to properly allocate funding for the needs of the project than for example a team of inexperienced students.