Never trust an ICO ranking site!

[Zazzu]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

ICO ranking sites are paid advertisements. They are not reliable at all. Any ICO who has money can have a good rating. Your own research will always be reliable, just don't rely on anything else.

As far as I know, ICODROP is still good for us to follow, in addition to the other sites are bullshit. They will never be honest in evaluating new ICOs and confuse many people with scam ICOs and good ICOs.

[1715549282]

1715549282

[1715549282]

1715549282

[1715549282]

1715549282

[1715549282]

1715549282

[1715549282]

1715549282

[Jateng]

I always remind that anyone should not rely on ICO ranking sites, because ICO ranking sites that even have high rankings will not guarantee you. They work, are paid and provide the best data to display. You need to be careful with ICO ranking sites.

You just be careful but not totally rely them and make them support for your own ICO ranking. I think there are few ICO you can rank them now since ICO are not yet popular when they used to. You can simple determine them and choose the right ICO you will invest and trust. Some ICO ranking sites have still basis why they choose them maybe their are true but I'm sure most of them get paid because its a matter of business.

[coin-investor]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

Glad that you finally find out, they used to be very popular among investors they are the go-to the sites when it comes to investing in ICO, but eventually, greed has overtaken them, they charge up to 1 Bitcoin just to have a good rating, now how can you have an impartial rating if you are already paid.

[cryptoknightt]

It is true that many people say such sites are inaccurate or there are some parties who pay the site provider so that their projects / coins get good reviews, if that is the case, you have to check for yourself whether the data is correct by checking directly.

[jcpone]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

I don't trust any of them actually, because mostly are just being paid by money, you know what I mean.
This will only deceive by many to think the ico is good because they will see it is in the higher ratings but the
reality things that is not of course where in the end they're being deceived by them only.

[pikkie]

I always remind that anyone should not rely on ICO ranking sites, because ICO ranking sites that even have high rankings will not guarantee you. They work, are paid and provide the best data to display. You need to be careful with ICO ranking sites.

You just be careful but not totally rely them and make them support for your own ICO ranking. I think there are few ICO you can rank them now since ICO are not yet popular when they used to. You can simple determine them and choose the right ICO you will invest and trust. Some ICO ranking sites have still basis why they choose them maybe their are true but I'm sure most of them get paid because its a matter of business.

indeed the existence of ICO rating can help a little see whether the project being carried out has potential and can be useful for many people or not because the success of an ICO project depends on the concept developed which is very useful for many people or not.

[imstillthebest]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

I don't trust any of them actually, because mostly are just being paid by money, you know what I mean.
This will only deceive by many to think the ico is good because they will see it is in the higher ratings but the
reality things that is not of course where in the end they're being deceived by them only.

that what most people are saying so if that was true then how can we search an ico when most of us also use search engines that will lead us to an ico ranking site  or ico info site   .  so i guess its better to rely on forum alone just to be safe because we know the users here if who are shillers and who are honest   . plus we have legit scam busters on here so we can easily tell if an ico is potentially scam     .  keep safe everyone , we are now on time where scammer are on loose

[suryana]

It is true that many people say such sites are inaccurate or there are some parties who pay the site provider so that their projects / coins get good reviews, if that is the case, you have to check for yourself whether the data is correct by checking directly.

Everyone already knows the behavior of sites manipulate the ranking of an ICO project, False ranking is not only when the developer makes a project but even when their tokens are listed on the Exchange there are sites manipulate ranking. So we are not surprised if those who have a lot of money can buy fake ranking.

[Mealea]

Politics has eaten deep into some many affairs of life and cryptocurrency world is not an exemption. So many things are going wrong all because of what to gain. Many are buying their way into so many areas these days. We can only hope for a better tomorrow. How I wish ICO ranking can take a new turn for the future of cryptocurrency.

[suryapro]

you are not the first person who does not believe in the existence of ICO, especially those who are closed. because most ICOs that occur are essays from the owners for the purpose of attracting investors to be able to invest in projects that are run. and this is something funny in my opinion

[lobo13hf]

If we can't even trust the ICO itself, why should we trust another 'ranking system' by some dude over the internet? There ain't no such thing as a free lunch and there site actually have motive of their own.

It caused by some ico ranking sites have been manipulating the data to fool the investors and give the advantage to the scam project. Some dudes who have been creating the ranking system were only creating it to be an information to the newcomers or even investors.

You can't generalize them all until there will be a strong evidence.

[OrangeII]

It is true that many people say such sites are inaccurate or there are some parties who pay the site provider so that their projects / coins get good reviews, if that is the case, you have to check for yourself whether the data is correct by checking directly.

that's why sometimes such sites have different ratings. as far as I know, they also have different standards in conducting analysis on a project. Well, maybe we can find information from the site, it's just that for the final assessment, you should use your own decision.

[Doranile432]

ICO websites rate projects based on money they paid the website team, I'm glad ICO is no more but even few of these websites not opt into IEO projects too, you can still use these websites just to know about any upcoming IEO projects but do not trust their ratings, they are fakes

[Baimovic]

ICO ranking sites are made as attractive as possible to make it look convincing and certainly to make users believe. therefore if you want to invest in a project, don't just rely on or trust ICO ranking sites. they don't display data correctly

[Viscore]

Politics has eaten deep into some many affairs of life and cryptocurrency world is not an exemption. So many things are going wrong all because of what to gain. Many are buying their way into so many areas these days. We can only hope for a better tomorrow. How I wish ICO ranking can take a new turn for the future of cryptocurrency.

I don't think ICO ranking is still useful now that ICO is not anymore popular.
Was not following the most of the IEO now, but I think they have already called it an IEO ranking.

For now, I guess we have to forget about ICO and focus on the IEO as the success are now coming from IEO, especially on big exchange.

[MCobian]

In my opinion it is no secret that ICO ranking sites are not trusted, because there are indeed many victims who have been tricked
by ICO ranking sites. I am one of the victims who was tricked into believing in ICO ranking sites, it turns out that the ICO projects
that I followed failed. Since then I don't trust ICO ranking sites. It's better to do research before investing in ICO projects rather than
relying on ICO ranking sites.

[fortunecrypto]

There are still many ICO rating sites now even though there are lesser and lesser ICO being launched, if the ICO is stopped or investors stopped investing in ICO totally I don't see the rating sites continuing their business, which they badly messed up by supporting scam ICO in the past and until now.

[ije07]

The ico website only cares about payments and doesn't care about the project data that is displayed, therefore you shouldn't rely too much on or trust any ico ranking sites. what they display is not what you expect it to be.

[sandra_x]

Most rating sites are paid to give some sort of ratings to projects. Also, the so-called experts who do reviews on many of these sites are not really experts, so one should not trust the opinion of another quack. it is best to do your own findings and make judgments accordingly. MVP is a good start.

[BRODIN]

I personally use ico ranking sites as reference materials and do not depend on them. as wise investors need to research more about the project, the product and how big the investor or partner in it. the ico website does not fully guarantee that the project will succeed.