ICO investors are more excited on exchanges than product developments?

[Getmon]

Because they are excited to earn than to use whatever products the projects are offering or launching. They invest in ICOs that have the most potential to give them profit rather than on the ICOs that would offer the best product. It is very obvious why. They invest to earn. And once they earn enough profit from their investment, they will leave the project just like that.

[Maturnuwun]

because they want to get tangible benefits like when their ico project has been completed and tokens can be traded in exchange, on the other hand there are a lot of good ico projects but the product doesn't work well.

[Obito]

Well what is the point of all going hard work when they wouldn't be in any of the exchange. They got excited because they got motivated with such announcement. To think of it they are already half way of becoming successful. I may be not part of it but I will be happy as well. In addition rest assured that they will be working harder after that.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

Maybe if everything balanced, any problem can be avoided. Because for me, maybe 2 years is very long time if no listed in exchange, and usually a lot of investor already tired to wait. And about what happen recently if investor only ask to listed in exchange, i think maybe 1-2 exchange first as long developers keep update with the project will be good. For now after listed, usually developer look not really care anymore.

[Pearls Before Swine]

I mean there is no sense for the update if the coin/tokens is not tradeable it will not create hype .

This was the first thing I thought when I read the op.

I'm not a bounty hunter and don't follow all the ico projects that have cropped up in the past few years, so I wasn't aware that *any* of them were doing what op described.  Not getting a token listed on an exchange seems like a perplexing move at best and something scammy at worst.  Are bounty hunters getting paid in tokens that don't get listed for a long time or what?  If that's the case it would be yet another slap in their faces by the project devs.

Can't think of a good reason why a project wouldn't try to get their token listed.  'Working on the technology' sounds like an excuse, because no team has to do choose between doing one or the other, and it isn't like there aren't exchanges out there that wouldn't leap at the chance to list a new token.  Maybe they don't want to see how badly the token is going to perform on the market?  I think by delaying listing it only delays the inevitable selling wave that's going to happen once it does get listed. 

I don't know, this sort of practice seems very shady to me.

[Winscosinally]

It doesn't make sense when a project successfully raise fund and refuse to list on exchange, it can't be trusted, the only projects that wait that long are those who failed to meet their target, they surely will find it hard to proceed with development

[LouVandetta]

Sadly, that's how it is nowadays. People's only concern now is when the token/coin hits the exchange.
They don't really want to know what the development of the project or whatsoever, they only want something profitable. Who doesn't, right?

With how many scammed ICOs, they're kinda scared that if the project doesn't come to an exchange sooner, then the project will be considered a scammed one.
And it's also in their roadmap, about when it goes to exchange and all, but if it's out of schedule, then people started to questioning them.

[DabsPoorVersion]

Naturally,  we could say that listing token in an exchange is always part of the plan in every project, so why do they have to let their investors to wait for a long time before listing in an exchange, dumping of coins will always happen even if they delay it. Investors are after for making a profit, it's only natural to become excited upon listing once they have already make a profit.

[btcdie]

That I know of projects like ICO that are able to list on well-known exchanges, means the project / product is clear and has a lot of interest. Every exchange must conduct a token voting event first. so that it can be registered, and all of that must have a limit or a minimum of tokens must be reached before being listed on the exchange. A good project will definitely choose to be quickly listed on a well-known exchange, and that is also a form of promotion to get to know the product more broadly in my opinion.

Those are some reasons investors want to know how big the project is and on average investors want to know the profit generated. so it's appropriate, sometimes investors are also in a hurry because of the daily needs / fulfill their economic life.

Many scam project able to list on Big exchange so that investors will stop complaining about the price. Investors has zero interest on the development but the profit only. Just like Walton chain. They are listed on big exchange lile binance but they have plagiarized code of ETH when they recently show there code.

do exchanges like binance have tokens or scam coins?
of course not right?
big exchange is the dream of a project, because this is also a form of product promotion that is marketed. if their products are favored by investors, this is certainly a feature of the project to be successful. Of course the project being developed will be more advanced, this is more preferred by people and supply is increasingly in demand, in fact this makes prices soar. so investors also feel the profit. You are right, in fact, investors are only looking for profit, but investors also need project development so that prices will also increase.

[aprilnot]

at the moment I think no one really supports the new project. because investors are currently only profit oriented. so it's normal if they are more interested in the market than developing the project itself. I don't blame them because that's the best. wholeheartedly supporting the project will only make you lose at the end. time, Dana, your feelings are just a waste, because sooner or later the project will just die.

[zenhu]

Its complicated thing in crypto world, especially when we talk about ICO. Investors are more exicited when their token already on exchange because they can liquidates their own. I think its short term investment, but its have high risk if we are late just an hour to exchange it.
Then they don't really care about roduct developments because they afraid to be scammed, because didn't use 'free' money, and don't know exactly about the project.
Every decision have reason to make sure what we choose is the best, may be that is conditions what they feel.

[Google+]

Investors do not just look at it from an ordinary exchange place because at this time many places of exchange are created but do not have a good development even they cannot get a lot of capital because I think investors have not dared to invest capital in large amounts because they have too many scams by several projects.

[BigBos]

IMO, it's natural that investors want to see that these tokens have a high price, cus the price of the token illustrates how useful the product they are making. no matter they develop product 2.0 or who they work with, most investors want results, not just unnecessary developments.

yes, on the one hand, it is not entirely a mistake of development, but investor awareness. Investor awareness is also needed to make coin prices because the development of a product cannot be done like turning the palm of the hand. it requires quite a long time. if Team has a new product for development, an investor must be an awareness that Team has worked hard to for upgrade the price and work hard from the team needs to be appreciated

in this case, investors and developers have their own shortcomings. it's just that I feel that investors need to be careful choosing a project and know everything about the product that will be produced by a project because sometimes things don't work out easily like what we think.

[NewRanger]

Investors do not just look at it from an ordinary exchange place because at this time many places of exchange are created but do not have a good development even they cannot get a lot of capital because I think investors have not dared to invest capital in large amounts because they have too many scams by several projects.

in fact if projects able listing in reputable exchanges such as binance or huobi they consider as if all roadmap finished developted.exchanges reputation could bring hype in market ,roadmap and product be second number.investors thinking if developers team able bring project to binance or other good exchanges ,they are serious  with their projects.and now many presumption ,exchanges representated developers team seriousness .

[knuckey]

Unfortunately it is a fact that we often see and we find in every moment after ico is finished. Such behavior continues to occur and investors continue to demand that tokens can be immediately listed on the exchange, they want return for their investment and do not care about the development and future of the project itself. But sometimes some new projects promise to be immediately listed in exchange after the sale of tokens is complete and this is also often listed in every road map that makes investors claim their rights that is profit.

[albrots]

I have also participated in projects that have not yet been listed on any exchange. The reason they are not listed in any exchange is to keep their coins from being dumped and discarded by participants who follow their bounties. But it greatly affected investors who bought coins at the beginning of the ICO. eventually there will be a lot of speculation, ranging from scams, fraudsters and others.

[biddicoin]

i totally agree with this, many investors get excited when the coin listed on big exchange than product development

in my humble opinions, this is very reasonable. when coins listed on big exchange, the price is often pump so hard

most of investors just wanna take a short profit from their investement. that's why listed on exchange make them excited rather than product development

[InwardContour]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

I definitely agree with you, most investors are more concerned with exchange listing update rather than product development or other remarkable milestones achieved. The truth is that everyone in crypto space is also in for the money, even if you are a tech savy or also concerned about what will happen to crypto in coming years. Personally, I prefer product news before exchange listing update since it will even help build confidence in holders not to dump in a hurry. Also, for me it's better a project doesn't list at all than listing on a crappie exchange with almost negligible liquidity, forcing the price down with great margin. We just have to be patient about exchange listing if a project is cool with development, even though exchange listing is very important.

[Hamphser]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

This is in terms of money making that's why ICO investors are too excited to dump their tokens because it happens all the time, when the developers are also the one that you have to blame for automatically dumping when the tokens got listed on an exchange. If there would be some kind of rules or codes that could stop them from dumping those tokens when listed that they are allowed to sell it on a period of time. That would be so helpful for the project.

[Findingnemo]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

First of all investors are here for profits not to get anything developed so asking them to wait without any specific time period is more likely scamming them.

And from the project's point of view its definitely good to get the final product to list on the exchange but is there really need for it? Even after than this is going to be another bump and dump coin or token.

Actually I agree with you since I lose huge money for believing on one ICO coin telling that there exchange will come out and the price will boom way back 2018 that's why i'm so skeptical by now and want to get out with those token if there's a chance since I don't want to get the same outcome since it's so stressful when you see the tokens you hold is dumping to much and the only choice you have is to hold since you are afraid to lose if you sell on low price.

Its the time for you make a decision whether you come out with some amount of loss or waiting to get the price boomed,it may not even happen so act smart and invest that money from token into coin like bitcoin where you have high hope of getting returns in the long run which is comparatively better than holding a shit coin with no hope.