Never trust an ICO ranking site!

[ElmedoRator]

Today there are many websites evaluating ICOs, but most of them are not reputable and give false reviews. I will never completely trust the ICO review sites, I only rely on them to make my personal assessments.

[Baimovic]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

Well they have their own marketing strategy to attract investor on there project, It is really hard to know legit information and rely on any ranking site. It is better to investigate with your own and try to rely on other and ask with there opinions also.

yes i also agree with your opinion that to not fully trust the ico website. most of them do not guarantee or match what they attach. what we can do is do our own research and help from forum users here. as well as look in the Utas section about fraud projects, maybe this is all we can do here.

[AmoreJaz]

Today there are many websites evaluating ICOs, but most of them are not reputable and give false reviews. I will never completely trust the ICO review sites, I only rely on them to make my personal assessments.

the question here is - is there anyone here who really trust those ICO ranking sites? maybe they can be used as a guide but nothing more than that. we all know that they are putting a lot of info that are misleading to potential investors. of course, they always want to please their clients, so if their clients are paying -- are they going to give them bad reviews?

[Denamen]

Today there are many websites evaluating ICOs, but most of them are not reputable and give false reviews. I will never completely trust the ICO review sites, I only rely on them to make my personal assessments.

In general, popular ICO review websites like IcoDrop are not worth trusting because they are paid to do this. During this time, you should limit your investment in ICO projects because the risk can occur at any time. However, if it's an IEO project listed at major exchanges, then you should consider investing because exchanges like Binance or Huobi are often home to lots of big investors.

[Kotone]

ICO industry is like a heaven for all scammers, do you know from which source money comes? Mostly from people that are using ICO investments due to money laundering. So not only ICO creators are scammers but also some investors. What a crazy market. 

ICO rating sites usually shills project but of course with payment. I have noticed this on the past, even though your project is good they will still list it however if you dont pay them with some review expect that you will have a bad or low points on their platform. Example of this is ICObench which giving a high score to a shitcoin project and even the KYC of the team has marked checked even though the users or profiles are copied only. I dont want to be on their scheme method, nothing can beat money for creating a good ICO project.

Id rather use this forum for good references.

[gwaposakon]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

I observed most of these ICO ranking sites tend to rankup sponsored projects. Not really objective about their reviews. I see most of really good projects don't get high ratings. Anyway, these sites could be a way to know what ICOs are upcoming or currently in the market. Just reinforce those reviews with your own research.

[preikaler]

isn't the ICO now no longer trusted by investors so why would I still trust the ICO website that gives unclear ratings! now it is a trend for IEO and ICO now to really not benefit investors

[studio1one]

isn't the ICO now no longer trusted by investors so why would I still trust the ICO website that gives unclear ratings! now it is a trend for IEO and ICO now to really not benefit investors

ICO/IEO are basically the same thing these days only one major difference is that now a days exchanges are in on a scam.

Please note I am not saying all IEOs are scam.

[Pomogator]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

I looked for all ICO projects through such sites. At first there were a lot of good projects, but then they began to be replaced by paid scams. This was understandable by user ratings. Soon, by the way, all these sites were closed. It is better to look for an ICO yourself without using any tops.

[siajeen]

At this time nobody trusts the ICO website anymore, because the average ICO project no longer benefits anyone, including investors, so don't worry about the ICO website because now people are busy analyzing the IEO projects that are in the top exchanges.

[jcpone]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

That's 100% true, ranking site is just a money matter where as long as you have a lot of money, you can buy the good ratings for the
project you want to promote in cryptocurrency, so once the community will see at the no.1 ratings in ranking they will thought the project has a potential but the truth is not, so lets be wise and careful in choosing project campaign.

[memed97]

At this time nobody trusts the ICO website anymore, because the average ICO project no longer benefits anyone, including investors, so don't worry about the ICO website because now people are busy analyzing the IEO projects that are in the top exchanges.

Yes, and the IEO projects in the top exchanges have also begun to slow down now, the average seen by the IEO project in the medium and small exchanges, so for the ICO website it is very feasible to throw away, because we no longer need it.

[Flickkk]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

As you can see now in 2020 . Most of the ICO list sites are dead. Not always votes are involve in ranking but money too.
It is a marketing strat where newbie investors and some bounty hunter get easily fool with the ranks.
 

[Kong Hey Pakboy]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

As you can see now in 2020 . Most of the ICO list sites are dead. Not always votes are involve in ranking but money too.
It is a marketing strat where newbie investors and some bounty hunter get easily fool with the ranks.
 

Indeed. The only reason why they make fake ICO list, so they could attract investors and bounty hunters, especially those newbies who really don't know about cryptocurrency and ICO projects. It is also the reason why there are no more existing ICO list in any websites today because most of them aren't true.

[Nhor1011]

I don't believe in ICO ranking sites. Most of them are paid and not real.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the rank they will give!

What I am looking for in ICO is looking at MVP, live and working products. Something that really can make a difference. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

You right,ICO ranking is not real because it is a money matter,the bigger you pay ,the higher ranking you get. It's really disappointing to the investors because ranking is just a deception just to attract more people to invest on their project. That's why if we invest we should study the project very well and not rely on ICO ratings.

[husencoe]

this can be a place of business for ICO ranking site owners, because the more costs that are given the higher the ICO rating, so it makes some investors tempted to invest in projects, hopefully investors are more observant in choosing projects before investing in them.

[tanjiran]

this can be a place of business for ICO ranking site owners, because the more costs that are given the higher the ICO rating, so it makes some investors tempted to invest in projects, hopefully investors are more observant in choosing projects before investing in them.

By paying a certain amount of money, the project owner can ask to be given a good rating and review. I've been stuck with reviews like that. Regardless of whether the dev team really falsified its badness neatly or the website was only concerned with profit, I don't know. What is clear, since I was trapped because I too trust the ICO rating, I no longer make it the main benchmark to assess whether a project is legitimate or not. Really an important lesson for me.

[alan2here]

this can be a place of business for ICO ranking site owners, because the more costs that are given the higher the ICO rating, so it makes some investors tempted to invest in projects, hopefully investors are more observant in choosing projects before investing in them.

I think investors are now smarter, and before deciding to invest in ICO, they will check very carefully because the current ICO projects are scams. It isn't easy to find a good project for you to consider.

In my opinion, it is best to invest only when the project is mentioned by many people and evaluated by famous people at Telegram. Of course, it's still a reference, and you should make your own choice. d

[princeyeboah]

Just as not all projects can be trusted, not all ICO rating sites can also be trusted. As already said, most of these sites are just paid to show the upcoming projects and do not necessarily perform any research on them. The responsibility is always up to the investors to do their due diligence.

[bearexin]

It is not really about not trusting the website but more like not trusting the owners of the ICO's that would basically pay everyone to look good. That is what the bounties are as well, they pay you 10 bucks or 100 bucks or whatever with their tokens and you see their followers who will be paid spreading the name around everywhere in the whole world, I do not really support it all that much but I understand it. Now, if the bounty hunters are doing it that way, why wouldn't others do the same?

ICO  ranking websites are only doing what a sensible business manager would do, they get paid to rank the project high and that allows the company to continue being profitable. If someone offered you that much money you would take it too, or at least you should take it to be a profitable website.