Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 01:06:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 788 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [UNO] Unobtanium Info & Discussion - Merge Mine w/BTC! - Update NOW to qt 0.11.5  (Read 1046659 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076


keybase.io/fallingknife/


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 12:21:32 AM
Last edit: February 06, 2015, 12:48:52 AM by FallingKnife
 #5921


 Hi everyone! Here what I think :

Firstly I don't see  we discussed enough the sidechains think and we don't have enough opinions here to take any decisions!  

From what I see seems to me that Bryce wants and planning to do some changes on uno, without consensus with the community. Are we?I don't think we given to him any agreement to do now hard changes, side chains,forks or anything else!  Unobtanium is community driven material and Bryce must should serve and listen the community on first place! But how is even possible that he is our DEV and he never show up here in this forum even once?  I DO NOT like this and this methods of work !  Maybe Bryce is professional or crypto genius,but he got zero communication with Uno community!!!!! Twitter is not count! And i am sure BW not gonna show up here in the future!!!?
Blazr2 is missing to -to give competent advice as the original father of Uno!

FalingKnife please give us more information about your contacts and conversation information with Bryce if you have one lately. I want to see opinion from Blazr2 before we to decide to do any changes or zero changes first!

We are good on our own. We are sha256 ,but must stay totally separate from any other blokchein. We are totally different story! - merge mining Yes but maybe later! Security gonna come naturally with the price. Sidechains I don't think so! We stay pure and lite and simple as possible!

Nobody can touch Unobtanium without our /the community/ consent! And guys don't rush things.

Hey ProminerOne,

I think we should discuss and learn about sidechains and how it could benefit Uno.  Bryce brought it up because he wants us to talk about it.

It's no secret he hates BCT, as much as he loves Uno. When I see him tweet something interesting I put it here for you guys.  You're always welcome to talk to him on @bryceweiner
He's pretty chatty on Twitter.  I have periodic contact with Bryce by eMail. He's always been responsive to my questions.  I haven't heard from Blazr2 for awhile, but I trust that he's still around watching over uno.

Bryce's last response to me when I emailed him recently about sidechains:
"Here's the sidechain white paper. I think it will answer your questions and then some. :-)
 
http://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf "

I've been sorting through it. It introduces a whole new world of possibilities for moving assets between blockchains.  I encourage you all to find an hour to sit and read it, then read it again. I'm still not an expert on sidechains, but from what I understand so far, I think there could be a huge opportunity here.

One of the things I love about this community is that I keep getting pushed to learn and educate myself. I'm always learning something. Read through that document and lets pick up the discussion. If you read it, you'll know what I know.

Sidechains as I understand  it, could be transformational to crypto. The "old" Satoshi model is 1 coin = 1 blockchain, and you need to have a risky intermediary to change the value of one coin into another coin, or one asset into another asset.  It challenges us to rethink what crypto could be.  In the case of Uno, what makes it valuable? Is that Uno is tethered to a blockchain (lots of junk coins are, so can't be that alone), or is it everything else that Uno is?  Should uno be bound and tethered to it's own blockchain island so that it's value can only be converted through risky exchanges?  Or, might sidechains bring the opportunity to seamlessly exchange it's value across multiple assets? And if so, what sort of arbitrage opportunities might that provide?  I am still learning about sidechains, but my take away so far is that if sidechains for Uno are ever implemented, you will really, really, really want to be holding Uno before the sidechain is implemented. I think that everything that makes me love Uno, its essence, would be carried forward. It would still be Uno, still rare and fair. Read the paper and I think it will become clear why Uno might be a great candidate as a sidechain.

Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 12:31:36 AM
 #5922


 Hi everyone! Here what I think :

Firstly I don't see  we discussed enough the sidechains think and we don't have enough opinions here to take any decisions!  

From what I see seems to me that Bryce wants and planning to do some changes on uno, without consensus with the community. Are we?I don't think we given to him any agreement to do now hard changes, side chains,forks or anything else!  Unobtanium is community driven material and Bryce must should serve and listen the community on first place! But how is even possible that he is our DEV and he never show up here in this forum even once?  I DO NOT like this and this methods of work !  Maybe Bryce is professional or crypto genius,but he got zero communication with Uno community!!!!! Twitter is not count! And i am sure BW not gonna show up here in the future!!!?
Blazr2 is missing to -to give competent advice as the original father of Uno!

FalingKnife please give us more information about your contacts and conversation information with Bryce if you have one lately. I want to see opinion from Blazr2 before we to decide to do any changes or zero changes first!

We are good on our own. We are sha256 ,but must stay totally separate from any other blokchein. We are totally different story! - merge mining Yes but maybe later! Security gonna come naturally with the price. Sidechains I don't think so! We stay pure and lite and simple as possible!

Nobody can touch Unobtanium without our /the community/ consent! And guys don't rush things.


+1
fully agree
I am currently educating myself again on sidechains to be qualified for questions on deep level. Bryce announced an AMA on reddit about it.
I agree, changes like this can't happen without the investors on board - if we are not happy, nobody is happy.
In any case: sidechains aren't even ready soon - will take more months. (so thank god, it's not going to be rushed)
I am right now preparing many questions for the AMA and Bryce. There is a lot of questions about it from my side. The AMA is going to be interesting.

In any case i wouldn't be ready to agree on any of this without getting an opinion from Blazr2

thanks for giving opinion, prominer Smiley
balu2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 12:43:35 AM
 #5923

i have a the following concerns about SC:

-I heard there's the possibility of a sidechain overtaking the main chain and make it worthless in the process. Why do we want that on UNO?

-some people say sidechains would end bitcoin.

- why do we need assets on UNO chain? So others (scammers) can abuse it without even holding many UNO? We have no way of blocking people from abusing it once it's  implemented. (it's actually providing a service for outsiders who actually don't even hold uno currently - not many uno will be demanded only for the utility of SC as they are probably cheap to purchase(under 1 UNO))

-bloat

-complexity

- i don't see why miners would mine sidechains as they do not reward them - only ad work for them (so why would a sidechain bring more hashpower? I don't think that's the case. Contrary it just ads more work for the miners without additional reward)

- I don't see what a sidechain should be able to do that an seperate altchain can't do

i would have more ... seriously. Do it in Diraq and Bitcoin first. I  hope we are not going to hardfork for that hype-of-the-week-experiment.

For me sidechains are a fear-driven invention for bitcoin. Uno is better than bitcoin. We aren't scared of competition like btc.
BitcoinNational
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010


Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 12:51:07 AM
Last edit: February 06, 2015, 01:07:09 AM by BitcoinNational
 #5924

@gustav

Personal Opinion of Me

Merger with BTC ... yes but not until the rewards are much much lower (say 18 months).  BUT if the current UNO trend continues we'll be at $300 UNO and 9000TH/s ... so why merge?

Sidechains ... http://insidebitcoins.com/news/gregory-maxwell-demo-sidechains-to-be-available-in-a-few-months/29531 ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE_elgnIw3M ... still not sure what a sidechain is ... is Namecoin a sidechain?  If anyone makes a good arguement then ... okay maybe.  But best to let other Coins beta-test this one, no?

I am for snap shots.  And then merge-mine that new coin with UNO.  This does not bloat the UNO chain and it gives equity to UNO holders.  Too me this is much more interesting.  The tech is not new it is just the bitcoin code (so not buggy like NXT/NEM/QoRA/ or the much hyped but not existant Ether).  The 'new' part is creating a 'multicoin wallet' ... plus smart asset designs ... THUS this is the path of least resistance to making UNO a platform like NXT, BTS, CP, Master.  The hard part is creating sound assets but this is non-technical.  

My bad, didn't know that there were limitations on the honour!

Here's a toast to 300 pages anyway!

 Cool




sorry old dogs ... and it looks like Gustav had #1 on #300 ... but ... "2 kilos for first new guy"
@IMZ ...  tertius993? no?

https://cryptap.us/uno/richlist/ ... cryptapus is doing greatwork! <feel bad> shoulda said first guy to post productive work gets the 2 kilos Sad

                ▄██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
           ▄████▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▄
         ▄████████████████▄▄▄███████
       ▄█████████████████████████████
     ▄████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████████▄
   ▄████████▀█▀███▀        ███████████
 ▄████████▀███             ███████████
▄███████▀████                ██████████▄
███████████▀                  ██████████
 ██████▄████                   ██████▄███
  ██████▄████                 ▄█████████
   ██████▄████              ▄██████████
    ██████▄█████▄▄▄▄▄     ▄████████▀
     ██████▄████████████▄████████▀█▀██▀
      ██████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀█▀██▀
       ██████████████████████▀█▀█▀
         ▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
                      ▀██▀▀
─────────────────
Revolutionized.  ──


█████████████████████████
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
██ █████████████▀█████ ██
██ ███ ▀█████▀      ▀█ ██
██ ███     ▀▀      ▐██ ██
██ ███▌            ███ ██
██ ████▌          ▄███ ██
██ ██████       ▄█████ ██
██ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████ ██
██ ███████████████████ ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀





█████████████████████████
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
██ ████████████▀▀▀████ ██
██ ████████▀▀     ████ ██
██ █████▀    ▄▀  ▐████ ██
██ ██▀     ▄▀    ▐████ ██
██ ████▄▄ █▀     █████ ██
██ ██████ ▄▄█   ▐█████ ██
██ ████████████ ██████ ██
██ ███████████████████ ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.WHITEPAPER.
ANN Thread
Reddit

█████
██
██ █
██ █
██ █
   █

  ─────────────  Join
SMARC token ICO

█████
   ██
 █ ██
 █ ██
 █ ██
 █
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:06:40 AM
 #5925

@gustav

Personal Opinion of Me

Merger with BTC ... yes but not until the rewards are much much lower (say 18 months).  BUT if the current UNO trend continues we'll be at $300 UNO and 9000TH/s ... so why merger?



+1
i would currently also not be up for a hardfork even for merge mining because in case bitcoin bites the dust due to the hardfork without consensus (i think at least 30% chance for that) or because investors just scratch their head and want out because of that and it crashes and burns we will only grow with that chaos around bitcoin. Right now the situation is much different than it was when we last time discussed it. So right now i would vote against any hardfork.



But best to let other Coins beta-test this one, no?

I am for snap shots.  And then merge-mine that new coin with UNO.  This does not bloat the UNO chain and it gives equity to UNO holders.  Too me this is much more interesting.  The tech is not new it is just the bitcoin code (so not buggy like NXT/NEM/QoRA/ or the much hyped but not existant Ether).  The 'new' part is creating a 'multicoin wallet' ... plus smart asset designs ... THUS this is the path of least resistance to making UNO a platform like NXT, BTS, CP, Master.  The hard part is creating sound assets but this is non-technical.  


yes, betatest please
Snapshot uno for merge coin is maybe a good idea (on the other side wouldn't that mean we would have a mirror of it? Do we want a twin-coin? Isn't there a risk to dilute Uno value? That needs to be thought about.) - or other idea we can make a snapshot of uno and have a let's say 5% premine of the new coin and that get's distributed according to snapshot but the coin should have very different metrics (more coins for example) ... there's some ideas there to discover.

All in all i think: sidechains can't do even half as good as a merged mined coin. What about launching a new chain like DUO and implement sidechains there aswell as AUXPOW? I would support such a coin a lot - it would bring hash, bryce can play with sidechains, uno doesn't need to fork, we have good publicity, everyone is happy as it only brings benefit and almost no risk in case the experiment fails only the other chain fails. It would also be fun to speculate on it. I  wouldn't want it to have in uno and hardfork and all that shenangians and useless risks. Please create a new coin for the sidechain experiment and auxpow it against uno and give Uno holders a 5% premine according to their uno holdings! (isn't this idea just brilliant?)


FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076


keybase.io/fallingknife/


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 01:08:04 AM
 #5926

Lets be clear that Merged Mining is not a merger with BTC.

Shared mining would be more accurate, but alas, someone long ago used the term "merged mining" and so we're stuck with it.

All we're doing with shared-mining (ok, merged mining) is allowing miners to find blocks for multiple coins, simultaneously. Their hashes can find blocks on Uno, Bitcoin, Nmc, I0C and other coins. It doesn't change anything with the coin, just secures the Uno blockchain by raising the difficulty immensely. It makes all miners more profitable, and protects Uno from uncertainty as the block reward continues to halve on schedule.

Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:11:22 AM
 #5927

Lets be clear that Merged Mining is not a merger with BTC.

Shared mining would be more accurate, but alas, someone long ago used the term "merged mining" and so we're stuck with it.

All we're doing with shared-mining (ok, merged mining) is allowing miners to find blocks for multiple coins, simultaneously. Their hashes can find blocks on Uno, Bitcoin, Nmc, I0C and other coins. It doesn't change anything with the coin, just secures the Uno blockchain by raising the difficulty immensely.

currently there is only the risk of the question arising with the hardfork without consenus on btc: which 'Bitcoin'? Gavincoin or Mpcoin? Man, there is some potential real chaos on the horizon for btc if you ask me. It could potentially become unsafe to accept merged blocks from btc chain after the harfork of btc. So i am not so sure about it.

There's a lot of unease and many people shouting at each other over at btc. I think there's a fair chance it's not going to end well. Lot's of movement and heated discussion over at camp bitcoin.

(remember the titanic - they also said it would be unsinkable)
IMZ
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:11:46 AM
 #5928

reading; reading
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076


keybase.io/fallingknife/


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 01:14:32 AM
 #5929

Lets be clear that Merged Mining is not a merger with BTC.

Shared mining would be more accurate, but alas, someone long ago used the term "merged mining" and so we're stuck with it.

All we're doing with shared-mining (ok, merged mining) is allowing miners to find blocks for multiple coins, simultaneously. Their hashes can find blocks on Uno, Bitcoin, Nmc, I0C and other coins. It doesn't change anything with the coin, just secures the Uno blockchain by raising the difficulty immensely.

currently there is only the risk of the question arising with the hardfork without consenus on btc: which 'Bitcoin'? Gavincoin or Mpcoin? Man, there is some potential real chaos on the horizon for btc if you ask me. It could potentially become unsafe to accept merged blocks from btc chain after the harfork of btc. So i am not so sure about it.

If Uno was "shared mined" (ok merged mined) with Bitcoin, let them fork. Who cares, besides the miners. It doesn't make any difference to Uno. The hashes that solve Uno blocks would still be good.

Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:15:39 AM
 #5930

Lets be clear that Merged Mining is not a merger with BTC.

Shared mining would be more accurate, but alas, someone long ago used the term "merged mining" and so we're stuck with it.

All we're doing with shared-mining (ok, merged mining) is allowing miners to find blocks for multiple coins, simultaneously. Their hashes can find blocks on Uno, Bitcoin, Nmc, I0C and other coins. It doesn't change anything with the coin, just secures the Uno blockchain by raising the difficulty immensely.

currently there is only the risk of the question arising with the hardfork without consenus on btc: which 'Bitcoin'? Gavincoin or Mpcoin? Man, there is some potential real chaos on the horizon for btc if you ask me. It could potentially become unsafe to accept merged blocks from btc chain after the harfork of btc. So i am not so sure about it.

If Uno was "shared mined" (ok merged mined) with Bitcoin, let them fork. Who cares, besides the miners. It doesn't make any difference to Uno. The hashes that solve Uno blocks would still be good.

true. Will we accept Mpcoin or Gavincoin? (this question is not a joke)
BitcoinCharlie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 01:16:52 AM
 #5931

Wow, what great conversation! I don't know if it's possible, but can somebody record the chat with mr. Weiner. I have to go into a meeting and will not be able to be any part of it.

Unobtanium - The crypto commodity you keep! |
Hate Inflation? You'll love $UNO
BitcoinNational
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010


Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:17:18 AM
 #5932

Quote
"What about launching a new chain like DUO and implement sidechains there as well as AUXPOW?"
Actually Brilliant.

Relaunch DUO
1. AUXPOW (so you can mine any sha256 and DUO)
2. or you can mine Doge/Lite and DUO
3. The basemoney is snap-shot of UNO ... so if you hold UNO at that time you get DUO equity
4. Factor the sidechain thing into DUO
5. Multi-Coin wallet ... it holds both UNO or DUO ... and future coins too Wink
6. Hardliners are happy UNO code is not fork'd, tweaked, nor the chain bloated.

                ▄██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
           ▄████▄▄▄▄▄██████████████▄
         ▄████████████████▄▄▄███████
       ▄█████████████████████████████
     ▄████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████████▄
   ▄████████▀█▀███▀        ███████████
 ▄████████▀███             ███████████
▄███████▀████                ██████████▄
███████████▀                  ██████████
 ██████▄████                   ██████▄███
  ██████▄████                 ▄█████████
   ██████▄████              ▄██████████
    ██████▄█████▄▄▄▄▄     ▄████████▀
     ██████▄████████████▄████████▀█▀██▀
      ██████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀█▀██▀
       ██████████████████████▀█▀█▀
         ▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
                      ▀██▀▀
─────────────────
Revolutionized.  ──


█████████████████████████
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
██ █████████████▀█████ ██
██ ███ ▀█████▀      ▀█ ██
██ ███     ▀▀      ▐██ ██
██ ███▌            ███ ██
██ ████▌          ▄███ ██
██ ██████       ▄█████ ██
██ ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████ ██
██ ███████████████████ ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀





█████████████████████████
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██
██ ████████████▀▀▀████ ██
██ ████████▀▀     ████ ██
██ █████▀    ▄▀  ▐████ ██
██ ██▀     ▄▀    ▐████ ██
██ ████▄▄ █▀     █████ ██
██ ██████ ▄▄█   ▐█████ ██
██ ████████████ ██████ ██
██ ███████████████████ ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.WHITEPAPER.
ANN Thread
Reddit

█████
██
██ █
██ █
██ █
   █

  ─────────────  Join
SMARC token ICO

█████
   ██
 █ ██
 █ ██
 █ ██
 █
BitcoinCharlie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 01:19:00 AM
 #5933

Quote
"What about launching a new chain like DUO and implement sidechains there as well as AUXPOW?"
Actually Brilliant.

Relaunch DUO
1. AUXPOW (so you can mine any sha256 and DUO)
2. or you can mine Doge/Lite and DUO
3. The basemoney is snap-shot of UNO ... so if you hold UNO at that time you get DUO equity
4. Factor the sidechain thing into DUO
5. Multi-Coin wallet ... it holds both UNO or DUO ... and future coins too Wink
6. Hardliners are happy UNO code is not fork'd, tweaked, nor the chain bloated.
+1, if possible

Unobtanium - The crypto commodity you keep! |
Hate Inflation? You'll love $UNO
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:20:09 AM
 #5934

Quote
"What about launching a new chain like DUO and implement sidechains there as well as AUXPOW?"
Actually Brilliant.

Relaunch DUO
1. AUXPOW (so you can mine any sha256 and DUO)
2. or you can mine Doge/Lite and DUO
3. The basemoney is snap-shot of UNO ... so if you hold UNO at that time you get DUO equity
4. Factor the sidechain thing into DUO
5. Multi-Coin wallet ... it holds both UNO or DUO ... and future coins too Wink
6. Hardliners are happy UNO code is not fork'd, tweaked, nor the chain bloated.

would require :

-DUO has different metrics and also different rewardstructure
-multicoinwallet does not break backwards copatibility of the current wallet
(then i'd be more than happy)
prominerone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:21:06 AM
 #5935

  
  " Bryce brought it up because he wants us to talk about it. It's no secret that he hates BCT "  

-that's not a excuse

 Yeah I hate BCT to ,but love a  unobtanium talk. And watch it every day.

I believe Bryce reading us sometime from time to time....but show up here man!

BTW  This BCT is too overweight. Very often is unavailable lately! Maybe we need to think for unoforum that is separated in the future as  option.  

gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:26:33 AM
 #5936

 
  " Bryce brought it up because he wants us to talk about it. It's no secret that he hates BCT "  

-that's not a excuse

 Yeah I hate BCT to ,but love a  unobtanium talk. And watch it every day.

I believe Bryce reading us sometime from time to time....but show up here man!

BTW  This BCT is too overweight. Very often is unavailable lately! Maybe we need to think for unoforum that is separated in the future as  option.  

We can use reddit more often actually.
prominerone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:26:39 AM
 #5937


 One guy opinion is missing from very long time. Where is our V500  Cry

gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:31:19 AM
 #5938


 One guy opinion is missing from very long time. Where is our V500  Cry

he's probably reading and one day make an appearance. Or maybe something happened to him  Huh
FallingKnife (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1076


keybase.io/fallingknife/


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2015, 01:35:01 AM
Last edit: February 06, 2015, 12:38:42 PM by FallingKnife
 #5939

 
  " Bryce brought it up because he wants us to talk about it. It's no secret that he hates BCT "  

-that's not a excuse

 Yeah I hate BCT to ,but love a  unobtanium talk. And watch it every day.

I believe Bryce reading us sometime from time to time....but show up here man!

BTW  This BCT is too overweight. Very often is unavailable lately! Maybe we need to think for unoforum that is separated in the future as  option.  

I don't make excuses for BW. Just stating a fact. His appearances on BCT are rare. But anyone can talk to him on Twitter.
He my show up here sometime, but I can't make him. Meanwhile everyone knows exactly where they can find him.
Maybe he would show up here if you guys invited him over on Twitter.

I would also love to see V500 and Blazr2 reactivate. I think we have not heard the last of them.

Nostr:
npub14wk4hrq6atlq020c7r6eyylpu9gjukyqzafzxu6u80unqfrplq9qhtx8sy
gustav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 06, 2015, 01:49:08 AM
 #5940

Wow, what great conversation! I don't know if it's possible, but can somebody record the chat with mr. Weiner. I have to go into a meeting and will not be able to be any part of it.

BW chat will likely occure on reddit later and will last at least a few days (that was the word on twitter from him.) So i don't think you'll miss out.  Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 788 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!