Bad projects equals Bad results

[metenjean]

Bad project stand from with fake team and owner than become bad moment for get good result, many project always use not correct information about their team and looks not transparent about their company.

[cytpoway121]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

I think this is dependent on the project. Tachyon did well with their product and trade preparation, they also had a limited amount of bounty hunters and that ensured the sanity in the token trade.

Good projects can actually dump either hunters sell or not.

[ballerin and giroud]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Are they use the strategy to limited the bounty hunter sell the token? I have joined one bounty campaign ( I will not call the name) that I should hold the coin for one year and until now the coin price has been increasing. I have got the coin for $50 when the distribution came and I hold them until now and the coin price has increasing and now its value has touched $600. I didn't know what will happen later when they are allowed to sell the coin because it has reached one year. I just guessed that the tokoin has done it and make the price raising although the distribution for bounty hunter has done.

[ife2020]

In my own opinion, I do not think it works that way.
why do I say that?? We have seen bad projects excel and have better value in this crypto space. And I am sure you have noticed too.

Does a project being bad necessarily mean the token won't be of good value? I greatly doubt so.
there are more factors leading to better results than just bad projects

[wingfield_crypto]

    A bounty hunter is constantly informed about the chosen project. Thus, if he realizes that the project to which he is enrolled does not rise to the level of expectations, he must make a decision. Many hunters receive their coins from campaigns, but they sell them quickly, because they realize that the project will die, and their work should not be in vain.

[slashz9]

yes maybe actually so however the amount of prizes distributed to hunters is only a few percent and of course it will not have an impact on the price of tokens in the long run, it will probably decrease in the beginning because hunters sell all their coins.
but it will improve if indeed investors survive and do not sell their coins all, in a short time.
because there are some investors who only want profits at the beginning, and do not care at all whether the project is good or not.

[btcdie]

-snip-
hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Yaps, there is no need to blame Bounty Hunter for making coins / tokens worthless. while the project has a positive community or support, products tend to be in demand so supply demand continues to grow so prices are stable and go up. hunters are also entitled to get more profit, if the project is potential I am sure bounty hunters will not dump coins. keep in mind, the allocation for bounties is only around 0.1% - 5% of the total supply, so if a dump does not always blame the bounty hunter, the mastermind behind the event is the investor if they are in doubt and have no interest in the project.

[oscarftw]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Only bounty hunters can't dump any good project price. Tokoin and Tachyon  protocol didn't distribute huge rewards to bounty hunters. For low volume good project good project price could dump. Bcnex exchange was good project but this exchange is going to scam, bounty didn't distribute yet. Only team members and market situation is behind everything.

[robelneo]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Good trees only bear good fruits and no other way around, investors will invest in projects if they see the potential on it but if after crowdfunding and developers are very slow in developing the platform and getting the project in good and popular exchange, they will dump the coin, one example is Adab, there are many FUNDS on their ongoing crowdfunding but investors still go on, but after sensing that developers are very slow, they immediately dump even at a loss.

[Shallow]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

It is as simple as that; when a project is good it will have good investors who will keep buying and using the services offered because they know the team will keep improving to better the platform, therefore even if bounty or airdrop payments are made the token price won't dump badly. And also, the team within a good project focuses more on how to serve it's users well. On the other hand, when a project is all about promises with nothing to show for, they will have little or no investors thus the project tends to suffer the most especially when they pay for bounty and airdrop, in this case, the blame game will start on how hunters dumped the price. In addition, the team won't bother about development instead comes up with excuses why there is delay and before you know it, the project will become worst each day from which the team might start looking for a way to exit. Thus your title is right, bad projects equals bad results and vice versa.

[gundala]

I also joined Tachyon and Tokoin, both of which were good quality projects, so they could maintain the price even though they paid the bounty hunter fairly. This is proof that dumps are not entirely caused by bounty hunters. Project quality, marketing strategies, good products, are the combinations that determine the success of the project and the bounty campaign. Just imagine how much is the allocation for bounty hunter rewards? mostly only 1-2%, if even a small value can have an adverse effect on the price of the coin or token, you can imagine what the quality is like. Stop blaming each other, market conditions often make all plans not achieved.

[kawetsriyanto]

why are other bounties getting ruined after launch?

There are many factors to make it happens. Bad management or strategy from the project can be one of the factors. If they choose bad exchanges to list their tokens, it probably makes less interest from investors. Then, the price may be decreasing. Also, if the projects cannot show good progress related to their MVP. It can trigger a decrease in people's trust, so people become not interested anymore to buy the tokens. 

[Lordhermes]

From my point of view,, projects that's gets listed on high volmes and volatility exchanges gets better and keeps on rising if bounty hunters sells off their reward. Tokoin was listed on kucoin exchange which is among the most reputable exchange in cryptocurrency,, the same applied to Tachyon protocol as was listed on Bithump global which is also a high volume and volatility exchange. So I think for a project to resist dumped,, such project should be listed on high liquidity exchange like binance, huobi, kucoin, IMO and more.

[Perfect35]

Most of the projects that were able to maintain a good price system and progressive growth on the exchange had already planned what to do. Those who did not plan were the ones experiencing setback. the few projects mentioned have good experience and know-how to back up their listed tokens on the exchange.
Apart from having enough investors, if the project team is so greedy and stingy and not ready to spend, the resultant effect will be that the Ico price might not be achievable or that it dumps unnecessarily at the initial stage.

[Twinkledoe]

why are other bounties getting ruined after launch?

There are many factors to make it happens. Bad management or strategy from the project can be one of the factors. If they choose bad exchanges to list their tokens, it probably makes less interest from investors. Then, the price may be decreasing. Also, if the projects cannot show good progress related to their MVP. It can trigger a decrease in people's trust, so people become not interested anymore to buy the tokens.  

But they should not blame those bounty hunters about the continuous decline of price. Because if they are strong enough, they can always reverse the downward trend after the hunters sell their share. Remember, they are only allotting very small portion to these hunters, so it should not have big impact on their market performance. It is more on the project's development, if the investors see that it is already hopeless, they will share whatever they have to recover their losses.

[Kiefner]

Bounty hunters should not influence the project. If the project does not show any results and their coin has fallen in value, it is the fault of the developers only.

[BitTraderCute]

Bounty hunters should not influence the project. If the project does not show any results and their coin has fallen in value, it is the fault of the developers only.

but often bounty hunter blamed by some investors eventhough some hunter also use their money to investing. some developers have wrong distribution and discount management to attract investor. they have huge discount to whales and make it easy to dumped. dev team didnt deliver their MVP well so investors keep complaining,

[swivel1983@gmail.com]

Many projects blame their failures on bounty hunters and investors. But this is a big misconception. People often want to blame everyone else for their failures, but not themselves.

[TanakabZX]

If a project is good enough getting large trading volume won't be a problem at all, we have too many useless coins from developers this days and I think it's better to safe your energy, don't just go out there and promote any project, dyor very well

[semobo]

That is why they have been called as shit coins,once they lost their values all the blame will be on bounty hunters because they have no one else to be blamed without facing any issues.Anyway its hard to find a good in 2020 and I hope no potential project will be released until the global economy comes to the older level.Until that stay away from promoting this shits.