ICO investors are more excited on exchanges than product developments?

[romanij]

This will of investors is justified. Developers and organizers of the ICO project are obliged to follow their roadmap or whitepaper. If this does not happen it gives a hint that the organizers are not coping with their task. People feel sorry for their money because they believed in the project in vain and spent personal funds on it.

[1714502338]

1714502338

[1714502338]

1714502338

[1714502338]

1714502338

[1714502338]

1714502338

[1714502338]

1714502338

[ableh]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

Yeah right, even after the tokens are listed on the exchange, they are still angry because the price is very far different from the ICO. If like this, they should not choose to become an investor, but rather become a short trader after the token is listed on the exchange. Because basically, an investment requires a long period of time to return the capital and get a profit.

[abeecrypto]

Why won’t they be? Most projects are always giving early-bird investors huge discounts; after buying, they try to sell quickly in order to make profit. Many of recent investors are not too interested in the project’s product development. And that is not good for the blockchain community.

[xiboothrezi]

----
This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

This is something complex. Naturally, if investors want their capital to return soon, especially after several years have passed. Supposedly, if the development team is really consistent in developing the product, especially if it is always actively communicating the development of the project, that's actually a very good thing, right? We also need to realize that market conditions are still less conducive, so why not rush, let them work and investors need to be patient, hopefully when listing everything can be happy.

[oktana]

investors are just afraid of being trapped in the same pattern because 2018-2019 is full of ico that does not keep its promises. ideally after ICO, the projects they offer are already working transparently, no longer in the form of raw projects. In other cases, most developers also prioritize revenue team as a result of their hard work, and put investors in second place after project development. Not a few developers who really triggered the sale of their own tokens from the start. So investors have their own trauma.

[kooboat]

Most people who venture into cryptocurrencies are in for the money and not technology. That is the real fact for most investors, for product development and the technology that comes with the various projects crypto enthusiasts especially investors are not interested since that is seen as a long term thing.

[Kemarit]

those aren't "investors" that you are talking about. it seems like you are talking about the "owners" or in other words the "creators" of the ICO. and it is apparent that they don't want their token to be dumped to oblivion and the only thing that they cared about was receiving the money they raised through their ICO scam. which is why they no longer do any meaningful work apart from making false promises and fake news.

Right, I'm supposed that the creators or the owners knows that listing their tokens right away will cause a massive dump on prices of their products, so they want to hold as much so that they can create more money out of it. And then when they got listed, majority of them are the first people who are going to dump it right away, win-win for them. And don't bother to create any enhancements because they are moving forward on another project, rinse and repeat for those scammers.

[Immakillya]

It's an easy money. What else do they want? To be honest, people are buying ICO for one purpose only. To get quick money. They grab token as much as they can and dump it when it hits an exchange. That's natural here in cryptocurrency market. You have to be fast. So you won't be left behind. Some ICOs after hitting an exchange doesn't recover after massive dump. So better dump it before it's too late. Investors doesn't care much on the development. That's why in this environment only the best project survives and weak projects dies.

[deadsilent]

We can't do anything about that. Investors doesn't care that much about the full potential of the project. I can't blame them because it makes you quick money. It's a chain reaction. When people dumps huge amount, the price is likely to call and that's what's other investors is fearing about. The fear of left behind. But there are few out there who are still waiting for the development because they knew that could make huge gain if they wait for the finished product. But that's risky also. It could book or not. So what else do they do?

[boltz]

That is the harsh true , yes . Investors care nowadays to list on good exchanges like " When binance ? when moon ? " and this can only hurt the project because those investors who are asking for good exchanges without a working product are those who are looking to get rich quick or over night spamming " When lambo ? ". What they don't know is that good exchanges won't list them even if they pay the fee in order to be there as they don't have a working product that have tested and already ready to be implemented.

Personally, I'm the guy who patiently waiting for the project to get a strong working product and deliver as much high-tech as they can and then focus in exchanges as some point they will receive tons of offers to be listed.

[BlackFor3st]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

I totally agree with it. If you are investors, are you not happy when your investment will double in just few months or even more than that? That is why most of the investors didn't care about the project itself they only care for their return of investment.

Most of the investors are investing their money as they think that they can easily get a profit therefore a project that needs more development rather than focusing on marketing and exchanges it will be best that they should stop any fundraising or else they will receive lot's of complains from the investors. Raising a funds will help the development faster therefore if they are taking too long to develop the project it only means that they don't know how to use the funds that they gather in order to speed up everything.

[minairia3]

Can't dwell with those people. Of course they wanted to see their money grows. I think most investors are like this, but of course there are people who believe in the project even for long term, but this is rare cases. Also noticed that investors now, wanted a get away quick rich scheme. So they tend to invest in IEO rather focus on product development. If its about product and services, I'll invest in huge firm such as Libra and Gram those two are probably big and has potential for long term.

[fortunecrypto]

Developers should understand the motivation of investors, they invited developers to support their project, they are not supporting it out of charity, they want to see it's potential in the market as well, the investors will always request exchanges because the parameters to see if the coin has a good future or will be supported, I will not be surprised if this kind of project will land a complaint in the scam section.

[Ailmand]

Most investors are investing in a project because of income and not in the product or project. That is why a lot of investors always ask for exchange listing when investing in a new project. I am not saying that listing a new project into an exchange right away is bad, but investors must understand that this would only slow down the project development because of the amount of money that would cost the team to get listed in a decent exchange which should have been used for the product development.

[meliodas]

Hard truth but yes. Most of the ICO investors are in the project because they want a quick profit. I know a lot of people within my circle that are ICO hunter back in the old days when ICO was still a hype. They always look for ICOs and they don't do much research about it and they just invest their money and wait for the listing and sell their tokens at a 20-50% return.

[Gontxi]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

Announce with exchange market fro ICO coin very excited for investor than ICO announce with their real product, give very positive effect price and increase higher than 50% if ICO announce new exchange market than publish with new product adopt by an altcoin, new product not give positive effect for price increase to higher and keep not interested with investor.

[Kyraishi]

This is the reality nowadays, but I don't know if you agree or not.

As what I have observed since last year, lots of ICO investors are more excited and making some noise when a crypto startup announced that they will be listed in some exchanges.

I have browsed a lot of Telegram groups coming from various ICOs, IEOs and other forms of token sales. When they announce their partnership with a "XXX" company or they have launched their v2.0 of their product, it seems that the community are kind of less impressed and not excited about that.

Last year, there's an ICO where until now, they haven't listed in an exchange as they focused more on product development. It's like almost 2 years and they haven't listed their token yet in exchanges but they only give us a quarterly report on what they're doing with the product. It results for most investors to become impatient and demand their money back or getting listed to exchanges at least.

This is what I've been observing for now, the behavior of most investors who are expecting their returns or gains after the ICO is complete. What do you say guys? Agree with this or not?

It's because those investors are the new breed of them, that don't really care about growing a product and a long term investment, they just want some quick profits from crypto, and having liquidity means easier profits.

Most of these investors are coming from the real market and are coming in with the mindset that crypto is essentially just free money in the current state, and they obviously get impatient when they don't get their way.

[huu78]

I agree with you, the investor prefers a quick profit when the ICO or IEO is finished so that their money continues to spin not on hold by the project's still growing party. So most ICO or IEO is now no longer in demand because their projects are rambling and very long to list on market exchanges.
Although the list on the exchanges is faster the price also often drops from investors forecasts and makes losses. It has been this way the crypto development today, we have to follow their flow or will be left later in the future.

[alexsandria]

Because they have no problem with listing on several exchanges anymore. That's worthy of a toast mate. Though I find it little bit complicated 'cause what if they failed after that right? Listing is more like just a waste. Nevertheless, they might be able to see more an inspiration to furthermore push through on their way to success though still a long way to go.

[Peanyut991]

Yes, I agree, the fact is that investors are more interested in ICOs who announce their partnership with the  exchange, rather than with their products. ICO or IEO which has partners with well-known exchanges like Binance will surely be successful, because that's how investors assess ICO or IEO projects.