🔵🔵🔵 [ANN] BitMax.io Transaction Mining & Reverse-Mining ⚡️⚡️⚡️

[Mrcharles]

It's rather unfortunate that the deepcloud team chose the wrong part. Transparency is a core value in the cryptocurrency space and from the information I read, it's lacking in the project's strategy on releasing her tokens. This made it virtually impossible for BitMax to keep track of deep tokens, making it difficult for the market makers to manage the situation.

[1714631396]

1714631396

[1714631396]

1714631396

[1714631396]

1714631396

[ning_aric]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

[kriszz50983]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

[jumiapaul]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I believe the issue bothers on deception and lack of transparency. Deepcloud wasn't keeping to the terms of the contract by releasing tokens sporadically making it impossible for BitMax to keep track of the actual number of tokens in circulation. I can say this only shows that the Deepcloud team lacks integrity and were concerned about their personal financial reward as against the policy of the exchange and longevity of the project.

[gee777]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel.

Apparently deepcloud where behaving shady and did not adhere to the terms of bitmax along side their rolling out of false influence to investors

[Getadaaa]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

I have been a BitMax.io user for close to a year. It’s what you may call a transparent version of Binance, where Georgette comes on community telegram to talk about new developments. I think if there’s a good reason to delist Deepcloud AI then, I stand with George.

[Anilbg]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I believe the issue bothers on deception and lack of transparency. Deepcloud wasn't keeping to the terms of the contract by releasing tokens sporadically making it impossible for BitMax to keep track of the actual number of tokens in circulation. I can say this only shows that the Deepcloud team lacks integrity and were concerned about their personal financial reward as against the policy of the exchange and longevity of the project.

Oh, I have visited the both telegram channels and it seems both have own version, would wait for things to get more clear. For investors point of view, both teams should sit together and work on the resolution.

[champ005]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I believe the issue bothers on deception and lack of transparency. Deepcloud wasn't keeping to the terms of the contract by releasing tokens sporadically making it impossible for BitMax to keep track of the actual number of tokens in circulation. I can say this only shows that the Deepcloud team lacks integrity and were concerned about their personal financial reward as against the policy of the exchange and longevity of the project.

Oh, I have visited the both telegram channels and it seems both have own version, would wait for things to get more clear. For investors point of view, both teams should sit together and work on the resolution.

Juts going through the blogs shared by both team. Not looking good for investors but I think it's better to stop or delist the token rather than keeping it and playing with investors.

Hope investors can move the token to wallet without any issues

[ning_aric]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

[em777]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

[Anilbg]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

Yeah that's what I was saying. Both team should talk and resolve the issue. It's matter of thousands of investors and huge money.

[Ace44]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

That's what matters most, i don't intend looking into any project that lacks transparency, the cryptocurrency industry is been littered with a lot of projects without core values and hence many are scared of investing which is somehow affecting the industry heavily, its when things are done right that we will get to see the blockchain industry rise up to its expectation

[kriszz50983]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

That's what matters most, i don't intend looking into any project that lacks transparency, the cryptocurrency industry is been littered with a lot of projects without core values and hence many are scared of investing which is somehow affecting the industry heavily, its when things are done right that we will get to see the blockchain industry rise up to its expectation

I hope all exchanges start reporting such cases were token supply, or any kind of misinformation is provided by project.

[Sozialtourist]

Juts going through the blogs shared by both team. Not looking good for investors but I think it's better to stop or delist the token rather than keeping it and playing with investors.

Hope investors can move the token to wallet without any issues

Could you post the link to the article by DeepCloud?

I can understand the reason from Bitmax for this delisting but it could also be that they have a legally binding agreement between each other. Let's just hope that this won't end in a legal dispute between both parties.

[Ace44]

Juts going through the blogs shared by both team. Not looking good for investors but I think it's better to stop or delist the token rather than keeping it and playing with investors.

Hope investors can move the token to wallet without any issues

Could you post the link to the article by DeepCloud?

I can understand the reason from Bitmax for this delisting but it could also be that they have a legally binding agreement between each other. Let's just hope that this won't end in a legal dispute between both parties.

I think the situation is quite deep, though bitmax gave a very strong reason for the delisting of deepcloud as a result of providing false information to investors and the the community, which to me is pretty serious, even though they may have a legal binding but providing also documentation as a means of getting listed is a serious crime that can lead to serious brand damage for deepcloud 
 

[icekohl]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

Deepcloud have changed their vesting schedule, which violated the agreement between Bitmax and Deepcloud. So I think because of that Bitmax delisted DEEP token, and I think Bitmax is doing right.

[Getadaaa]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

Deepcloud have changed their vesting schedule, which violated the agreement between Bitmax and Deepcloud. So I think because of that Bitmax delisted DEEP token, and I think Bitmax is doing right.

It’s risky in crypto. Sometimes we forget that. They say you get more luck when you work hard, but who needs any more luck, when you’ve done your research and invest in tokens with a transparent team like BitMax. I mean the consistent AMA with BitMax CEO has been reliving. I bet most traders use BitMax not just because of the volume, but the transparent team.

[kriszz50983]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

Deepcloud have changed their vesting schedule, which violated the agreement between Bitmax and Deepcloud. So I think because of that Bitmax delisted DEEP token, and I think Bitmax is doing right.

Okay, but did both teams tried to discuss and sort this issue at first place before taking such action? This was sudden surprise for retail investors, that's why I asked.

[Anilbg]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

Deepcloud have changed their vesting schedule, which violated the agreement between Bitmax and Deepcloud. So I think because of that Bitmax delisted DEEP token, and I think Bitmax is doing right.

Okay, but did both teams tried to discuss and sort this issue at first place before taking such action? This was sudden surprise for retail investors, that's why I asked.

I think this decision came only after initial discussion between each other. When that discussion was not fruitful, bitmax decided to delist the tokens.

[Cnote112]

Got this from the deepcloud AI telegram group https://medium.com/@DeepCloud_AI/statement-in-regards-to-bitmax-delisting-of-deepcloud-ai-1cd0072ade seems both parties having different stories