ROCKMINER - miners using GEN3 ASICMINER chips

[elasticband]

1 Pre-investment
2 Clear profit model and short return period .
3 hard work of 8 people team from end of 2013.
4 1P hashrate chips of ASICMINER preOrder for the first batch to start up.
5 others.


Thanks for your concern. We are looking for partner oversea and some have already contacted.

So reading over this.

does number 4 mean that the private shareholders actual purchased the preorder of the 1petahash worth of AM gen 3 ships?

Is so nice input!

Does this mean that the public funding was  more sought to secure future batches of chips while waiting for return from the first?

Some clarity on these would be great.

[hephaist0s]

I fell asleep. It was like trying to stay up late enough to see Santa, except completely different.

[kmtan]

I am in...let see how..

[CanaryInTheMine]

Looks like chips are good!

From friedcat:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438359.msg5968082#msg5968082

[kololo]

Looks like chips are good!

From friedcat:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=438359.msg5968082#msg5968082

Great news. I wish the first batch chip will come out in one month.

[rockxie]

We've received some sample chips.



http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/07/ASICMINER gen3 chips received

[jimmothy]

We've received some sample chips.



http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/07/ASICMINER gen3 chips received

They are beautiful

[freedomno1]

http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/07/ASICMINER gen3 chips received
That looks unreal nice stuff

[Chris_Sabian]

I wouldn't mind have a few hundred of those chips for myself...   

[101111]

They are beautiful

+1

[dhenson]

Was looking over the shareholder list and  noticed these amounts.

15TeGQW9SnXGqZLMxKRQKC7aKF1ezYJRUz   1000
16v6ywLLbp6hqD3MdNxMwkmS3bdkknwMEz   500
1K2sJqYFs5G5Ad2B4VtEzg9VpHzjwDNdct   200
19YSHgbdniDqdkt3N6jZy1iRPwpohCHUKn   200
1FiaHA7ieutyaBrhAceAhuxioNNQ1TW7i4   185

Any idea how that happened?  100 was the max post IPO purchase amount, and you had to buy 2000 shares to buy early.

Also, has there been any talk of a passthru on Havelock?

[rockxie]

Hi,these shares are traded offline recently by shareholders.

We are talking with HAVELOCK, but the fees are too expensive I think.

Was looking over the shareholder list and  noticed these amounts.

15TeGQW9SnXGqZLMxKRQKC7aKF1ezYJRUz   1000
16v6ywLLbp6hqD3MdNxMwkmS3bdkknwMEz   500
1K2sJqYFs5G5Ad2B4VtEzg9VpHzjwDNdct   200
19YSHgbdniDqdkt3N6jZy1iRPwpohCHUKn   200
1FiaHA7ieutyaBrhAceAhuxioNNQ1TW7i4   185

Any idea how that happened?  100 was the max post IPO purchase amount, and you had to buy 2000 shares to buy early.

Also, has there been any talk of a passthru on Havelock?

[SyRenity]

Hi,these shares are traded offline recently by shareholders.

We are talking with HAVELOCK, but the fees are too expensive I think.

What about using 2nd gen coin, like counterparty?
https://www.counterparty.co/

They just launched mainnet wallet yesterday:
https://www.counterwallet.co

You can easily register a new asset there.

[dexX7]

You can easily register a new asset there.

How about you go ahead, collect shares and start a passthrough? Forcing anyone who holds direct shares to use XCP is not feasible.

[SyRenity]

You can easily register a new asset there.

How about you go ahead, collect shares and start a passthrough? Forcing anyone who holds direct shares to use XCP is not feasible.

It would be a good idea (I'm a long time XCP user and supporter), if there was not a possible conflict of interests (Spond).

[minerpumpkin]

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

[Chris_Sabian]

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

Since there was only a small amount of public shares available during IPO, 1/100 PT may be a good idea.

I'll pick up a few

[freedomno1]

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

Since there was only a small amount of public shares available during IPO, 1/100 PT may be a good idea.

I'll pick up a few

I will as well it doesn't hurt to diversify and I would trust rockxie to be at an advantage/invincible as well
Friedcat: Our advantage to manufacture chips at the cost price is invincible
Rockxie: Our ROCKMINER's ability to miner design, produce, sale and mining operation is invincible

[rockxie]

Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now.
XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well.
Thanks for your supporting.

Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough?
Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).

Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?

[rockxie]

We've got the PCBs for testing board.It will take about two days to weld them to testing boards.

http://blog.rockminer.com/#!/2014/04/09/Materials_and_pcbs_for_testing_demo_boards