ICO investors are more excited on exchanges than product developments?

[kaneki007]

I think it's natural because some investors only want to get profit when investing their money in ICO or IEO. If they believe the project will succeed in competition and good development, i think there will be many investors will choose to wait for the product to be released compared to being listed on exchangers

[1714882171]

1714882171

[1714882171]

1714882171

[1714882171]

1714882171

[1714882171]

1714882171

[1714882171]

1714882171

[sapnu]

Well, they are right in some ways if you check. Any product that is not listed on an exchange is less likely to succeed.
Investors need something that they can trade at any time they want and when a product is not listed on an exchange it doesn't grow, so they are not going to still waste time with it.

You can take yourself as an example, I don't think you will like to be pouring thousands of dollars on a project that is not going to make you any profit. When things are not working you are sure going to quit and switch to something different, unless you're just someone that likes being a loser and losing your money on things that don't make any sense.

Of course, investors and bounty hunter to be exact because we supported that particular project until the end especially when it becomes successful, the biggest event or happening that is awaited is to be listed in some exchange so that the token that investors bought is able to sell by them if that particular token has already a lot of volumes and value, because there are some projects that are being listed but the token itself doesn't have any value, so the investors and bounty hunters are waiting until that particular token can have a price.

[cudora]

For sure and in my opinion it is the right point. Generally speaking, investors are those who should rule the project, because there would be nothing without their money, so I usually do not get why team members are so stubborn from time to time.

[TRONTON]

Investors refer to their previous IEO track record. all exchanges initially experience uncertainty and the first IEO occurs due to positive reactions from their own users, eventually growing into the special trust of various other investors.

Other exchanges also apply equally, but on average those who fail will not be too desirable anymore, investors don't want to experience problems and even incur a second loss. Product development is no longer attractive to short-term investors/traders, I think people like this are still more dominant than loyal ones.

[Katashi]

We can't blame those investors because some of them are just expecting quick returns from their investment and nowadays you can only see a few investors who really believe in a project and targeting long-term goals, maybe because of what happened in the crypto market wherein the bear market stays longer than the bull market which makes them think not to hold for so long and forget about the real worth of the project.

[jacafbiz]

If you do invest into these projects and the team fail to list on any decent exchange then this is the downfall of the project.  I will use Davcoin for exchange, raised more than $20 million and the team couldn't list on any decent exchange and the project now is less than $200k in Mcap the last time I check, regretted not selling and cutting short my loss

[bittraffic]

Understand that investors are looking for profit. They will push the team to add the tokens to the exchange for them to dump already. The rise of IEO is a good chance for these  investors for they know the tokens that are for sale on exchange are assured to be listed on the same exchange and the only they need to know is when the market will be open and that is when they collect their profit by dumping.

[huu78]

The developers are mostly looking for profit by way of hit and run. They set aside ICO funds to enroll in market exchanges and the rest are carried away by him.
So most of their projects are nonsense and finally, investors lose. So I totally agree with your problem like this. That makes CRYTPO worse in investor's image.

[aramine]

Only few investors are interested in the product that a project is developing and this is the reason why they careless about it. What investor want mainly is a liquidity channel which they can use to liquidate their token and move on to the next project and it's only exchange that can provide such and that's the why many investors are more excited over exchange listing than product development.

[Pamadar]

The developers are mostly looking for profit by way of hit and run. They set aside ICO funds to enroll in market exchanges and the rest are carried away by him.
So most of their projects are nonsense and finally, investors lose. So I totally agree with your problem like this. That makes CRYTPO worse in investor's image.

How many times do we see such complains regarding to those developers who are not real, they are just so-called teams to attract investors and afterwards runaway with the funds. Most of the time risk investors are just waiting for the chance to see the project being listed to take the advantage
to sell quickly not knowing that the scam developers have their own motives dumping the tokens that they have before investors will.

[Doranile432]

It still happening till date, projects i promoted since 2018 failed to list on exchanges till today, they always postpone or complaining about the present market condition, the truth is most new projects of today are not here for what they want to offer but here for the gains

[Leonardo7]

Why should any ICO not list if they have raised good funds? The major reason investors buy ICO is the hope of making a profit when it's listed in an exchange. However, it's very important to state on the road map if they won't be listing on exchanges on time so as to avoid unnecessary asking of questions about the listing. Even projects that refuse to list can be suspected like Flashmoni keeps coming up with several excuses that are unreasonable, denying investors of privileges.

[Aying]

It still happening till date, projects i promoted since 2018 failed to list on exchanges till today, they always postpone or complaining about the present market condition, the truth is most new projects of today are not here for what they want to offer but here for the gains

That's the saddest thing we know in all projects that existed. they want users in crypto only to gain and for their self. 80% of crypto projects are failed or run as scam. only 2 to 5 project that survive in 2018 and some of them is more on reasons. well we can expect this to happen because we know that they want money and don't want changes. let's hope for a good one in upcoming 2020 or there is still a lot of reasonable project.

[OasisDre]

Its really not easy to hold new coins for a long time without listing on exchanges so if the news do come people will be excited about it for sure, to me many new projects are red flag, why have roadmap on their projects then if new developers are too worried about market condition?

[Whilemost]

I agree with this idea. ICO investors are getting excited when a cryptocurrency startup says so. The investors will be more excited and exchanged and the product more.

[Longthi_4823_Love]

I think investors will not be interested in exchanging and developing products very much because the company says it lacks facilities. There is no relevant evidence that makes us believe.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

unfortunately Yes. These are so called short term traders and want to get rich in a day or two. We must understand that the more we will wait the more good returns we will receive.
Without complete product development, there is no point listing on exchanges as will only create dump.

[efxtrader]

Investors who want to invest in the long term in my opinion are very few, generally prefer the short term. Waiting for new projects to produce good products sometimes takes years and for some investors are impatient and prefer to sell when there is a chance to profit

[ajaymukund]

You are telling the real situation of the crypto market now. because all ICO projects are now scams and just want to get as much investor money as possible. after that, they only spent one-tenth of their money to list the exchanges and then they didn't continue to grow their business. because they have no motivation and no investors control them.

[naikturun]

Most people do aim to invest in the ICO just to take advantage regardless of the market conditions in advance they assume under any circumstances will make a profit, in fact this is what makes them lose, and forget about the risk Invest in Crypto.

In fact, it often happens that some of their ICO projects always postpone the launch of their tokens on the exchange, I often even see the team saying they will soon enter the market in the next few weeks, but it is true that this is nonsense until this project takes investors' money away.
Investors now know better which ones will be invested in the future, no longer choose ICO because it is considered a scamer if there are projects holding ICO.

 so you think is there no more ico legit, actually there is still exist but hard find the good one.
so you need analyze first with carefully, if there no ico that mean develovment for blockchain already is complete and there will be no further development.