[ANN] [ICO] AQER: the first blockchain & AI marketplace for Vloggers and Brands

[DiscoMan]

Well, only I started)) in general, I decided to try my luck here. For some reason I believe in these guys.

[GucciGangClub]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

[C|R|Y|P|T|O|M|A|N]

But honestly, I don’t really understand all these worries. The Jihan Wu team and others have played their part in the cryptoworld and raised the bit-cache stakes twice, for $1000. The draw was good, the move was a success, but I don’t think it could really hit the bitcoin very hard. Its rate against the dollar is about 6.3 thousand dollars. And now let's remember what its course was before the breakthrough to $7800? About $7,500. In general, a light shake-up of the cryptoworld has a positive outcome, for the total capitalization of the crypto world was about 120 billion US dollars. And it was a long time 102-104 billion for a long time. It is already necessary to get used to constant volatility. And all the altcoins eventually grew(the bitcoin used to cost less than 1 dollar).

[JohnYDillinger]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

[RazBOYnick]

But honestly, I don’t really understand all these worries. The Jihan Wu team and others have played their part in the cryptoworld and raised the bit-cache stakes twice, for $1000. The draw was good, the move was a success, but I don’t think it could really hit the bitcoin very hard. Its rate against the dollar is about 6.3 thousand dollars. And now let's remember what its course was before the breakthrough to $7800? About $7,500. In general, a light shake-up of the cryptoworld has a positive outcome, for the total capitalization of the crypto world was about 120 billion US dollars. And it was a long time 102-104 billion for a long time. It is already necessary to get used to constant volatility. And all the altcoins eventually grew(the bitcoin used to cost less than 1 dollar).

Well, basically, yes, a reasonable remark.

[BTC_Eldorado]

But honestly, I don’t really understand all these worries. The Jihan Wu team and others have played their part in the cryptoworld and raised the bit-cache stakes twice, for $1000. The draw was good, the move was a success, but I don’t think it could really hit the bitcoin very hard. Its rate against the dollar is about 6.3 thousand dollars. And now let's remember what its course was before the breakthrough to $7800? About $7,500. In general, a light shake-up of the cryptoworld has a positive outcome, for the total capitalization of the crypto world was about 120 billion US dollars. And it was a long time 102-104 billion for a long time. It is already necessary to get used to constant volatility. And all the altcoins eventually grew(the bitcoin used to cost less than 1 dollar).

Well, basically, yes, a reasonable remark.

I have been in this topic since ICO weren’t mainstream))

[TheFirstCreator]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

[Guardsman]

But honestly, I don’t really understand all these worries. The Jihan Wu team and others have played their part in the cryptoworld and raised the bit-cache stakes twice, for $1000. The draw was good, the move was a success, but I don’t think it could really hit the bitcoin very hard. Its rate against the dollar is about 6.3 thousand dollars. And now let's remember what its course was before the breakthrough to $7800? About $7,500. In general, a light shake-up of the cryptoworld has a positive outcome, for the total capitalization of the crypto world was about 120 billion US dollars. And it was a long time 102-104 billion for a long time. It is already necessary to get used to constant volatility. And all the altcoins eventually grew(the bitcoin used to cost less than 1 dollar).

Well, basically, yes, a reasonable remark.

I have been in this topic since ICO weren’t mainstream))

What do you think about this project? worth investing?

[DreamerJ]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

I read both your whitepaper and yellow paper ... Everything is clear, but somehow the information is crumpled up ....

[kmntrci]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

I read both your whitepaper and yellow paper ... Everything is clear, but somehow the information is crumpled up ....

Damn, this is another of those ICO, which uses the ERC20 standard for smart contracts? Well, it is outdated, outdated!!!!

[ZloiRediska]

But honestly, I don’t really understand all these worries. The Jihan Wu team and others have played their part in the cryptoworld and raised the bit-cache stakes twice, for $1000. The draw was good, the move was a success, but I don’t think it could really hit the bitcoin very hard. Its rate against the dollar is about 6.3 thousand dollars. And now let's remember what its course was before the breakthrough to $7800? About $7,500. In general, a light shake-up of the cryptoworld has a positive outcome, for the total capitalization of the crypto world was about 120 billion US dollars. And it was a long time 102-104 billion for a long time. It is already necessary to get used to constant volatility. And all the altcoins eventually grew(the bitcoin used to cost less than 1 dollar).

Well, basically, yes, a reasonable remark.

I have been in this topic since ICO weren’t mainstream))

What do you think about this project? worth investing?

why not?

[alp]

After reading your documentation and studying the materials on the site, I can say the following. Perhaps in the future your idea will get the masses. But at the moment this technology already exists. I met a lot of sites that offer the opportunity to meet bloggers and advertisers in one place and agree within the framework of advertising sites. Perhaps your project will have a resonance to the niche of the blockchain and cryptocurrency advertising, but this is an extremely small market compared to the rest. I hope that they will be able to convince me back and show good and strong sides that can not be compared with anyone.

[DonProton]

why not?

Well, there’s no rating on their icorating, nor any special information on the Internet ....

[Crypton2018]

why not?

Well, there’s no rating on their icorating, nor any special information on the Internet ....

Well, so what, the guys are doing everything right - they are not engaged in marketing, but work on a project.

[ARTiShock2008]

why not?

Well, there’s no rating on their icorating, nor any special information on the Internet ....

Well, so what, the guys are doing everything right - they are not engaged in marketing, but work on a project.

But because they want to attract investors, it means that we must somehow work these moments through ....

[Hanna_Money]

Well, so you have the whitepaper and yellow paper ... What else do you need?

[saveeege]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

I read both your whitepaper and yellow paper ... Everything is clear, but somehow the information is crumpled up ....

Damn, this is another of those ICO, which uses the ERC20 standard for smart contracts? Well, it is outdated, outdated!!!!

Yes, you tell about it to everyone who makes blockchains on Ethereum. probably 95% of ICO are based on this platform. And what’s so bad about that?

[pogi23]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

I read both your whitepaper and yellow paper ... Everything is clear, but somehow the information is crumpled up ....

Damn, this is another of those ICO, which uses the ERC20 standard for smart contracts? Well, it is outdated, outdated!!!!

Yes, you tell about it to everyone who makes blockchains on Ethereum. probably 95% of ICO are based on this platform. And what’s so bad about that?

Well, actually, I read in some article that almost all ICOs have failed over time and in general all this is a scam.

[Discovery2017]

Well, so you have the whitepaper and yellow paper ... What else do you need?

it seems to me that this project is simply meant for large investors. They are unlikely to research something a lot on the Internet. Rather, learn about the project through their channels

[JohnYDillinger]

By the way, we’d like some of the forum participants’ attention. We will be very grateful if you take your time to read our whitepaper and highlight here if something’s escaping your understanding. It is small and you should be interested if you’re here)

are you talking about? about grammatical errors, or what? ... I have read the Whitepaper and j found it rather well done

No, about difficulties you may have with technical descriptions - is everything clear in the whitepaper clear to you? Although, if you find some grammatical errors, we’d be grateful if you told us))

oh, I will look for sure, as much as I  am interested))) grammatical errors is not so important as real technical aspects written there

I read both your whitepaper and yellow paper ... Everything is clear, but somehow the information is crumpled up ....

Damn, this is another of those ICO, which uses the ERC20 standard for smart contracts? Well, it is outdated, outdated!!!!

Yes, you tell about it to everyone who makes blockchains on Ethereum. probably 95% of ICO are based on this platform. And what’s so bad about that?

Well, actually, I read in some article that almost all ICOs have failed over time and in general all this is a scam.

ohhh, here we go again. want to share a link? There are a lot of hackers that are sending fishing links to get all money from the wallets