Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[daporivera]

personally, an ICO  project reaching it hard cap is not in anyway an indicator that the project will succeed. a lot of project in the past met their hard cap and still turned out not to be  a success. success of an ico project all boil down to the team.

[1714809837]

1714809837

[1714809837]

1714809837

[1714809837]

1714809837

[Maxre]

sometimes projects that have achieved hardcap do not really achieve it but only marketing manipulation from the team so that people believe in the project.

[suryana]

The fact that the project collects hardcaps only says that investors believed in the project, and the team did everything right to deliver the project. And further it will depend on how they translate these ideas into a product, and whether the market situation will change.

Not necessarily, sometimes investors also believe in the project that has only achieved the target softcap. Hardcap is not a guarantee that the project will grow better in the future. We can see the issue where many of the managers project carry a runaway investor's money.

[ishirut009]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

even if an ico only makes it to the soft cap, it can prosper as soon as the project is sound and they have a dedicative team that works hard every single day to make things happen. Hitting the hardcap might got some of the disadvantages as well like the project is so hyped.

[uniquark]

hardcap only shows that investors believed in that particular project. but this trust doesn't guarantee that developers will succeed in the future.

At the same time, a successful fundraising suggests that the project has enough money for listing and exchanges and for further development. With projects that have not raised money, things are completely different.

It is an advantage for the project team with a large amount of money to maintain and develop the project. However, it depends very much on how to use that money reasonably

[hazidofasa]

The hard caps of different projects can be very different from each other. Some of them try to raise $25 million, others $3 million. It is interesting, that many investors do not invest their money in projects with low hard cap, considering such investments unprofitable or assuming that later spent efforts will not be repaid completely. However, over time specific drawbacks began to rear their ugly heads. Fake and fraudulent ICOs left investors in the lurch, which meant genuine projects were soon facing more difficulties during the funding and marketing stages. Now, it's a time of IEO'S and hard cap is guarantee that the project will succeed in IEO. Moozicore also serves their services in the market.https://tokensale.moozicore.com/

[daenarys_stormborn]

yes, I agree with you, because the project reaches hardcap, it is not certain that the coin will increase in price when listing in any exchange, because the development of the project behind the coin will greatly affect the price

[o.ogurlu]

Yes, I think the fact that a project reaches the hard cap does not necessarily mean that project will be successful. I think the important thing is how the team members of that project used the money which they collected at ICO. If the team members use that money to develop the project, then the project is successful.

[Slavyanskiy]

Yes, I think the fact that a project reaches the hard cap does not necessarily mean that project will be successful. I think the important thing is how the team members of that project used the money which they collected at ICO. If the team members use that money to develop the project, then the project is successful.

Of course, it’s important how the team members spend money. It is even better when investors would have the opportunity to track the spending that the project carries out. But usually projects do not provide any reporting, and this is not correct.

[Daffadile]

I have seen projects reach high caps but still, the price dropped. I have a feeling they faked that volume. You have to check the contract address to make sure the adequate amount of eth has been sent to justify the cap they claim to have reached. If it is legit and they did claim cap then I do think that makes the project a better choice then most. It is not the only thing though as you say.

[lousie9]

Yes, I think the fact that a project reaches the hard cap does not necessarily mean that project will be successful. I think the important thing is how the team members of that project used the money which they collected at ICO. If the team members use that money to develop the project, then the project is successful.

This project will definitely succeed in carrying out its actual business but the problem is that the price of the tokens they stretch when selling ICOs are many that fail to maintain prices when entering the market, so hardcap cannot be a reference that these tokens will get a good price when they enter the market.

[santiPOGI]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

A project ICO which took a hardcap reached is a successful start of the team.
This will ensure the investors that the project will go and will be listed in an exchange.
THough this hardcap is not an assurance that the project will have a bright and successful future.

[arimamib]

yes, I agree with you, because the project reaches hardcap, it is not certain that the coin will increase in price when listing in any exchange, because the development of the project behind the coin will greatly affect the price

But people are not just investing a lot of money in a project, so it means that people are interested in something, I think that the projects that have reached hardcap should be considered

""
I always think that achieving hardcap is the beginning of a project to do work in accordance with the road map they are plan, because if it's only focused on the sales process, the planned is only a plan. in this case I think all aspects of a project must run optimally from the starting to develop it.

[Fireag]

Definitely not a guarantee of success. I know the projects that have collected a lot of money, have not done anything. People are just in shock, and the price of a coin has dropped 100 or more times.

[CoinsOrDie]

Although ICO might suggest that a project meets the fancy of the cryptocurrency community but without achieving finished products in terms minimum value products, partnerships and a good market value, then the project wouldn't be assumed to be fully successful

[Zulkifli BI]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

if a project has reached hardcap then it is definitely successful ... because all projects have sales targets up to hardcap ... so I disagree if you say there is no guarantee of success if a project has reached hardcap ... because one of the factors is the success or failure of a project determined by the amount of sales ... so if it has reached hardcap then it is guaranteed success ...

[MBMauL]

if a project has reached hardcap then it is definitely successful ... because all projects have sales targets up to hardcap ... so I disagree if you say there is no guarantee of success if a project has reached hardcap ... because one of the factors is the success or failure of a project determined by the amount of sales ... so if it has reached hardcap then it is guaranteed success ...

it is not a certainty. even though they have a lot of money they don't necessarily succeed in using the money they have collected to develop their projects. even some who have reached hardcap, the products of their projects are not in the market's interest. it is a very bad thing.

[mulia sabee]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I agree with your thoughts about the success of ICO that achieved hardcap does not guarantee that the project will be successful in the future ... because many altcoins have died in several markets, making the coin price down and no progress at all ... even though there are some coins able to survive strongly in several markets after the ICO was able to reach hardcap ...

[Spaffin]

I would like to see a rating or a table of all those companies over the past year.  I am sure that no company has shown a good result.  Even before the end of 2017, some ico company managed to assemble a hard cap, but Nil was the final stage of their success, because now these projects lie at the bottom of the cryptocurrency market.

[Moeda]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Don't you see a project that from its source ICO has also been successful, and is now circulating in the market. Which has brought a lot of income for all of us, both investment and bounty. If the team managing the project comes from a trusted or verified team, I'm sure the project will be successful.