Bad projects equals Bad results

[thisnewcoin]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Maybe you were the Tokoin VIP bounty participant, that's why you received your payment in full! But you don't know that Tokoin is playing a nasty game with their regular bounty hunters. At first, they planned to distribute the whole reward by four weeks! We accepted that, but after two months of payment, they extended it for more 10 months, so, Tokoin was shit in this case! You can tell about the temtum bounty, they were far better than Tokoin regular bounty!

[1714201226]

1714201226

[1714201226]

1714201226

[1714201226]

1714201226

[thisnewcoin]

ICO projects are falling due to a lack of advertising. A good bounty campaign is not enough.
Good managers usually take projects where the price does not merge right away.

Sorry to say You are absolutely wrong here, mate! ICO projects are failing because people have a mindset that all ICO is a scam, not for lack of advertising! If your project is good, you still can raise money through ICO sale as like Ferrum or recent xx coin! 2018 was the dead year for ICO market, hundreds of ICO project took the money and then scammed! So, normally, people won't invest in ICO anymore!

[jakelyson]

I also noticed that utility tokens do not normally care about the price of their tokens, especially the US-based projects. They cannot make a move to make the price go higher because they will be shut down if they do. If they got dumped during the first few months listed because of bounty hunters, it will be very hard for them to recover. So every utility token I have, I dumped immediately upon listing. They are not bad projects, they are just not geared towards price but development of their projects. It will take years before the token reaches the ICO price.

[mdzahed134]

Tachyon is listed in exchanges many days ago when bounty campaign conducted. Developer made tried made a stable price because they doing everything very systematically. Which bounty reward isn’t over so that hunters didn’t affected in price. Good projects is surviving we saw that Tokoin and Tachyon.               

[Sendi blackspade team]

Tachyon is listed in exchanges many days ago when bounty campaign conducted. Developer made tried made a stable price because they doing everything very systematically. Which bounty reward isn’t over so that hunters didn’t affected in price. Good projects is surviving we saw that Tokoin and Tachyon.               

You are right, not all projects currently are all bad. some still pay well and they have well-updated developments. this will be good if it is supported by a strong market situation. we must wait for the best moment to come.

[Youghoor]

It's very strange how the death of projects are quickly linked to bounty hunters dumping their holdings. Sometimes i ask myself, how much of the tokens were given to hunters in the first place and was it at any bonus? No, so why do you link the death of project to bounty hunters. it's rather the fault of so called investors who dump their tokens right as they are listed and because they bought at a huge bonus they don't care much even if it dumps a little.

[Sanugarid]

ICO projects are falling due to a lack of advertising. A good bounty campaign is not enough.
Good managers usually take projects where the price does not merge right away.

ICO projects indeed fails due to lack of adverisement wherein as it fails to meet its market cap, the bounty hunters would recieve small amount of profit. As they hold their token and its becomes dead or barely goes high, the ICO would fall apart and end up closing instead of being an official currency.

It's a big shame for project teams to blame bounty hunters for drop value of their own token, they build a stupid use case that's why price drop in the first place, no demand no high liquidity

The value of the token usually rely on how often it is being sold or bought so maybe we can say that bounty hunters have their part on it. Still, the team will be the one to manipulate the price growth as they make their project work on a better performance.

[suryapro]

Tokoin and tachyon, are projects that have good selling points, so that hunters who participate in the program will have a large profit. naturally, because hunters are an important factor in introducing the project to the wider community.

[doctor877]

These are good project with high demands , good trading volume, good community, and great idea. That's what is important for a project to survive. Taychoon bounty wasn't much so it shouldn't cause much dip to the price. But tokoin paid very well and later they decided to slash the remaining reward to be paid for a year. It's all about what have mentioned. Good project are not usually affected by hunters dumping token and not or long, they usually receiver quick .

[hirngespenst]

You are right. Investing in a bad project is totally waste of money! That's why investors are looking for a good project, which is very rare nowadays! I am spending my time to research to get a better project, this year Tachyon was a perfect project for investment when it's the price was 0.03$! Tokoin is doing good, so, you are right, bounty hunters are not a problem for any project if your project is good!

[hirngespenst]

Tachyon is listed in exchanges many days ago when bounty campaign conducted. Developer made tried made a stable price because they doing everything very systematically. Which bounty reward isn’t over so that hunters didn’t affected in price. Good projects are surviving we saw that Tokoin and Tachyon.               

No mate, Tachyon paid all the committed rewards to its bounty hunters, the bounty was really cool! But Tokoin extended their bounty payment for 12 months, I mean they will be distributing the reward throughout the year! Both are good project but their nature is different in bounty payment.

[Ashong Salonga]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Many projects do fail and the price of the coin drops after the rewards are being distributed due to the reason that the bounty hunters are now selling off their tokens to easily get their rewards from the campaign which is their own rights since they have worked hard for that the entire campaign span. Probably, bounty hunters must not be blamed about it because if the project is really attractive, many people will still get interested into pursuing on purchasing or investing into it after the promotion has been done and the bounty hunters have already claimed their part from the campaign. It is just that there is really something wrong with the project which is the idea is not that good or we can just say a low quality project that doesn't suit to the preference of the public because if it is that attractive, even the bounty hunters have dropped the price, many people will still get into it not just because of its price but because of the project itself. But we must not always drop into conclusions that if a certain project have dumped their prices is they are already considered as bad projects which not because there is also other factors that are needed to be seen to conclude that they are really a bad project that makes them to have a bad result after the reward distribution.

[Jennygirl]

There's an African proverb that says a bad tree produces bad fruits. A bad project cannot be useful to her investors because the team are only interested in what they'll be making out of the project. It's best for one to be very careful in selecting projects to invest or work for.

[OrangeII]

You are right. Investing in a bad project is totally waste of money! That's why investors are looking for a good project, which is very rare nowadays! I am spending my time to research to get a better project, this year Tachyon was a perfect project for investment when it's the price was 0.03$! Tokoin is doing good, so, you are right, bounty hunters are not a problem for any project if your project is good!

Well, it's very rare for projects like Tachyon to appear at the moment. however, research continues to be done and hopes that the projects we support provide good results.
the comparison of a good project with a bad project now is so far away, so now it's easier for people to fall into projects that don't have potential compared to choosing projects like Tachyon. however, a bad project is a bad result, and a good project is a good result. all these results depend on our quality in choosing projects.

[Lexurdania]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

In my opinion, bounty hunters are not a factor in reducing prices after listing on exchangers. Bounty hunters usually get paid a few weeks or months after the initial listing and I think tokens or coins whose prices fall after listing are tokens with a low level of investor confidence

[pragna]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Yes, this is very sure that those projects which has low quality roadmap and did not work for which roadmap they published before IEO is low quality project and when people saw such kind of work they did not buy or sell that tokens. As a result token price fall down.

[firmino10]

The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.

[Kasabus]

The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.

Good projects always end up a good one and a sucessful one but a bad project will never be good enough and always resulted into bad. So we should always DYOR before participating a project and make sure to check its background so we will not end up being scammed or even dumping our coins because of their low value.

[trauchot]

I agree with you, top-level projects will always develop their technologies and capabilities and will monitor the price of their token and will try to increase the price of their token as much as possible both through marketing and through their product, but of course there are very few such projects now.

[someone703]

Tokoin and Taychon are good projects, they have huge volumes and are listed at major exchanges, so the price of tokens don't fall after the distribution of bounty. But there are so many bullshit projects listed on exchanges that don't have volumes, so prices often fall after bounty is distributed. I totally agree with you, bad projects will lead to bad results