101111
|
|
April 09, 2014, 07:20:22 AM |
|
thanks for the update and good luck with the testing
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:35:48 PM |
|
I'm loving the frequent blog updates. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:47:52 PM |
|
out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?
|
|
|
|
minerpumpkin
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:56:12 PM |
|
out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?
I doubt there'll be a lot of revenue. If they're doing things professionally, they'll also just stay on testnet
|
I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
|
|
|
donut
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:35:21 PM |
|
Please consider Mastercoin as an alternative to XCP, which appears to be alpha-quality software.
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
April 09, 2014, 07:39:45 PM |
|
out of interest, the test farm, the revenue generated will be made public via mining address on pool api?
I doubt there'll be a lot of revenue. If they're doing things professionally, they'll also just stay on testnet who mines on test net when you just build the most efficient miner on the market? set that baby to work Also a farm that requires extraction of that size will not be small potatoes
|
|
|
|
Anotheranonlol
|
|
April 10, 2014, 03:09:50 AM |
|
Please consider Mastercoin as an alternative to XCP, which appears to be alpha-quality software.
Total nonsense, Having tested both recently XCP is the clearly superior choice at this time. Mastercoin is not even at alpha stage in comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
April 11, 2014, 09:48:41 AM |
|
Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them,some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.
How many chips are supposed to go on one board? I can't figure out from the pictures.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
April 11, 2014, 09:54:52 AM |
|
Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them,some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.
How many chips are supposed to go on one board? I can't figure out from the pictures. one BE200 on each
|
|
|
|
101111
|
|
April 11, 2014, 10:21:01 AM |
|
> BTW,our testing room has been renovated. If that's the testing room I can't wait to see the actual mining centre!
|
|
|
|
pigheadbig
|
|
April 11, 2014, 10:53:07 AM |
|
Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough? Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).
Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER? go head for the answers! thanks
|
|
|
|
eastpk
Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 10
WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling
|
|
April 11, 2014, 11:43:16 AM |
|
Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough? Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).
Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER? go head for the answers! thanks
They answered this question - disregarding Havelock because of high fees. Hi,these shares are traded offline recently by shareholders.
We are talking with HAVELOCK, but the fees are too expensive I think.
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
April 11, 2014, 02:50:17 PM Last edit: April 11, 2014, 03:20:01 PM by 520Bit |
|
Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now. XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well. Thanks for your supporting. Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough? Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).
Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?
Counterparty is your best choice to issue your STOCK! Counterparty have a full functionality now. You can pay dividend by both BTC and XCP, choose whatever you like to pay.
Moreover, you can issue your shares with nearly zero cost, because it just costs you 0.5 XCP to issue any asset.
Counterparty thread on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.0Counterparty official website: https://www.counterparty.coCounterparty online wallet: https://counterwallet.co/Counterpartyd(Command line client): https://github.com/PhantomPhreak/counterpartydCounterparty GUI client BoottleXCP: https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCP
|
|
|
|
pigheadbig
|
|
April 11, 2014, 03:58:36 PM |
|
hope everything go well for the miner.
|
|
|
|
_mr_e
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 817
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 11, 2014, 04:19:49 PM |
|
What do they mean that something is wrong with the chips? Is this AMs chips??
|
|
|
|
Franktank
|
|
April 11, 2014, 04:22:50 PM |
|
What do they mean that something is wrong with the chips? Is this AMs chips??
Testing boards are arrived,one BE200 on each,but we found that there were something wrong with them, some of components bought from Huaqiang North market can't work normally.We are working hard on this,more info will be given out soon.
|
|
|
|
pigheadbig
|
|
April 12, 2014, 08:04:23 AM |
|
What do they mean that something is wrong with the chips? Is this AMs chips?? the PCB components ,not the chips
|
|
|
|
rockxie (OP)
|
|
April 13, 2014, 02:33:03 AM |
|
Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now. XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well. Thanks for your supporting. Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough? Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).
Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?
Counterparty is your best choice to issue your STOCK! Counterparty have a full functionality now. You can pay dividend by both BTC and XCP, choose whatever you like to pay.
Moreover, you can issue your shares with nearly zero cost, because it just costs you 0.5 XCP to issue any asset.
Counterparty thread on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.0Counterparty official website: https://www.counterparty.coCounterparty online wallet: https://counterwallet.co/Counterpartyd(Command line client): https://github.com/PhantomPhreak/counterpartydCounterparty GUI client BoottleXCP: https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCPWe noticed that there is already an asset named of ROCKMINER at Counter Market ( http://www.blockscan.com/assetinfo.aspx?q=ROCKMINER) when doing some testing,it is not issued by us,please be aware of it. It seems that everyone can issue any name of assets in Counter Market.We worry that this would confuse shareholders if we issue shares through this way.
|
|
|
|
pigheadbig
|
|
April 13, 2014, 03:01:58 AM |
|
Havelock said their policy is changed,and they only accept direct shares right now. XCP is under developing,we will consider it if it really works well. Thanks for your supporting. Should I contact Havelock about the terms and conditions of running a Passthrough? Do we want to keep everything in whole shares or rather fractional shares (1/100 maybe, like AM100?).
Would an external operator of a passthrough be OK for ROCKMINER?
Counterparty is your best choice to issue your STOCK! Counterparty have a full functionality now. You can pay dividend by both BTC and XCP, choose whatever you like to pay.
Moreover, you can issue your shares with nearly zero cost, because it just costs you 0.5 XCP to issue any asset.
Counterparty thread on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.0Counterparty official website: https://www.counterparty.coCounterparty online wallet: https://counterwallet.co/Counterpartyd(Command line client): https://github.com/PhantomPhreak/counterpartydCounterparty GUI client BoottleXCP: https://github.com/JahPowerBit/BoottleXCPWe noticed that there is already an asset named of ROCKMINER at Counter Market ( http://www.blockscan.com/assetinfo.aspx?q=ROCKMINER) when doing some testing,it is not issued by us,please be aware of it. It seems that everyone can issue any name of assets in Counter Market.We worry that this would confuse shareholders if we issue shares through this way. should make it clear or just buy the asset named of ROCKMINER if possible.
|
|
|
|
|