🎲BetFury.com|🚀Join BetFury Cryptodrop 🌔 Share $20 MLN in BFG

[dwyane36]

One thing with campaign (and by campaign, I assume forum signature) is that its best when it's done long term, yes, it cost money and all that, but then, it wins more customers for the casino if it's the campaign is allowed to run for the long term, check out all the casinos that have their campaign running since God knows when, they are all doing fine..

But then again, I still agree with your that every casino have their marketing term and it's up to them to research and know what marketing strategies fits their business, maybe based on marketing budget/allocation available to the marketing team.

Of course, signature campaigns are effective in the long run, while short campaigns lasting just a couple of weeks have almost no effect. In the case of Betfury, we see that its marketing team is not particularly fond of long signature campaigns on this forum and prefers to promote its platform through social networks. However, they don't refuse to promote Betfury on this forum completely, but even if they decide to launch new signature campaigns, they only do it during some big events, as it was a couple of times last year.

[dezoel]

Do not forget that the issuance of a Curacao license by any casino is a fairly successful commercial enterprise, which was originally conceived as a rather formal check of the casino's accounts and the issuance of a corresponding certificate, license.  I don't think that the bosses of this commercial enterprise, even with the involvement of government officials of Curacao, will refuse to issue a license based on arguments such as issuing their own casino token.  In general, I think they do not consider this as some kind of serious violation leading to the deception of the players of this casino. 
And let's not forget that the bosses of the licensing authority themselves, on this basis, cannot receive and lose several tens of thousands of dollars for some beautiful piece of paper of a license - this is simply stupid.

I do agree that it is not going to be token based or care about the token or anything like that, they see that as a separate business under the same name and not the same business. I mean the license is for the games, which means if you gamble and there is a rigged game where casino scams you, the license will be revoked, and I have to say they are pretty legit as well as Curacao could have made a lot more money by just accepting bribe from casinos, and yet they still revoke the licenses of rigged casinos.

This is why I believe that it means something, doesn't mean all the ones that have license is legit, that's why some of them get it revoked, but it's good to have at least.

[len01]

One thing with campaign (and by campaign, I assume forum signature) is that its best when it's done long term, yes, it cost money and all that, but then, it wins more customers for the casino if it's the campaign is allowed to run for the long term, check out all the casinos that have their campaign running since God knows when, they are all doing fine..

But then again, I still agree with your that every casino have their marketing term and it's up to them to research and know what marketing strategies fits their business, maybe based on marketing budget/allocation available to the marketing team.

Of course, signature campaigns are effective in the long run, while short campaigns lasting just a couple of weeks have almost no effect. In the case of Betfury, we see that its marketing team is not particularly fond of long signature campaigns on this forum and prefers to promote its platform through social networks. However, they don't refuse to promote Betfury on this forum completely, but even if they decide to launch new signature campaigns, they only do it during some big events, as it was a couple of times last year.

every casino business in this forum is different, some have the goal of continuing to run campaigns here if they have achieved their target goals, some are just planning to promote through other means that make a better contribution to the casino itself.
I mean maybe BetFury has other goals to market somewhere else that's easier for him to plan things out.
because there's no way the casinos on this forum have a signature campaign to survive if they don't plan something from scratch.

so they have their own way to promote their company

[Fredomago]

One thing with campaign (and by campaign, I assume forum signature) is that its best when it's done long term, yes, it cost money and all that, but then, it wins more customers for the casino if it's the campaign is allowed to run for the long term, check out all the casinos that have their campaign running since God knows when, they are all doing fine..

But then again, I still agree with your that every casino have their marketing term and it's up to them to research and know what marketing strategies fits their business, maybe based on marketing budget/allocation available to the marketing team.

Of course, signature campaigns are effective in the long run, while short campaigns lasting just a couple of weeks have almost no effect. In the case of Betfury, we see that its marketing team is not particularly fond of long signature campaigns on this forum and prefers to promote its platform through social networks. However, they don't refuse to promote Betfury on this forum completely, but even if they decide to launch new signature campaigns, they only do it during some big events, as it was a couple of times last year.

every casino business in this forum is different, some have the goal of continuing to run campaigns here if they have achieved their target goals, some are just planning to promote through other means that make a better contribution to the casino itself.
I mean maybe BetFury has other goals to market somewhere else that's easier for him to plan things out.
because there's no way the casinos on this forum have a signature campaign to survive if they don't plan something from scratch.

so they have their own way to promote their company

Understandable as they have marketing team who are working in this matter maybe they are planning or they've got other things in mind to work with their promotions, or as like how they are doing it before, they are assessing and will soon offer it again once they have some promotional events to gain gamblers and investors attentions.

For now, only them who really have that answer in terms of not bringing the campaign yet.

[arwin100]

One thing with campaign (and by campaign, I assume forum signature) is that its best when it's done long term, yes, it cost money and all that, but then, it wins more customers for the casino if it's the campaign is allowed to run for the long term, check out all the casinos that have their campaign running since God knows when, they are all doing fine..

But then again, I still agree with your that every casino have their marketing term and it's up to them to research and know what marketing strategies fits their business, maybe based on marketing budget/allocation available to the marketing team.

Of course, signature campaigns are effective in the long run, while short campaigns lasting just a couple of weeks have almost no effect. In the case of Betfury, we see that its marketing team is not particularly fond of long signature campaigns on this forum and prefers to promote its platform through social networks. However, they don't refuse to promote Betfury on this forum completely, but even if they decide to launch new signature campaigns, they only do it during some big events, as it was a couple of times last year.

every casino business in this forum is different, some have the goal of continuing to run campaigns here if they have achieved their target goals, some are just planning to promote through other means that make a better contribution to the casino itself.
I mean maybe BetFury has other goals to market somewhere else that's easier for him to plan things out.
because there's no way the casinos on this forum have a signature campaign to survive if they don't plan something from scratch.

so they have their own way to promote their company

Understandable as they have marketing team who are working in this matter maybe they are planning or they've got other things in mind to work with their promotions, or as like how they are doing it before, they are assessing and will soon offer it again once they have some promotional events to gain gamblers and investors attentions.

For now, only them who really have that answer in terms of not bringing the campaign yet.

Its also good to stop the marketing they use before if they didn't see this as effective tool to boost up their project so maybe they decide to stop their signature campaign because they didn't get their target engagement for running this campaign. But we don't know yet what plan they have since for sure they are thinking about something related to this since they also need to market their site so that they can make more people get involve on their casino.

[TopTort777]

But we don't know yet what plan they have since for sure they are thinking about something related to this since they also need to market their site so that they can make more people get involve on their casino.

Btw their future plans are really a mystery, as they have already fulfilled everything they wanted according to roadmap from whitepaper There is nothing planned after 2022. The only goal that is not achieved is to get in top100 among cryptocurrencies. I think they should consider running an AMA one day, because number of questions to them grows every month.

[Coin_trader]

Its also good to stop the marketing they use before if they didn't see this as effective tool to boost up their project so maybe they decide to stop their signature campaign because they didn't get their target engagement for running this campaign. But we don't know yet what plan they have since for sure they are thinking about something related to this since they also need to market their site so that they can make more people get involve on their casino.

This is the most possible reason for their coldness in the forum. I believe this started after they receive negative feedback due to their issue regarding the retroactive changing of affiliate commission rate against  reputable user here. I don’t understand on what Betfury trying to make stand for their rules while they are now offering a huge affiliate commission for their recent event. We have no idea how much money in dispute with their issue but they should settle it fair and square if they want to clear all their reputation.

Right now the representative is just posting announcement here without engaging on any discussion that is a clear indication that they are not interested much on Bitcointalk community engagement. I remember that they are still launching signature campaign whenever they have a big event but that’s all and nothing long term plan here. I think they are doing very good when they are active here, They just shifted to social media and partnership as part of their new promotion strategy.

[dwyane36]

Btw their future plans are really a mystery, as they have already fulfilled everything they wanted according to roadmap from whitepaper There is nothing planned after 2022. The only goal that is not achieved is to get in top100 among cryptocurrencies. I think they should consider running an AMA one day, because number of questions to them grows every month.

The Betfury team announced its plans for the first quarter at the beginning of March. Based on the information in this article, it is clear that they only plan to improve existing features, add new games and make some partnerships throughout the year. As we can see, they have some plans for the future, but it's unlikely it will have any effect on the BFG price. So the top 100 is likely to remain a pipe dream.

[Unsoldier]

Betfury carried out its 41st scheduled burning of BFG.

Amount of BFG burned:

- 5 000 000 BFG ($89 270) – Team Burned
- 342 095 BFG ($6 108) – Auction Burned
- 663 211 BFG ($11 841)– Gaming Burned

The total amount of tokens burnt was 6,005,306 BFG.

Read about the 41st BFG Burning session:
https://betfury.io/news/bfg-burning-41

[capedbaldy]

Betfury carried out its 41st scheduled burning of BFG.

Amount of BFG burned:

- 5 000 000 BFG ($89 270) – Team Burned
- 342 095 BFG ($6 108) – Auction Burned
- 663 211 BFG ($11 841)– Gaming Burned

The total amount of tokens burnt was 6,005,306 BFG.

Read about the 41st BFG Burning session:
https://betfury.io/news/bfg-burning-41

Great news, I rarely see a project have a continuous burning plan up and running for the 41st burning of BFG, but how does the team determine the amount of token burning in each stage, if the estimated tokens are +$100k in each token burning stage then the circulating token supply will decrease and it will be easy to increase when the market price increases high.

[o48o]

Btw their future plans are really a mystery, as they have already fulfilled everything they wanted according to roadmap from whitepaper There is nothing planned after 2022. The only goal that is not achieved is to get in top100 among cryptocurrencies. I think they should consider running an AMA one day, because number of questions to them grows every month.

The Betfury team announced its plans for the first quarter at the beginning of March. Based on the information in this article, it is clear that they only plan to improve existing features, add new games and make some partnerships throughout the year. As we can see, they have some plans for the future, but it's unlikely it will have any effect on the BFG price. So the top 100 is likely to remain a pipe dream.

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

[dimonstration]

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

It’s already a norm for casino that has a utility token to behave like this since BFG tokens main feature is for casino reward while BFG token value derives from the success of the casino. I think improving the casino is their top priority to have long term benefits for the token growth.

Besides all this update including the partnership are the one that always boost the price of the token if only BFG tokens is still on hype. Don’t expect any massive price growth on this token in near future as long as the team keeps using the token for marketing purposes with less token burning. BFG needs to lessen emission rate to stop flooding the token supply.

[babygun]

Great news, I rarely see a project have a continuous burning plan up and running for the 41st burning of BFG, but how does the team determine the amount of token burning in each stage, if the estimated tokens are +$100k in each token burning stage then the circulating token supply will decrease and it will be easy to increase when the market price increases high.

Every burning they do has almost no impact on the market price; to have a real impact on the price, they will need to develop further and add more features. The burning does have an effect on the dividends, every time after the burning, the daily dividends you get are higher but that effect only lasts for a couple of days.

[danadc]

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

It’s already a norm for casino that has a utility token to behave like this since BFG tokens main feature is for casino reward while BFG token value derives from the success of the casino. I think improving the casino is their top priority to have long term benefits for the token growth.

Besides all this update including the partnership are the one that always boost the price of the token if only BFG tokens is still on hype. Don’t expect any massive price growth on this token in near future as long as the team keeps using the token for marketing purposes with less token burning. BFG needs to lessen emission rate to stop flooding the token supply.

A casino like the betfury style has many facilities, in addition to winning some cryptocurrencies, that is also Something that is different than in other casinos that always have other types of services, which are only tracked in games and promotions, but I give it Importance to the tokens because if the bfg token went up in price it would be good for those who are whales and believed in the project from the beginning and since they burn there are more options to make profits as the number of tokens decreases.

[FanEagle]

Its also good to stop the marketing they use before if they didn't see this as effective tool to boost up their project so maybe they decide to stop their signature campaign because they didn't get their target engagement for running this campaign. But we don't know yet what plan they have since for sure they are thinking about something related to this since they also need to market their site so that they can make more people get involve on their casino.

This is the most possible reason for their coldness in the forum. I believe this started after they receive negative feedback due to their issue regarding the retroactive changing of affiliate commission rate against  reputable user here. I don’t understand on what Betfury trying to make stand for their rules while they are now offering a huge affiliate commission for their recent event. We have no idea how much money in dispute with their issue but they should settle it fair and square if they want to clear all their reputation.

Right now the representative is just posting announcement here without engaging on any discussion that is a clear indication that they are not interested much on Bitcointalk community engagement. I remember that they are still launching signature campaign whenever they have a big event but that’s all and nothing long term plan here. I think they are doing very good when they are active here, They just shifted to social media and partnership as part of their new promotion strategy.

I think that was a weak attack to begin with. I think they missed a chance there because even though there was a few people who didn't like it, and there was a big affiliate who made a scene about it, the reality is that there were a lot of us who supported it as well. And them leaving just because some other people said something about them is a bad move because they also left the supporters like me on the road when they did that, when in fact they could have stayed with us here as well.

In any case, they did what they did and I support them and they have the right to change the rates whenever they want to because it's their business and if anyone wants to stop working for them, they could do so if they want to.

[dwyane36]

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

As already mentioned above, the Betfury team is already burning BFG tokens every month, and it seems that almost 33 percent of the total BFG emission has already been burned, but the problem is that this does not have any positive effect. Maybe I'm wrong, but I get the impression that the Betfury team just ran out of ideas, especially after they initiated a vote last year to extend BFG mining for 53 months.

[o48o]

Yeah, i am not sure who is in charge of their product planning but that is more like "we will carry on". One would hope that they had more vision as they could potentially change the whole face of casino as we know it. For example tokens could be used for DAO, airdrops, free passes for events, not to mention they could just officially commit to burning. Now they could just stop at some point and we don't know when.

As already mentioned above, the Betfury team is already burning BFG tokens every month, and it seems that almost 33 percent of the total BFG emission has already been burned, but the problem is that this does not have any positive effect. Maybe I'm wrong, but I get the impression that the Betfury team just ran out of ideas, especially after they initiated a vote last year to extend BFG mining for 53 months.

Yes, everyone knows that, yet no one knows how long they are going to do that. They might stop to 50% like some projects or keep going indefinitely. What i would like to know why they are not answering to this. They are not committed to any number so they might just stop burning after 40% for all we know. They have never promised to keep going indefinitely, and at some point there are no team tokens to be burned.

[klarki]

Yes, everyone knows that, yet no one knows how long they are going to do that. They might stop to 50% like some projects or keep going indefinitely. What i would like to know why they are not answering to this. They are not committed to any number so they might just stop burning after 40% for all we know. They have never promised to keep going indefinitely, and at some point there are no team tokens to be burned.

I think if they decide to stop burning BFG tokens, they will first ask the community about it and create a vote.
As it was when they decided to extend the mining period for BFG tokens.

[Emitdama]

I think as long as they keep burning, that means there will be less and less, which is more than enough and as long as we can create a hype that covers the difference then we should also be going up when you consider between burning and buyers, the sellers should feel smaller. But, right now that hasn't happened yet and people are worried if it will ever happen or not.

It is not going to be an easy decision, and shouldn't really be an easy decision to buy any tokens of course, but unless people all start to buy some, there is no solution. Team can't do anything, we can't do anything individually aside from buying a small amount, there is really no solution but to make sure that everyone wants to have BFG.

[babygun]

Yes, everyone knows that, yet no one knows how long they are going to do that. They might stop to 50% like some projects or keep going indefinitely. What i would like to know why they are not answering to this. They are not committed to any number so they might just stop burning after 40% for all we know. They have never promised to keep going indefinitely, and at some point there are no team tokens to be burned.

I think if they decide to stop burning BFG tokens, they will first ask the community about it and create a vote.
As it was when they decided to extend the mining period for BFG tokens.

I think and hope the same. Even if they are running out of team tokens, they can still burn the tokens coming from gambling and the auctions. On a side note, I don’t think the extension of the mining was a bad thing and it gives them some time to determine the next steps whenever it stops.