Bad projects equals Bad results

[makishart]

Tokens for bounties are actually not enough to make a dump in the market because tokens for bounties are only 1% of the supply, very different from the bonuses that investors get. those who experienced dumps because they are indeed very bad projects that make little demand in the market and no one is interested

As we think, the 1% supply for the bounty is not able to create a price dump in the market if there is a lot of demand on the token, but what we see at the moment is the 1% supply for the bounty is also able to make a price dump in the market when many bounty participants release the tokens they get through the bounty.

It looks like i should remind you again even if the team was putting 2% or 3 % to the bounty and that will not create a dump as long as there was a lot of demand to the tokens in the market. This will prevent the dump to happen. There are so many project with a huge liquidity has proven this statement

[nikki4]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

After or later every project needs some correction, that time price will dump. Bounty hunters can't be a reason to price drop. One coin hasn't demand all time until long time pass like Bitcoin or top coin. More good project price was dumped, so I think tokoin and tachyon price needs some correction. Still you can decide which project is good.

[Bitstar_coin]

From my observations, the problem now is not about hunters dumping, many projects don't even give hunters the opportunity to dump because they never had the opportunity to be listed on an exchange let alone have any small value, many of them keeps failing because they don't have investors, without investors funds project can not list or develop
So if project fails to attract investors hunters will not get their rewards.

[gweedo]

Tokens for bounties are actually not enough to make a dump in the market because tokens for bounties are only 1% of the supply, very different from the bonuses that investors get. those who experienced dumps because they are indeed very bad projects that make little demand in the market and no one is interested

As we think, the 1% supply for the bounty is not able to create a price dump in the market if there is a lot of demand on the token, but what we see at the moment is the 1% supply for the bounty is also able to make a price dump in the market when many bounty participants release the tokens they get through the bounty.

It looks like i should remind you again even if the team was putting 2% or 3 % to the bounty and that will not create a dump as long as there was a lot of demand to the tokens in the market. This will prevent the dump to happen. There are so many project with a huge liquidity has proven this statement

It all depends on the liquidity of that project. I still remember the TemTum project, they have a liquidity of over 500k $ per day. And when they distribute bounty at the same time, the price doesn't collapse, there are even more buyers than before and that's the best bounty I've seen in 2019.

[Odebowa]

Hmm, it's true bad project is tantamount to bad results  because you can't give what you dont have . Though most project success are determined by investor demand if their low demand it can tagged project bad results and sometimes manager and teams fault. So those project you mentioned thrive because of their demand

[b1k4ng]

All I know is about the Tachyon Protocol project, they are still working and still growing. the team in the project is indeed very professional, so that prices do not experience a dump. Other projects that sometimes dump or die because they do not work professionally and only give false promises to everyone and make everyone feel bored

[ZincUnrated]

As with everything in life.. If you aren't set up rightly, there is a great chance that you won't succeed. It is exactly what it is. Most cryptocurrency projects keep doing the exact thing like the ones that have come before them leading to repeated failures. If you are set up badly, it's more likely that you produce bad results. Until something changes in the industry, we will keep seeing bad results. Most projects are just copying and pasting the same thing other projects that have come before did and there is simply no innovative approach.

[suryapro]

most projects have a good price and value, they on average have a good team and concept, as well as a real product. especially Tokoin who is now making a program on biki exchange. This is an example of the concept of Tokoin, which I can write a little about

[taufik0911]

tachyon in my opinion they are on the wrong blockchains because this is what I saw when opening dex exchange waves there was really no large volume and this is one of the reasons I don't like Waves-based projects, that is when the token is generated, the token is automatically entered in exchange dex waves
with a very cheap manufacturing cost and also a very easy token creation, this triggers a good project in waves to be very bad

[glowing10]

yes, the point is that not all projects that look bad will end up bad too or sometimes can end otherwise. for example the Taychon or Tokoin project, many prize hunters or investors claim that the project ended with a scam. and it turned out unexpectedly that the project was successful.

If your luck is good or bad things may be accordingly. So sometimes even bad project may give little profits and you may book it and then it becomes worthless, so you made money out of it even if it was bad project in the end. But overall, we cannot expect the bad projects to sustain in the long run.

[H1N1]

Good project won't be affected by the hunters. Even if many hunters sell the token, the token price won't going down too much.
The most important thing is how the team manage their project. To protect the value of the token, the team must find a solution how to do it.
For example, buyback the token, find some new investors, etc.

[Valak]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Yes. It was a bad project, and their sales didn't hit the mark. Apart from that they are unable to recruit investors who buy their coins. Maybe recently there is a project called DIA. If we look at now the price is increasing. In fact the price of the coins is much better than the prices during the campaign.

So the decline in the coin price after launch had no effect on the peseta bounty. If the project goes bad, even though the bounty participant doesn't hold the token, their token price will still go down.

[cepot9]

Bounty hunters cannot be blamed in full because they are entitled to or paid for the work done. Usually it is indeed a bad project or because the exchange is less attractive or because many investors sell large quantities because they buy tokens at private sales at a lower price.

[Dollar_Hunter]

if there is already a bad picture why should you invest in it ?, the answer is already in you,
if you enter into a bad project then you are like suicide

[akwfleaspirit]

Good projects stay strong even when marketers dump. Already team should know there game plan in developing there project. If it's not having a good use case, it will not succeed. Some also depend on investors or shillers as they call them. But most importantly, a successful project depends on the dev and team.

[Bezobraznike]

Good projects stay strong even when marketers dump. Already team should know there game plan in developing there project. If it's not having a good use case, it will not succeed. Some also depend on investors or shillers as they call them. But most importantly, a successful project depends on the dev and team.

   The problems in what people think what is strong! They only watch current price, and they think that price represents true value.
That's wrong thinking, when Bitcoin price drops nothing stops, people continue to do the same, everything is alive and well, and
after some time the price rise again. With bad projects it's different, people don't use them in anytime, just pump and dump
group, they create volume for their needs, and when they dump everything, the coin drops and can never recover.

[Miaallen]

Definitely, once a project is bad, you can't expect anything from it beyond failure. Although, looking has different dimensions. That's why conducting research before joining a project is very mandatory.

[Lorokan]

Well, i have a different opinion, because as a investor who buy low and sells high most times you cannot care if the project is bad or poor, you only care about the price of the token, With this regard, we can boldly state that bad projects can equal to massive bullish price which equals to good profits.

Do you agree with me ?

[zulfi125]

Most of the projects are coming to make money to sell their tokens or coin to investors and promote through bounty hunters you can say good project never dumped just little dumped when bounty hunter sold their token. Still, after the little dump, the price is gone up, so this is a reality bad project not giving good profit to bounty hunters.

[lousie9]

do you mean the project token value is destroyed? and do you think it was caused by the bounty hunter himself? In my opinion he is not alone, usually early investors sell first after they get it even before the bounty project ends, bounty hunters only get the rest.