Bad projects equals Bad results

[Tomcolor]

It is very simple. If a project has some investors, in other words, buyers in the marketplace, the price will survive. Most of the projects nowadays lack of investors because of low-quality projects and that is why those projects can not survive. However, do not forget that a project can be easily manipulated and most of the projects owner keep doing that.

Yes luck will be depend everything but not lot quality project right now because now more investors very smart and their do not want invest in every project. A project means competition word so if those project well strong developed activity then their will be successful.

[1714208476]

1714208476

[1714208476]

1714208476

[1714208476]

1714208476

[Retainly_Collie]

The thing is projects like Tokoin are very good projects and they are rare. Only good projects can achieve the kind of success they achieved in a bear market. Likes not like other projects are scam or too bad but it's the market conditions that makes it hard for them to succeed.

At least they are listed at the top exchanges in this market. Huobi is one of the largest exchanges so the price of tokens is unlikely to be broken by the bounty hunter. Only bullshit projects listed on small exchanges are afraid of this issue

[Wildwest]

True as you say if the project is good then the value of the selling until now persists but we are very difficult to find such a project, we often find projects that run but ultimately the token is not worth it, then we as gift hunters are very disappointed with such circumstances, we expect to go forward all projects can get satisfactory results.

[SacriFries11]

Tokoin and Taychon are good projects, they have huge volumes and are listed at major exchanges, so the price of tokens don't fall after the distribution of bounty. But there are so many bullshit projects listed on exchanges that don't have volumes, so prices often fall after bounty is distributed. I totally agree with you, bad projects will lead to bad results

It's still depends in the application of the project in crypto world and even it's been very popular during the bounty and crowdfunding still they didn't survived in the market. High value projects will always be a high value when they launch to the market. If they saw a lot of potential of this project, many of investors will surely invest to this and improvement of the project will continue over the years to come which results to a successful project.

[Ryushin]

Tokoin and Tachyon have investors in it so that the coin is valuable when it is launched on the exchange because the hunter cannot be blamed for his disposal, he knows which coins are good for holding from the bounty.
While other projects have a token destruction after being released or dumped and it is always blamed because hunters sell simultaneously, even though I don't think it's the hunter's fault because hunters can judge which coin is the best.

Here I hope SPYCE can survive like Tokoin and Tachyon which have large volumes on the exchange.

Looks like it's not happening, SPYCE is now trading on BW at 0.012 from its IEO price of 0.03, I don't think it will be like Tachyon protocol or Tokoin bounty, unless the team decide to list on OKEX or Binance

[mirakal]

Looks like it's not happening, SPYCE is now trading on BW at 0.012 from its IEO price of 0.03, I don't think it will be like Tachyon protocol or Tokoin bounty, unless the team decide to list on OKEX or Binance

This is the trend now, it's very rare to see a coin trading higher than its IEO when only traded in low volume exchange.
I am not so confident with OKEX but with Binance there is a big possibility that it will rise, however, it's hard to tell at the current situation.

[Yamifoud]

True as you say if the project is good then the value of the selling until now persists but we are very difficult to find such a project, we often find projects that run but ultimately the token is not worth it, then we as gift hunters are very disappointed with such circumstances, we expect to go forward all projects can get satisfactory results.

Nothing has changed. This means that you can't magic the results, the bad projects will surely result nothing while good projects will succeed. People will make an investment that they feel or it looks that project is promising. They can't be fooled by now as I believe that they had learned already from their mistake before. Crypto communities are in combat against fake and scam project, it surely they won't succeed and be failed.

[kceekcee]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Token  dumping has never been the faults of bounty hunters, its just that blames were always shifted to hunters.
And bad projects equals to bad results is not the true if i may say

We have seen bad projects retain value in the market for a long while before dumping off, and we have seen good projects never going past the crowdfunding stage.
Either good or bad; a project will always dump if care is not taken to maintain value

[gikere]

Yes, bounty hunters dump after receiving the reward is nothing new. If that project is good then the dumping is just a good way for investors to get the coin for cheap. A redistribute from bounty hunters to investors. If that project is just riding on hype train without any backup then of course, it going to be dump without even a chance to recover.

[noorman0]

So far, I've never found a quality project to dispose of their tokens of more than 3% of the total supply to hunters and distribute them at the same time as token/coin listed in the exchange. So, in this case I won't blame the hunter completely with such little allocation as to kill the project. But my assumption, these are projects that have been abandoned by the initial investors (tokensale investors). Until the listed token has reached several times the purchase price and has sufficient trading volume, at that time almost all of their initial investors will sell all tokens. This means that their interests with this project have been fulfilled and they will exchange it back with the original coins (eg. BTC or ETH).

I'm not a proejct investor, but I understand that it's not good to keep new coins/tokens for a long time. The current situation is not like 5 years ago. Of course investors are experienced in this field and more thought by them.

[t3m4nc0k]

That's because their products are real and the market demand is so great that it keeps the price of coins going up and even going up, in contrast to other projects that are just bullshit, which always dream of high prices, and another that makes me laugh "when people say that dumps are caused by bounties hunter "those who say that have never seen Tokoin and tachyon protocol

[aemma]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Your last line or statement explains everything, that is the difference between a good and bad project. Another thing is, a good project never worrys about bounty payments, they put their energy on making their products and services a good one but a bad or questionable project will look for where to shift blame, from which they start saying that either the bounty didn't produce results and/or the distribution will be delayed. And if they eventually pays, and hunters sell, the blame will increase but in the case of a good project the price will hardly feel the impact of hunters selling off as investors will see it as an opportunity to buy more.

[leatutz]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

I think only foolish person can blame only bounty hunters when most of the bounty budget is under 1 percent. Tokoin and Tachyon protocol is doing great but later all project will follow cryptocurrency market condition as doing old bounty project. New projects don't know about old project and condition, devs just do what he thinks as do blame on bounty hunters.

[BRODIN]

it depends on how the bounty hunter or token holder is, although it can be said that the tokoin & taychon project is a good project, but if the prize hunter is pressed for economic needs, it is not possible if they will keep it for a long time. especially if they see a high price of course they will sell it.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

you are correct. It's not hunters who are dumping the price. Its private investors at the initial stage and later investors if they found it to be a not so good project.
Bounty allocation itself is assigned as around 5% so even though 5% tokens are sold out, there should not be much impact to price.
At last, its project concept and its development which makes the project successful.

[joinfree]

Exactly. instead of team members putting plans together about the use case of the project to increase the use and demand of the token. They rather blame bounty hunters for selling the scanty amounts of tokens/coins they gave them without considering the loose token mechanics and the huge insane bonuses offered to investors which makes them dump their holdings as soon the coin hits the market.

[pikkie]

many bad projects fail when collecting funds, but there are some bad projects that succeed in deceiving traders and investors as happened some time ago the bcnex exchange site project was finally a scam and failed which ultimately made many people lose.

[mirakal]

many bad projects fail when collecting funds, but there are some bad projects that succeed in deceiving traders and investors as happened some time ago the bcnex exchange site project was finally a scam and failed which ultimately made many people lose.

They belong to the bad projects because their purpose is just to scam people.
When a certain project will not be able to collect at least the minimum, that means investors don't trust their platform in overall and they will fail.
What will happen next is they will now make a new group and try to raise funds again in IEO, this is happening that's why investors should be very careful in evaluating the project before they will invest.

successful project means profitable investors and bounty hunters.

[Jateng]

Exactly. instead of team members putting plans together about the use case of the project to increase the use and demand of the token. They rather blame bounty hunters for selling the scanty amounts of tokens/coins they gave them without considering the loose token mechanics and the huge insane bonuses offered to investors which makes them dump their holdings as soon the coin hits the market.

They should be prepared with that scenario where bounty hunters will sell their coins after it launched to exchange sites. Probably they also need money to support their financial problems and because of this situation some projects hold some amount of payout of their bounty hunters over a couple of months. Another campaign paid their bounty hunters by month basis to secure the price their tokens and required KYC so some participants have no longer want their token to pay because of this KYC verification.
Probably some projects are not in good concept and proper delivery in the market so some of them results to be failed and end up with nothing.

[olabiyijummy02]

Whether the token will be fruitful or not after launch will rely upon the liquidity of the token. furthermore, the token liquidity will rely upon the project itself. on the off chance that the project is acceptable, at that point all things considered, the liquidity of the token is likewise acceptable and it will incredibly influence the token exchanging volume with the goal that it can endure and keep on expanding. on the off chance that it has no liquidity by any stretch of the imagination, at that point the token will vanish after launch and that is a reality that has been going on this time.