How to distinguish between good and bad projects

[frost_wind]

It is quite difficult to distinguish them, because very often the information that they publish about their project does not correspond to reality. Nevertheless, really good projects simply have to have partnership agreements with other companies and a officially registered business. And the bad ones often don’t even have white paper and information about their team is missing or just fake

[bigcash2011]

At the moment the bears are dominant not only in the crypto market but also in the ico market so untill we see atleast 50% recovery in the market based on 2017 volumes. Plus we should be vigilant and avoid low quality projects and discourage them by not investing in any of them.

[BanaCrypto]

the project is good when it has a public trust or extensive experience in manging the project , if a project bad mean they do not have much clear vision about their project ...

[Barabulya]

If there is such a question, then the person who asks it is most likely not well versed in cryptocurrencies. I would advise him not to bother with the choice and to pay attention to the projects that are in the top ten cmc.

[ScarletSnow]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

There are some projects that seems like its good and promising but ending up as a Scam! if its coins are in the exchange already then thats the best thing for projects. Because you know thats where you can sell and trade their tokens.

[kingpin4321]

To be honest it's really hard trying to distinguish between a good project and a bad project
But you can check this criteria
*good management team
*reasonable white paper
*those already investing in the project

[axel2078]

To be honest it's really hard trying to distinguish between a good project and a bad project
But you can check this criteria
*good management team
*reasonable white paper
*those already investing in the project

All can be fake and you will be fooled if you still analyze the same thing. So this is a bad way for you to evaluate an ICO. Ideally, you should invest in ICO after it is listed in the exchange

[trudovik]

Today there are no full-fledged services that would say that today is good or that is bad. I think that today we need to make a serious choice based on the experience that you have received in all this time.

[fvb]

You need to understand the project very well before investing.  Examine the white paper, team, product and other qualities of the company.

[andrejka]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

The first thing you should do when choosing the good project and ICO is to check out the team behind this project. Because the team is the main driver who will lead the ICO to success or to scam. And you need to distinguish whether the team is real or not, good or bad etc. Besides you must carefully read the whitepaper and analyze the road map trying to understand how real the implementation of the project is. The last but not the least you need to check for the competitors of chosen project and guess if the team would beat them or if  would be beat themselves...

[Reid]

For me it is actually simple.
If it aint unique anymore then I wont support it.
Most of them will not hit the cap that they need to reach the starting capital for the project. It will be a waste of time and money.

That is my own opinion though. If you surveying here then please also look unto that field. Mostly they are just repeating projects and there are still people who are being fooled by it.

[smoolae]

The true answer is that sometimes you cannot. When an ICO looks and feels right and still comes out as a scam there is nothing you could have done to expose it. Sometimes you just have to hope that everything works out in the end.
Red flags are: extending the time for no reason, not giving answers in Telegram, fake team members, etc...

It all comes down how much effort is being put in the scam.

[danherbias07]

In a quick look I go hunt for best features.
Does it look inviting to investors? One question which mostly ICOs cannot answer.


The liveliness of the management in everything. Social medias, telegram and other forums not just here.
It would be pleasing to see that kind of attitude since they are going for big efforts to pull more investors.
Another will be freebies for loyal ones.

[rijaljun]

ICO rating is not a relevant site to find bad or good project because many of them are paid-rated project. Also, scammers are smarter today that maybe even ICO rating site can't rate it accurately.

[OcTA Bd]

To me go though the team members and their white paper. And also analysing their ico plan will also be helpful.

[LUCKMCFLY]

A good study of the equipment must be done, of its whitepaper, which offers guarantees to the investors, now that there are new regulations for the ICO, it is good to demand the legitimate documents under the legality basis, they are obliged to show them to the community where they are they find, this increases their reliability. Many ICOs are starting to be listed in Binance, this is a good indication for those projects, since Binance is one of the level 1 exchanges.

[Wayrey2020]

Probably no way because if everyone knows or everyone knows how to distinguish between the bad and the good project, I believe every one here won't have to come up with different such of companies, so the answer is take a time to do your own research and believe in yourself.

[emmybd]

There are no clear-cut rules of distinguishing between good and bad projects, you have to do your own research to collect information about them. You can also see rating of a project in ICO rating sites to learn about it.

[fathur01]

I just stopped investing in ICO and therefore stopped tracking which projects are good or bad. I think that at the moment there may be only 2 - 3 good projects, and even they will put their conditions for investors, I mean that the ICO can stretch for unlimited time.

[vinasky]

I took a risk and participated in Thrive ICO https://cmc.io/coins/thrive-token
And I still don't have any regrets