🔵🔵🔵 [ANN] BitMax.io Transaction Mining & Reverse-Mining ⚡️⚡️⚡️

[Nathan01]

Got this from the deepcloud AI telegram group https://medium.com/@DeepCloud_AI/statement-in-regards-to-bitmax-delisting-of-deepcloud-ai-1cd0072ade seems both parties having different stories 

I've seen lots of reaction towards this article of late. Many claimed Bitmax haven't been sincere and straight forward with their dealings especially with IEO.

I don't know how true but I want Bitmax to come out of this very strongly

[1714653436]

1714653436

[1714653436]

1714653436

[Maebeo2017]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel.

Crazy happenings around the crypto sphere but one thing is certain many investors won't be comfortable with the happenings. A lot of us expected more from Bitmax. They could easily have been the next Binance but well...

[em777]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel.

Crazy happenings around the crypto sphere but one thing is certain many investors won't be comfortable with the happenings. A lot of us expected more from Bitmax. They could easily have been the next Binance but well...

I still believe they are on track, measures like this needs to be taken in order to ensure trustworthiness and transparency. Shortcomings are usually in business. I believe investors are aware of that.

[Ace44]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel.

Crazy happenings around the crypto sphere but one thing is certain many investors won't be comfortable with the happenings. A lot of us expected more from Bitmax. They could easily have been the next Binance but well...

I still believe they are on track, measures like this needs to be taken in order to ensure trustworthiness and transparency. Shortcomings are usually in business. I believe investors are aware of that.

Yea, its things like these that will help strengthen the industry, when you have rules in place to curtail such inadequacies things are bound to change sooner or later, i'm still going through deepcloud statement on medium and their CEO made some points but i believe they have these written on paper or something, i mean both parties, if yes, then they should make it public

[Cnote112]

Got this from the deepcloud AI telegram group https://medium.com/@DeepCloud_AI/statement-in-regards-to-bitmax-delisting-of-deepcloud-ai-1cd0072ade seems both parties having different stories 

I've seen lots of reaction towards this article of late. Many claimed Bitmax haven't been sincere and straight forward with their dealings especially with IEO.

I don't know how true but I want Bitmax to come out of this very strongly

I still think both parties should have a sit down and pan things out, there's nothing a conversation can't solve.

[jumiapaul]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two projects could settle their differences because from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

[gee777]

New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.

Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel.

Crazy happenings around the crypto sphere but one thing is certain many investors won't be comfortable with the happenings. A lot of us expected more from Bitmax. They could easily have been the next Binance but well...

This is not good for both parties. They need to sight this out soon. I feel both CEO should come together and come to an agreement or they will both get hurt.

[Mrcharles]

Got this from the deepcloud AI telegram group https://medium.com/@DeepCloud_AI/statement-in-regards-to-bitmax-delisting-of-deepcloud-ai-1cd0072ade seems both parties having different stories  

On reading this article, I can confirm that the two sides of the story are a perfect contrast and it would be impossible to judge based on the two information because there's no proof of Authentication as to whether the information is truthful or not.

[Ace44]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

[Nathan01]

It's been quite some time I heard about Bitmax new moves and new listing. I miss the genius and activities of George Cao. What's been happening with Bitmax of late?

[Maebeo2017]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.

[Ace44]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.

You're right but i do not think there will be any resolution because a lot of damage as already been done, investors must have left the scene and even potential investors must have flee from deepcloud, the position that bitmax is making is quite clear and deepcloud really have to sort themselves out immediately or they risk loosing everything

[shinratensei_]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.

that will never happen based on both of stories have created by bitmax and deep, it looks like both will never try to shake hands for a better solution.

It's really sad to know that deep was only listed on the bitmax but it has delisted.
Investors are a party who has been getting a huge impact caused by this problem and these investors have lost their money in this case.

But in my opinion if both are dishonest platforms.

[Ace44]

Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.

What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was?

I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens.
Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed?

I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project

In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar.

You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories

For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands.

that will never happen based on both of stories have created by bitmax and deep, it looks like both will never try to shake hands for a better solution.

It's really sad to know that deep was only listed on the bitmax but it has delisted.
Investors are a party who has been getting a huge impact caused by this problem and these investors have lost their money in this case.

But in my opinion if both are dishonest platforms.

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

[jumiapaul]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

[Mrcharles]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

On reading the testimony from the both projects, am sceptical on the smooth resolution of this issue. The disagreement between both parties was evident in the article and the content of the article bothers on different perspectives. I can only pray for them to resolve this amicably as the issues has degenerated substantially to make Bitmax delist their tokens.

[em777]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

[Ace44]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough

[gee777]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

Communication is the key here. There is a lack in communication somewhere. I am not happy that this is happening, there should be a way to curb this and avoid the dramas.

[Ace44]

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big  boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

Communication is the key here. There is a lack in communication somewhere. I am not happy that this is happening, there should be a way to curb this and avoid the dramas.

There must have been a lot of communication for it to have gotten to this stage, i mean it won't be right for bitmax to just wake up one morning and drop deepcloud out of their exchange, there are rules of engagement and if that doesn't solve the problem, then i wonder what else will, both parties have dropped a lot of information about this