Home Court advantage = Not an advantage now because of no-live audience?

[iv4n]

For sure, without full stadiums and fans it will not be the same. But here we talk about professionals, they will play no matter what. With fans or without, on rain or snow, angry fans or peace, they will give their best, that makes them professionals! For sure some players like to have fans, but I am sure that some players hate it, all in all the quiet peace on the stadium will help some players with their concentration.
I will join here with some members who say that bad team will lose wherever they play, and good time will try to give their best in every game, home or away it's not matter.

[Botnake]

For sure, without full stadiums and fans it will not be the same.

Obviously because the situation now is different, remember covid-19 already infected over 2 million people all over the world.

But here we talk about professionals, they will play no matter what. With fans or without, on rain or snow, angry fans or peace, they will give their best, that makes them professionals! For sure some players like to have fans, but I am sure that some players hate it, all in all the quiet peace on the stadium will help some players with their concentration.
I will join here with some members who say that bad team will lose wherever they play, and good time will try to give their best in every game, home or away it's not matter.

They have a contract, they have to follow that, that's what professionals do, otherwise, their future will be compromise in a sport that they dream to play with when they are still not part of the league, if the organizer of the league will say they can play, it's almost assured that they are doing all the measures to protect their players against the virus. It might not be as fun as before, but in the current time, security is the main priority.

[adzino]

Yeah, true. The stats speaks, team playing at home are always seem to have better chance to win than playing away. I guess it is because of those all psychological affect. They tend to perform better as the crowd cheers for them, being used to playing at the same court and referee being bias (its kinda true  ). So even without the crowd, the home team still be getting some advantage. I am talking about NBA over here.

[palle11]

I am talking about NBA over here.

Even in all sports apart from courts, there is what is called home advantage. Either the pitch gives the morale and advantage or the umpires do that either intentional too.
Advantage is there in the home., I have seen soccer teams winning because of home advantage from cheering from the spectators.

[Questat]

I am talking about NBA over here.

Even in all sports apart from courts, there is what is called home advantage. Either the pitch gives the morale and advantage or the umpires do that either intentional too.
Advantage is there in the home., I have seen soccer teams winning because of home advantage from cheering from the spectators.

If this is for basketball or NBA, I think they will only play in one venue, so there's no home court advantage under that set up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I understand on the article below is that games will be played at Walt Disney World, so there's no home court advantage.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29256449/everything-know-nba-22-team-restart-walt-disney-world

[harizen]

If this is for basketball or NBA, I think they will only play in one venue, so there's no home court advantage under that set up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I understand on the article below is that games will be played at Walt Disney World, so there's no home court advantage.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29256449/everything-know-nba-22-team-restart-walt-disney-world

Yes, the NBA will be playing on one venue once resumed.

It can now be considered as no home-court advantage which I think I also mentioned on previous page.

We will see the setup once it resumed if this no home-court advantage can truly affect their performance. But knowing NBA players, with or without home-crowd they can still play at their best. Not really matters at all if they will play without their home-crowd.

[Vaculin]

If this is for basketball or NBA, I think they will only play in one venue, so there's no home court advantage under that set up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but what I understand on the article below is that games will be played at Walt Disney World, so there's no home court advantage.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29256449/everything-know-nba-22-team-restart-walt-disney-world

Yes, the NBA will be playing on one venue once resumed.

It can now be considered as no home-court advantage which I think I also mentioned on previous page.

We will see the setup once it resumed if this no home-court advantage can truly affect their performance. But knowing NBA players, with or without home-crowd they can still play at their best. Not really matters at all if they will play without their home-crowd.

I think with the new set up, bettors will not gonna doubt betting on their favorite team since there is no home court advantage anymore.
The odds might also be adjusted, making heavily favorite a slight favorite only, which makes it more interesting as both sides can get the best odds when betting.

[STT]

I wont count this as a factor until it shows up in the stats, a town thats not mine is still not going to be as familar and comforting as preparing for the game just before in somewhere I own.   The crowd is part of it but I dont think its the majority of why, no crowd at all can throw off the feeling and play of some is my first guess so its going to be a bit more random if anything.

[iTradeChips]

If you come think of it, even if there is what we call a "home-court advantage", there is really no assurance that the home team will win, even if the statistics show they win most of the wins, there is still a small margin between the wins on a home court and wins outside of the home court. I still believe that the outcome of a match depends on how the players perform on the field, audience or no audience, the performance and the efficiency of the players would still be a key factor in winning a game or losing it.

[Vaculin]

If you come think of it, even if there is what we call a "home-court advantage", there is really no assurance that the home team will win, even if the statistics show they win most of the wins, there is still a small margin between the wins on a home court and wins outside of the home court.

Advantage does not mean that a home team will win, they will only have the advantage but the better team will win as they have bigger advantage in overall factor, now that there is no home court, then the more they will lose if they are not a good team.

This is only similar to international games where a game is played in the same venue or a venue that teams are not familiar with.

I still believe that the outcome of a match depends on how the players perform on the field, audience or no audience, the performance and the efficiency of the players would still be a key factor in winning a game or losing it.

As always, crowd is just an additional factor though. 

[cabron]

Home court is always an advantage. The players who are used to the court are always going to perform well in the court. You know which sport is slippery and all. Just like we know every corner in our house. We know which to avoid so that we won't bump into something and this is also going to the players who are used to the home court. It doesn't matter whether there are cheers that will inspire the players because they know people are watching them on the screen.

[Mahanton]

If you come think of it, even if there is what we call a "home-court advantage", there is really no assurance that the home team will win, even if the statistics show they win most of the wins, there is still a small margin between the wins on a home court and wins outside of the home court. I still believe that the outcome of a match depends on how the players perform on the field, audience or no audience, the performance and the efficiency of the players would still be a key factor in winning a game or losing it.

You can really expect that there would be comparison between those numbers and even on a very small margin it can really prove out that teams/players which are on their homecourt do really have much
winning percentage.I agree on what said above that this is some sort of psychological aspect where it can really help a team or player to boost up their plays since they do know that there are lots of
people whom do support and cheer for them and now in the new normal where theres no audience then that would really give some odd situation even when you are playing on home but the game must
go on neither theres a crowd or not. Only best team wins and wont really rely if there are people around them or havent.

[Nellayar]

I made a simple research about home court advantages in NBA. It showed that 7021 games won in home and 4569 games they have lose in home court. Almost 60.6 percent is the win rate in home court during regular season.

If we are going to base in statistics, it showed that homecourt advantage is really a factor of winning the game.


Even in boxing, Jeff Horn defeated Manny Pacquaio in Australia. Why? Because of Homecourt Advantage. But then, Manny Pacman defeated Keith Thurman in his homecourt.

Now, if we will look at the factors when it comes in homecourt advantage. We conclude that it has factors in winning the game because:

1. Audience Impact
2. You are familiar with the place
3. You can prepare a lot of time in the court where will you play.

But then, the main reason why players win are detemination, eagerness to win and luck. There is no homecourt advantage for the player who wants to bring home the word "Victory"

Reference:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1520496-how-important-is-home-court-advantage-in-the-nba.amp.html

[k@suy]

I made a simple research about home court advantages in NBA. It showed that 7021 games won in home and 4569 games they have lose in home court. Almost 60.6 percent is the win rate in home court during regular season.

If we are going to base in statistics, it showed that homecourt advantage is really a factor of winning the game.


Even in boxing, Jeff Horn defeated Manny Pacquaio in Australia. Why? Because of Homecourt Advantage. But then, Manny Pacman defeated Keith Thurman in his homecourt.

Now, if we will look at the factors when it comes in homecourt advantage. We conclude that it has factors in winning the game because:

1. Audience Impact
2. You are familiar with the place
3. You can prepare a lot of time in the court where will you play.

But then, the main reason why players win are detemination, eagerness to win and luck. There is no homecourt advantage for the player who wants to bring home the word "Victory"

Reference:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1520496-how-important-is-home-court-advantage-in-the-nba.amp.html

Yep you're right. The court doesn't matter if the fighter has determination to win just like Manny Pacman Pacquiao, he can win his game and fight against other great boxers because he has determination and inspiration for bringing home the bacon and the audience impact, familiarity in the place and the preparation is just a secondary factors in winning a championship.

[robelneo]

Home-court advantage is one of the factors that some sports bettors are looking for picking a team alongside stats, match history, injuries, and current standings.

Not that the team with that advantage will win 100% but the psychological contribution of a live audience really boosts the morale of any players, at any sports, making it an effective recipe to win.

Looking at the home-away stats in the previous season at these leagues at different sports, we can see how being in a home advantage
What do you think, does this home-court advantage, still an advantage now? Do you think Moneyline odds will now be different from now on especially if both teams are equal in strength?

The home-court advantage is a small factor in the performance of any team, management, and the team's motivation are the factors why a team will win in a game, now that matches are with no live audiences we can see the potential of the team on how they play even without the support of the crowds, we will see who are deep in talent and how the management encourage the team to win.

[Ucy]

Home court is always an advantage. The players who are used to the court are always going to perform well in the court. You know which sport is slippery and all. Just like we know every corner in our house. We know which to avoid so that we won't bump into something and this is also going to the players who are used to the home court. It doesn't matter whether there are cheers that will inspire the players because they know people are watching them on the screen.

If you are too focused on your game, you probably won't often remember that people are watching from home or far from the stadium/court. The sounds and presence of fans could drive players to move or not move in certain ways/direction.
Some kinds of sports are better played without people and noise though . The reward is usually enough incentive.

[Kasabus]

Home court is always an advantage. The players who are used to the court are always going to perform well in the court. You know which sport is slippery and all. Just like we know every corner in our house. We know which to avoid so that we won't bump into something and this is also going to the players who are used to the home court. It doesn't matter whether there are cheers that will inspire the players because they know people are watching them on the screen.

If you are too focused on your game, you probably won't often remember that people are watching from home or far from the stadium/court. The sounds and presence of fans could drive players to move or not move in certain ways/direction.
Some kinds of sports are better played without people and noise though . The reward is usually enough incentive.

The home court advantage was an advantage because of the crowd and players sees them interact, and I don't think players are gonna think of whoever watching them in screen because it's a given reality that people are going to watch them in their TV and w are talking of millions of people. If the sports will resume, they will experience the new normal which they need to adjust, but we people who are watching in our TV, it's not a big deal anyway, we just enjoy because they are playing and we can bet at the same time.

[rodskee]

If you are too focused on your game, you probably won't often remember that people are watching from home or far from the stadium/court. The sounds and presence of fans could drive players to move or not move in certain ways/direction.

Distractions can be created with huge noise coming from the fans who are cheering with the team that they are supporting,
from this view, home court advantages are very possible.
But with many events where professional players who are well trained from this kind of audiences they are no longer affected
as focused are always there once they've step inside the court / stadiums.

Some kinds of sports are better played without people and noise though . The reward is usually enough incentive.

Some games needs quite place not to be bothered by anyone, depends from player/s.

[Taskford]

Home court is always an advantage. The players who are used to the court are always going to perform well in the court. You know which sport is slippery and all. Just like we know every corner in our house. We know which to avoid so that we won't bump into something and this is also going to the players who are used to the home court. It doesn't matter whether there are cheers that will inspire the players because they know people are watching them on the screen.

If you are too focused on your game, you probably won't often remember that people are watching from home or far from the stadium/court. The sounds and presence of fans could drive players to move or not move in certain ways/direction.
Some kinds of sports are better played without people and noise though . The reward is usually enough incentive.

Nope mate even if you are focused still you will be bothered if the crowd chants bad on you, but since there's a quarantine and new normal has been implemented for sure they will be less stressed for the game but still I find the home court still an advantage since you still play the ambience that you are familiar and even if no crowd still you will feel comfortable playing at home.

[dimonstration]

If you come think of it, even if there is what we call a "home-court advantage", there is really no assurance that the home team will win, even if the statistics show they win most of the wins, there is still a small margin between the wins on a home court and wins outside of the home court. I still believe that the outcome of a match depends on how the players perform on the field, audience or no audience, the performance and the efficiency of the players would still be a key factor in winning a game or losing it.

The only advantage of home court now is the comfort ability knowing that what you practised all happens within that premises or area. Even there's no audience but being comptable in the area will make our move smoother, thou it will really depend on the teams determination and how they really play. They will win as long as they will do what is needed and know how to manage their game whenever they are.