CWC2019 Prediction Pool - Win x BTC [Additional prize in every round]

[Little Mouse]

4.38 RR, not very much imoressive. Losing one or two more wicket earlier can lead NZ to a small score. Two new batsman are in the pitch. I guess it will be tough for NZ to score more than 250 from this situation.

[AB de Royse777]

4.38 RR, not very much imoressive. Losing one or two more wicket earlier can lead NZ to a small score. Two new batsman are in the pitch. I guess it will be tough for NZ to score more than 250 from this situation.

New Zealand should score more than 250 runs. They are playing slow. Not sure if this is the pitch but one have to say that English bowlers are bowling very well. My hope for sharing the first place is still alive :-)

Okay here I see an issue, I need feedback:

More than one winner in the same category share the prize equally.

How are you guys translating it? I am asking because we have very good chance to see three members may have the same points for the first place if New Zealand wins.

How do we share the price then:

~ Add the prize for 1 to 3 and then divide them by three for the top three?
~ Divide the prize of first place only by three? In this case we will see more people in the winning list and will share the prize. We may also see 1st place users were getting less prize amount than 2nd or even third place holder :-P

Sorry, I never thought that we will have that close competition which will need more clear terms.

[RapTarX]

4.38 RR, not very much imoressive. Losing one or two more wicket earlier can lead NZ to a small score. Two new batsman are in the pitch. I guess it will be tough for NZ to score more than 250 from this situation.

New Zealand should score more than 250 runs. They are playing slow. Not sure if this is the pitch but one have to say that English bowlers are bowling very well. My hope for sharing the first place is still alive :-)

England is bowling better than the other match they did, probably the pitch is helping as well. However, pitch will not help much NZ later I guess.

[FIFA worldcup]

4.38 RR, not very much imoressive. Losing one or two more wicket earlier can lead NZ to a small score. Two new batsman are in the pitch. I guess it will be tough for NZ to score more than 250 from this situation.

New Zealand should score more than 250 runs. They are playing slow. Not sure if this is the pitch but one have to say that English bowlers are bowling very well. My hope for sharing the first place is still alive :-)

Okay here I see an issue, I need feedback:

More than one winner in the same category share the prize equally.

How are you guys translating it? I am asking because we have very good chance to see three members may have the same points for the first place if New Zealand wins.

How do we share the price then:

~ Add the prize for 1 to 3 and then divide them by three for the top three?
~ Divide the prize of first place only by three? In this case we will see more people in the winning list and will share the prize. We may also see 1st place users were getting less prize amount than 2nd or even third place holder :-P

Sorry, I never thought that we will have that close competition which will need more clear terms.

In case of a tie in the first position, ignore all those who are tied and give the prizes to 6th , 7th and 8th position.
Or you may divide the prize to the first 10 toppers .  (Easy for you to calculate)

[AB de Royse777]

Aha! This is interesting :-P



Did you guys notice it?

[Harkorede]

Aha! This is interesting :-P



Did you guys notice it?

Yes, I noticed this from the semi finals.

A win for New Zealand would see you claim first prize, any thing different will see myself and/or win the 1st and second prizes.

[Little Mouse]

5th gone and it was a poor short from Nesham. It's now I think safe to say NZ will not get more than 250. In that case, England will get an easy win. What do you guys think? Will it be more than 250?

[Thanasis]

5th gone and it was a poor short from Nesham. It's now I think safe to say NZ will not get more than 250. In that case, England will get an easy win. What do you guys think? Will it be more than 250?

Don't forget the semis also feels like same but the low score is enough to defend the team India to reach final so they might recreate the same thing here as well.

[Harkorede]

5th gone and it was a poor short from Nesham. It's now I think safe to say NZ will not get more than 250. In that case, England will get an easy win. What do you guys think? Will it be more than 250?

250+ still look achievable. However, I think any score below 300 could be easily chased by England.

5th gone and it was a poor short from Nesham. It's now I think safe to say NZ will not get more than 250. In that case, England will get an easy win. What do you guys think? Will it be more than 250?

Don't forget the semis also feels like same but the low score is enough to defend the team India to reach final so they might recreate the same thing here as well.

AFAIK India could have won the game if the match had continue the same day.

[FIFA worldcup]

5th gone and it was a poor short from Nesham. It's now I think safe to say NZ will not get more than 250. In that case, England will get an easy win. What do you guys think? Will it be more than 250?

The last 5 overs are important for New Zealand. If they manage to score 250, it might be a competitive score. England has a long batting line up and NZ has to make sure they at least score 250 and then defend it with a decent bowling attack.

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

The last 5 overs are important for New Zealand. If they manage to score 250, it might be a competitive score. England has a long batting line up and NZ has to make sure they at least score 250 and then defend it with a decent bowling attack.

Well seems like England is taking the advantage of the last five overs. Another soft dismissal and this time Grandhomme. If you guys is not going to play shot then don't hit! There are no point of hitting soft.

[UmerIdrees]

~snip~

The last 5 overs are important for New Zealand. If they manage to score 250, it might be a competitive score. England has a long batting line up and NZ has to make sure they at least score 250 and then defend it with a decent bowling attack.

Well seems like England is taking the advantage of the last five overs. Another soft dismissal and this time Grandhomme. If you guys is not going to play shot then don't hit! There are no point of hitting soft.

I do not understand the approach from NZ batsmen. Why aren't they were hitting hard. Most of them got catch out by hitting a half hearted shots. Even the last ball was ducked by NZ batsmen. Strange.  

England only need to play 50 Overs (and not bowled out) and they will Win this final.

[Little Mouse]

England only need to play 50 Overs (and not bowled out) and they will Win this final.

Bairstaw gone now. It's not that easy as you think. Can you guess now why NZ can't hit. England had bowled well, so does NZ. The pitch is helping as well. Looks like it will be hard for England to win the match.
Who will be the choker of chokers 

[JSRAW]

Its game of nerves ladies.

[FIFA worldcup]

Its game of nerves ladies.

Its anyone game from here on. England has made 80 Runs and still 80 + 80 = 160  runs still need to be made. Who will keep the neves.
I can't keep my nerves.

Edit:  Morgan Out  (Its a catch of the tournament)

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

Its anyone game from here on. England has made 80 Runs and still 80 + 80 = 160  runs still need to be made. Who will keep the neves.
I can't keep my nerves.

Edit:  Morgan Out  (Its a catch of the tournament)

New Zealand is in the driving seat. The only way England can save this match is to make a big partnership between Stokes and Buttler. If any of them gone then England will most provably out!

History LOL

~snip~

In case of a tie in the first position, ignore all those who are tied and give the prizes to 6th , 7th and 8th position.
Or you may divide the prize to the first 10 toppers .  (Easy for you to calculate)

:-P

Guys I need some realistic feedback. Please.

How do we share the price then:

~ Add the prize for 1 to 3 and then divide them by three for the top three?
~ Divide the prize of first place only by three? In this case we will see more people in the winning list and will share the prize. We may also see 1st place users were getting less prize amount than 2nd or even third place holder :-P

Sorry, I never thought that we will have that close competition which will need more clear terms.

 

[Little Mouse]

Its game of nerves ladies.

Its anyone game from here on. England has made 80 Runs and still 80 + 80 = 160  runs still need to be made. Who will keep the neves.
I can't keep my nerves.

Edit:  Morgan Out  (Its a catch of the tournament)

For now, match is almost out of England's hand. RR is beyond 6 and it's increasing. If NZ can get Butlar or Stoke before 150, they will officially win the match  
The match is more interested than I thought.

~ Divide the prize of first place only by three? In this case we will see more people in the winning list and will share the prize. We may also see 1st place users were getting less prize amount than 2nd or even third place holder :-P

This doesn't sound cool that 1st place will get less than 2nd. Better you divide all of them equally.

[UmerIdrees]

Its game of nerves ladies.

Its anyone game from here on. England has made 80 Runs and still 80 + 80 = 160  runs still need to be made. Who will keep the neves.
I can't keep my nerves.

Edit:  Morgan Out  (Its a catch of the tournament)

For now, match is almost out of England's hand. RR is beyond 6 and it's increasing. If NZ can get Butlar or Stoke before 150, they will officially win the match  
The match is more interested than I thought.

~ Divide the prize of first place only by three? In this case we will see more people in the winning list and will share the prize. We may also see 1st place users were getting less prize amount than 2nd or even third place holder :-P

This doesn't sound cool that 1st place will get less than 2nd. Better you divide all of them equally.

Buttlar and Stokes are looking comfortable now and they can easily take the game away from NewZealand.  Its time NZ take another wicket otherwise it might be too late.

[Harkorede]

snip

I think the best thing to do is in case of ties both user splits both prizes.

Ex: If there are 2 (or 3) people tied for 1st position, then they should both Share the 1st and 2nd (and 3d) position prizes equally, The same thing should apply If have 3 or more ties, they split the prizes equally. That's the most logical approach IMO.

[Little Mouse]

What's going on? Can't remember when I have seen such an interesing match. Match tied. Will it be super over? England has been all out. Never seen such match. It's thrilling.
Super over in progress.