Premier League Prediction Thread 2024/2025

[Jegileman]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

No team can achieve a long term success without having to wait to build a very strong and stable team for it. This could take years as it differs the team and the money they’ve spent on having such a very strong team. Chelsea wants quick change add improvement in the club which they just have to wait for a little more time after their failed seasons back to back from the time Tuchel left. Building a strong team as the old Chelsea requires a lot of patience and hard work and if they don’t want to wait for that time, they’ll keep changing coach till they don’t have anything else to show, no options to rely on than keeping a coach for a longer period which will bring them back to square one. Chelsea can still be great again, but they should stop sacking coach and allow them to build a strong and formidable team to rely on for years to come.

[Abu-Naim]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

[Dzwaafu11]

For somebody that wants his club to get better i don't see a reason why he should not sack who is not performing the management as the right but the case of Chelsea is becoming something different because they are always sacking their coaches, and that instant result that they want they won't get it because the club needs more time for them to get results, but since they want a quick one they will keep sacking and I can bet you that they won't get results if this is what they want to be doing, because no coach will be good for them. Two seasons and the club have not actually archived anything, even with the number of coaches and buying of players they still did not succeed. I think  the management should just focus on fixing rather than winning. Rhat way they will be able to move forward. If it is performance I know I don't like arsenal but you can not compare the two clubs arsenal finished second so are they comparable no.

Sacking a coach is not a big deal if that is what is going to bring betterment to the team, but Chelsea's is too much to be sincere. They always sack their managers once they see a little mistake that is difficult to correct. They don’t give him enough time to see if he will be able to get things right.

However, when a new coach comes to a team, before he gets the squad back to full performance as everybody wants, it takes time since he will come with his new method of play. Apart from that, Chelsea management does not usually give enough time; they want things to be done in a very short period of time, and that is the problem.

[rahmad2nd]

Therefore, although Chelsea has a lot of money and can afford to buy talented young players but anyway, the reality is that Chelsea cannot appreciate a process. Therefore, the result is always changing the coach despite the fact that Pochettino is also slowly and giving good results. But even though Pochettino still managed to end the season in a position that was at least still good, but it still made Chelsea sack Pochettino. Thus, it will certainly remain difficult for Chelsea to become a title candidate team next season because they have a new manager, while Manchester City and Arsenal only need to maintain their good trends. But about Chelsea with their new manager, then of course they will adapt first to be able to improve the quality of the team.

Chelsea managers have put in enough long runs and we know it's very difficult for top challenges. Todd Boehly have made the required instructions to forward strategic measures and everything will pan out smoothly. Former headcoach, Mauricio Pochettino had nothing to offer because he's consider average coach, he has faced alot and have been dismissed. However, Todd Boehly never relents and have make the requirable moves to appoint Enzo Maresca. Chelsea is forming to be an elite team, we know the structural composition of the club but everything have turned out to be in favor of the new coach.

Throughout Chelsea's development, I didn't try to get involved in discussing it. I just want to see first, the newcomers and the pre-season matches they played. however, it seems like lately Chelsea has been paying attention in the community. Let's look back first, previously Todd Boehly had prepared various options as Chelsea coach. however, several coaches refused to manage Chelsea in the previous season. in the end, Pochettino was appointed and he agreed to handle Chelsea. but unfortunately, he had quite a hard time building his team to reach a level quickly. moreover, most of the players Chelsea brought in were not of his will. it could be said, Pochettino only works with the players available. at the same time, the players they have had difficulty performing well even though at the end of the competition Chelsea were able to win several of their matches. and, Pochettino was only able to bring Chelsea to sixth place in the Premier League. not so bad, unfortunately Poche is not interested in continuing his coaching at Stamford Bridge.

Burrently, Boehly has appointed Enzo Maresca to coach Chelsea.
talking about whether Chelsea will be able to compete closely with its rivals, we'll just have to wait and see when the competition starts. however, in my personal opinion, it is not an easy matter for Enzo Maresca to bring Chelsea towards significant change. especially, if they are aiming for a trophy. I think the struggle will be very tough because several other teams are quite ready with their squads to compete next season. but, let's see how far Enzo Maresca can contribute to Chelsea.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

Yeah it depends on which way we look at it, while I think both have an impact. Management wants to see team performance improve quickly while they forget everything needs a process, we will see what their steps are in the next season. Arsenal may have had a better history in the last few seasons but we know it also needs a process, I remember Arsenal was at the bottom of the standings when the new season started but slowly they started to find their best game until Arsenal is always in the top 4.

In my opinion, one season is not enough to build a squad like Chelsea at least the coach is given 2-3 seasons to make 11 players find the right strategy in the game. Of all the teams in the Premier League, only Manchester City has succeeded in building a team quickly at least in the last 5 years and not all coaches have this kind of ability.

[ginsan]

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

Yeah it depends on which way we look at it, while I think both have an impact. Management wants to see team performance improve quickly while they forget everything needs a process, we will see what their steps are in the next season.

Why do Chelsea managers do that because they certainly have their own analysis of why they want to change faster it could be that there is nothing suitable that the Chelsea owner wants while we know all that needs a process but Chelsea owners have money they can change whatever they want.

Chelsea now has a new manager Maresca I hope he is the one who can make changes where Chelsea will not play badly anymore but never expect this too quickly there is a long process sometimes the owner is always impatient as he said, next season we can see a new face for Chelsea.

[SOKO-DEKE]

For somebody that wants his club to get better i don't see a reason why he should not sack who is not performing the management as the right but the case of Chelsea is becoming something different because they are always sacking their coaches, and that instant result that they want they won't get it because the club needs more time for them to get results, but since they want a quick one they will keep sacking and I can bet you that they won't get results if this is what they want to be doing, because no coach will be good for them. Two seasons and the club have not actually archived anything, even with the number of coaches and buying of players they still did not succeed. I think  the management should just focus on fixing rather than winning. Rhat way they will be able to move forward. If it is performance I know I don't like arsenal but you can not compare the two clubs arsenal finished second so are they comparable no.

Honestly, if Chelsea continue to be sacking their coach in this manner without giving them enough time to prove themselves, they will hardly find a better coach that will suit the team and bring back the team to their best form. Out of the coaches Chelsea have sacked, the one that surprises me very much is Pochettino. With the little improvement Chelsea have seen toward the end of last season, I did not expect Chelsea to sack Pochettino. If Chelsea had given Pochettino next season, with the way he was understanding Chelsea, next season may have been a better season for Chelsea.

I know that the sacking of Pochettino was based on the agreement they had; Pochettino did not meet up with the agreement. But with the performances Pochettino showed, without meeting up with what Chelsea wanted from him, it should have been considered. Sacking with only a little time will hardly work for them.

[Stable090]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

Maybe that’s just what Chelsea management doesn’t really understand. The previous Chelsea coach was trying to stabilize Chelsea's performance towards the end of the season, which we think his performance is going to improve by next season, but all the management did was sack him after the season ends, and they already have a new coach who will manage the club by next season. I just hope his performance will be better than the previous coach, and Chelsea will be able to give him time. Changing coaches frequently is really affecting Chelsea's performance every season.
 
Everyone applauded Pochettino towards the end of the season, so everyone expected Chelsea to keep him. It was a shock to everyone to see them sack Pochettino. Let’s just hope the new coach performs better.

[Egii Nna]

For somebody that wants his club to get better i don't see a reason why he should not sack who is not performing the management as the right but the case of Chelsea is becoming something different because they are always sacking their coaches, and that instant result that they want they won't get it because the club needs more time for them to get results, but since they want a quick one they will keep sacking and I can bet you that they won't get results if this is what they want to be doing, because no coach will be good for them. Two seasons and the club have not actually archived anything, even with the number of coaches and buying of players they still did not succeed. I think  the management should just focus on fixing rather than winning. Rhat way they will be able to move forward. If it is performance I know I don't like arsenal but you can not compare the two clubs arsenal finished second so are they comparable no.

Sacking a coach is not a big deal if that is what is going to bring betterment to the team, but Chelsea's is too much to be sincere. They always sack their managers once they see a little mistake that is difficult to correct. They don’t give him enough time to see if he will be able to get things right.

However, when a new coach comes to a team, before he gets the squad back to full performance as everybody wants, it takes time since he will come with his new method of play. Apart from that, Chelsea management does not usually give enough time; they want things to be done in a very short period of time, and that is the problem.

The best thing that Chelsea needs, and they find it hard to understand, is that they need to give their coach’s enough time to adopt with the team so that they can get a balance between the demands of the excellence that they need, which can provide a conducive environment for the players and the coaches in which they can try their best to bring the success that Chelsea needs. 
 
Because if they continue to sack their coaches with just small mistakes, they will end up losing their reputation that they already have, even though you know that they have already lost some of their reputation. But if they can give adequate time and support to their coaches, they will gain back some of their reputation, so Chelsea will have to take a good time for themselves in order to see success. 

[Rengga Jati]

Why do Chelsea managers do that because they certainly have their own analysis of why they want to change faster it could be that there is nothing suitable that the Chelsea owner wants while we know all that needs a process but Chelsea owners have money they can change whatever they want.

Chelsea now has a new manager Maresca I hope he is the one who can make changes where Chelsea will not play badly anymore but never expect this too quickly there is a long process sometimes the owner is always impatient as he said, next season we can see a new face for Chelsea.

This time, Chelsea seems more serious about improving their performance based on their poor performance last season. And one of them is related to purchasing players. It's just that several times they have not been successful in bringing in top players to strengthen the team. However, they are still continuing to observe and negotiate the recruitment of several players they are targeting.

There are several names that are rumored to be going to Chelsea, such as Nico Williams, Marc Guiu and Jonathan David. It's just that it's still related to the fees that will be spent and Chelsea doesn't seem to want to be too generous in spending money just yet. That's why several times the club failed to bring some of these top talented players to Chelsea.

Yeah let them work and see the result. They have a new coach who they hope can make Chelsea much better than last season. Getting into the UCL is their main target and Enzo Maresca has started working towards that. Even though there are many people who doubt his abilities, Chelsea themselves are quite confident that Moresca is the right choice for the club.

[GiftedMAN]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

At the same time I do not think you should blame the management of Chelsea for not being patient enough to give the managers time to improve the performance of the Chelsea team rather I think the managers should have worked so hard in helping the management of Chelsea to improve the performance of the team and to win trophies which is the main reason why the management invested heavily in purchasing players into the team.

The management of Arsenal is different from that of Chelsea that is what we need to understand and looking at the time that has been given to the Arsenal coach Arteta and how close he has gone without winning the league don't you think the management of Arsenal is getting tired of him already? Arsenal didn't invest much money like Chelsea they have a better team now that is already competing with City for the trophy but I think the new season will decide if Arteta is loved for not winning trophies for Arsenal or not.

[Falconer]

-snip-

Why do Chelsea managers do that because they certainly have their own analysis of why they want to change faster it could be that there is nothing suitable that the Chelsea owner wants while we know all that needs a process but Chelsea owners have money they can change whatever they want.

Chelsea now has a new manager Maresca I hope he is the one who can make changes where Chelsea will not play badly anymore but never expect this too quickly there is a long process sometimes the owner is always impatient as he said, next season we can see a new face for Chelsea.

It is not an easy task at all to change a team's inconsistent performance in a season. New coaches need adaptation, the same goes for Chelsea bringing in new players. Chelsea could improve gradually and this is clearly more likely than expecting them to win the title straight away next season.

It requires good cooperation between players and coaches both in a game and in the dressing room. Basically, Chelsea has good players in their squad, but sometimes their performance is like players who are not motivated to win. I had that impression in many of Chelsea's games last season, but I hope they can improve next season too. What is certain is that not only Chelsea, but I also hope that Manchester United can also improve better.

[Die_empty]

I'm Chelsea fan, and I've watched how my club have surpassed the struggling limits and now settled for lesser poor results. This is out of the picture and I've come to realized that time is perfectly the stable form ought to be give to these assigned coaches. But everything turn up against our expectations, we're seeing different outcome. Chelsea is elite team but everything worked smoothly during the era of Abramovic, he made good use of his players and signed appropriate talent players. Chelsea owner, Todd Boehly is impatience and have placed down the instructed maps.

I have heard some people say that it was the wrongful and forceful changing of ownership of Chelsea that is affecting the club. They feel that the UK government wrongfully took away the club from Roman Abramovich and sold it to Todd Boehly and his partners. They argued that every wealthy man would always be close to the government. Most top business owners in the UK have connections in the government, so one cannot claim that the relationship between Vladimir Putin and Roman is out of place. As a rich Russian he has to be close to the government to protect his investment. I don't believe in these spiritual thoughts but in Chelsea's case, I have been forced to believe it. Todd has done everything within his power to make Chelsea successful, but it seems like some unseen forces are fighting against the club.

Honestly, if Chelsea continue to sack their coach in this manner without giving them enough time to prove themselves, they will hardly find a better coach that will suit the team and bring back the team to their best form. Out of the coaches Chelsea have sacked, the one that surprises me very much is Pochettino. With the little improvement Chelsea have seen toward the end of last season, I did not expect Chelsea to sack Pochettino. If Chelsea had given Pochettino next season, with the way he was understanding Chelsea, next season may have been a better season for Chelsea.

I was also surprised that the club sacked Mauricio Pochettino. Except there are some other reasons that have not been made public, I think his sack was a blunder. The Argentine has started getting results from the time he has spent to build the team. He has started gaining mastery over the players and style of play and this was the time the club decided to let him go. The new coach will have to start from the foundation again. The club is known for its high level of impatience and it is affecting them adversely.

[Frankolala]

Chelsea's poor performance is mainly due to some bad management decisions. It takes a long time for a new coach to stabilize a team. Stabilizing such a troubled team is no easy task for any coach. But the Chelsea management wants a quick improvement. This is not possible at all.

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

Chelsea needs patient in order for the coach to build a strong team with a tight bond. Changing coach always will not yield to good result because the coach and the players needs to understand themselves and play together for long in order for them to be successful in future.

This season might turn out to be similar with the previous seasons where Chelsea is always battling to win matches. However, Enzo might make things work out faster than we thought but we should not expect too much from him, because he is new with the team. Victory does not come in just one day, take for example Manchester city, Pep have been in that club for a very long time and that is why they are the best currently.

[Jaycoinz]

Therefore, although Chelsea has a lot of money and can afford to buy talented young players but anyway, the reality is that Chelsea cannot appreciate a process. Therefore, the result is always changing the coach despite the fact that Pochettino is also slowly and giving good results. But even though Pochettino still managed to end the season in a position that was at least still good, but it still made Chelsea sack Pochettino. Thus, it will certainly remain difficult for Chelsea to become a title candidate team next season because they have a new manager, while Manchester City and Arsenal only need to maintain their good trends. But about Chelsea with their new manager, then of course they will adapt first to be able to improve the quality of the team.

Chelsea managers have put in enough long runs and we know it's very difficult for top challenges. Todd Boehly have made the required instructions to forward strategic measures and everything will pan out smoothly. Former headcoach, Mauricio Pochettino had nothing to offer because he's consider average coach, he has faced alot and have been dismissed. However, Todd Boehly never relents and have make the requirable moves to appoint Enzo Maresca. Chelsea is forming to be an elite team, we know the structural composition of the club but everything have turned out to be in favor of the new coach.

Well let's see what the next coach have to offer because from what I deduce from this Chelsea team I should yat they really need time and a very strict and hard coach to work with the players because most of the players there are all full of themselves maybe because of the actual money used in purchasing them and they all feel full of themselves well that's my take and I don't know if changing porchettino will help because they started actually clicking well at the end of last season.

[Nheer]

Chelsea managers have put in enough long runs and we know it's very difficult for top challenges. Todd Boehly have made the required instructions to forward strategic measures and everything will pan out smoothly. Former headcoach, Mauricio Pochettino had nothing to offer because he's consider average coach, he has faced alot and have been dismissed. However, Todd Boehly never relents and have make the requirable moves to appoint Enzo Maresca. Chelsea is forming to be an elite team, we know the structural composition of the club but everything have turned out to be in favor of the new coach.

Actually Pochettino was not so bad he just didn’t meet up the conditions set for him that was what made him to be sacked. Looking at how the team performed and ended the season we all saw the improvement but for me personally i am not convinced because he still has the problem of being able to manage the players properly especially when there are lots of players to select from, he is still unable to select a preferred eleven and thats a major problem as a coach.

Everyone applauded Pochettino towards the end of the season, so everyone expected Chelsea to keep him. It was a shock to everyone to see them sack Pochettino. Let’s just hope the new coach performs better.

They couldn’t keep him because he couldn’t meet the demands of the management but he still tried his best though.

[Oluwa-btc]

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

Chelsea management did gave Graham Potter time though, how well did he do the job? They gave him too much tike but he did flop and let down the management.
Todd Boehly is good with selling and making profits from players but I feel like he should just play hus role as CEO and allow those who are experienced in that field do their work for the club.

Why the Comparisons between Arsenal and Chelsea?

Arsenal knows they have a good manager for longer term plans, as for Chelsea I can't say, I'm just keen to see how Enzo Maresca performance for the club.
I'm sure in my heart that he'll definitely be successful with that.

[Antotena]

Actually Pochettino was not so bad he just didn’t meet up the conditions set for him that was what made him to be sacked. Looking at how the team performed and ended the season we all saw the improvement but for me personally i am not convinced because he still has the problem of being able to manage the players properly especially when there are lots of players to select from, he is still unable to select a preferred eleven and thats a major problem as a coach.

You reviewed everything Pochettino played in the last season and you decide to give him some accolades towards the end of the season. You didn't review the days he had opportunity wasted when Chelsea could have done better. The days they were stuck in the 11-10th place in the Premier League table for 6 weeks in row withoht any changes. If you owned Chelsea and you see a lot of potentials outside, you wouldn't be please to use him for second season.

They couldn’t keep him because he couldn’t meet the demands of the management but he still tried his best though.

That's exactly what happened, who knows if he has signed a contract with a condition to give the team a trophy, maybe FA cup, Premier League or promised to finished the season among top four but the result wasn't what they all expected and he was relieved from his job for another person to take over. Maybe things are going to change under management of Maresca.

[Dailyscript]

I don’t blame any of their coaches they signed or any player for their poor performance, in fact, I am putting the blame on the management and the owners for lacking patience with managers just because of the money they blindly spent on signing players and because they want quick results.

 Take Arsenal for example; they spent some money for players, but they gave the manager some time to build his team, now Arteta is doing well since he was able to build his team and can now perform very well in all competitions. Despite Arteta not winning trophies, Arsenal management were patient, but I am sure they will win title next season.

Chelsea management did gave Graham Potter time though, how well did he do the job? They gave him too much tike but he did flop and let down the management.
Todd Boehly is good with selling and making profits from players but I feel like he should just play hus role as CEO and allow those who are experienced in that field do their work for the club.

Why the Comparisons between Arsenal and Chelsea?

Arsenal knows they have a good manager for longer term plans, as for Chelsea I can't say, I'm just keen to see how Enzo Maresca performance for the club.
I'm sure in my heart that he'll definitely be successful with that.

Yeah right. When it comes to management one person cannot do it all alone. And there are persons who are gifted or should i say talented in some specific areas. Since the management of a club comprises of management of the players and management of the affairs of the club. A coach should be given full right to manage the players given to him to work with. He should have the right to decide who to choose to join the team so that such players will execute the plans he had for the team. Most time the player given to a coach is one that has been highly hyped which is not what the coach wants for the team yet he will have no choice but to manage such players.

[Hyphen(-)]

Chelsea management did gave Graham Potter time though, how well did he do the job? They gave him too much tike but he did flop and let down the management.
Todd Boehly is good with selling and making profits from players but I feel like he should just play hus role as CEO and allow those who are experienced in that field do their work for the club.

Graham Potter was not given too much time but the little time they gave him, he miss used it because many fans believed in him before they signed him from Brighton; when he joined them, his performance and reputation as a good coach drops until he get sacked.

Todd Boehly has never gain when it comes to transfer of player because since he joined the team, he and his management has been spending money to buy reputable players, but sold out some average players with low market value.

Why the Comparisons between Arsenal and Chelsea?

Arsenal knows they have a good manager for longer term plans, as for Chelsea I can't say, I'm just keen to see how Enzo Maresca performance for the club.
I'm sure in my heart that he'll definitely be successful with that.

If Chelsea has given Pochettihnho time, he could have done more in the coming season, but they sacked him just because they are eying young coach that they feel will do some good jobs just as Arteta is used to do; they can now give Enzo Maresca some time to build the team.