KYC SHOULD BE STOPPED FOR BOUNTY HUNTERS

[Rostock]

I think that the procedure of KYC, no one will cancel. Problems bounty hunters are not interesting to developers and bounty managers.

[surgexvb]

I think it is a good idea to go through KYC at the beginning of the campaign, then it will be immediately clear whether your documents will be accepted or not and whether it makes sense to spend your time participating in the promotion.

[bangjoe]

I think it's better if all participants in the project are asked to verify KYC, all of them, and the team
if applied then it will minimize cheating and scam, because the bounty hunter cannot commit fraud in the form of multiple accounts and the team will not dare to scam

[ataki]

KYC is justifiable if the coin is security, otherwise if the ICO requires KYC they should do it before the bounty ends because it is not correct if you do the job and then if  fail on KYC procedure.

[tippytoes]

KYC is justifiable if the coin is security, otherwise if the ICO requires KYC they should do it before the bounty ends because it is not correct if you do the job and then if  fail on KYC procedure.

Or better yet, do not implement it at all if you are just giving few bucks to those bounty hunters. I do believe that if there's no need for kyc for these bounty programs as they won't know where you will gonna use it afterwards.

[hahay]

I did a bounty which i passed, and earned some amount of the token, but i failed kyc and my effort was gone just like that, after rendering my services to them by promoting the project. I got really pained.

The main problem of KYC is not like that, we are aware that KYC is something very sensitive because KYC is about real personal identity. With so many internet crimes such as dark web etc., the identity can be misused by irresponsible side. It seems that KYC has become the main thing now for active internet users, because many places require users to send KYC. So it seems difficult to stop the KYC.

[nugezmils]

KYC, in my own opinion should be stopped for bounty hunters. And if need be, that you want to ascertain that the hunter in question is not from the restricted countries, then KYC should be done from inception of the bounty campaign. Here, the hunter would know if he or she is accepted via KYC, hence, allowing him/her to go ahead with the project. But two questions, Are our documents and information SAFE? Is KYC not only for customers (buyers) as the name depicts?

[fuer44]

it is indeed too heavy for bounty hunters, because sometimes bounty hunters only get tokens in small amounts but they are forced to fill them up which sometimes the process is difficult. it would be better if only the big investors were required for Kyc.

[Henrobakkara]

in my opinion KYC doesn't need to be stopped because it can help find scammers. But if KYC has to be done at the beginning of the campaign, I strongly agree because after we graduate KYC can calmly do work

[AtlantaFive]

I don't like bounty campaign asking users to do kyc. You know why, KYC for me is for people who will buy their tokens or join in their ico. Some of the campaign too after finishing the entire campaign will just ask their participants to pass i.d or everything. So people who cannot pass kyc will just lose their hard earn token in the promoting the ico. That's why it's important to check first if the bounty is asking for kyc or not so if you are not confident passing this then you won't join them.

[fortunecrypto]

I'm into KYC for the beginning of campaign but not after, you don't hire people and submit their resume after they are hired and have already worked for the project, you are misleading them if you do these for bounty hunters and your project will have a bad reputation.

[coinsycrip09]

when viewed from your position, i really strongly agree that KYC is stopped for bounty hunters.

but KYC is also needed so that no member uses many accounts in one project. if we fail in KYC, we can ask the reason directly to the project team. this often happens to me, and it can be handled well if we communicate well with the project team.

[Omela44]

I still think that kyc is not good at the crypto area. Crypto stands for paying anonymously and kyc prevents this. I can understand the use of kyc, especially in the bounty area, but i would find it better if there would be another solution for kyc.

[karmapala]

I agree with your statement it seems unfair for bounty hunters if after working to provide services to participate in promoting and succeeding a token project it turns out he did not get a wage for failing for kyc. whether this will make people lazy tobecome a bounty hunter. Does bounty hunters now have no important role in making a token successful?so I think it's better if Kyc is canceled

[jaywizzy]

I don't think that this kyc of a thing can be curtail because some project still require kyc and is not a must you promote a particular project. If you know you can't meet up with their requirements is better you don't partake in such project at all.

[soramon]

I agree with you 100%. I never like KYC requirement for bounty hunters. Because there is a chance you may failed to pass KYC. i failed KYC once and its make sad. The project that already 4 months ended with nothing. I hope there is other way beside KYC for bounty hunters claim their reward.

[CryptoTech_]

I honestly think kyc should be stopped for bounty hunters, reason being that we are not buying the token of the project ,rather we are rendering services  to create awareness for the project. Which ought to be paid for.

KYC for the bounty is one of them to avoid cheating, and there are also projects that require all of the token holders to do KYC

In another view, if a bounty hunter has to go through KYC ,then it should be at the start of the bounty, during registration, if accepted or passed, then you go on with the bounty.

I agree with this, but the project that forced bounty participants to do KYC after the project ended was a project that wanted to get more profits, because with the KYC not being implemented from the start, it would make more participants than the KYC imposed from the start

[Whaletale]

I see it as a cage for bounty hunter and also not a decentralized technology as we speak, if any one is to do kyc then it should be investors who has more than $10,000 and not even those that buy with just $50-$100 , they have turn this kyc to some scam manner which I believe is the real bad image for this technology, bounty hunter are not even suppose to do kyc cos they only promote yr project and got reward for it , so it left for you as the bounty manager to prevent the scammer not to get reward for others work.

[libert19]

You stop participating in projects that requires kyc and they will fade away. There are still good amount of projects that do not require kyc for bounties, check bingo bounty projects and Jarvis, which am doing right now.

[Globen]

I honestly support your i dea, kyc should be stopped, bounty hunters are not investors so i see no reason why bounty hunters should be made to go through the hassle of doing kyc and also putting their documents at risks. Investors should be the one doing kyc because it is know your customer , we bounty hunters are not their customers. We privide the best service we can and need to get paid, not making us work for free by saying we failed the kyc.