Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[ricardobs]

What ever it takes even reaches the hardcap or not I'm sure that Dencoin will be a successful project that we may invest and join,This can help us to make profits and the project was designed to help people in the future so this project has the good ideas amd not just benefits their team but also people who will use the project and invest the project.

Yes it has never been a guarantee that the project will succeed and I think that ICO has been rejected by the mass crypto users because of the lacking points and the shortcomings that made people loose their money. So I think that even if there is a ICOs with great ability to achieve the hard cap and maybe a great project, people might still not invest.

[1714821067]

1714821067

[1714821067]

1714821067

[1714821067]

1714821067

[1714821067]

1714821067

[1714821067]

1714821067

[Stanlo]

Many good projects I know of never did  introduce any form of fund raising e g ICO and I still wonder why they always do better than the ones that are funded

[Toraynt]

But if a project collects the maximum amount of funds, we can say that people like the project, of course hardcap is not the most important thing in the project

[smyslov]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Investors are now staying away from ICO and they have a good reason to be, millions of dollars have been lost in ICO, and there are now better alternatives, like STO and IEO so why risk investing in ICO when there is a much safer environment and profitable too.

[spike420211]

Nowadays, nothing guarantees the success of a project, except that if a project conducts an IEO on the basis of such exchanges as Binance, Huobi or Okex, all other IEO projects are of little profit.

[cribusen]

There is general no guarantee that a project will succeed and it definitely does not depend on money that they raised. There were some teams that collected 75 million USD and failed to make a good project. The only thing that they did, they dropped the price by 15 times.

[Gayong88]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Most projects that reach the hardcap in the future do not guarantee that they will grow or even the price of the coins will decline. But there are also those who reach the hardcap and the project is indeed developing. So it all seems to depend on the project how to respond to the future by reaching hardcap.

There are many things that become a benchmark for evaluating an ico project to succeed or not, the perspective of each person is different. Usually a Project has exposure to both the vision and mission and the time limit. This is where we need to adjust the data and facts when they describe it.

[Korkorjkk]

ICO also counts in the success of a project, because if there is no money, then how can the project move on. The main thing that moves a project is the team, when the team is dedicated and ready to push the project to all lengths, then it will be successful.

[AgentZero23]

I have seen ICO's have raised the hardcap and still couldn't deliver the roadmap and having slow progress. That's why the token price is dropping and the volume is low and it's disappointing knowing they have the money to get things done. However, kudos to other projects even though they have limited budget still they have progress and have a working product.

[elpiji]

achieving hardcap means that projects can easily develop because they have a lot of funds but even though the project reaches hardcap it does not mean that the price of tokens when listing will have very high value, because high value means that their products are in great demand by many people. now there are a number of projects that reach hardcap but their products fail, because developers don't work properly ... so I fully agree with you

[elcoblast]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

yes nothing one point can be a the benchmark for the success of an ico campaign even though they have reached the point of sale.
but in other case if some campaign launching an IEO is better than conventional ico campign directly to developer wallet

[Nekoma2018]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Why would a project that was able to raise enough money for its idea or aim not succeed, if it wasn't scam from the start

[Averim]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

There is no guarantee for any project no matter the gaddered money. Everything is about the risks you are ready to take.

[Nekoma2018]

Investors should be very careful on what they put their money on..I've seen quite a good number of projects that wasnt able to raise up to 3k usd but claims theyve achieved their softcap

[Nekoma2018]

Projects like these are normally goes to zero in value in a matter of minutes during exchange listing.. because there was no real investors from the start... just imaginary investors brought up by the team

[pelumi20]

I personally think meeting hardcap should not be a yardstick to judge a project whether it will be successful or not. I have seen projects with Hardcap but still řailed and I have seen projects that didn't meet their Hardcap but they still became successful.

[sieemma]

The fact is that this projects are not in to bring something new into the crypto space but rather to fetch their part of the money that is in crypto. Reaching hardcap in an ico has nothing to do with how the intentions of the project will come into reality

[ricardobs]

Nowadays, nothing guarantees the success of a project, except that if a project conducts an IEO on the basis of such exchanges as Binance, Huobi or Okex, all other IEO projects are of little profit.

To be honest, I do not believe in ICO anymore because the projects have not yet been so good in achieving their hard cap and yes there might be some good ICOs out there as well but the overall demand for IEO has been pretty much higher than what it had been for ICO. This is the reason I think we should focus more on IEO for future benefits.

[Anonylz]

For a long time now ico's have been finding it very difficult to achieve hardcap, some can't even reach softcap, mostly because of the just ending bear market, and also because most ico's are not meeting up with expectations of investors, the post-ico effect where the ico will dump up -70% of ico price is another reason,
Most ico now lie about reaching their target but after ico the project is unable to develop properly,
Others who managed to meet their target can't manage the funds properly so the project becomes unsuccessful, always somebody among the team will be greedy that is beginning of problem.
Hardcap or not, any dedicated team will work hard to make their project a success no matter the recourse available.

[ansarose1]

Yes it is true that reaching the hard cap of the project means to be successful, because even projects reached its hard cap doen't grow further and in the long run their tokens still not that good price to invest with. However reaching a hard cap is also a good thing for a project because several of the projects are not that kind of thing that it could reach its soft cap.