Bad projects equals Bad results

[Saisher]

Many projects blame their failures on bounty hunters and investors. But this is a big misconception. People often want to blame everyone else for their failures, but not themselves.

In my experienced as a long time bounty hunters all blames should be on the developers, they are the one running with the money, they are the one who do not want to complete their roadmap and they are the one who is in charge of getting their coin in exchanges, investors and bounty hunters will not dump if they see development.

[isaac_clarke22]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

You already answered your own question. There are just massive dumps happening and that's why they don't last for 1 night. Sometimes the project becomes bad just because how the participants of certain bounties treat the reward they got. Let's accept that many will just aim for the quick profit, and they'll just sell and sell whenever they want. Finding good projects is quite hard these. You might end up a legitimate project, but not worth the price of yor work.

[Utoy101]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

no, because they dont want to set a buy orders and support thier coins until the price will be stable. They dont want to use any money they raised to set a buy orders so it will not be affected by the bounty dumpers.

And this is the reasons of more project failed.

You nailed it all, tokoin was able to survive dump from both  investors and hunters because they planned out a well buy back strategy, the buy back was able to prevent dumb not just from investors and hunters but also from the general market dip that fellow suits then. The token price dump woefully few months later when they stop buying back tokens. Bottom line is, as a project you have to protect your token price witg frequent buy back plan, no investor buy coins/token that is doing woefully on exchange

[Ezravdb]

Tokoin and Tachyon have investors in it so that the coin is valuable when it is launched on the exchange because the hunter cannot be blamed for his disposal, he knows which coins are good for holding from the bounty.
While other projects have a token destruction after being released or dumped and it is always blamed because hunters sell simultaneously, even though I don't think it's the hunter's fault because hunters can judge which coin is the best.

Here I hope SPYCE can survive like Tokoin and Tachyon which have large volumes on the exchange.

All depends on the development and strategies adopted by the team to convince bounty hunters or investors to hold on longer. Tachyon has a great team and loyal investors coupled with the support of his partners so that when entering the IPX exchange many traders are interested in buying. Today Spyce has been listing Probit but many Spyce tokens have been order at lower

[Crypto5060]

It has become stale, the occasional story of blaming bounty hunters for token dump. If a project is built with promising tech, people will queue to buy it but if there's no demand it will definitely dump irrespective of who sells.

[dainoran]

bad projects due to lack of investor interest and they impose projects. different from successful projects because they complete the concepts they have so that investors are confident about projects and well-scheduled projects.

[btcholder]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Of course not. They always blame hunters because they don't know about how to control bad things in crypto market. Huge dump by bounty hunters or greedy investors is not new thing but if a project not capable to control those kinda situation then probable they are not in the right place. A good project always holds ability to take any kinda bad situation. Other side bad projects just shows excuses which made them failure.

[fortunecrypto]

That is why they have been called as shit coins,once they lost their values all the blame will be on bounty hunters because they have no one else to be blamed without facing any issues.Anyway its hard to find a good in 2020 and I hope no potential project will be released until the global economy comes to the older level.Until that stay away from promoting this shits.

People will not invest in ICO anymore but there are some good projects coming out that are not ICO based and these are mining based like IDENA and RING, it will take some time some time before the market recover and investors who will be buying back will prefer to buy coins that are already in the top instead of new coins so project like Emirex will likely expend their IEO indefinitely and so are other projects that do crowdfunding.

[gaston castano]

yes some projects do not have a roadmap, a clear development their main goal is to register in the market and collect ico compilation funds, discussing many projects that are directly down in value or suddenly disappear.
the example you mentioned above is proof that hunters only cause a temporary effect on the value of their coins.

[yanto@1977]

Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

I think dump and pump is because buyer and seller activity for saving and selling, no one can't control it. Good project give development and value result. They will try built trust use their program and services that fit with project idea. Giving secure platform with profit is what users what. Pump and dump is about trust, sometimes developer need to dump to analyze their users so dump not always bad.

[bonyaserg]

Personally, I think that projects are currently very unstable. And all the bounty hunters are constantly in search of the best projects. And the market has a large number of useless projects that are simply not needed and most often these projects turn out to be scam. And if it turns out to get rewards from the project, then immediately the price of the token becomes so low that to sell it becomes much more expensive for the user since no one needs the token. And accordingly, if the token is in demand, then the price of the token will be stable, which will always bring profit.

[Stanlo]

It's a big shame for project teams to blame bounty hunters for drop value of their own token, they build a stupid use case that's why price drop in the first place, no demand no high liquidity

[thisnewcoin]

It is very simple. If a project has some investors, in other words, buyers in the marketplace, the price will survive. Most of the projects nowadays lack of investors because of low-quality projects and that is why those projects can not survive. However, do not forget that a project can be easily manipulated and most of the projects owner keep doing that.

You are right! Nowadays I don't see a good project in crypto anymore! Most of the projects are manipulated everywhere, like their telegram group, social channels, IEO page everywhere I see manipulated! Almost every project are trapping new investors! It's better to avoid investing in new projects in this dip situation!

[mirakal]

You can't say that all will fail, or course there are some which will succeed despite paying a good bounty reward, but still we can't deny the fact that majority failed. I am not so familiar with the project but the big factor here is the timing of the launch, if its bullish there's a bigger chance but if the market is bearish, only few will succeed, and maybe we can also consider the team behind the project, they have a good program or a business plan that's why they succeeded.

[sangjoewara]

It's a big shame for project teams to blame bounty hunters for drop value of their own token, they build a stupid use case that's why price drop in the first place, no demand no high liquidity

Yes, how can they blame the bounty hunters, this is very illogical if we look at it, because the bounty hunters don't hold a lot of tokens and the bounty hunters also don't make tokens for the project, they only have the duty to make promotions on the project, so very illogical to blame.

[aioc]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

That's expected bad developers that bad plan cannot come out with a good plan and project, even if the plan turns out to be good it will not last long because it will be exposed, we have seen so many projects with a great announcement and people think that this is not the best thing until it's exposed, you cannot fool the community who will check the legitimacy of the project.

[masterrex]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

I think the situation in each project is different, in what way we can judge any projects as the bad one or even the good one, are we saying that Tokoin and Tachyon projects are good because after the bounty payment was made still its token price was stable, I think it is a shallow reason, for me the price of any project tokens are still depend on the confidence of its investors. bounty tokens are only a small portion of the total supply so it will not affect much. if the project has huge support from its investors. they will buy those bounty tokens from the bounty hunters.

[Vishnu.Reang]

During the past couple of years, I have examined hundreds, if not thousands of ICOs. You may not agree, but most of these projects had very good ideas and well defined timelines and business plans. But very few of them were successful upon their listing in the exchanges. That means that the planning phase was not at the fault. The problem always lies with the implementation phase. A project may look very attractive on paper, but the team fails to transfer it to the real world.

[Destroyeroff98]

ICO projects are falling due to a lack of advertising. A good bounty campaign is not enough.
Good managers usually take projects where the price does not merge right away.

[totoy4741]

They are good projects with strong back ups from different establish platforms and Team Members and those I things I guess will have an integral part of making a project successful, while some other projects don't really have something or someone they can rely on right from the very start of their ICO or Campaign even those projects that have great vision and ideas they even fail without strong supporting casts.