Influence of Bounty Participants

[shoreno]

For projects that have really good potential, only the signature campaign has a huge marketing influence.

if a project really do have a good potential then it can stand out even on a small budget advertising or on a simple advertising that is done thru the net and not on this forum or via signature campaign but sig campaigns on the forum are a verry big help especially to those projects that arent really promising .

It would be better if the campaign manager didn't limit the participants to this campaign both in terms of number and rank.

thats a big no for me . if they wont limit the participants the forum will be bloated of spam from a single campaign and other projects wont be given a chance to shine  .  it can also cause abuse if all ranks are allowed  .

[dengpei]

There is a need for careful selection and elimination of undeserving participants because not every entrant is good for your project.
Even high rankers can turn out to be unfaithful individuals who may just try to game your campaign and earn undeserved rewards. A good bounty campaign is as good as its participants and more importantly, its manager.

[btcyoda]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty hunters are very important here for every project campaign that will appear here in crypto world especially on bitcointalk.
Without them for sure the success of the project has a very low chances to be happen, this is the reality things that We need to accept were bounty hunters has a big part for each project.

You are right, without their promotion, it is impossible for them to get succeed in the market. Companies are launching the bounties based on the previous companies have successfully raised money, so the companies should be on their promises and should deliver after the campaign concludes.

[lienfaye]

1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?

Bounty participants has a big influence to spread awareness for the project. If many people participate to promote the particular project then there's a chance to gain the attention of investors especially if the project has potential.

2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Sometimes its not about the number of participants, as long as the project itself has something to offer that can attract investors to trust then it will succeed.

[han313]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

1. I think it affects between 50-70% of projects because all bounty hunters promote in a variety of ways, maybe investors will glance at their project.
2. it will not fully affect the new project, depending on the project and the team that will run the project and how attractive the project will be.

[fourpiece]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

bounty participants will increase the popularuty of a project by advertising it to diffetent social media sites, with thier advetisement  the project can attract investora to invest on the project.

[rat03gopoh]

if they wont limit the participants the forum will be bloated of spam from a single campaign and other projects wont be given a chance to shine  .

BM should have the ability to judge posts that are worthy to be given a stake regardless of the participants have been received without regard to their ranking status. It could be said that spammers still don't have the chance to join even if they have a high ranking.

 it can also cause abuse if all ranks are allowed .

What abuse?

[aioc]

Adab solutions just earned the ire of its bounty participants by cutting over 80% of everyone's rewards, now they are going to get it when these bounty hunters starting to post, tweet and write articles that Adab is a scam site and this exchange should not be trusted.

[numanoid]

Adab solutions just earned the ire of its bounty participants by cutting over 80% of everyone's rewards, now they are going to get it when these bounty hunters starting to post, tweet and write articles that Adab is a scam site and this exchange should not be trusted.

Cutting 80% bounty amount from their promise before is another scam for bounty hunter. Their reason should be between because their ICO didn't reached hardcap or it's only at softcap

I remember someone who constantly accusing adab scam exchange and even prepared a signature and worn it for long time.

Here is the guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855

[Russlenat]

Adab solutions just earned the ire of its bounty participants by cutting over 80% of everyone's rewards, now they are going to get it when these bounty hunters starting to post, tweet and write articles that Adab is a scam site and this exchange should not be trusted.

Cutting 80% bounty amount from their promise before is another scam for bounty hunter. Their reason should be between because their ICO didn't reached hardcap or it's only at softcap

I remember someone who constantly accusing adab scam exchange and even prepared a signature and worn it for long time.

Here is the guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855

That's a bad decision for them although they think that's a good idea to prevent dumping, but a promise is a promise, they just broke the rules of the game because they mess with the bounty hunters and now they will pay for that action and I don't see a good future of this project.

[numanoid]

That's a bad decision for them although they think that's a good idea to prevent dumping, but a promise is a promise, they just broke the rules of the game because they mess with the bounty hunters and now they will pay for that action and I don't see a good future of this project.

I don't think it will be work, bounty hunters can't do anything since they can use any excuse to not give them like their promise. Afaik that bounty also asking them to provide KYC, which is unnecessary for me (after they have cut 80% from your reward, would you give your ID to them? Hell no)

[xamxam]

For projects that have really good potential, only the signature campaign has a huge marketing influence.

if a project really do have a good potential then it can stand out even on a small budget advertising or on a simple advertising that is done thru the net and not on this forum or via signature campaign but sig campaigns on the forum are a verry big help especially to those projects that arent really promising .

It would be better if the campaign manager didn't limit the participants to this campaign both in terms of number and rank.

thats a big no for me . if they wont limit the participants the forum will be bloated of spam from a single campaign and other projects wont be given a chance to shine  .  it can also cause abuse if all ranks are allowed  .

Agreed, But giving limits to the count of participants is good. Moreover, most of the time bounty participants always suffered in terms
of distribution payment, they became like beggar in the end begging for their rewards token in the end if ever it has been delayed.

[aggress0r]

To my mind the work and the share of advertisers should be well-organized, controlled to avoid spam-like overhyped actions. Too much advertising brings much low-quality content arousing harmful consequences for a project.

[leea-1334]

Adab solutions just earned the ire of its bounty participants by cutting over 80% of everyone's rewards, now they are going to get it when these bounty hunters starting to post, tweet and write articles that Adab is a scam site and this exchange should not be trusted.

I remember someone who constantly accusing adab scam exchange and even prepared a signature and worn it for long time.

Hunters might get some attention earlier and saved their time.

It will not be the only company to be like this I can tell you,,, and they were not the first. But you can almost tell which company is going to go bust just through the bounty hunters joining them. The way I see it, Adab bounty hunters were all non stop shilling and with no quality to their posts, AND were shilling other projects at the same time. What do you expect the outcome to be like this?

[Mahanton]

For projects that have really good potential, only the signature campaign has a huge marketing influence.

if a project really do have a good potential then it can stand out even on a small budget advertising or on a simple advertising that is done thru the net and not on this forum or via signature campaign but sig campaigns on the forum are a verry big help especially to those projects that arent really promising .

It would be better if the campaign manager didn't limit the participants to this campaign both in terms of number and rank.

thats a big no for me . if they wont limit the participants the forum will be bloated of spam from a single campaign and other projects wont be given a chance to shine  .  it can also cause abuse if all ranks are allowed  .

Agreed, But giving limits to the count of participants is good. Moreover, most of the time bounty participants always suffered in terms
of distribution payment, they became like beggar in the end begging for their rewards token in the end if ever it has been delayed.

This is the thing i dont like where you do come to a point on where you do beg for your payments which should really be given yet you deserve it for your work.
Most team do make delays or nothing at all when it comes to payment time.It turns to be a waiting game for an unsure payout and come to think that bounty hunters or advertisers is one of the most important on projects exposure.

[numanoid]

This is the thing i dont like where you do come to a point on where you do beg for your payments which should really be given yet you deserve it for your work.

They didn't beg anything actually, if the dev promised to pay them based on their promise, will the bounty hunter ask when the payment will be start? The problem is, the dev keep delaying their promise and as the result, many bounty hunter keep asking about their payment.

[shoreno]

This is the thing i dont like where you do come to a point on where you do beg for your payments which should really be given yet you deserve it for your work.

They didn't beg anything actually, if the dev promised to pay them based on their promise, will the bounty hunter ask when the payment will be start? The problem is, the dev keep delaying their promise and as the result, many bounty hunter keep asking about their payment.

Thats the problem  . they promise to pay on that time but why they delay it ?  This was also the reason why bounty hunters keeps asking if what is the status of their payment . however you are right that ico owners didnt beg for bounty hunters to work with but they only post thier bounty that they will be needing promoters for thier project  .

Bounty hunters can give more influence on the project so they should treat bounty hunters as a professional and not just a dummy that they will leave without payments after the contract is done

[Mahanton]

This is the thing i dont like where you do come to a point on where you do beg for your payments which should really be given yet you deserve it for your work.

They didn't beg anything actually, if the dev promised to pay them based on their promise, will the bounty hunter ask when the payment will be start? The problem is, the dev keep delaying their promise and as the result, many bounty hunter keep asking about their payment.

Thats the problem  . they promise to pay on that time but why they delay it ?  This was also the reason why bounty hunters keeps asking if what is the status of their payment . however you are right that ico owners didnt beg for bounty hunters to work with but they only post thier bounty that they will be needing promoters for thier project  .

Bounty hunters can give more influence on the project so they should treat bounty hunters as a professional and not just a dummy that they will leave without payments after the contract is done

Bounty hunters do have the right to claim on what they work for.So its just right to ask about their payment but it turns out that these hunters become beggars in the end.
Keep asking and asking on when until they do surrender and accept that the project gone scam.Typical scenario that do happen on bounty world.