P00P135
|
|
October 29, 2021, 04:16:00 PM |
|
We are close to do LHR 1 90% unlock on linux/windows.. Thats cool. Is that with certain 455-460 drivers like lolminer does currently?
|
|
|
|
|
cost82el
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2021, 04:40:16 PM |
|
what model and OC do you have on GPU1?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 29, 2021, 04:51:02 PM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 12:53:12 PM by mprep |
|
dag verification failed add --dagintensity 0 It will write in the console of you have set the dag intensity correctly. you could also try --dagintensity [0,0,0,0,0,0]
We are close to do LHR 1 90% unlock on linux/windows.. Thats cool. Is that with certain 455-460 drivers like lolminer does currently? no.The latest driver. cuda 11.4. The unlock beta version will probobly be released on sunday
care to elaborate? i cant make sense of the screenshot. are you saying you can get 90% of the full hashrate out of LHR cards?
Yes. On the 3060 LHR 1. should work on lhr 2 as well , but needs to be tested.. Latest drivers.. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2021, 06:09:56 PM |
|
Heyhey, what Cuda version do u recommend for 1070 + 3080? As im still on 1.15 since almost 2 weeks for now, i might give it a try to see what happens. Maybe it can beat the outcome of over 225$ even bigger of what i mined in 14 Days from Shiba Inu with this 2 cards.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 29, 2021, 06:31:01 PM |
|
what Cuda version do u recommend for 1070 + 3080? As im still on 1.15 since almost 2 weeks for now, i might give it a try to see what happens.
v1.21 is faster than v1.15..
|
|
|
|
snoby67
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2021, 07:46:12 PM |
|
sp_, do you have an idea about my problem ? Message #1096 Still do not work to chose nvidia and amd card one by one
|
|
|
|
long2905
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 12:11:58 AM |
|
care to elaborate? i cant make sense of the screenshot. are you saying you can get 90% of the full hashrate out of LHR cards?
Yes. On the 3060 LHR 1. should work on lhr 2 as well , but needs to be tested.. Latest drivers.. amazing. soon onto 120mh/s on 6900xt?
|
|
|
|
poisons77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 01:21:00 AM |
|
Ok, I want to retry but I'm a bit confused. My configuration is 9x580, on HiveOs, Amd driver 20.40 (5.9.0325)
What is the best configuration for my rig? Till 1.19 it always failed, but before retrying would like to start with the best configuration options
Thanks
|
|
|
|
ZerodayTrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 02:21:16 AM |
|
what Cuda version do u recommend for 1070 + 3080? As im still on 1.15 since almost 2 weeks for now, i might give it a try to see what happens.
v1.21 is faster than v1.15.. Thats why i wanna test. But thats why im a fan of; "never touch a running system" https://i.imgur.com/k0taZif.png
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2021, 06:27:35 AM Last edit: November 08, 2021, 12:52:00 PM by mprep |
|
--worker_name has been renamed to --worker-name
Ok, I want to retry but I'm a bit confused. My configuration is 9x580, on HiveOs, Amd driver 20.40 (5.9.0325)
What is the best configuration for my rig? Till 1.19 it always failed, but before retrying would like to start with the best configuration options
Thanks
--xintensity 60 works good on the 580 [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
XyeetmanX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 06:38:32 AM |
|
Does the --xintensity command increase vram temps as i cannot check them on raveos
|
|
|
|
Chaf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 06:51:22 AM |
|
Hi ! I have a probleme to configure TBM on HiveOS. I have a rig witch mix Nvidia and AMD cards. Actually, your disable GPUs doesn't work, I can't put any card here, the miner doesn't start. I have to use the command --cuda-devices to select manually which Nvidia card I want to use. I want to do the same thing witch my AMD cards, so I used --cl-devices to select witch card to mine with. But it doesn't work. So how to select only some Nvidia cards and some AMD cards ?
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2021, 08:20:24 AM Last edit: November 01, 2021, 08:52:55 AM by mprep |
|
Hi ! I have a probleme to configure TBM on HiveOS. I have a rig witch mix Nvidia and AMD cards. Actually, your disable GPUs doesn't work, I can't put any card here, the miner doesn't start. I have to use the command --cuda-devices to select manually which Nvidia card I want to use. I want to do the same thing witch my AMD cards, so I used --cl-devices to select witch card to mine with. But it doesn't work. So how to select only some Nvidia cards and some AMD cards ?
use tbminer --list-devices to find the correct id of the amd card
TeamBlackMiner v 1.21 Let's test it? The default setting can give more stale shares than other miners, so wotls best on miningpools that accept stale shares
Does the --xintensity command increase vram temps as i cannot check them on raveos
Higher xintensity, Higher hash, more power needed. higher temps. not sure about vram temps [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
dedizonesv2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 3
|
|
October 30, 2021, 08:48:27 AM |
|
Testing latest TBMiner version vs GMiner. Here below results after about 10 hours: TBMiner (ver 1.19) GMiner (ver 2.70) Honestly I don't know what to say, despite TBMiner shows more hashrate, GMiner is always providing more shares to the pool... Even shares per minute calculation seems wrong, since both miners startd at the same time. I've got the same result. The higher reported hashrate on the TBM then on the Gminer but much more shares on the Gminer. 3 days testing on 12x 1660S. 6 GPUs on the Gminer and 6 GPUs on the TBM. Honestly, I've got to say the TBM lies about the hashrate similarly like the Phoenix miner does. I'm back on Gminer at this moment. I have the same observation as you ... Gminer 2.70 - Kernel 4 33 x RTX 3070 Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 61.60Mhs 1 x 3080 Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 100.3Mhs Total farm 4875w (on the wall) @ +/-2.133Ghs ----------------** TBM 1.21 - Kernel 8 - intensity 224 33 x RTX 3070 Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 64.80Mhs 1 x 3080 Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 103.8Mhs Total farm 4980w (on the wall) @ +/-2.203Ghs -----------*** RED TBM Share ! Green Gminer Share https://0bin.net/paste/VlP1g9SC#PSL3QHWAXHtIwAO+hqgkR7ib9av3k5sXrVCxlcPBBAY----------- the question is how one can have with such a low OC memory still 61MHS? I had fun putting at 61 Mhs as for Gminer in order to have 2.133Ghs and the surprise consumption only drops by 50W on all rigs? and the heated cards in the same way as at 2400Mhz !! in reality that I drop from 2400Mhz to 1900Mhz the consumption is identical but as my cards run at 61Mhs I am at 650 / 720shares instead of 800/900 So I tested all the possible settings, I conclude either you are lying on hashrate in order to deceive the newbie because it judges only by the power instead of looking at the number of shares / hour. I read all the pages, you play with stales and recommended pools that don't pay! you say that 2% of stale is not serious because the pool pays! except that 2% solo is too much! then say to go on 2min because it is more profitable it is completely wrong ... especially with the stories of M.E.V and E.D.E.N network You have just taken the sources of Ethemine with the ideas of lolminer (besides he released 192 in workload, you also recommended after 192 ??) .. Gminer and so on. the miner is too complicated to set, we have no course of action you even do not know which setting to put I'm sorry but when I take Gminer, lolminer or trex whether on 2miner or crazypool I don't need to spend 2 days finding the right setting for $ 0.20 more but which will actually end up in the business because your miner takes 100w more So for me it will not be recommended at all to my community. simplified the miner and really displayed what we mine and rule
|
|
|
|
Chaf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 09:00:17 AM Last edit: October 30, 2021, 09:28:13 AM by Chaf |
|
Hi ! I have a probleme to configure TBM on HiveOS. I have a rig witch mix Nvidia and AMD cards. Actually, your disable GPUs doesn't work, I can't put any card here, the miner doesn't start. I have to use the command --cuda-devices to select manually which Nvidia card I want to use. I want to do the same thing witch my AMD cards, so I used --cl-devices to select witch card to mine with. But it doesn't work. So how to select only some Nvidia cards and some AMD cards ?
use tbminer --list-devices to find the correct id of the amd card That’s what I did, it didn’t work either. https://ibb.co/kXHQQ0Vhttps://ibb.co/JtBXnt3https://ibb.co/ts7fVmmhttps://ibb.co/LkshGNChttps://ibb.co/zHPSvmX
|
|
|
|
XyeetmanX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 09:27:49 AM |
|
Testing latest TBMiner version vs GMiner. Here below results after about 10 hours: TBMiner (ver 1.19) https://i.ibb.co/BGcxvkP/tbminer.pngGMiner (ver 2.70) https://i.ibb.co/LJPJ43H/gminer.pngHonestly I don't know what to say, despite TBMiner shows more hashrate, GMiner is always providing more shares to the pool... Even shares per minute calculation seems wrong, since both miners startd at the same time. I've got the same result. The higher reported hashrate on the TBM then on the Gminer but much more shares on the Gminer. 3 days testing on 12x 1660S. 6 GPUs on the Gminer and 6 GPUs on the TBM. Honestly, I've got to say the TBM lies about the hashrate similarly like the Phoenix miner does. I'm back on Gminer at this moment. I have the same observation as you ... Gminer 2.70 - Kernel 4 33 x RTX 3070 Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 61.60Mhs 1 x 3080 Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 100.3Mhs Total farm 4875w (on the wall) @ +/-2.133Ghs ----------------** TBM 1.21 - Kernel 8 - intensity 224 33 x RTX 3070 Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 64.80Mhs 1 x 3080 Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 103.8Mhs Total farm 4980w (on the wall) @ +/-2.203Ghs -----------*** RED TBM Share ! Green Gminer Share https://0bin.net/paste/VlP1g9SC#PSL3QHWAXHtIwAO+hqgkR7ib9av3k5sXrVCxlcPBBAY----------- the question is how one can have with such a low OC memory still 61MHS? I had fun putting at 61 Mhs as for Gminer in order to have 2.133Ghs and the surprise consumption only drops by 50W on all rigs? and the heated cards in the same way as at 2400Mhz !! in reality that I drop from 2400Mhz to 1900Mhz the consumption is identical but as my cards run at 61Mhs I am at 650 / 720shares instead of 800/900 So I tested all the possible settings, I conclude either you are lying on hashrate in order to deceive the newbie because it judges only by the power instead of looking at the number of shares / hour. I read all the pages, you play with stales and recommended pools that don't pay! you say that 2% of stale is not serious because the pool pays! except that 2% solo is too much! then say to go on 2min because it is more profitable it is completely wrong ... especially with the stories of M.E.V and E.D.E.N network You have just taken the sources of Ethemine with the ideas of lolminer (besides he released 192 in workload, you also recommended after 192 ??) .. Gminer and so on. the miner is too complicated to set, we have no course of action you even do not know which setting to put I'm sorry but when I take Gminer, lolminer or trex whether on 2miner or crazypool I don't need to spend 2 days finding the right setting for $ 0.20 more but which will actually end up in the business because your miner takes 100w more So for me it will not be recommended at all to my community. simplified the miner and really displayed what we mine and rule Did you try raising the intensity try 800 on kernel 8
|
|
|
|
waldoffs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2021, 09:31:12 AM |
|
ok so i cant get teamblackminer to run on hive os, it constantly just gives me this message over and over
Skipping miner log rotation due to execution time < 30sec 00:00:00 [2021-10-30 19:25:55.496] 00:00:00 [2021-10-30 19:25:55.496] Sorry. SSL is not fully implemented yet 00:00:00 [2021-10-30 19:25:55.496] Shutting down threads 00:00:00 [2021-10-30 19:25:59.496] Exiting teamblackminer exited (exitcode=0), waiting to cooldown a bit
what do i need to change in the setting of hive to get it to start
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2021, 10:18:10 AM Last edit: November 01, 2021, 08:52:18 AM by mprep |
|
00:00:00 [2021-10-30 19:25:55.496] Sorry. SSL is not fully implemented yet
You need to change the mining pool port. SSL is not complete, so we only support normal ports. See in the example scripts.
the miner is too complicated to set, we have no course of action you even do not know which setting to put
The next version will have --dagintensity setting for AMD cards so you can push the memclocks even further. We need to find the optimal defaults, in the meantime you have to experiment a bit to get the best hashrates. simplified the miner
https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/FAQ.mdflexpool ethermine crazypool Are not the optimal pools for this miner. It's not only about stales, but how frequent jobs are sent out and how much work that needs to be thrown away.
To update my comment from yesterday regarding the Hashrate of my 3090. I ran the card overnight on 2Miners with the following settings: XIntensity @ 3108 Kernel @ 8 Gpu Clock @ 1600 Mem Clock @ 11326 PowerLevel @ 111% Which resulted in a 6 hour average of 139.38 MH/s, Reported 135.5 MH/s 139.38MHASH poolside is pretty good.. For a single rtx 3090... I would say that's the understatement of the year! Looking back through my 2Miners API logs, it was running in excess of 140MH/s at points over night! { 28/10/2021 04:46:41 !Workers: {'emerald_ronin': {'lastBeat': 1635410736, 'hr': 140590111, 'offline': False, 'hr2': 140186116, 'rhr': 145917131, 'sharesValid': 172, 'sharesInvalid': 0, 'sharesStale': 0}, ... { 28/10/2021 07:34:07 !Workers: {'emerald_ronin': {'lastBeat': 1635420825, 'hr': 164829785, 'offline': False, 'hr2': 143822067, 'rhr': 137026116, 'sharesValid': 335, 'sharesInvalid': 0, 'sharesStale': 0}, Now if we can get my AMD cards running like the 3090 I'll be back to pre-EIP1559 Ether / day! --xintensity 3108 would give more than 5% stale shares on ethermine. But ok on 2miners.com because you get payed for stale shares there. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
|