Influence of Bounty Participants

[lutfi-hasan]

The influence of Bounty participants is very large in the success of an ICO project, because with Bounty hunters an ICO project will be publicly delivered on a large scale, so that it can potentially attract Investors into a project. Because with the Bounty campaign the project information was conveyed well.

[patz22]

Bounty hunters influence is big in cryptocurrency.  Do you know more than fifty percent of bounty hunters also invest in the campaign they are involve with?  In reality,  bounty hunters are also an investors,  so project should not mess with them!

Where did you get that information if more than 50% of them are also investor? Afaik most of bounty hunters don't want invest their money because they don't want to risk their money on market like this

50% is not correct! Probably small percentage of investors are hunters as well. To tell you honestly if I really like the project I'll surely invest some to it. But I agree that devs should not mess with hunters as they may create FUD's or make something bad if not paid.

[martina14]

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?

The more participants will be better for the ICO team as more influencer will share and do post about the project and its ICO.
More number of people to advertise the longer the range it will reach.

2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants should not join any ICO with out reviewing the project and its ICO.
You should study well and by doing that, You will know if you will be on restricted zone.

[dainoran]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

in my opinion the influence of bounty hunter is very large in the development of a new project, because the investors are continuously carried out by bounty hunters through facebook, twitter, youtube and others.
too many bounty participants will make the allocation of prizes decrease, often there are also participants who commit fraud such as registering bounties of more than one account. so restrictions on bounty participation in order to reduce cheating committed and prizes are divided equally.

[ilcapitano]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I think with ICO projects, bounty hunters have no small role to help to introduce and advertise projects closer to investors. Forthcoming, there may have stricter regulations for bounty hunters

[Sengoko]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants are just like promoters. If you’re starting a business and you want it to be successful you will have to do promotion for that business. So bounty participants are very important cause they are ones who help to promote the ICO and make it known and also attract investors who will then invest in the project.

[Ma1evich]

Hunters are not particularly needed for large companies and they mostly cost one advertising but for the usual team of bounty is an indispensable cheap tool.

[Tahdayi]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

At the moment, I do not believe that the participants strongly influence the success of the ipo, now there is a lot of spam and little effective advertising from them

[kdiag]

i think the influence of the bounty hunters on ICO is very great since this is a huge advertisement for the project and, moreover, many hunters also take part in investing the project.

[11:11pas]

The influence of participants on the bounty is certainly important because this concerns ongoing projects, promotions carried out by bounty participants will certainly boost the popularity of the project itself and this also affects investors who will join

[nutildah]

I think this thread has single-handed proven that bounty hunters aren't very key to the success of a project. Most of you regurgitate the same words over and over again; there's very little originality in the things any of you have to say and I don't know why people would ever click on the signature beneath your text. ICOs continue to offer bounties as a cheap way of advertisement but without quality control they're just as likely to have a negative effect on the outcome of their project as a positive.

[airdropcoin]

I don't think there are more and more bounty hunters. I think this profession is declining. The massive failure of ICO projects has led to the disappearance of bounty hunters. Now cryptocurrency market hunters have already faced a crisis of survival, and they may have gone bankrupt.

[R9s]

I think the number of bounty participants means the attractiveness of bounty activities, which also means that the project is more reliable. But this does not mean that it is absolutely true and legal.

[dedocry]

My opinion is that the bounty participants do not bring tangible Influence to the project. neither here nor twitter twitter

[Sevarchik]

First of all prices drops faster then boutny participants recieve their tokens.
Second limiting is good, but what to do with participants who join and do their job bad ?

[Japinat]

First of all prices drops faster then boutny participants recieve their tokens.
Second limiting is good, but what to do with participants who join and do their job bad ?

Limiting is tantamount to saying that the ICO will surely a success and to limit the dump, they will release a small portion of the coins or tokens.
It does not work that way, most ICO prefers a lot of participants so they have better exposure, bounty are compose of different task to spread in the crypto world. The only reason why people complain now is because no one is buying and bounty hunters are dumping, this also affect the bounty hunters as they will receive a lesser value than their expectation.

Let's go back when the market is fully recovered, we will see that bounty has a little effect or no effect at all.

[Pontorez]

I am sure that bounty hunters are really of great importance for the work and development of the project. Especially at the initial stage of development. After all, they are able to draw attention to the selected company, help develop the community and attract the necessary investments for the successful development of the platform.

[imstillthebest]

My opinion is that the bounty participants do not bring tangible Influence to the project. neither here nor twitter

lol how can you say that ? look at you , you are also a bounty hunter because you are carrying a sig and you are working towards the success of your  chosen bounty .  do you think you are not helpful ?  if yes , then youd better quit applying bounties because you dont expect to get paid anyway .

you know mate you arent the only one that promotes the project becuase there are 100's of users that work on a specific bounty and all of them actually drives a traffic and exposure to the project itself .

[Ridwan Fauzi]

2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty hunters are indeed important because they are part of the promoter of a project, if there is no bounty hunter then there is a high probability that there will be no project. However, keep in mind that not all bounty hunters can make a project successful, it depends on the project itself. If the team offers a project with promising potential or functions that can make cryptocurrency continue to grow, then to promote the projecg does not require many bounty hunters, the team / developer can limit each participant for only the legendary rank and member hero and You can see on several projects.

[elitemobb]

Participants of the bounty companies have a huge impact on the project itself through media resources, it is useful in cases when projects do not pay bounty rewards and many participants of bounty companies create a lot of videos and topics for discussion with uelia to bring projects to clear water.