How to distinguish between good and bad projects

[Freeesta]

I advise you to carefully analyze the coin of interest. Follow the news of the project, if the project team is not involved in the development of the project, then there is no need to invest. Now most of the projects have lost their popularity due to the fact that employees of the ISO company do not release updates for the project.

[tonyvo2017]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

I feel that the ICO market is no longer hot and not interested by many investors. All attention has been paid to the IEO and STO. these are new ways to mobilize capital and it is quite safe for investors. STO is more appreciated when investors have the right to comment on business activities.
This is a new and wonderful change. ICO will soon no longer appear in the crypto market.

[justdimin]

I think the best way to realize which project is good and which project is bad is to follow those project outside of their shill accounts. There are a bunch of people supporting bunch of other coins and they all love the coins they support and we get it but maybe ask about that project to someone who researched the project but didn't invested in it. Ask them what made them not invest into it, that way you can get an objective opinion out of people.

Shills that are everywhere who keep on promoting the coin will only talk about the great parts but will miss out on why it could fail as well, yeah all coins could go insanely high but most of them don't and look for why this might fail, that is where you will find an honest answer. That is what I do, I go to reddit and check what people talked about that coin and most of the time find a reason why not to invest.

[kidbounty]

How can you quickly distinguish between good and bad projects and even being invincible in the bear market？

In fact I join an ICO Rating Project recently and now I am testing if the project do help to investors.
Our team has analyzed almost 3,000 blockchain projects.
The analysis dimensions include Exchange, Community, Sentiment, Code and Market.
This project began half a year ago and is currently in beta.

Contact me if you are interested and you can download it for free.

does this include promotion?
Come on, there isn't a good new project right now. since the bear market started almost all the newly launched projects were shit. so I'm not interested in this.

[bitcoiner.psn]

The resume of the team members is'nt  important very much, such a many  creative people with high abilities that have'nt  known, yet. The most important factor for success an ICO is  drive forward  to enhance and fix the pow & pos problems  which can  prosper the transaction speed. I recommend reading WhitePerper to diagnose How to distinguish between good and bad projects.

[NeuroticFish]

Three things - Research, gut and experience.
[~]
Combine all three.

Common sense does also help, at least to avoid the ones too good to be true.
And also the community. Waiting a little and reading others' reactions/review can help in not getting burned.

[superscommessebitcoin]

At first glance, all the projects are good, but sometimes it is enough to study it in more detail and it becomes clear that this is not so. But sometimes a bad project is difficult to expose. Use rating sites, they at least for a little help to limit you from scammers.

[Huntler1993]

Just look at the way things are done by the team, and do your thorough research. Never trust hear says since it might lure you into bad project. As the saying goes most at times empty projects makes the most noise so make sure you never fall to that.

[Stargazer]

This is not easy to distinguish between good and bad project. Recently Icobench gave 5 rating out of 5 to the Bolton Coin STO! But after my complaint, they make it 3.3 rating out of 5! And I have seen this mistake with many projects, icobench is not a trusted source anymore! So, by looking at the team, telegram, whitepaper, roadmap you can't distinguish which one is good and which one is a scam project. You need to look at their real even with big partners, not just in the picture you should be verified from the partner's site too!

[coinbirds]

It is very difficult to distinguish between good and bad projects based on ratings.
It can help, but we have to do our own research.
There is no guarantee for successful projects in early phase.
Like the idea when exchanges are supervising the projects IEO, like Binance is doing.

[Ultimist]

I think you should study the team and the idea of the project. The team now plays a major role because many scammers can change names and release new fraudulent projects.

[reynald70]

It is very difficult to distinguish between good and bad projects actually, because they are very neat cheats in doing their jobs, but for me personally if I want to participate in the project I always research all aspects in a project, the key is we have to be careful first.

[mrdeposit]

I think you should study the team and the idea of the project. The team now plays a major role because many scammers can change names and release new fraudulent projects.

The most important demonstrators of currency are the whitepaper and the team. While the Whitepaper is given extensive information about what they are and what they will be useful for, the team should have the power to keep project alive.

[chanc3r]

I think you should study the team and the idea of the project. The team now plays a major role because many scammers can change names and release new fraudulent projects.

The most important demonstrators of currency are the whitepaper and the team. While the Whitepaper is given extensive information about what they are and what they will be useful for, the team should have the power to keep project alive.

Team is more important than whitepaper, if you can know if that was a fake team and it's not worth to read their whitepaper, scam icos will always use fake identities and that's the first thing to consider the scam ico.

[hulla]

I think you should study the team and the idea of the project. The team now plays a major role because many scammers can change names and release new fraudulent projects.

The most important demonstrators of currency are the whitepaper and the team. While the Whitepaper is given extensive information about what they are and what they will be useful for, the team should have the power to keep project alive.

Team is more important than whitepaper, if you can know if that was a fake team and it's not worth to read their whitepaper, scam icos will always use fake identities and that's the first thing to consider the scam ico.

ICOs team are the one that played roles of making the project successful and the best way to spot a good or bad project is doing background check on the team involving, their capacity, website and the concept they cook for the project. However, I don't believe in whitepaper because it just a page full smooth words which will convince investors.

[labilaab]

Theres no such thing as invincible in the bear market. Even in not bearish situation no one is pro enough to avoid the loss. Instead theres a strategy to somehow lessen it and if lucky will also get a huge profit. Distinguishing good project from bad ones also is a hard one especially if that project has a volume already and been trading to some exchanges.

[libert19]

I think you should study the team and the idea of the project. The team now plays a major role because many scammers can change names and release new fraudulent projects.

The most important demonstrators of currency are the whitepaper and the team. While the Whitepaper is given extensive information about what they are and what they will be useful for, the team should have the power to keep project alive.

Most ICOs don't do what they promise in their whitepaper, the difference between imaginary product displayed in WP and real one is huge, like a real horse and a pen drawn horse by 5 year old.

[djuragan]

If they also open for bounty campaign, then we could also check on the bounty campaign manager, usually a good bounty manager will filter any project they are working on with a good quality project.

[shoreno]

If they also open for bounty campaign, then we could also check on the bounty campaign manager, usually a good bounty manager will filter any project they are working on with a good quality project.

True but that isnt always the case that happen  . some managers will only work because they are being paid to the managing job but they are not responsible for any loss that may occur in the latter stages    . they infact put a disclaimer notice before they start a campaign  , so that partipants will be aware that the risk that they may face  .  chosing a good between bad projects is a tough task especially on the current market that we are facing right now  

[ryan992]

until now, I don't how to identify between good and ba projects. Its Hard, which I can do is look track record the company or if its the bounty campaign, look who is the bounty manager or team who handle the projects.