abanamat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 274
Merit: 1
|
|
October 15, 2021, 07:36:24 PM |
|
Testing 1.15 now. If its not "that good"
For pascal cards the cuda 11.2 build is better. Check it out 1.15 it's just what the doctor ordered! Thank you!
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 15, 2021, 10:17:52 PM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 01:07:16 PM by mprep |
|
link=topic=5358334.msg58178171#msg58178171 date=1634214451] Any plan to add LHR unlock support soon?
How about other 6000 series cards? 6600 should be quite efficient. LHR1 is already cracked by the friends of skidrow.Nvidia have chosen to limit their speeds, so team black will push cards that have no limit.
who will buy lhr cards if the 6900xt can do 120MHASH?
who will buy nvidia lhr cards if the 6900xt can do 120MHASH?
how much would an asian buyer bid for 500 000 cards? [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 12:13:51 AM |
|
who will buy lhr cards if the 6900xt can do 120MHASH?
woah is this your endgame lol. right now in Vietnam i can get one for around $1500 so 120mhs would be a steal!
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
October 16, 2021, 05:10:36 AM |
|
Testing 1.15 now. If its not "that good"
For pascal cards the cuda 11.2 build is better. Check it out Is it possible to get a 11.2 Ubuntu 18 build?
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
abanamat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 274
Merit: 1
|
|
October 16, 2021, 05:40:00 AM |
|
who will buy lhr cards if the 6900xt can do 120MHASH?
It's not a typo? 120mhash?! Show me please
|
|
|
|
Ramsete2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 5
|
|
October 16, 2021, 07:45:01 AM |
|
Probably found a bug on ver 1.15, lots of statistics are at zero:
│[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] crazypool.org (ethash) PING: 22ms DIFFICULTY: 2.00 EPOCH: 447 │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] ID BOARD TYPE TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT kW/h COST/h │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU0 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU1 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU2 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU3 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU4 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU5 3080 Cuda 0/0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] 0 0.00 0.00USD │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU0 3080 0.00 H/W 102.47 MH/s 102.51 MH/s 7/0/0 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU1 3080 0.00 H/W 102.96 MH/s 102.94 MH/s 3/0/0 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU2 3080 0.00 H/W 102.90 MH/s 102.92 MH/s 2/0/1 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU3 3080 0.00 H/W 102.90 MH/s 102.89 MH/s 3/0/1 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.028] GPU4 3080 0.00 H/W 102.94 MH/s 102.90 MH/s 9/0/0 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.028] GPU5 3080 0.00 H/W 102.95 MH/s 102.90 MH/s 8/0/0 (100.00%) │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.028] 0.00 H/W 617.13 MH/s 617.06 MH/s 32/0/2 (100.00%)
|
|
|
|
scaramanga_gold
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 08:48:08 AM |
|
This looks promising as the devs are really pulling an effort. Would be nice to see a direct compartment to T-rex miner for nvidia lhr 30x0 cards.
|
|
|
|
Ramsete2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 5
|
|
October 16, 2021, 08:51:28 AM |
|
I'm currently testing it with two gemini rigs of 6x3080 cards, one TBMiner and one GMiner
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 09:30:07 AM |
|
This looks promising as the devs are really pulling an effort. Would be nice to see a direct compartment to T-rex miner for nvidia lhr 30x0 cards.
LHR not supported yet. you get the nerfed hashrate as designed by nvidia. switching back to gminer for now...
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 01:15:10 PM |
|
Comon sp, lets beat the 110mh/s! Its sooo close already, im sure u can further optimize it! Just dont wanna (yet) tweak more on the GPU, guess its kinda on its limit already. https://imgur.com/ZsPCXzz.jpg
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 01:34:20 PM |
|
sp makes me seriously consider a 6900xt right now as it still relatively cheap lol anyone with one on hands can share their current results?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 16, 2021, 01:52:25 PM Last edit: October 16, 2021, 02:03:28 PM by sp_ |
|
Comon sp, lets beat the 110mh/s! Its sooo close already, im sure u can further optimize it! Just dont wanna (yet) tweak more on the GPU, guess its kinda on its limit already. nice hashrate, did you use the new core lock function? │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES │[2021-10-16 07:42:01][info][miner/0]: 8m [2021-10-16 07:42:00.027] GPU0 3080 0.00 H/W 102.47
try to lock the coreclock at 1330 Run as admin and add this to the commandline: --lock-cclock [[1330,1330],[1330,1330],[1330,1330],[1330,1330],[1330,1330],[1330,1330]] memclock at 10840
|
|
|
|
Ramsete2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 5
|
|
October 16, 2021, 02:00:10 PM |
|
Sorry but why we should increase core on RTX 3080 so much? 1050-1080 range is more than enough to keep stability. Anything more is just a waste of power. I made a test on my cards and passing from 1050 to 1500, wattage moved from 215W to 240W each.
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 02:08:54 PM |
|
Sorry but why we should increase core on RTX 3080 so much? 1050-1080 range is more than enough to keep stability. Anything more is just a waste of power. I made a test on my cards and passing from 1050 to 1500, wattage moved from 215W to 240W each.
im setting 1200 on my 3080, 3080ti and 3090. memclock varies though. it is the sweet spot for me.
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2021, 02:26:08 PM |
|
did you use the new core lock function?
Not yet, still my Custom curve, as it bounces around and uses more core clock when needed, or turns down when not needed just at that moment. Looking forward for further optimisations on the Miner. <3
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 16, 2021, 05:09:25 PM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 01:06:20 PM by mprep |
|
im setting 1200 on my 3080, 3080ti and 3090. memclock varies though. it is the sweet spot for me.
Thanks tried it out on the rtx 3070 laptop gpu. v1.15 with --lock-cclock [1200,1200] 1.14 was only doing 49-50
v1.16 will have 4 nvidia kernels. GTX cards will pick a different kernel than rtx cards. We have also managed to reach cuda_11_2 speeds on in 11_4 on gtx cards. Actually a tiny bit faster. (+0.1%) [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2021, 02:04:35 AM |
|
im setting 1200 on my 3080, 3080ti and 3090. memclock varies though. it is the sweet spot for me.
Thanks tried it out on the rtx 3070 laptop gpu. v1.15 with --lock-cclock [1200,1200] 1.14 was only doing 49-50 https://i.ibb.co/x3jqCZR/3070L.jpgdamn look at that efficiency!
|
|
|
|
hashatharias
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2021, 02:36:22 AM |
|
The core lock is really a blessing, locking the core with afterburner is such a chore... What would also be quite nice is the way to set the memory frequency and fan speed as well.
Really impressive, I can't wait for it to be released on HiveOS
|
|
|
|
KillrBee
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 139
Merit: 3
|
|
October 17, 2021, 01:44:52 PM Last edit: October 17, 2021, 02:31:04 PM by KillrBee |
|
There seems to be a bug in the "Average" hash rate when starting up AMD RNDA2 cards and a high intensity value. https://imgur.com/a/382cFXO
|
|
|
|
ayiphelmy
Copper Member
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 416
Merit: 105
|
|
October 17, 2021, 03:26:45 PM |
|
v1.16 will have 4 nvidia kernels. GTX cards will pick a different kernel than rtx cards. We have also managed to reach cuda_11_2 speeds on in 11_4 on gtx cards. Actually a tiny bit faster. (+0.1%)
let see if this version can beat nbminer on 1070ti, v1.15 still 1.5 mhs slower
|
|
|
|
|