Influence of Bounty Participants

[javadsalehi]

I can say the influence of the bounty participants on the success of the bounty is 30%, and the rest is the invetsor and the team itself. simple language is that participants promote bounties to attract investors to participate in investing funds for bounty success, of course with projects that have been neatly arranged by their team.

then if the participants are limited, it doesn't have a big influence on the bounty, because one participant can do promotions on various campaigns and that can still help. indeed, when the bounty was finished, most of them carried out large dumps which could have an impact on the sustainability of the coins in the market. also good enough to limit the number of participants to reduce the big dump and that is more effective in my opinion than Kyc.

Limiting the number of participants is not a good idea. In almost all the campaigns, the number of coins or tokens allocated to bounty participants is fixed and it doesn't depend on number of participants. Higher number of participants leads to more marketing and also less income for participants. So, It's better.

[Cmoh]

The bounty participants are not so much of influencer in the market for the price driven nor any big role in the company. But, the participants itself are affected in the way of getting their reward. The more participants the low reward they get.

[TrevorS]

We bounty hunters is very influential because we can spread to the word and create awareness about the projects that can lead the investor to see what we have promoted and they invest on it, the limitation of bounty participants it depend on the team of the project because I think they want a fair and good share of bounty reward to the participants.

It is very important that the bounty hunters are educated and have a high skill of analyzing and selecting projects, then investors will begin to listen to our advice and good projects will continue to raise funds as before. All remain in the win.

[Asmh85]

In my opinion it's beneficial for projects when the number of  bounty participants  is big because the projects will have a great spread word and will distribute the rewards among many holder.
But it's not good because the rewards amount will be small.

[Isuk]

The popularity of bounty campaign in this forum has a great impact to the marketing of ICOs that is why it has a massive participants even the ICOs owners really appreciate the value of bounty participants towards the success of their protects.

I agree with you, bounty program has a great impact to the marketing of ICOs.
When the members of this forum see the bounty program, they can be interested in joining the campaign.

[Vilagra]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

It seems for me that dump doesn't depend on amount of bounty participants, it depend on the amount of payments, for example project allocates 100 000$ in tokens, suppose 5000 participants will get tokens on 20$, or 10 participants will get tokens on 10 000$, I think in second case probability of dump is higher, because in first case  20$ isn't big money and many participants will hold their tokens with hopes that it will grow, otherwise people who got big payments will wish to sell their tokens and price will dump. So I think dump doesn't depend on the amount of participants

[MikeyVeez]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I am long time here and I see that bounty campaigns, bounty managers and bounty hunters are getting worse day by day.
Yes, there are many bounty campaigns, many managers and many hunters and the quantity replaced quality  . Thats why I think that ICOs no longer need bounty campaigns to promote their projects.

[Lerikaweb]

I think that one day projects will become more choosy on bounty participants. And social media bounties need a lot of regulations because some hunters just spam around the web thus reducing the trust to the project.

[jekainvestor]

personally I think that it depends. as for the bounty participants it is really good for them to be limited in amount because their rewards are higher in this case. but as for the project it is better to spread the word about the project and advertise it by more amount of the participant. but at th same time among the too many participants there are too many bots and I do not think that they help to the project very much, because except the quantity the good project needs the quality from the participants.

[adzino]

Their participation does actually have some kind of affect. Participating in their bounty program means they are helping the project in various ways. They are making things easier for the developers by helping them promote the project. But I think restricting or allowing more users will have both its downside or upside. Restricting users will cause the project to be less noticed by the people. On other hand, allowing many users means giving out more tokens for free which might cause the price to fall when dumped.

[jrrsparkles]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

If there are more people promoting their project then the project will get more exposure for the same amount of token they are allocated for any number of persons doing bounty so they won't limit the participants but nowadays the project feared that hunters were dumping so they were holidng the rewards for few weeks the only they are paying the participants.

[anatolij.shishkin]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I think the more bounty hunters participate in the project, the better. Things are not even in the budget. The project receives huge advertising. The reward for hunters remains the same, but the amount of advertising that they produce cannot be measured. Even if the product is not high-quality, this is vseravno advertising.

[rajuahmed330]

Yes, bounty hunters can greatly influence the new ico project. On the one hand, it’s good that there are a lot of participants and there will be strong marketing, but even that can scare some away. But there should be at least some restriction, because at the end of the bounty there can be very small payments and many will simply not be satisfied. There, the bounty manager must find a middle ground for everyone to win.

Right said.
Bounty hunters increasing day by day and also increasing on different ico project. But ethereum under $500, and now $199. Before 6 month, there was so less participants but now huge.

[Kotone]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project? - influential in the extent that it's like a snowball effect on other enthusiasts as well
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?- They need to double up their other marketing campaigns aside from this and if to restrict make it as quality as possible to maximize the power of the hunters

[incomefromcoins]

most of the ico projects these are are running on bounty participates their role has a huge impact on cryptocurrencies and upcoming ico market

[dimonarka]

The main purpose of bounty companies is to advertise any project. so I think that bounty has a huge impact. because advertising is the engine of progress

[zarintasnim]

Bounty is a very good way to promote a new project. Number of participant is also matter of project. I think limited participant is the good for promote a project. Take quality participant and make success the project. 

[faza13]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?

I think the participant's bounty is quite influential on a project because a lot of participant bounties are even more powerful than investors about an ICo, and the more participants there are, the more likely the holder

2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

although not too much, but I think it will be quite influential too

[selenophile]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty campaign is a very good advertisement for the newly project that has ICO.  Managers just need to filter the participant who joined.

I guess the limit of participants in bounty campaign that stake base does not work. Thats the main goal of a bounty campaign more participants = more advertisement. 

[Irvinn]

In my opinion, it is clear that without the participants of the ICO generosity campaign, no one ICO project will be able to raise the necessary funds, because potential investors will not be aware of such a project. Therefore, the participants of the ICO generosity campaign play a very large role. Further, it depends only on the prospects of the ICO project whether the ICO team will raise funds or not.