Hello LoyceV I don't have this idea you review post history as well, maybe it might skip my memory so I decided to utilize the chance you posted on that topic to report some of my post as you said.
You and I have different definitions of good posts. I tried all 6 posts, but couldn't get past the first 2 lines.
I am actually short of words, basically I don't still understand but those you feels is quality can receive merits, then you can skip those you feels not qualify. That is why I said earlier it's hard to judge how people evaluate their posts. Basically the way I evaluate my post 'is the message the poster is trying to convey' if the reader gets his way out or understand what the writer is saying then is a good post.
Someone can place everything according as you said but if the post doesn't convey anything meaning then I will have to skip. Basically not everyone takes english as their L1, rather there are people who takes their L2 as their main speaking language whereby might not be perfect in L1 at this point how do you judge them with their post?
Does it send a message to reader or not?
Does the reader tried to respond back to the message?
And if the reader respond to the message then it's an effective communication.
Meaning, the message they pass on is useful and carry meaning since the reader responded and there is a communication between the sender and the receiver lines.
That is how I evaluate my post but if you feels my post doesn't convey any meaningful message to you as the reader then I have no choice than you doing what you feels like +-.
Thank you for your time sir
Love you!