Premier League Prediction Thread 2024/2025

[Blitzboy]

At least with the new coach now Todd has hope that Enzo can change Chelsea to be better than before although surely this can be realized will be very difficult to do but on the other hand we also cannot judge as if Enzo will not be able to bring Chelsea.

Before a coach is signed, the management always has the hope that the club's performance is going to improve. The same thing is happening to Enzo, everyone is expecting a better performance from the coach, but we don’t know how the coach is going to perform yet until the season starts. A coach might be performing well in a particular team, and when the coach decides to join another team, his performance might reduce, so I can’t really wait for the season to start so that I can see the pattern that he is going to be using, and I hope Chelsea performance next season will be better than last season.

The hope of getting the team's performance out of decline is always a priority for management. Changing coaches is common in a club when the team's performance is not as expected. Chelsea management has high hopes for Enzo Maresca, they consider Enzo to be the most appropriate figure to improve Chelsea performance after he was successful with the previous team.
Changes in the squad began to be made gradually, since Enzo was appointed as head coach, management immediately dipped into their pockets to bring in new players. Next season there will be several new faces in the Chelsea squad, Enzo must be able to fulfill management's expectations after they have worked hard to see his team can compete in the title race.

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

But if he doesnt deliver, he's gone. Similar to every other one. That is the way Chelsea functions, which is unfortunate. Its not about building, its about quick fixes. Long-term effectiveness of such never comes.

[Nheer]

In addition, I think Manchester United current performance and consistency is nothing but the poor system and training pattern implemented by ten hag so far, because if we look at Manchester United can be very great when playing against big teams like in FA matches, but they actually perform very poorly when they do play against teams that are commensurate or inferior to them in the league,Isn't that pretty weird?

It’s weird and proves that Ten Hag has not been doing a great job with the team, the level of inconsistency is just too high, training pattern is definitely poor or not good for the caliber of players they have. Some might think that winning the FA Cup will prove that Ten Hag  is worthy enough but i will disagree because a team that cannot win small and average teams is not showing any signs of improvement at all.

Sometimes it looks strange at Manchester United, but I wouldn't consider Manchester United a completely bad team because they just need to improve several factors so they can become better, such as examples of training and tactics that must be clear from their own coach. So Ten Hag must be able to realize the things he needs to improve now before the season resumes.

They are so bad but it’s just the level of inconsistency despite having so many good players. I believe if a better coach should handle these players they will be more productive than under Ten Hag. I doubt if he is even able to identify the areas that needs to be improved on, he seem confused and at this point I would advise they replace him with a better manager that can lead the team to glory.

[Jody.Drummer]

Sometimes it looks strange at Manchester United, but I wouldn't consider Manchester United a completely bad team because they just need to improve several factors so they can become better, such as examples of training and tactics that must be clear from their own coach. So Ten Hag must be able to realize the things he needs to improve now before the season resumes.

They are so bad but it’s just the level of inconsistency despite having so many good players. I believe if a better coach should handle these players they will be more productive than under Ten Hag. I doubt if he is even able to identify the areas that needs to be improved on, he seem confused and at this point I would advise they replace him with a better manager that can lead the team to glory.

Erik Ten Hag has not been able to show his capacity as a coach, and in my opinion what he has done so far cannot be said to be anything good. The reason is that he also cannot see and use the players properly and this creates an internal problem that is part of Manchester United's problems, especially in implementing a game scheme where it is not clear how they will play.

He was lucky because he was still given the opportunity by Manchester United, even though their performance this season was not at all satisfactory. In next season he should be able to improve again, but personally I doubt that he will be able to bring Manchester United even better. Although I also don't rule out the possibility that they will be better, for now I still doubt it.

He still has a lot to improve in the game that they often show, because there are so many problems that I see. The chemistry between the players is also not good, he has not been able to create that.

[fadhilz123]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

It's going to be tough to handle Chelsea who you liken to a pressure cooker because the team themselves always want good results quickly without wanting to see the process first. Chelsea should realise that in order to make a team better it has to go through a process that doesn't even take a short time to achieve what they want. Because in the Premier League the competition is very competitive and I think Chelsea already know that so they should realise that changing managers every season is not going to change anything in their own team.

[Slow death]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

It's going to be tough to handle Chelsea who you liken to a pressure cooker because the team themselves always want good results quickly without wanting to see the process first. Chelsea should realise that in order to make a team better it has to go through a process that doesn't even take a short time to achieve what they want. Because in the Premier League the competition is very competitive and I think Chelsea already know that so they should realise that changing managers every season is not going to change anything in their own team.

Chelsea's management probably think that signing young players who have great talent to start playing in a few years is the best way for the team to be strong in the coming years. Chelsea's management forgets that they have had many players seen as highly talented players but who in a few years later became ordinary players, Chelsea don't have an intelligent owner who understands football, now they want to become Dortmund or in Benfica, Portugal. I say this because in my opinion the goal of Chelsea's management when signing young players is probably so that these players continue to be good players. their price increases a lot and Chelsea sells them later and makes a big profit, they are not looking at securities as being a priority in the future, I could be wrong in my way of thinking, time will tell if I am really wrong or not.

Ipswich are set to sign Chelsea winger Omari Hutchinson in a club record deal, subject to a medical.

The 20-year-old is expected to complete a move worth an initial £20m - with a further £2.5m potentially due subject to performance-related add-ons.

Hutchinson was the club's primary transfer target after his exceptional performances on loan in the Championship last season, contributing 10 goals and six assists.

source: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c10l4424ry2o

Omari Hutchinson is 20 years old, made 44 appearances and scored 10 goals when he played for Ipswich last season, I wonder why Chelsea let him go to Ipswich permanently? Honestly, Chelsea is a very strange club and I highly doubt that we will see Chelsea managing to win the premier league next season or even in the next 2 seasons. They were already getting off to a good start last season, but after the coach was fired, they started making weird signings again.

[Weawant]

Sometimes it looks strange at Manchester United, but I wouldn't consider Manchester United a completely bad team because they just need to improve several factors so they can become better, such as examples of training and tactics that must be clear from their own coach. . Because if nothing changes next season, it is not impossible that the Manchester United team will be in a much worse position than last season. So Ten Hag must be able to realize the things he needs to improve now before the season resumes.

Realizing the need for improvement and implementing the steps to improving is one very key factor Ten Hag appears to have failed to recognize that it's now a problem to their team because they have continued in managing the situation for just too long enough without steps to solving the issues at hand, mainly it's based on their tactical approach and their mind set. Ten hag can be a good coach but then he needs to work on himself to be able to become productive enough to start to achieving good results.

His tactics is something he needs to improve on and get a better strategy that will be very potent enough to making the team achieve productivity. Manchester united can be able to win another trophy in the new season if they get improvement on all sides, Ren hag should look into his defense line and make sure to so something about it, either he applies a different defense tactics or he gets to the market and purchase new defenders, his relationship with the players too should improve so he will be able to build in them the mentality to winning and becoming Strong.

If all the possible a d needed changes and improvement are implemented, I believe Manchester united can be a better team than they were last season but if they do contrarily, the worse will be their situation and the most terrible thing that can happen to Manchester united is if they get worse than they were last season, the chances they may just be fighting to escape relegation will be high and Ten hag shouldn't be tollerated till such point as the damage by then would be too much already to fix.

[ShowOff]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

It's going to be tough to handle Chelsea who you liken to a pressure cooker because the team themselves always want good results quickly without wanting to see the process first. Chelsea should realise that in order to make a team better it has to go through a process that doesn't even take a short time to achieve what they want. Because in the Premier League the competition is very competitive and I think Chelsea already know that so they should realise that changing managers every season is not going to change anything in their own team.

I've heard quite a few people complain like that about the way Chelsea build their team and their journey to success. Sometimes things don't go according to expectations and there is a possibility that what we talk about does not match what is actually happening within the team. We are just observers and criticize based on what we see, whereas we are never involved in it to know everything.

Chelsea is building and they are trying to find themselves back into the top competition in the Premier League. The phase they will go through is never easy because changing ownership will change many things and they also have a different approach. No success comes quickly without struggle, consistency, sacrifice and patience, while Chelsea needs support instead of unconstructive criticism.

[Palakka]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

Expecting instant results is of course the reason why Chelsea continues to change coaches at this time, but the current Chelsea owners do not realize that what they are doing actually makes Chelsea worse later, what happened to Napoli in Serie A should be a reference for Chelsea owners to see the effects of coach changes that are indeed carried out continuously at this time without a process and tend to hope to see Chelsea become more Both in a short time, what Chelsea is doing now is a time bomb that will indeed make them fall later although Chelsea has a strong financial presence so far.

Manchester City and Liverpool are able to become strong teams after going through a long process in building their teams, the two clubs can not achieved instant success since the beginning of the two coaches came, Guardiola and Klopp had a difficult era in building teams when they first came to Manchester City and Liverpool, but both teams continue to trust the two coaches to be able to build a strong team foundation and also a playing philosophy that is indeed Finally giving a sweet result at this time, I hope Chelsea will give Enzo lot of time to build Chelsea into a strong team later.

[Oluwa-btc]

Sometimes it looks strange at Manchester United, but I wouldn't consider Manchester United a completely bad team because they just need to improve several factors so they can become better, such as examples of training and tactics that must be clear from their own coach. . Because if nothing changes next season, it is not impossible that the Manchester United team will be in a much worse position than last season. So Ten Hag must be able to realize the things he needs to improve now before the season resumes.

They wasn't bad during the first season of Erik Ten Hag, they played as a team when it mattered most. Manchester United saw improvements during that first season.
They need to change the medical team, they need new defenders and also two midfielder's that are technically sound and at the same standards of Bruno Fernandez.

Y'all complain about the tactical approach of Erik Ten Hag's game this wasn't the same way he did during the first season. He just lacked a complete squad and was misinformed about the return of Luke Shaw and Tyrell Malacia.

Erik Ten Hag will definitely improve. I'm not doubting his capabilities, he remains a good coach, it's also grwt to see the backing from the management. So much has been said about Todd Boehly, I feel like he is not doing things the same way Europeans do it, I'm not sure for a quick impact, also Chelsea fans shouldn't have high expectations ahead of the new season.

[lizarder]

He was lucky because he was still given the opportunity by Manchester United, even though their performance this season was not at all satisfactory. In next season he should be able to improve again, but personally I doubt that he will be able to bring Manchester United even better. Although I also don't rule out the possibility that they will be better, for now I still doubt it.

He still has a lot to improve in the game that they often show, because there are so many problems that I see. The chemistry between the players is also not good, he has not been able to create that.

If he was at Chelsea, Erik Ten Hak might have been on the verge of being fired when he had such a bad season like last season. He is lucky enough to still be maintained even though if you look at Man United's inconsistent performance due to the many players who are injured. I think the problem is with the players because from last season we could see the level of selfishness shown by some of the players he has.

In addition to Chemistry, Erik Ten Hak also often tries different strategies in every match and always puts players in the wrong position. I don't understand what he is looking for, but if you pay attention, he has not found a form of play that suits his players.

[DaNNy001]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

It's going to be tough to handle Chelsea who you liken to a pressure cooker because the team themselves always want good results quickly without wanting to see the process first. Chelsea should realise that in order to make a team better it has to go through a process that doesn't even take a short time to achieve what they want. Because in the Premier League the competition is very competitive and I think Chelsea already know that so they should realise that changing managers every season is not going to change anything in their own team.

If the owner of the club can't bear or stand the transition which the team has to go through then the only possible resort that he is gonna turn to will actually be the sacking and appointment of new coaches and which every football enthusiast knows is actually not the solution for a team to grow and become stronger.

[redsun114]

Chelsea will find it difficult to achieve success if club officials and managers don't share the same ideas in looking at the future, this could be a factor in their failure every season. Pochettino wants to have greater influence in player transfer matters, his goal is clearly understandable, Pochettino wants players according to his strategic needs. In Todd Boehly view, Pochettino wishes are considered to be contrary to his policy, which in my opinion Todd Boehly prioritizes building a club with young players. Ideally a good squad is a mix of young players and mature players. As the next successor, Enzo Maresca will certainly tend to think the same as Pochettino in terms of building the squad. In my opinion, Chelsea future really depends on how big a role their manager has in building squad depth.

Chelsea is club which having historic achievements but now due to few wrong decisions things are going into wrong way, and we are having difficult time for their fans those are expecting better results, but it's not coming soon because in last season we have good performance and there was hope of improvement, but suddenly we have another wrong decision, and now they are doing from scratches which is surely not easy to bring quick good results Todd Boehly is doing things which are surely making mess-up even few are saying he wants to have new and young squad, but this all is just personal statements with things are not easy set.

Enzo Maresca is having good last season, but now it's not guaranteed to be done again like this, so expectations are high, but reality has never been easy hopefully we will have them back at his best and things could be competitive for all clubs in Premier League.

[Asiska02]

In addition, I think Manchester United current performance and consistency is nothing but the poor system and training pattern implemented by ten hag so far, because if we look at Manchester United can be very great when playing against big teams like in FA matches, but they actually perform very poorly when they do play against teams that are commensurate or inferior to them in the league,Isn't that pretty weird?

This same exhibition of poor football by Manchester United when they face lower teams is applicable to what we once saw in Chelsea before the end of the season. It is very painful to see teams perform well when facing bigger teams and then begin to fail to win against lower teams that they can confidently win and increase their place in the standings. Manchester United under Ten Hag hasn’t been so exceptionally, but I’ll say given him another chance is not a bad thing, he should be tried again and maybe he’ll make things better for the team now.

The premier league next season is going to be more competitive than we think,Pep Guardiola will be aiming to win his 7th premier league Tittle,but I am sure other teams in the premiership will be out there battling with them and one of those teams is Arsenal.They have become runners up for two seasons now,but last season,they came very close to winning the tittle,and were waiting for the least mistake from Mancity for them to take over the top position and be winner of the league.
I will be so happy the day Arsenal will become premier league winners again after so much struggle,and I'm hoping next season will be that season.

The case of Arsenal always coming as runner ups cannot be overemphasized. They need to do something about that because they can’t continue to finish the league for the third time in succession without winning the league title even when they always get a lot of opportunity to make that happen. I know they’ll try their best in the next season again and a lot of people will be looking up to them to defeat Manchester City this time around. They have what it takes and if they play well as demanded from them, they’ll be the one lifting the premier league trophy by the end of the season. Arteta performance is great, I don’t think they’ll want to change him now.

[tygeade]

Chelsea will find it difficult to achieve success if club officials and managers don't share the same ideas in looking at the future, this could be a factor in their failure every season. Pochettino wants to have greater influence in player transfer matters, his goal is clearly understandable, Pochettino wants players according to his strategic needs. In Todd Boehly view, Pochettino wishes are considered to be contrary to his policy, which in my opinion Todd Boehly prioritizes building a club with young players. Ideally a good squad is a mix of young players and mature players. As the next successor, Enzo Maresca will certainly tend to think the same as Pochettino in terms of building the squad. In my opinion, Chelsea future really depends on how big a role their manager has in building squad depth.

The club "owner" is the real problem, well not a problem at all but just the expectations is the one. They are spending way too much money and they are building a team for the future as well, but Chelsea is a big club and normally they are used to seeing something right away, so building a club for the future is their issue right now.

If you take the money they spent this summer, and previous last summers, which can only grow bigger if they buy anyone more this summer, we could say that they could have bought players who are ready right now and could go for top four easily and even try for a title. Doesn't mean they would have won, but could have been much better than what they have right now. The downside is that they would have to keep on buying players, this way they are building for the future.

[hahay]

Chelsea's like a revolving door for coaches. In, out, in again, out. Ridiculous. Does it improve the team? Absolutely not! Its a mess. Its chaos. Building a winning team is not done that way. This Enzo man has some respectable experience, now. He has been with winners like Pep. He returned Leicester to the major divisions. That is excellent and rather remarkable. Yet Chelsea? It is a cooker under pressure. Can he manage that? We'll see.

It's going to be tough to handle Chelsea who you liken to a pressure cooker because the team themselves always want good results quickly without wanting to see the process first. Chelsea should realise that in order to make a team better it has to go through a process that doesn't even take a short time to achieve what they want. Because in the Premier League the competition is very competitive and I think Chelsea already know that so they should realise that changing managers every season is not going to change anything in their own team.

If the owner of the club can't bear or stand the transition which the team has to go through then the only possible resort that he is gonna turn to will actually be the sacking and appointment of new coaches and which every football enthusiast knows is actually not the solution for a team to grow and become stronger.

I am sure, if for example, Enzo Maresca managed to make Chelsea get good results in his first season at least to compete strongly in the top five, then maybe Enzo Maresca will be retained. But, if in his second season Enzo Maresca fails to make Chelsea get good results, then I'm sure Chelsea will not hesitate to fire him. So yes, of course any new Chelsea coach should be ready to be fired at the end of the season, no matter they have good results or management, because Chelsea simply cannot appreciate a process. Indeed, they are very silly, no matter too, if for example Enzo Maresca managed to make Chelsea get a trophy because in the end Enzo Maresca will be fired, a real example also happened to Tuchel. Although Tuchel managed to make Chelsea get the Champion League trophy but still, Todd Boehly did not hesitate to fire him.

[Leviathan.007]

~~snip~~

Next season, Manchester United will still have a little difficulty getting super good results if they don't buy any young players to complement their weak lines. Because apart from the Manchester United coach who must have more ways to make the team more developed, of course the player factor is also quite an important factor to look at because this can also have a better influence on the team. Likewise for Chelsea who are still quite egotistical and want instant results through new coaches who always change every season so they always don't have much time to make improvements and will still have difficulties next season.

Manchester United have many weak points that need to be strengthened; if not, they will continue facing difficulties in their matches, and next season will be more tough than last season, so if they don’t start their preparations now, it won’t be a better season for them again. The fact that their coach always tries to see that he uses the available resources to make things possible for them and they still fail to get back to their performance makes me think that they must get new experienced players to join the squad.

As for Chelsea, we can’t say anything about that team as of now because we don’t know whether their performance will get better next season or not because Chelsea always wants quick results, which is impossible. They don’t give their manager time to restore the team's performance; all they want is to get everything back in a short period of time, and it won’t happen by changing different coaches. They need to assign an experienced coach and give him some time to see how things turn out for them.

Manchester United tried to keep Ten Hag and maybe it was a good session for them because like this they can have more stability and this stability can help Manchester United to have a better team in the next season because we know Ten Hag was a good coach for them and he is the one who had good performance in Manchester United while this team didn't have good performance in during the two years ago.  

[rahmad2nd]

Manchester United tried to keep Ten Hag and maybe it was a good session for them because like this they can have more stability and this stability can help Manchester United to have a better team in the next season because we know Ten Hag was a good coach for them and he is the one who had good performance in Manchester United while this team didn't have good performance in during the two years ago.  

I'm not a fan of The Red Devil, but often I like to provide clarification for Ten Hag. I mean, based on my personal point of view, what happened to Man United last season was not entirely the result of Erik Ten Hag's fault. the reason is, there are many problems if we trace it. starting from acquisitions, player spending last season, a storm of injuries, coaching disputes, and several players who lacked discipline who put their egos first. as a result, Manchester United's performance was disorganized unlike the previous season when they were able to finish in the top four. IMO, Ten Hag carries the philosophy of a modern football system which he applies to his squad. unfortunately, because the problems that Ten Hag had to face and resolve were one of the inhibiting factors. in the end, United struggled to finish in the ranking they previously occupied. yes, at least rather than dropping to eighth position. and we agree, Manchester United provides an opportunity for Ten Hag to improve his team. At its peak in the coming season, it is hoped that Ten Hag will be able to bring United back to its performance and be able to perform consistently. maybe that's why Erik Ten Hag is still being retained until at least 2025.

[Furious 7]

In addition, I think Manchester United current performance and consistency is nothing but the poor system and training pattern implemented by ten hag so far, because if we look at Manchester United can be very great when playing against big teams like in FA matches, but they actually perform very poorly when they do play against teams that are commensurate or inferior to them in the league,Isn't that pretty weird?

It’s weird and proves that Ten Hag has not been doing a great job with the team, the level of inconsistency is just too high, training pattern is definitely poor or not good for the caliber of players they have. Some might think that winning the FA Cup will prove that Ten Hag  is worthy enough but i will disagree because a team that cannot win small and average teams is not showing any signs of improvement at all.

Situations like this occur because of Ten Hag's mindset and way of coaching which sometimes we cannot predict because seeing from the 2 seasons he has coached to date how many players end up complaining and conflict with Ten Hag just because of problems that can actually be resolved if they have a good relationship and conversation.
It's just that Ten Hag's big ego makes this condition complicated and difficult to resolve.

This season we can see how Sancho is really not in the lyrics at all even in some rumors he was banned from training at Mancehster United just because they did not have the same opinion which made Sancho considered a player who lacked discipline and there were also some news about Garnacho towards the end of the season because of a match even though it could be resolved properly and Garnacho could still play.

Ten Hag's coaching style, which I think is quite eccentric, especially in matters of decision, makes the situation ultimately complicated for Manchester United itself but even so the management still entrusts Ten Hag even though his condition is on the verge of destruction.

[dezoel]

He was lucky because he was still given the opportunity by Manchester United, even though their performance this season was not at all satisfactory. In next season he should be able to improve again, but personally I doubt that he will be able to bring Manchester United even better. Although I also don't rule out the possibility that they will be better, for now I still doubt it.

He still has a lot to improve in the game that they often show, because there are so many problems that I see. The chemistry between the players is also not good, he has not been able to create that.

If he was at Chelsea, Erik Ten Hak might have been on the verge of being fired when he had such a bad season like last season. He is lucky enough to still be maintained even though if you look at Man United's inconsistent performance due to the many players who are injured. I think the problem is with the players because from last season we could see the level of selfishness shown by some of the players he has.

In addition to Chemistry, Erik Ten Hak also often tries different strategies in every match and always puts players in the wrong position. I don't understand what he is looking for, but if you pay attention, he has not found a form of play that suits his players.

There is no doubt about this Eric Ten Hag completed 2 seasons here at the Manchester United, and we have three coaches at Chelsea during this time and without any doubt if we have him at the Chelsea then surely long time ago he could be fired but here things are completely different, and we are still watching him with his poor strategy and things which are not helping his team to have results as they deserve in presence of top quality players his poor decisions are having huge negative impact on this club, but they are still having him which is wired.

After every season we have new hopes and new promises which are surely needed to be filled now with Eric Ten Hag is now having last year of contract with if he is able to bring huge changes and positive results then surely we can expect something positive for him otherwise we will surely have new era which could be having his own story.

[lixer]

I won't take this too seriously because Ruud van Nistelrooy is not someone who has experience in the coaching field so I don't think the impact will be too big if Manchester United management appoints Ruud van Nistelrooy as Ten Hag's assistant.

Manchester United's management built this team as if they didn't have a clear plan, now they trust Ten Hag too much and always fulfill Ten Hag's wishes in recruiting players, but Ten Hag has not succeeded in improving Manchester United's performance.
But now we see that they are going through a process and we have to respect and also wait for the results of this process.

Few things are never been look good or as we want, but these are having big impact on few players and teams for improving their performance same happening in this case right now we all know Manchester United is having few top players which can do much better than expectations, and they are not able to do on this way so having legendary player like Ruud Van Nistelrooy is surely going to have good impact on their performance, and we can expect better results from their strikers which are best.

Here I am agreed as they are building their team without any plan, but you can't expect anything good with long term strategy from the business mind peoples like Glazers which are running this club for years but fail to bring good results which is surely their failure.