🎲BetFury.com|🌟Join the 5-Star Birthday Event | 💸$500 000+ prize pool💸

[ethereumhunter]

Even with high bankroll martingale can easily eat and deplete you fund especially when you encounter a series of reds in your roll. 20+ red streak can possibly make your bankroll negative  and we all know that 20+ read streak is very possible.  I even experience this in spinning a slot. 20+ dead spin.  Imagine if I martingale my bet and I experience that 20+ streak. 

If someone doesn't realize that getting to 10+ is a sign, he should stop immediately and doesn't stop gambling. Instead, he will only run out of money if he uses big bets, especially if he gets 20+ a series of reds.

For slot games, usually after getting several losses, we can get a win which, even though it's a small win, can make us continue to gamble. So for gambling, I think it's really worth it if we stick with small bets even though we have a big bankroll because it sure hurts to see all our balances used up that day.

[babygun]

In my experience I can say with respect to the Martingale that at one point I applied it here at Betfury and at that time the BFG tokens were at a good peak and I lost around 1500BFG which was difficult to recover, at the time the I lost I stopped playing with that strategy, I could get away with 200BFG but when I went over 400BFG I lost and stopped before I had lost everything, so I settled for losing that amount and not all of it, this is something that has to be taken into consideration with regarding the martingale.

Who told you to use the Martingale strategy when most of us already know that it is a fail way to win in gambling. I have heard many time that people have lost everything in Martingale. Good that you stopped and did not piling up the BFG token in the game and lose more.
By the way, having BFG token when it was at higher prices is a loss in itself as your portfolio keep on decreasing even if you do not lose any gambling games.
I wonder when they are planning to list it on big exchanges 

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

[ultrloa]

In my experience I can say with respect to the Martingale that at one point I applied it here at Betfury and at that time the BFG tokens were at a good peak and I lost around 1500BFG which was difficult to recover, at the time the I lost I stopped playing with that strategy, I could get away with 200BFG but when I went over 400BFG I lost and stopped before I had lost everything, so I settled for losing that amount and not all of it, this is something that has to be taken into consideration with regarding the martingale.

Who told you to use the Martingale strategy when most of us already know that it is a fail way to win in gambling. I have heard many time that people have lost everything in Martingale. Good that you stopped and did not piling up the BFG token in the game and lose more.
By the way, having BFG token when it was at higher prices is a loss in itself as your portfolio keep on decreasing even if you do not lose any gambling games.
I wonder when they are planning to list it on big exchanges 

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

Martingale is common strategy so I'm not surprised if even by now many gamblers still using this technique since its still good strategy to use and also a challenging one. Much better not to use BFG since its not really worth to do it knowing that you can get something in return with that, although not big percent but quite decent so best to use other currency if you want to gamble on their casino since this is much ideal thing since who knows maybe they release an update about this and BFG price will pump up due to their actions made.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Of course, yes, in fact, just seeing the casino signature campaigns here are always maintained and this means that things through this marketing path give good results, and that is what you have to see, now, in the In the case of Betfury, the only way they can go back to being the way they were before is to remember how they started and they started with a great marketing campaign, not just signature campaigns, I remember that there were Betfury ads everywhere, on Twitter, in social networks, with its contests, in giving a lot of publicity even to its token, that was something impressive.

This is something that has already been discussed some times and it up to the marketing team of Betfury to decide on how to want promote their casino and on what platforms. When there is a big contest (like for Christmas) they hold a signature campaign and this seems to work for them.

Every casino development team that is authorized to carry out how to promote has their own way and choice, we want to discuss what it looks like and what kind of advice if the team doesn't believe in it and has its own way then it will only be in vain.
We can only hope that they do the right and proper things to promote so that they can develop and follow in the footsteps of other casinos that are already big and popular.
To promote using signature campaigns is indeed quite good and has a very significant positive impact, but all success in campaigns depends on who is in control and who participates in the signature campaign.

You have to wait, but here is a safe path, the forum can help them a lot in terms of giving them better options for them to recover, of course the signature campaigns are the best option and that they improve their conditions for the tokens, which inject them with more liquidity, I know that the market is very oily, but that's the way it is and in an Economy as particular as that of a tken what you have to find and keep your investors very happy, because it is the never way They can Stay afloat, plus the Competition with other casinos is Always very strong.

[beerlover]

Even with high bankroll martingale can easily eat and deplete you fund especially when you encounter a series of reds in your roll. 20+ red streak can possibly make your bankroll negative  and we all know that 20+ read streak is very possible.  I even experience this in spinning a slot. 20+ dead spin.  Imagine if I martingale my bet and I experience that 20+ streak. 

If someone doesn't realize that getting to 10+ is a sign, he should stop immediately and doesn't stop gambling. Instead, he will only run out of money if he uses big bets, especially if he gets 20+ a series of reds.

For slot games, usually after getting several losses, we can get a win which, even though it's a small win, can make us continue to gamble. So for gambling, I think it's really worth it if we stick with small bets even though we have a big bankroll because it sure hurts to see all our balances used up that day.

Usually that is true, but not every single time. You could get a lot of losses that will eventually make you run out of money and there is no return from there, it just doesn't work like that. I have seen people turn just a few dollars into thousands of dollars and then end up losing it all back again. Casinos have house edge on their side which means that it would not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling and win.

If you gamble long enough, then you are going to end up with a loss eventually and that is the end of it, that's just going to be the case for sure, without a doubt. I hope that it gets to a point where it will not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling for a long time and still not face 20+ losses in a row, if you keep gambling, you will reach that one day.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~
Of course, obviously things with AI are like this, the data collected will never be the good option to decipher what can happen, also there are many things that influence sports games, who are the ones that motivate players to play like this, what It caught my attention, it was in the World Cup in Qatar where an AI predicted that the final would be between Portugal and Argentina, it was something really chilling because the one who won the mjudnial was Argentina, although the AI was wrong for the contender from Argentina, but It seems to me that it was just a coincidence, I know that the AI quickly pulls the statistics and that is a very good functionality.

There were also some other predictions that said that France and Brazil would be in the final.

At the end of the day, given enough predictions, one of them will be right. So always keep that in mind. People tend to ignore the failed predictions and focus on the ones that actually happened.

Yes indeed, I cannot deny that the final that the AI predicted would be between Argentina and Portugal caught my attention, because at once I imagined Messi vs CR7, and that was something phenomenal, I really would have liked it much more than France would have reached the Final, and I also did not like that Deschamps did not include Benzema and I think that was a great warning of having lost that final, this is one of the things that happens when the technical director has not been able to mature the differences with his players, you can't send the weakest to war, you must send the strongest to win it, but Deschamps couldn't see that, and that's what the AI failed to predict, that's why I say to this the AI needs a lot of development.

Even how much it would be developed, there's still no way that it could really be able to make precise predictions due to factors which cant really be read up with any AI no matter how advanced it would be.
There are things which cant really be touched up by technology advancement not matter how good it is on other aspects but in speaking about future results and other correlated things
then it would be an another story.It is really just we should accept that AI couldnt touch up betting area or something that do talks about predictions and future events
which are bound to happen.

I totally agree, even with AI technology advncing, there are certain factors that can't be predicted by machines, no matter how sophisticated they are. Some things are just beyond the scope of technology, especially when it comes to predicting future events like sports games. We need to accept that betting and predictions are areas where AI simply can't compete with human intuition and expertise.

Human experiences are the ones that often determine many things, it is a learning that can be intuited and used to have Better results, it is a more Analytical type of memory that is used for us to be able to engage some functions, especially in sports betting, In soccer, for example, there are times when one uses certain experiences that can be seen within a match that manages to see a higher or lower level of soccer and what their players are like, that could help a lot to bet,I would say that in that You gain a lot of experience,and that is very difficult to be able to program in the AI or for the AI to think that way.

~
With a good source of information I'm sure AI will beat them but in terms of emotions things that only human experts can play and weight the possibilities, there's something that still needed to consider unforeseen cases that might affect how AI will decide with their recommendations, the good thing here is you can use AI recommendation or you can go to the other-side.

Something that you'll going to be against the favorite, which is most of the time I believe that AI will provide after sorting all the available information around.

Expecting that with all available information provided AI will always be right in its predictions is not wise. We shouldn't rule out the possibility of a team winning against all the odds. The question is, will AI predictions be more cumulatively more accurate than those of the human experts? I think, we are less than a year from the time when AI will beat humans in this regard.

But before AI can provide recommendations, we must check the accuracy of the information provided by AI, especially considering that AI still needs to be developed even better in the current situation.
I wouldn't put too much hope in AI until it could show me possibly more accurate information than I could find.
We can't still depend on AI for now. Moreover, we have seen how AI answers something we ask, so we should stick to what we have done before in betting on sports betting.
By continuing to use the methods that we are used to, maybe the chance of victory that we can hope for will also be greater, but we can also keep an eye on AI projects in the gambling sector so that we can know their progress.

If you are practical, it's really the best thing to do before following any AI recommendations, you need to know the percentages of how well AI can provide decent information about the game and how good are the sources of information before you follow or before you use the recommendation to place your bets.

With your own knowledge about the game and the information from the AI, it can confirm to follow whatever you think that will give you a win.

Indeed it is so, we cannot deny that there must be many developers who must be working on obtaining a robot that can learn the master moves of the best players in the world in casinos, for example in poker, dice, roulette, in the most popular games, They have all of this and can have it to learn and have good results, however when we make certain Movements in the casinos we know that the best thing here is to give priority to what we know for now, that there aren't any and they don't have precision, and if There is the truth, they have not yet been seen or discovered, But it is a matter of time before they Achieve it.

On a very personal note, I would like the AI to be developed so that they can perform surgical interventions with more precision through robots and that many lives can be saved, for example in operations on the hands, brain, spine, that these operations are supervised by a doctor and thus the AI can be used in Pro of what should actually be used,and that can generate many antibiotics, medicines to cure diseases such as cancer, HIV, among others that turn out to be deadly.

[Coin_trader]

Usually that is true, but not every single time. You could get a lot of losses that will eventually make you run out of money and there is no return from there, it just doesn't work like that. I have seen people turn just a few dollars into thousands of dollars and then end up losing it all back again. Casinos have house edge on their side which means that it would not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling and win.

If you gamble long enough, then you are going to end up with a loss eventually and that is the end of it, that's just going to be the case for sure, without a doubt. I hope that it gets to a point where it will not be possible for anyone to just keep on gambling for a long time and still not face 20+ losses in a row, if you keep gambling, you will reach that one day.

I have an experience that fits this description recently. I manage to turn my 100$ bankroll to 500$ with continuous playing of Blackjack and other table games. I was supposed to withdraw all my funds after I hit the 500$ mark but the website didn't allow me to withdraw due to my transaction is still doesn't received enough confirmation because of the current mempool overload.

End result was I keep gambling using small amount, my 1$ loss turns into 20$ then I keep chasing it using high bet amount. I become less cautious on chasing loss that result on losing all my bankroll just because of chasing that small lose.

We human always being careless when we are on profit then chase minimal loss. We don't consider anymore how big our bet is once we are already on the profit side. This is the reason why it's easy to lose quickly when you are already in profit compared to when you are just starting to built-up our bankroll.

[piebeyb]

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

Not as a whole using the martingale strategy will fail and lose, sometimes we can also get a win, it's just that it depends on how we reach the profit target we want, sometimes when we have won using this strategy but we keep playing that's what the casino wants when you win and keep playing so at that time the martingale strategy will drain your money

I often get occasional wins using this martingale strategy. I have played many casino games and tested them, after I noticed that this strategy actually can also give us wins, it's just that we need to target when to stop when winning, especially the important things I learned from all these trials is to get rid of greed when using this strategy. 

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

Not as a whole using the martingale strategy will fail and lose, sometimes we can also get a win, it's just that it depends on how we reach the profit target we want, sometimes when we have won using this strategy but we keep playing that's what the casino wants when you win and keep playing so at that time the martingale strategy will drain your money

I often get occasional wins using this martingale strategy. I have played many casino games and tested them, after I noticed that this strategy actually can also give us wins, it's just that we need to target when to stop when winning, especially the important things I learned from all these trials is to get rid of greed when using this strategy. 

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

[babygun]

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

Martingale does give you winnings as it doubles your base bet but that's it. So if things go bad and you start with 1$, it could take a bet of 512$ to give you the profit of 1$ lol. You are right that the winnings for every roll remains the same, but is it not also psychological? When you see a lot of low numbers on Dice in a row, your mind will think that the chance that a high number will fall is bigger all though mathematically they are still the same.

[Fredomago]

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

Martingale does give you winnings as it doubles your base bet but that's it. So if things go bad and you start with 1$, it could take a bet of 512$ to give you the profit of 1$ lol. You are right that the winnings for every roll remains the same, but is it not also psychological? When you see a lot of low numbers on Dice in a row, your mind will think that the chance that a high number will fall is bigger all though mathematically they are still the same.

Depends from how luck will back you up, as the losing streak will force you to waste a lot of money trying to recover and take that small amount of profits, just the same with how most of us understand this strategy, it's more on how good you are in controlling your bankroll and how good you are in controlling your emotions.

With a set of target profits and if luck permits you to achieve and you manage to quit and you did not let greed to manipulate you.

Then yes, you can go out and make some money but for sure it's just a wonderful wording but in real scenery, greediness will always win

[Unsoldier]

~~~
In my experience I can say with respect to the Martingale that at one point I applied it here at Betfury and at that time the BFG tokens were at a good peak and I lost around 1500BFG which was difficult to recover, at the time the I lost I stopped playing with that strategy, I could get away with 200BFG but when I went over 400BFG I lost and stopped before I had lost everything, so I settled for losing that amount and not all of it, this is something that has to be taken into consideration with regarding the martingale.

Martingale is a very simple technique. I think a lot of new casino players start playing with this strategy. But Martingale is a bad idea to make money gambling. Do you really think the casino algorithms can't recognize it? Developers know many strategies for gambling. So it's useless to use Martingale in the hope of winning big money.

[serjent05]

Even with high bankroll martingale can easily eat and deplete you fund especially when you encounter a series of reds in your roll. 20+ red streak can possibly make your bankroll negative  and we all know that 20+ read streak is very possible.  I even experience this in spinning a slot. 20+ dead spin.  Imagine if I martingale my bet and I experience that 20+ streak. 

If someone doesn't realize that getting to 10+ is a sign, he should stop immediately and doesn't stop gambling. Instead, he will only run out of money if he uses big bets, especially if he gets 20+ a series of reds.

Yeah 10+ red streak is the sign that the slot is in feeding mode but many slots player wanted to push their limits until they get more and more red streak with less winnings in lesser reward. 

For slot games, usually after getting several losses, we can get a win which, even though it's a small win, can make us continue to gamble. So for gambling, I think it's really worth it if we stick with small bets even though we have a big bankroll because it sure hurts to see all our balances used up that day.

True, I always make bets in minimum and occasionally raise it 5x but I noticed that I hardly get a good win when I bet on a higher amount so I stay at the minimum to not only avoid huge losses in a short span of time but also to make my session have more chance of triggering the bonus round.

[Strongkored]

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

Maybe more precisely, the Martingale strategy will give us a win at the start, but if this strategy is carried out for the long term, the result will be a loss because you will have a hard time beating the house.
At the beginning of the martingale system, it will give us hope that the end result will be profit, but actually it is not, so if you want to use this strategy, only do it for a few rounds, because even though we have prepared big capital, consecutive losses and also the max bet that is applied by the casino, in the end, will make this strategy give the gambler defeat.
Because I've tried it, only betting 1 satoshi on dice games and having a capital of around 50-100K satoshi and it looks nice at the beginning but in the end, it will only drain our balance, so if you want to use this strategy, don't forget to stop immediately when you're still in a profit whatever that amount is.

[arwin100]

~~~
In my experience I can say with respect to the Martingale that at one point I applied it here at Betfury and at that time the BFG tokens were at a good peak and I lost around 1500BFG which was difficult to recover, at the time the I lost I stopped playing with that strategy, I could get away with 200BFG but when I went over 400BFG I lost and stopped before I had lost everything, so I settled for losing that amount and not all of it, this is something that has to be taken into consideration with regarding the martingale.

Martingale is a very simple technique. I think a lot of new casino players start playing with this strategy. But Martingale is a bad idea to make money gambling. Do you really think the casino algorithms can't recognize it? Developers know many strategies for gambling. So it's useless to use Martingale in the hope of winning big money.

Its simple and most common used by people since this is always teach by people or those influencers. Casino algorithms might recognize it since this method is very common so maybe there's something program to deflect this strategy and make the game still all random on users end. But we don't know the real case about this since we can speculate only about such things. Its still not useless to use Martingale strategy since its still fun to use that method.

[piebeyb]

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

Not as a whole using the martingale strategy will fail and lose, sometimes we can also get a win, it's just that it depends on how we reach the profit target we want, sometimes when we have won using this strategy but we keep playing that's what the casino wants when you win and keep playing so at that time the martingale strategy will drain your money

I often get occasional wins using this martingale strategy. I have played many casino games and tested them, after I noticed that this strategy actually can also give us wins, it's just that we need to target when to stop when winning, especially the important things I learned from all these trials is to get rid of greed when using this strategy. 

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

Yes as I said sometimes I just test it using the martingale strategy it's clear it's unprofitable and always risky, every casino game is always risky using any strategy depending on how they play, whereas I only test it, after all I'm not a big bettor just a small gambler trying the game betting on small stakes only, except sports betting.

Sports betting makes more sense than using any strategy in the casino so that's just my experience using the martingale strategy from testing several casino sites and all the winning results depend on how we play stop when we win and never keep playing until the end before it's all gone. 

[danadc]

I think for a lot of gamblers Martingale is still a go to, especially if you are new to gambling. It is an easy to understand strategy and most of the times it will go good and than you will keep doing it. I always tried to avoid playing with my BFG tokens as I always want to maximize that to get a bigger daily dividend.

Not as a whole using the martingale strategy will fail and lose, sometimes we can also get a win, it's just that it depends on how we reach the profit target we want, sometimes when we have won using this strategy but we keep playing that's what the casino wants when you win and keep playing so at that time the martingale strategy will drain your money

I often get occasional wins using this martingale strategy. I have played many casino games and tested them, after I noticed that this strategy actually can also give us wins, it's just that we need to target when to stop when winning, especially the important things I learned from all these trials is to get rid of greed when using this strategy. 

Martingale strategy, as I understand it, does not give winnings, like I've said in several of my comments on other threads concerning this topic of martingale, martingale is a gambling strategy that does not increase a gamblers chances of winning, it only increases the amount of money the gambler wins if he or she gets lucky to hit a win.
Increasing your bet on every roll does not make you win faster, that is, it does not increase your chances of winning, rather it's simply the same technique with "the higher your invested money, the higher your profit when the market is green", with this strategy, when you hit a win, you make more money due to the higher bet amount.

Normally, your chances of winning on every roll remains 50:50, martingale present or not.

Yes as I said sometimes I just test it using the martingale strategy it's clear it's unprofitable and always risky, every casino game is always risky using any strategy depending on how they play, whereas I only test it, after all I'm not a big bettor just a small gambler trying the game betting on small stakes only, except sports betting.

Sports betting makes more sense than using any strategy in the casino so that's just my experience using the martingale strategy from testing several casino sites and all the winning results depend on how we play stop when we win and never keep playing until the end before it's all gone. 

But sports betting is better when you know a lot about the sport, I have been reading about a sport that seems to me to be easier to bet on and win without knowing much and it is boxing , because the statistics are almost never wrong and It is rare when a result does not occur, and according to the athlete's trajectory, conclusions can be drawn, I have seen that here those who know the most about boxing have doubts when they are the most famous fights, perhaps it is because they mix their tastes of which boxer seems better than the other or which is more famous than the other , or the boxer who is of your preference.

[Fredomago]

~~~
In my experience I can say with respect to the Martingale that at one point I applied it here at Betfury and at that time the BFG tokens were at a good peak and I lost around 1500BFG which was difficult to recover, at the time the I lost I stopped playing with that strategy, I could get away with 200BFG but when I went over 400BFG I lost and stopped before I had lost everything, so I settled for losing that amount and not all of it, this is something that has to be taken into consideration with regarding the martingale.

Martingale is a very simple technique. I think a lot of new casino players start playing with this strategy. But Martingale is a bad idea to make money gambling. Do you really think the casino algorithms can't recognize it? Developers know many strategies for gambling. So it's useless to use Martingale in the hope of winning big money.

Its simple and most common used by people since this is always teach by people or those influencers. Casino algorithms might recognize it since this method is very common so maybe there's something program to deflect this strategy and make the game still all random on users end. But we don't know the real case about this since we can speculate only about such things. Its still not useless to use Martingale strategy since its still fun to use that method.

Yup! We don't have any idea or we don't know the real score behind the system that the house is using, we can only speculate and we can just assume that they've got special system to bring it up as fair system, but for sure for gamblers who keeps losing blaming or pointing fingers to the house speculation that the results of each game is not being fairly executed, thinking that there's something behind it is possible to hear from gambler who lose their money.

I like that last word, martingale is the very common practice//strategy, but most of the time, the enjoyment is not being felt when you
experienced unexpected losing streaks.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I like that last word, martingale is the very common practice//strategy, but most of the time, the enjoyment is not being felt when you
experienced unexpected losing streaks.

In clear and easy terms, we can simply say that the happiness in gambling is when you are winning, and the sadness is when you keep losing.

But then, we all understand that nobody enjoys loosing money, but then, our happiness shouldn't all rely on winning our bets, sometimes, it's just so good to just gamble for the fun, enjoyment in doing it, and not for monetary purposes,, as this can help us to always be happy and joyful even while experiencing some losing streak.

[dwyane36]

But sports betting is better when you know a lot about the sport, I have been reading about a sport that seems to me to be easier to bet on and win without knowing much and it is boxing , because the statistics are almost never wrong and It is rare when a result does not occur, and according to the athlete's trajectory, conclusions can be drawn, I have seen that here those who know the most about boxing have doubts when they are the most famous fights, perhaps it is because they mix their tastes of which boxer seems better than the other or which is more famous than the other , or the boxer who is of your preference.

I doubt that making money by placing bets on boxing can be easier than betting on other sports. It is worth noting that each sport has some nuances that may not be reflected in statistics but may have a decisive factor in the outcome of the match. I mean that nuances may be obvious things for fans but not for ordinary users. So I personally prefer not to place bets on sports that I don't know much about.