Influence of Bounty Participants

[Diced90]

In my  opinion, the influence of bounty participants is quite powerful because I believe to succeed you need to become visible and most bounty participants do just that.

[1715002215]

1715002215

[1715002215]

1715002215

[iwamoto77]

To say that ICO should limit the participants of bounty companies in order to get more profit at the end,but more participants play a big role in the promotion of the company and therefore the Golden mean is important,only then we can talk about the success of the project.

[Xxmodded]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

this will always be a debate that doesn't end, but there are many campaign participants who don't do their jobs properly.
try to note especially for the signature campaign. I agree more if the signature participants are limited.

[Hemady17]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants are unknowingly influential. We are sharing the word of the projects and got investors. But we did not compensate by our works. I hope there are also ICO that knows the hardwork of their participants. They succeed because of bounty hunters however, they are deceiving the tokens once it hit on exchange. I hope every participant must be paid according to the work amd not because it is a gift of the company.

[jonruhoax]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

bounty participants have an influence in marketing, yes because there are many bounty campaign participants also make investments, yes like me.
but now there are many errors that occur in bounty hunters and this is intentional

[simak84]

Bounty hunters have always been very important for any project, especially at the initial stage of its development.
After all, it is thanks to them that there is a stir around any company. And on account of the limitations in each project, I agree that this should be done.
Otherwise, advertising may simply turn into spam.

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

In as much as bounty hunting is an activity to promote the new ICO, it is also a job for the bounty hunter so the amount of tokens to be received at the end of the campaign is necessary and that is why most hunters prefer bounties with high bounty pool. Limiting the number like what bountyhive does is always the best.

[travwill]

I think when a project makes a good bounty, this is usually a good tone, and it also draws attention to the project. But as practice shows me, the best projects do not conduct bounty companies as they have strong external investors.

[tikaka]

For an ICO project to succeed and to reach out to many of the big investors in the world, we need to have bounty hunters like us to help promote the project's image to more people. If the number of participants in a bounty is limited. I think this is a selfish thing and it does not attract many investors to your project.

[other_side]

The impact of the project is on the bounty hunter, if most of the bounty participants are friends and followers, or their content is constructive. It will help the project to know and invest a lot

[jt byte]

Bounty campaigns are almost free way how to promote some project, you are giwing away some tokens for spreading a word about your project.
If your project is succesful, bounty hunters are in profit.
If you fail deliver project, then nothing happened, you dont have to pay real money for "hard work".

[Genemind]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Most people here in this forum are investors, traders and crypto enthusiasts. That is why, I think doing bounties has a really big impact on ICO's success. Social media also has a big role on their success, that is why if bounty participants are restricted, the project will get lesser attention.

[judyrob]

the more participants then ICO marketing through bounty is becoming increasingly widespread. but for the moment this happens is many multi accounts and also spam which appears because of too many participants. at least a restriction of participants can be a solution to make the bounty can be fair and quality. even the strict regulation of the bounty has also become a good thing to do for the sake of the progress of the bounty and the forum as well.

[Wyndesam]

Of course bounty hunters have a good influence on the project is doing , and besides I don't think the bounty from participants because of this merge!

[Invigorated]

Bounty hunting and in effect Bounty hunters is a key sector in the crypto industry. It is for this reason that almost every project dedicates a portion of their resources towards bounties. The help job offered by bounty hunters cannot be overemphasised. Bounty hunters bring much needed advertising and marketing to the would be investors or potential investors. Traditional advertising means will costs the project hundreds of thousands of dollars but with bounty hunting, they spend little or nothing since payments are mostly made in form of project tokens. Bounty hunters are responsible for this and pull in tons of investments to the project which otherwise will be extremely difficult to come by. So yes, bounty hunters and their jobs have enormous effect to the success of any project.

[uniquark]

Bounty hunters have a huge influence on a new project, because the bounty is the most efficient way of promoting an ICO on the first stages. Without any bounty, an ICO won't reach its funding goals on such a market.

Agree with you, you can see that the bounty hunter is more connected to the crypto community than when advertising with Twitter or Facebook. It goes directly to the investors and those who are interested in ICO projects

[marcitosi]

It seems to me that the campaign bounty should not limit the number of participants because it is not profitable for them and the PR campaign of the project will be much worse

[indobitcoin.tk]

Bounty hunters have a huge influence on a new project, because the bounty is the most efficient way of promoting an ICO on the first stages. Without any bounty, an ICO won't reach its funding goals on such a market.

Agree with you, you can see that the bounty hunter is more connected to the crypto community than when advertising with Twitter or Facebook. It goes directly to the investors and those who are interested in ICO projects

I think social media is good its twitter and facebook just have an important role. the more bounty made sure marketing is increasingly widespread and not only in this forum only. though indeed there are at least a restriction of participants so as to make the bounty hunter also could receive a larger payment because if too many participants will be influential on the outcome of the bounty it brings.

[briton]

Of course bounty participants have an influence on the success of a project even though it is not entirely, because they indirectly promote the ongoing project and certainly with the promotion will be able to attract investors to join

[oneidentity]

It seems to me that the campaign bounty should not limit the number of participants because it is not profitable for them and the PR campaign of the project will be much worse

But in this case, the participants may become too much and then they will receive a very small payment. So I think it’s necessary to limit the number of participants.