massiveman
Member
 Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 08:37:17 AM |
|
I see many of you think this way; but lower vote doesn't mean higher price
short term it probably does because less of the currency is available to buy. long term I agree with you. |
|
|
|
|
crovasco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
March 16, 2014, 08:42:24 AM |
|
I see many of you think this way; but lower vote doesn't mean higher price
short term it probably does because less of the currency is available to buy. long term I agree with you. less of currency available to buy doesnt mean much if demand is low. If noone is buying this coin. If noone is buying why would it be important if miners mine more or less. It has been a week, and i hoped this coin would be more accepted. If that doesnt change, well, i think it would be better to make it "minable" |
|
|
|
|
massiveman
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 16, 2014, 08:51:49 AM |
|
I see many of you think this way; but lower vote doesn't mean higher price
short term it probably does because less of the currency is available to buy. long term I agree with you. less of currency available to buy doesnt mean much if demand is low. If noone is buying this coin. If noone is buying why would it be important if miners mine more or less. It has been a week, and i hoped this coin would be more accepted. If that doesnt change, well, i think it would be better to make it "minable" thats true but if nobody wants something it doesnt matter if there is 1 of it or a billion. Anyway you can cast your vote as you see fit as part of the voting process. |
|
|
|
|
crovasco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
March 16, 2014, 08:58:40 AM |
|
And i still believe, regardless of the vote, that the best course of action would be to buy this coin. That the nearly all of us organize and buy this coin, no matter the amount. Whatever amount someone is able to buy. If we all organize, we may be up to 10-20 btc, roughly half a million hvc in demand. And then, just hold coin. If we believe in coin, that will attract new miner and investitors. And its really not important that amounts are big, 0,0001-0,1 btc per person would be just fine
|
|
|
|
|
|
tabnk
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:02:11 AM |
|
WE NEED CGMINER  |
|
|
|
|
crovasco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:14:23 AM |
|
Lack of organizational stage and "fanatic" faith will just devalue coin. We cant just expect to sit and do nothing and the price will rise out of itself
|
|
|
|
|
|
eightspaces
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:19:29 AM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
|
|
|
|
|
massiveman
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:49:56 AM |
|
this coin will be fine, there will be a huge influx of mining/difficulty increase when the gpu miner comes out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eightspaces
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:52:58 AM |
|
this coin will be fine, there will be a huge influx of mining/difficulty increase when the gpu miner comes out.
yes, but not with "CPU-only" and "cpu only forever" statements all over the site. |
|
|
|
|
con
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:55:45 AM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth. All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now). |
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
March 16, 2014, 09:59:45 AM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth. All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now). Won't matter. |
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
|
eightspaces
|
|
March 16, 2014, 10:18:31 AM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth. All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now). Won't matter. WRONG |
|
|
|
|
|
ghur
|
|
March 16, 2014, 10:27:16 AM |
|
GPU miners already work. The authors are just taking their cut first before releasing it into the wild.
|
doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro |
|
|
|
asdlolciterquit
|
|
March 16, 2014, 10:50:15 AM |
|
How many HVC i mine for day with an AMD A8 6600K?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ghur
|
|
March 16, 2014, 11:48:31 AM |
|
That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum. |
doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro |
|
|
|
TiberiuC
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:56:47 PM |
|
That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum. So this is not a pool error? |
|
|
|
|
|
eightspaces
|
|
March 16, 2014, 12:58:57 PM |
|
That's generally what is expected when the pool's total hashrate equals about 2 rubber bands and half a pack of gum. So this is not a pool error? no, not a pool error. 1GH has basically 80%+ of the network's hashrate, hence heavycoinpool is useless sad but true. the network is entirely monopolized |
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
March 16, 2014, 01:18:25 PM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth. All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now). Won't matter. WRONG One of us will be that's for sure. GPU farms vs. botnets. Everyone else, green weenie. I can hardly wait. |
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for.
Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
deamon
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
yes!?
|
|
March 16, 2014, 02:01:56 PM |
|
keccak512, official statements about the fact that some GPU mine hvc? plz keep us updated
Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth. All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now). Won't matter. WRONG One of us will be that's for sure. GPU farms vs. botnets. Everyone else, green weenie. I can hardly wait. its hard for us all to wait |
|
|
|
|
