Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[mahibul49]

yes i have seen so many hard cap reached project failed to deliver any promised or anything from their roadmap.they take money and then left the crypto world and now chilling

[1714816724]

1714816724

[1714816724]

1714816724

[1714816724]

1714816724

[whyrqa]

Hardcap reach isn't easy to rise funds for any altcoins in cryptocurrency in this year. People don't want to check ICOs this year, just checking for IEO much better from ICOs. Development should be strong to reach the success and update will be release on time to time.

[2tang]

I also became one of the people who agreed with that opinion, I always considered ICO not a determinant or guarantee that the project would succeed, so far I only consider ICO as an added value, as a supporter or as a condition for the success of a project because without ICO successful (at least softcap) then the project will not run or the project will be stopped
so the more successful the ICO, the greater the chance of the project to succeed

[salad daging]

if there is an ICO that can really achieve hardcap then it shows that ICO is in demand by many investors, especially ICO who have high sales targets and although hardcap cannot be used as collateral but this can be used as a big trigger to make the project successful because the logic is when a project has large capital then at least the project does not have capital problems, only how can the team develop the project or not

[kanmo]

Yes, it doesn't guarantee the success of a project but at the same time it will surely have significant effect on the development of the project. For example, a project like EOS flourished because they have the financial capacity to fund the project.

[mangsitin]

I think if a project is really serious about running a project on Blockchain even though the project doesn't get Hardcap when ICO tends to succeed, because people need concrete evidence such as prices not too far from ICO prices, because many projects currently get Hardcap but have value bad at the exchange market.

[profitgenerator212]

Hardcap is simply the maximum amount of funds that can be collected to build a project. But that not withstanding, there are so many other underlying factors that can determine the success of a project and one is a "marketable working product".

[Chicky213]

Hardcap doesn't guarantee the authenticity of a project but it still goes a long way in helping them the project attain its goal. Reaching a hardcap means the project won't be having any issues with the funds to list In a top
exchange and also to achieve its road map.

[lousie9]

it is true that if a project does not require an ICO, maybe the project developer already has the capital to build the company in crypto. So far, many projects have held ICO aimed at raising funds so that the project can run with successful but true hardcap ICO sales when sales will not guarantee that projects get high stock prices because everything also depends on their products and the community in the project.

[Tylev]

Of course, the ICO team’s achievement of hardcap is just evidence that investors believed the ICO project team that this project will be successful. However, in the future, for various reasons, the ICO team may misuse the funds raised and the project may be unsuccessful or even the team may turn out to be fraudsters.

[Osayo]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

It is a truth that attaining the hard cap is not a guarantee that the project will be successful on the long run. There have been so many projects that did a very successful ICO and yet they still struggle.

[Vit83]

Look on hard cap of new ICO) they already gain a lot of money and don't need a project) Old successful projects was under 1 million of usd) and now 20-30 millions of usd) And the team have most of the tokens)

[avarnet]

Hardcap is simply the maximum amount of funds that can be collected to build a project. But that not withstanding, there are so many other underlying factors that can determine the success of a project and one is a "marketable working product".

Even today the hardcap can be manipulated by their own team. this happens usually as a result of the initial idea of cheating. so many list of projects that have the potential to scam right now due to lack of transparency in funds. there is so much evidence and examples of failed projects

[Bitze]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

so without realistic goals, good marketing and also a really very good idea it is impossible for a long time to reach the HC
who still succeeds now has in my eyes really achieved something. but even if only the SC is reached and the rest is good it is enough.

[lyks15]

Yes you are right nothing is sure or guarantee here in crypto industry even in ICO. Like you said there is no clear references. So accept the fact that all that we are doing and all thatbwe working is there is no sure and guaranteed income because it is clear at the first you invest and to work here in crypto industry.

[crispyfry211]

What ever it takes even reaches the hardcap or not I'm sure that Dencoin will be a successful project that we may invest and join,This can help us to make profits and the project was designed to help people in the future so this project has the good ideas amd not just benefits their team but also people who will use the project and invest the project.

[efrenbilantok]

I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed

[bittick]

I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed

Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap

[ned.ryerson]

I do fully agree with that, that will still depend on the experience of the team behind the project, especially the programmer and marketing manager are the two crucial for the job to be done they have to be good for the projects to grow and succeed

Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap

It is very important that project at least reach the soft cap. otherwise, the project simply will not exist. and I am surprised by projects that put a soft cap for 10-15 million dollars 

[robaya]

Hardcap aren't meant to guarantee the project success anyway. Hardcap was mainly to limit the fund that got gathered through crowdfunding in this case is ICO and that point is to give certainty and satisfaction for the ICO investors. There's nothing wrong if a project didnt reach their hardcap

your opinion is very correct, hardcap is only the determination of the target with the amount of funds that have been set. all depend on the development carried out by the team. I think you also saw a number of projects that managed to get hardcap but until now the development has not gone so well. from less good exchanges to low trading. all of that does not reflect the development that should be carried out by the team with very large funds.