Influence of Bounty Participants

[shadowduck]

The bounty participant does not affect the project in any way , but a huge number of participants can attract the attention of investors , namely, investors are needed by each ICO company.

[1714985148]

1714985148

[1714985148]

1714985148

[1714985148]

1714985148

[1714985148]

1714985148

[1714985148]

1714985148

[fullhdpixel]

Yes, bounty hunters can greatly influence the new ico project. On the one hand, it’s good that there are a lot of participants and there will be strong marketing, but even that can scare some away. But there should be at least some restriction, because at the end of the bounty there can be very small payments and many will simply not be satisfied. There, the bounty manager must find a middle ground for everyone to win.

If bounty participants have not been a major influence in the success of ICOs, I am sure by now, no team with new projects will even be bothering themselves with any bounty campaign at all. One thing with something is that there will always be an advantage as well as disadvantage, but in a way, when the advantage is far more than the disadvantages, I am sure, no one will not just prefer to discard the disadvantages and focus more on the advantage, which in this case, having a cheaper way to advertise is one thing that will always work for the team.

With respect to dumping, it should be noted that it is not only bounty participants that are the culprits here, whale investors tend to get huge bonuses as well and they try to dump it all for the weak hands who want to be selling at loss, and those weak hands in this case are even some of the bounty hunters who are always busy selling far below the ICO price.

[voztata]

One thing with a project being exposed to more bounty participants is that, the more the bounty participants, the more the project will be projected out there and the more likely the project will get at being successful. At the end of it all, the same allocation that would go for more bounty hunters is the same allocation that will go for less bounty hunter.

Secondly, the idea of bounty hunters dumping their tokens is not something that will limit the growth of the project in the long run, and it is not like even with fewer participants holding more of the token, that won't still be possible. The teams of projects know this, and they really would prefer a successful ICO than trying to limit their promotional campaign.

[ice098]

One thing with a project being exposed to more bounty participants is that, the more the bounty participants, the more the project will be projected out there and the more likely the project will get at being successful. At the end of it all, the same allocation that would go for more bounty hunters is the same allocation that will go for less bounty hunter.

Secondly, the idea of bounty hunters dumping their tokens is not something that will limit the growth of the project in the long run, and it is not like even with fewer participants holding more of the token, that won't still be possible. The teams of projects know this, and they really would prefer a successful ICO than trying to limit their promotional campaign.

Bounty participants have huge effect in a project because it is the reason why other people is also believe in a project. Also bounty participants have huge influence to know a one project especially when the participant have higher ranked. And Bounty participants are the possible reasons in a successful project.

[ub27]

If they limit the participants to each bounty, their project will not be widely promoted, and of course it will greatly affect their ICO sales. So they never limit the participants and expect as many participants as possible

[qolaqola]

restrictions on the number of participants on the success of the project does not affect much. But there is a certain benefit for bounty hunters. Because many of the participants share each gets less. In addition, if there will participate a lot of Heroes or Legends that others will get crumbs from the cake.

[dimonarka]

I believe that the influence of the bounty on the future fate of projects is very large. Bounty is considered a good advertisement and promotion of all projects.

[bryant.coleman]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty campaigns are quite essential for new ICO projects. Because 99% of those who invest in an ICO are members of this forum. So more signatures and social media exposure mean more investment from the users. That said, the campaign manager should ensure that only quality users are allowed to participate.

[harapan]

very influential, bounty participants are people who spread positive news about projects with their creative ideas.
the more participants the faster the news about the project spreads. the negative side is that if there are more bounty participants, the less payment will be received by the participants in the campaign bounty.
and if the project limits the number of participants, it depends on the people they are involved.
although a little, but if the participant is a creative peoples's then it will also support the success of a project.

[mr.robot8]

i think icos have to find a middle way for the right number of bounty hunters on the one hand more they are then more the project will be advertised and then more people will be aware, on the other side the same bounty hunters will lower the price of tokens once finished the ico

[Psec]

In my opinion, I think that bounty hunters are very important in making any ICO projects to be successful. Because they are the one that promotes the project in many social platforms and also Bitcointalk for potential investors. ICO gain more from this cheap method of marketing their project to the world.

[Ivanmikronov]

I will say my opinion on the part of the developers of the new project. It would not matter to me how many people participate, since the total number of tokens for distribution is limited, even though there will be a million of them and everyone will receive one token. More important is the quality of how hunters advertise a project, what articles they write, which videos they shoot and how they attract investors to a new project.

[Lyd]

The bounty participants can be a huge influence and I think they are also an influence to other participants or to other users

[Galley]

Now more and more Bounty projects introduce various restrictions to improve the quality of the work of the participants of the company. Quantitative audience coverage has somewhat lost priority in favor of work efficiency. I think it will benefit both the projects and participants of the bounty companies.

[serejandmyself]

Bounty hunters are the first persons who knows what a particular project is about. They can answers questions related to projects.

[Xclusive5]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

The influence of bounty hunters cannot underestimated because its the bounty hunters that create awareness for an ICO project on social media. Most ICO projects are unknown in the beginning but with the help of bounty participants, they became know and also came out successful.

[CaMeRoNy]

The greater the number of participants, the more advertising this project. A large number of participants will not affect the price of the token, as the number of tokens allocated to the bounty company remains the same.

[bestpikka]

in my opinion, more and more bounty participants will be better for the success of the project because more and more are promoting the project. for the problem of dumper it actually happens not because of the bounty participants in my opinion because we all know how much coin allocation for bounty participants is 1-5% so in my opinion if you consider that the participants bounty the cause of dumper is wrong.

[dfktynby1004]

If the project can allocate a large amount for bounty hunters, then it has big goals and free funds. Many like it. For example bounty hunters)

[CaMeRoNy]

The more participants, the more hype gathered around the project. A large number of participants implies that the project is promising and therefore in its bounty company involved so many people.