Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[Taskford]

Not completely wrong if you ask me, KYC doesn't just benefit the casinos alone, it also benefits the gamblers in general since it helps create a safe gambling environment for all, though i understand that this would or might be hard to believe for some, most especially for those who are head bent on never seeing the brighter side of KYC verification, but only choose to put their focus on their own personal interest.

Which world are you living in? Anyone with a brain would choose to put their own personal interest first over anything else. Also, there is no bright side of KYC verification and your example to prove your point is downright silly.

Only extremely dumb scammers try to scam others after submitting KYC while the majority obviously use their brains and try their best to stay anonymous.

People might completely disagree to that implementation done by many casino but sometimes they can't do anything with it but to obey to the law so they can operate without getting any trouble to the authorities. And I really get your point regarding on KYC discussion since its really better for us to stay anonymous since in online world there's so many risk that we can face especially if we handed out our identity on those scammers trying to ask this information to ask. That's why if we know how risky to participate on anything especially when your identity has been asked then we better backed up since our details is more important rather than pushing ourselves on playing on their casino while  we can't actually benefit to them. But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

[1715324982]

1715324982

[1715324982]

1715324982

[1715324982]

1715324982

[1715324982]

1715324982

[1715324982]

1715324982

[3kpk3]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

[goaldigger]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

We can't do anything aside to comply because those sites are just following the regulation as well and they have to implement it so they can stay in business and continue their operations. There are some sites that are still free from any level of KYC but for sure sooner or later, they will have no more choice but to implement it as well. Roobet started this KYC requirements years ago already, yet many are still addressing this issue, I believe this will stay as the topic as many are still not ok with the KYC process.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

You are very correct, KYC on online gambling this days is longer a matter of choice on the gamblers part, but a must do, pretty gone are the days when a gambler can decide or not whether to go through kyc verification on gambling, Infact, in those days, most casinos actually don't even have a kyc system.

But today, every thing have changed, kyc have become a process every gambler must be ready for, as long as the gambler is playing on a registered and fully licensed casino.

[Awaklara]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

You are very correct, KYC on online gambling this days is longer a matter of choice on the gamblers part, but a must do, pretty gone are the days when a gambler can decide or not whether to go through kyc verification on gambling, Infact, in those days, most casinos actually don't even have a kyc system.

But today, every thing have changed, kyc have become a process every gambler must be ready for, as long as the gambler is playing on a registered and fully licensed casino.

The most important thing is that no one is harmed by the KYC verification procedure. Casino users can still play without any funds being deducted or account suspension. and casinos can still operate because they comply with regulations.

Although some people still prioritize anonymity, I think more gamblers don't bother with KYC. All you want is to return to playing at your favorite and trusted casino.
I personally play at several casinos that do ask for KYC, and I don't feel there is any loss from it all. except for trying a new casino, we hope to be careful.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

You are very correct, KYC on online gambling this days is longer a matter of choice on the gamblers part, but a must do, pretty gone are the days when a gambler can decide or not whether to go through kyc verification on gambling, Infact, in those days, most casinos actually don't even have a kyc system.

But today, every thing have changed, kyc have become a process every gambler must be ready for, as long as the gambler is playing on a registered and fully licensed casino.

The most important thing is that no one is harmed by the KYC verification procedure. Casino users can still play without any funds being deducted or account suspension. and casinos can still operate because they comply with regulations.

Although some people still prioritize anonymity, I think more gamblers don't bother with KYC. All you want is to return to playing at your favorite and trusted casino.
I personally play at several casinos that do ask for KYC, and I don't feel there is any loss from it all. except for trying a new casino, we hope to be careful.

Well, as far as kyc helps casinos operate better without any regulatory issues, it's still a risk for gamblers regardless of how reputable the casino holding the kyc document is or are.

It's a risk in the sense that, those document could be stolen, hacked and sold in the dark web, or the casino itself, most especially new ones, may decide to sell those documents to third party companies for money, while the third party company may decide to use the informations contained in the documents for illegal activities which if care is not taken, may affect or put in the trouble, the real owner of such details contained in the document.

This is why as harmless as submitting a kyc for verification is, there is still risk involved, and we must always be very careful where or which casino we are submitting our private information to.

[Johnyz]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

We can't do anything aside to comply because those sites are just following the regulation as well and they have to implement it so they can stay in business and continue their operations. There are some sites that are still free from any level of KYC but for sure sooner or later, they will have no more choice but to implement it as well. Roobet started this KYC requirements years ago already, yet many are still addressing this issue, I believe this will stay as the topic as many are still not ok with the KYC process.

KYC will remain an issue in decentralized market and even if we talked about this many times already, expect to see more post concerning the KYC process. We know many sites are already ok with this process its just that gamblers can’t accept the fact that they have to fill out the KYC requirement before they can fully enjoy the gambling site. If you’re not ok with KYC, I guess you need to wait longer before a gambling site thinks for the alternative for KYC.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

We can't do anything aside to comply because those sites are just following the regulation as well and they have to implement it so they can stay in business and continue their operations. There are some sites that are still free from any level of KYC but for sure sooner or later, they will have no more choice but to implement it as well. Roobet started this KYC requirements years ago already, yet many are still addressing this issue, I believe this will stay as the topic as many are still not ok with the KYC process.

KYC will remain an issue in decentralized market and even if we talked about this many times already, expect to see more post concerning the KYC process. We know many sites are already ok with this process its just that gamblers can’t accept the fact that they have to fill out the KYC requirement before they can fully enjoy the gambling site. If you’re not ok with KYC, I guess you need to wait longer before a gambling site thinks for the alternative for KYC.

And you think there will ever be an alternative to kyc? And you and I know it is not even in the hands of the casinos to come up with an alternative to kyc if at all there will ever be any, it is in the hands of the regulatory system and brought about the mandatory implementation of kyc into every system that have to do with money and finance.

Personally, I feel that in the long run, kyc verification will or may become much more strict than they currently are, and by then, I really hope that decentralized casinos have developed enough to serve as an alternative for those gamblers who may not be able to meet the kyc requirements in the future when kyc becomes more strict than it currently is.

[Betwrong]

~

I know that we are not going to end up with all that many people like that, most of the people are just professionals, and they are aiming at trying to make money

that makes the competition more valuable because of those professionals that uses those kind of events as money making place , their ability will be a challenge to them.

I agree. If only people like me were taking part, it would be not that interesting. It's competing with the pros what makes it exciting. And if you don't win, you can at least enjoy the artworks made by others.

Now, it's two weeks left till the end of the Art Contest "Halloween". Remember, guys, this time you can submit your artwork in four different categories.

[arwin100]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

We can't do anything aside to comply because those sites are just following the regulation as well and they have to implement it so they can stay in business and continue their operations. There are some sites that are still free from any level of KYC but for sure sooner or later, they will have no more choice but to implement it as well. Roobet started this KYC requirements years ago already, yet many are still addressing this issue, I believe this will stay as the topic as many are still not ok with the KYC process.

KYC will remain an issue in decentralized market and even if we talked about this many times already, expect to see more post concerning the KYC process. We know many sites are already ok with this process its just that gamblers can’t accept the fact that they have to fill out the KYC requirement before they can fully enjoy the gambling site. If you’re not ok with KYC, I guess you need to wait longer before a gambling site thinks for the alternative for KYC.

And you think there will ever be an alternative to kyc? And you and I know it is not even in the hands of the casinos to come up with an alternative to kyc if at all there will ever be any, it is in the hands of the regulatory system and brought about the mandatory implementation of kyc into every system that have to do with money and finance.

Personally, I feel that in the long run, kyc verification will or may become much more strict than they currently are, and by then, I really hope that decentralized casinos have developed enough to serve as an alternative for those gamblers who may not be able to meet the kyc requirements in the future when kyc becomes more strict than it currently is.

Unfortunately they can't escape on some regulation happened on some parts of the world that's why those legit casino is trying to comply the necessary requirements needed so that they can continue to operate on those regions or even to get a license so that they can make their operation as legal. So for those people who's still not comfortable on the implementation happen here or even on other big casino then maybe this is the sign for them that they need to quit gambling since for sure they will be restricted to use some features on casino if they didn't comply on what they required to their users.

On other hand it seems that some artist do some waiting game on art contest since as of now we don't see some participants placing their arts, anyways there's so many days left and maybe we can see them to submit on first week of November.

[Oilacris]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

We can't do anything aside to comply because those sites are just following the regulation as well and they have to implement it so they can stay in business and continue their operations. There are some sites that are still free from any level of KYC but for sure sooner or later, they will have no more choice but to implement it as well. Roobet started this KYC requirements years ago already, yet many are still addressing this issue, I believe this will stay as the topic as many are still not ok with the KYC process.

KYC will remain an issue in decentralized market and even if we talked about this many times already, expect to see more post concerning the KYC process. We know many sites are already ok with this process its just that gamblers can’t accept the fact that they have to fill out the KYC requirement before they can fully enjoy the gambling site. If you’re not ok with KYC, I guess you need to wait longer before a gambling site thinks for the alternative for KYC.

And you think there will ever be an alternative to kyc? And you and I know it is not even in the hands of the casinos to come up with an alternative to kyc if at all there will ever be any, it is in the hands of the regulatory system and brought about the mandatory implementation of kyc into every system that have to do with money and finance.

Personally, I feel that in the long run, kyc verification will or may become much more strict than they currently are, and by then, I really hope that decentralized casinos have developed enough to serve as an alternative for those gamblers who may not be able to meet the kyc requirements in the future when kyc becomes more strict than it currently is.

Unfortunately they can't escape on some regulation happened on some parts of the world that's why those legit casino is trying to comply the necessary requirements needed so that they can continue to operate on those regions or even to get a license so that they can make their operation as legal. So for those people who's still not comfortable on the implementation happen here or even on other big casino then maybe this is the sign for them that they need to quit gambling since for sure they will be restricted to use some features on casino if they didn't comply on what they required to their users.

On other hand it seems that some artist do some waiting game on art contest since as of now we don't see some participants placing their arts, anyways there's so many days left and maybe we can see them to submit on first week of November.

They would really be needing to comply or else then they cant really do such operation yet these for sure you would really be the requirements knowing that they are dealing with crypto at the same time they are that type of business on which income and outgoing transfers do really involved possibly huge amount of money on which we know that government is really that too mindful or dead serious on trying out to crack with those possible money laundering thing. This is why it would really be just that so normal that they would really be that imposing such rule into those
businesses which does involved this kind of transaction which these things could really be a bridge on laundering money. Therefore, it is really just that normal approach or set up something like this.
As for sure then you wont really be having no choice but to comply or follow on whats asked but since you dont like KYc then good thing we do still have some other options left that we could
be able to get on.

[Lucasgabd]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

we talked over and over again too on how KYC is useless because some people can pay for other people to do it for them or buy KYCed accounts
in the end of the day making KYC mandatory only creates a parallel market that ends up being a bad thing...

but it's ok, move on, nothing to see here.

[peter0425]

~

I know that we are not going to end up with all that many people like that, most of the people are just professionals, and they are aiming at trying to make money

that makes the competition more valuable because of those professionals that uses those kind of events as money making place , their ability will be a challenge to them.

I agree. If only people like me were taking part, it would be not that interesting. It's competing with the pros what makes it exciting. And if you don't win, you can at least enjoy the artworks made by others.

Now, it's two weeks left till the end of the Art Contest "Halloween". Remember, guys, this time you can submit your artwork in four different categories.

Yes mate, being a part of competition is already something you must be proud of because you compete with full confidence even you
knew how hard beating them yet you show yourself respect and skills, Go mate I know that you can do it ..

thanks for the heads up about the new rules , i have not noticed that now competitors can send all in categories not like
in the past that only 2 that they can join, I am encouraging someone to join this event to showcase their talent , hope
that sooner they will send theirs and compete with professionals .

[piebeyb]

This is why as harmless as submitting a kyc for verification is, there is still risk involved, and we must always be very careful where or which casino we are submitting our private information to.

At least we can find out more about casinos where we can send our identity safely, I think in the future this KYC issue won't be something that scares anyone whether it's because of worries about being hacked, stolen or bought and sold, I think there should be Another way to process this KYC system is still safe without any risks involved, hopefully there will be technology and a little progress to complete KYC without the casino having to store all KYC and other information data.

I know it's difficult to describe it, but in the era of very sophisticated technology in the future there will definitely be other ways so that everything related to KYC will remain safe for both parties, both casinos and users. For me personally, KYC regulations have never been a problem for me during that time. I still play on sites that have a high reputation and are trusted.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

we talked over and over again too on how KYC is useless because some people can pay for other people to do it for them or buy KYCed accounts
in the end of the day making KYC mandatory only creates a parallel market that ends up being a bad thing...

but it's ok, move on, nothing to see here.

You are probably seeing this the wrong way, as long as this world is concerned, there is no system that is perfect anywhere, anything can be abused, and that does not make that thing a bad thing necessarily, take gambling for example, people gamble and enjoy the game, possibly win some money and use it to better their lives. While some other people gamble and get addicted, and instead of having a better life through gambling, they end up with the worst life, this is just how somethings are meant to be.

You may not like it, but if you will take some time to check, KYC have indeed done some good in our system, most especially, when it comes to reducing scam activities online, so KYC is not a bad thing, and the fact that some people are abusing it doesn't make it bad either.

One thing you should understand is that, those who engage themselves in buying already KYCed accounts, or are paying other people to KYC for them, will one day meet their Waterlow when the casino will probably ask them to verify their account with the same documents, they used in verifying it before, by then, if the person that did the first KYC verification is no longer available, then the KYC cheater will begin to run Helter skelter for solution which possibly, there could be non, and they end up losing money they probably have waited so long to win, back to the casino.

[aysg76]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

we talked over and over again too on how KYC is useless because some people can pay for other people to do it for them or buy KYCed accounts
in the end of the day making KYC mandatory only creates a parallel market that ends up being a bad thing...

but it's ok, move on, nothing to see here.

It's our own personal judgement because if you get caught using someone's else identity your account will be freezed immediately as we have seen in different cases so regretting later on won't help you a lot.They are implementing but it depends on you whether you want to comply with the rules or not as there are some options to play and withdraw without any KYC also.

[Lucasgabd]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

we talked over and over again too on how KYC is useless because some people can pay for other people to do it for them or buy KYCed accounts
in the end of the day making KYC mandatory only creates a parallel market that ends up being a bad thing...

but it's ok, move on, nothing to see here.

You are probably seeing this the wrong way, as long as this world is concerned, there is no system that is perfect anywhere, anything can be abused, and that does not make that thing a bad thing necessarily, take gambling for example, people gamble and enjoy the game, possibly win some money and use it to better their lives. While some other people gamble and get addicted, and instead of having a better life through gambling, they end up with the worst life, this is just how somethings are meant to be.

You may not like it, but if you will take some time to check, KYC have indeed done some good in our system, most especially, when it comes to reducing scam activities online, so KYC is not a bad thing, and the fact that some people are abusing it doesn't make it bad either.

One thing you should understand is that, those who engage themselves in buying already KYCed accounts, or are paying other people to KYC for them, will one day meet their Waterlow when the casino will probably ask them to verify their account with the same documents, they used in verifying it before, by then, if the person that did the first KYC verification is no longer available, then the KYC cheater will begin to run Helter skelter for solution which possibly, there could be non, and they end up losing money they probably have waited so long to win, back to the casino.

One thing you should understand is that making all people pay for the ill intentions and actions of few is usually a bad system design
there are several articles and research online stating how KYC, besides being useless, is costly and adds a lot of friction to businesses

I understand your point of view even though I disagree with it.

[3kpk3]

One thing you should understand is that making all people pay for the ill intentions and actions of few is usually a bad system design
there are several articles and research online stating how KYC, besides being useless, is costly and adds a lot of friction to businesses

Sites aren't really given a choice in this matter sadly thanks to trash government systems and their excessive regulatory policies which is why they end up enforcing KYC in some form or another to survive basically.

BTC's popularity surge over the years left the world governments trying to take back control in this manner.

[Agbe]

One thing you should understand is that making all people pay for the ill intentions and actions of few is usually a bad system design
there are several articles and research online stating how KYC, besides being useless, is costly and adds a lot of friction to businesses

Sites aren't really given a choice in this matter sadly thanks to trash government systems and their excessive regulatory policies which is why they end up enforcing KYC in some form or another to survive basically.

BTC's popularity surge over the years left to world governments trying to take back control in this manner.

Though I was not a gambler before but I know things that happened in gambling halls because I have seen friends, relations playing gamble and mostly in sportsbetting and in those those days the request of KYC was minimal unlike this days. And since I fully and actively from forum last year, I have been seen that the request of KYC is at the peak. And I am suspecting that it because of bitcoin which the government and it authorities can not control so they want to control the users from various organizations and firms.  And because KYC was not rampant in those days and when it was introduced in the gambling system many people fall into victim. And many casinos did not ask KYC at the registration time but at the withdrawal time to do and undo customers. But in the other hand, every genuine gambler should provide KYC for smoothly of using the site.

[aysg76]

But if they like to submit their KYC because they know for theirselve that the risk is low then they just need to be careful and be aware about those negative implications about the actions we do.

The problem is that KYC is pretty much mandatory in many crypto gambling sites these days because of regulatory pressure due to which players are only given the option to continue playing after submitting KYC or to leave.

This is why so many players end up submitting their KYC even if they don't want to since they want to keep playing at their favourite sites.

we talked over and over again too on how KYC is useless because some people can pay for other people to do it for them or buy KYCed accounts
in the end of the day making KYC mandatory only creates a parallel market that ends up being a bad thing...

but it's ok, move on, nothing to see here.

But we have also seen cases where they have been caught using someone's else KYC accounts to verify their identity which is why it's said that if you are comfortable with it then only proceed further with it otherwise there are options for you that you can choose for easy access without KYC without any further discussion on that.