Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[Onika84]

I don't see any project achieving hardcap at all lately, but even if it does, it's a great indicator that the project is good

That's not true, some projects reach hardcap in minutes or even seconds. But they did not use the ICO method but instead participated in the IEO.

[1714804228]

1714804228

[1714804228]

1714804228

[ice18]

I saw a project last year collected $100m almost reaching its hardcap this company is Envion for specific, investors on this ICO are totally rekt big loss million dollars I know has not been refunded to investors on my last news last year I dont know if there are some updates now regarding this company this is one of the best example that collecting huge amount of money is not a guarantee to success.  

[galestorm]

Yes, It solely depends on the developers whether or not the project will succeed. Reaching hardcap is not the only factor that determines a successful project, because there are some projects who do not focus on the development of the promised technology. Some projects stop there which will result to a rather faulty technology. Though based on my experience, those that i have participated in have mostly become successful, whther or not they have reached hardcap. Take Lympo as an example, as well as adbank.

[fortunecrypto]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

If they are limited in concept then investors will not support such kind of project, hardcap is very important for me if you have funds the project can move hire great developers market their platform and product, everything very much depends on funding.

[Kevlar]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Neither HARDCAP nor SOFTKAP is a guarantee of project success. In order for the project to grow several times after the release of tokens on the stock exchanges, many reasons are needed, the main of which is high popularity. Let us recall the OCEAN protocol, which all successfully collected but after a year and a half came out with a big loss ... There are a lot of such examples!

[cryp24x]

Like other traditional business, projects are like businesses that needs investors and marketing team. Since the marketing and did a great job, investors were attracted to the said project and the project became successful because of the development team. But on the other hand, when the development team did not perform well, then the success of the project will not ne guaranteed.

[kalstarzz]

yes, very hardcap is not a guarantee for the success of a project, but we also don't forget that hardcap is also a way to success.
but the most important thing in the success of the project is the consistency and professionalism of the team, this is the main requirement.

[profitgenerator212]

If the project is real and it reach its hardcap is good but that doesnt guaranteed its success when the production starts,the project might still fail ,hardcap is not the only thing that makes a project a successful one

The indicator of reaching Hardcap can be a good start to success because it shows the project appeals to many cryptocurrency investors and enthusiasts and that its why they invested. The rest of the work has to be done by the team to ensure final succeed else it fails

[joromz1226]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I've seen a lot of projects that reached hardcap, and yet some of them until now they never distribute the token rewards to their bounty participants. Ans sometimes there are ico's only reached softcap but in the end they've become more successful rather than the project who reached hardcap.

[Lexurdania]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I agree that if the target is hardcap, there is no guarantee that the price will rise and will be profitable investment. In the early period of 2018, many projects reached the hardcap target with a value of more than $ 30 million but now, the market cap value is not more than $ 1 million.

[arimamib]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I agree that if the target is hardcap, there is no guarantee that the price will rise and will be profitable investment. In the early period of 2018, many projects reached the hardcap target with a value of more than $ 30 million but now, the market cap value is not more than $ 1 million.

who can succeed in an ICO is not only hardcap income, but the developments made after the ICO process, in my opinion the ICO is the beginning of the development of a coin in the market, and hardcap is the initial target for these developments but what keeps coins alive is the continued development in do the developer of the coin which makes people believe that the coins they have the potential to be invested or used by community

[cak imin]

who can succeed in an ICO is not only hardcap income, but the developments made after the ICO process, in my opinion the ICO is the beginning of the development of a coin in the market, and hardcap is the initial target for these developments but what keeps coins alive is the continued development in do the developer of the coin which makes people believe that the coins they have the potential to be invested or used by community

yes the most important thing is development after the ICO sales process is complete. we can find developers who cannot process maximum funds from ICO sales and make their projects worse on the market. after being registered it is exchanged many fall and do not move. the developer is silent and can no longer do development. It is unfortunate that with perfect sales they cannot maximize it.

[eidoscore]

If they are limited in concept then investors will not support such kind of project, hardcap is very important for me if you have funds the project can move hire great developers market their platform and product, everything very much depends on funding.

hardcap is indeed important in a project that is running, but the problem is that some projects end in a scam even though the hardcap target has been reached, and it returns to the developer itself

[OneCoinMan]

Lol, you discovered America. I do not see any logic here. Of course, if the project has a hardcap, this does not mean that it is successful. What is important is the project itself, and the amount of money raised.

[BeManga]

If the project is real and it reach its hardcap is good but that doesnt guaranteed its success when the production starts,the project might still fail ,hardcap is not the only thing that makes a project a successful one

i agree its not really about hardcap to make the ico succesful . its about the project development and features. if the coin or token will have demands or you can use it in some platform it can become succesful if they have some solid team behind it.

[hahahafr]

Sure, attaining hardcap is not a full guarantee that a project will succeed. only a good use case supported with products can help a project succeed in this crypto market. I learnt this very lesson way back in 2017 when there were so many ICOs but most of them are dead now.

[Shallow]

That's totally true and I agree with you. There are most projects which were filled with hype thus achieving Hardcap and till today they are either nowhere to be found or the price is terrible.
What matters in a project is the team and the concept behind the project, thus with the little funds at hand, could be from softcap they will start off while working out ways to further develop their products.

[mekar sari]

I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market

[wack slacker]

I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market

Indeed, everything depends on the project and also the developer team. If the developer team is active and establishes many partnerships with many large companies, the community will expand and prices can rise.

Most importantly, they do everything written in their whitepaper and roadmap.  The value of the project depends on how they put their application into practice.  In 2017 there were many projects that mobilized ICO to achieve a huge hardcap and now the IEO only mobilizes smaller amounts.  I wonder how they can afford to develop their projects until they succeed.  In terms of profits from an IEO investment higher than the ICO is indisputable.

[Barracuda]

I agree, the Hardcap is no guarantee that the project will succeed because I have seen the project get a Hardcap, there is no surprise in the market, prices dropped far and were difficult to rise, I personally rate all depends on the team how they can convince traders to buy coin on the market

That is why the project must require a product so that demand is created when it is marketed later. And I also strongly agree that hardcap is not a guarantee that a future project can succeed or not. Because it all depends on the development of the project in order to be successful in the future.