Will Russia Emerge As The Next Dominant Superpower

[DrBeer]

Not that simple. Russia captured around 20% of the Ukrainian land in the first few days of the offensive. Then Russia concentrated their offensive in the Donbass region, where the Ukrainians themselves admitted that Russian artillery is 10x more numerous when compared to their own. And for the last 2-3 months, Ukraine has been on the offensive, especially in the Kharkov and Kherson regions (where they have captured around 10,000 sq.km of territory). Now going by your own theory, Ukrainian losses should be 3x that of Russia.

I agree! Absolutely!
But! I intentionally left out one sentence yesterday
It sounds like this - "if the attacking side qualitatively and technologically corresponds to the enemy" T
Those. if armies of the same type are fighting against each other, the ratio is approximately the same, according to all the canons of military affairs. If the Army of the 21st century is fighting demativized, primitive, stupid soldiers, armed with weapons of the 60-70-80s of the last century, and methods of waging the Second World War, then the situation is changing, and radically!

If you really follow the situation and how the Ukrainian units are attacking, then you should know the following:
1. Depots of ammunition, fuel and lubricants are being destroyed
2. Logistics is destroyed (railways, roads, bridges, ..)
3. Forward headquarters and control posts of the enemy are being destroyed
4. Suppresses artillery and other concentrations of troops with long-range artillery and missile systems.
5. After that, there is already a direct attack on the territory where the unfinished terrorists remained.

Do you know why? Because in Ukraine they PROTECT and VALUE the lives of their soldiers and citizens, and Russia is still trying to throw its meat at us so that we run out of ammunition Just like the USSR fought in World War II.

So once again I strongly recommend not to listen to the propaganda of rashists, but to study reality

PS. Yes, the only thing that the Russians have so far more or less succeeded in is their "heroic terrorism" - missile attacks on peaceful cities. In terrorism, Russia is ahead of the rest! But even here the situation is changing, not in their favor.
The day before yesterday's attack on Kyiv - all missiles and kamikaze drones were destroyed!

[1714743234]

1714743234

[1714743234]

1714743234

[1714743234]

1714743234

[1714743234]

1714743234

[DrBeer]

~~~
Can you refute something?

My question was about the Ukrainian casualties. Still, I am not sure whether the 65,000 figure that you had given for Russia is close to reality. BBC Russian has given a figure of 8,000 confirmed deaths. I assume it will be much higher, because a lot of soldiers are listed as missing, and many of them were affiliated with PMC Wagner and other militia for whom the numbers will never be added to the official tally. Still 65K? Suspicious.

Ukraine on the other hand has a population of around 40 million right now and can't sustain with huge number of casualties. The Ukrainian government hasn't given any official figures for their own casualties since the start of the conflict. And now they are going on the offensive. In regions such as Kherson, where the terrain is flat, the attackers are going to face huge losses in manpower and equipment. And this is where Ukraine is concentrating their offensive.

You can believe or not believe, that's your right. But I highly recommend using logic and thinking
I will start a little from afar - I do not serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but I partially touch on this topic (Service in the Territorial Defense, but not on the front line), plus my specialty gives me the opportunity to be close to the front line.
I personally saw with my own eyes the fields on which dozens and hundreds of corpses of Russian soldiers were lying, whom the Russian command refuses to take. I saw railway refrigerators stuffed to capacity with the corpses of Russian soldiers, who are also refused to be taken away by the "second army in the world." I saw Russian convoys of dozens of vehicles destroyed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, where among the vehicles were trucks torn to rubble, carrying terrorist manpower.
This is what I mean - they are destroyed in huge quantities.
And now about logic and thinking. I can already see that you absolutely do not even know the basic theory about the army, military operations and similar topics. I have such knowledge I'm telling you.
According to the canons, combat formations that have lost 50% of their personnel cease to be combat-ready and are unable to perform combat missions (this does not apply to formations such as sabotage and reconnaissance groups and similar small formations). And they urgently need a REPLENISHMENT. So - we take logic, thinking and basic arithmetic:
- The beginning of the next round of a terrorist attack on Ukraine - the Russian Federation has 300,000 troops, not counting PMCs and other terrorist mercenaries.
- after 6 months, the "invincible army" begins to flee, throwing the wounded and equipment in an amount commensurate with Land Lease, and the "most honest leader", who promised that there would be no mobilization, announces ... mobilization. The first wave of mobilization - another 300,000. Yes, I did not make a reservation - the FIRST wave. There will be 4 of them in total. In December-January there will be a second wave, remember
Now we collect all the information - and what conclusion do we have? What are the losses of Russian terrorists in Ukraine? 5000-10000? You can cite any source that is more acceptable to you, but there are FACTS that neither you nor those sources can refute. And this is quite enough for me to assert that at least 60,000 Russian terrorists were killed, at least 120,000 terrorists from Russia were wounded, and possibly more, because. from the Rostov region, Belgrod, Krasnodar, information comes in about overcrowded hospitals and hospitals precisely by wounded terrorists ... Once again - use knowledge, logic, thinking, and do not choose those sources that are "closer to your soul"
And please explain more - why are you trying with such perseverance to at least somehow (very often unsuccessfully) "support" the country of the world terrorist? Well, honestly, you are a citizen of Russia, not India, right, I guessed? A person from a normal country, such as India, cannot, with such persistence, try to "whitewash" and make "innocent" a country like Russia-terrorist ...

[sukmo]

A superpower is a country that can exert a great influence on other countries globally. For now the superpowers are still held by America and China, the two countries are a barometer for other countries to catch up in terms of economy and technology. The Russian state is currently planning the will to make it a superpower with everything it has. ranging from natural resources including natural gas which supplies more than 50% of natural gas to European countries and the Russian military which is included in the top 10 countries with the strongest military in the world can be Russia's main capital to achieve its goals. With the achievement of Russia becoming the next superpower, we hope that cryptocurrencies in the future can be widely accepted in various countries.

[Sithara007]

A superpower is a country that can exert a great influence on other countries globally. For now the superpowers are still held by America and China, the two countries are a barometer for other countries to catch up in terms of economy and technology. The Russian state is currently planning the will to make it a superpower with everything it has. ranging from natural resources including natural gas which supplies more than 50% of natural gas to European countries and the Russian military which is included in the top 10 countries with the strongest military in the world can be Russia's main capital to achieve its goals. With the achievement of Russia becoming the next superpower, we hope that cryptocurrencies in the future can be widely accepted in various countries.

Russia can't be termed as a superpower, either in terms of military capability or economic capability. It is true that they are among the leading exporters of natural resources, but it will not count as long as they need to import the finished products. USSR was the 2nd superpower until its disintegration in 1992. But Russia never reached that level. They still have top-notch military technology, but the lack of manpower resources is a big concern (and it is quite evident during the recent conflict in Ukraine as well). And as far as I know, their population is getting decreased by ~1 million per year.

[Ani1985]

Russia certainly has a great chance to become a super power country, the world's largest country with increasing military and economic power so that it can become a super power country, besides that citizens' loyalty is the main key to making the country more optimistic.

[JoyMarsha]

The attacking side (aggressor, terrorist, i.e. Russia), suffer losses, in manpower and equipment at least 3 times more than the side carrying the defense. Those. For every 1 defender, there are 3 attackers.

Not that simple. Russia captured around 20% of the Ukrainian land in the first few days of the offensive. Then Russia concentrated their offensive in the Donbass region, where the Ukrainians themselves admitted that Russian artillery is 10x more numerous when compared to their own. And for the last 2-3 months, Ukraine has been on the offensive, especially in the Kharkov and Kherson regions (where they have captured around 10,000 sq.km of territory).

Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 and collected their land which is Crimea(Ukraine's most oil-producing state). Now again in 2022 they invaded them again to take four more states again from them. People expect Ukraine to fold their hands and watch Russia take more of their land, and this time the most industrialized states.

[Sithara007]

Russia certainly has a great chance to become a super power country, the world's largest country with increasing military and economic power so that it can become a super power country, besides that citizens' loyalty is the main key to making the country more optimistic.

China can be a super power, but not Russia. In the end, it all comes down to manpower. Russia has a population that is equal to around 40% of that of the United States and every year they lose around 1 million people. They are more like Japan in terms of defense capabilities. Russia has some of the best military technology, but that is of limited use when they don't have a large pool of manpower for their armed forces. And this was especially evident during the Russo-Ukrainian war, where the Russian side was very dependent on rebel militias (DNR/LNR), private mercenaries (PMC Wagner) and ethnic minorities from within the Russian Federation (Chechens, Daghestanis, Tuvinians, Kalmyks, Ossetians, Buryats.etc).

[EarnOnVictor]

Russia will never be a superpower, if there is a country that would take that position from the US, it would be China. On the contrary, Russia has demonstrated tyranny rather than a hero, they don't also have the economic empowerment that would give them that status. Their invasion of Ukraine has even set them centuries backwards, this might not be obvious yet, but time will tell as the world are wary of them and might not regain such trust for long. Putin has caused more damage to himself and his country to the extent that he dares not travel to choice countries anymore for the fear of assassination. What a life!

[be.open]

China can be a super power, but not Russia. In the end, it all comes down to manpower. Russia has a population that is equal to around 40% of that of the United States and every year they lose around 1 million people.

Russia has difficulties and successes in the demographic problem, but I do not think that you are setting priorities correctly. The quality of the population is more important than its quantity - for any population of moderate scale. Quantity becomes a priority only for very small (because a small number directly becomes a threat to the survival of an ethnic group) and very large populations (for example, like India and China, because in a large population it is easy to select the right amount of high quality people in different areas of activity due to natural biodiversity). India and China have very large human capital, but there are problems with the shortage of raw materials and energy.

They are more like Japan in terms of defense capabilities. Russia has some of the best military technology, but that is of limited use when they don't have a large pool of manpower for their armed forces. And this was especially evident during the Russo-Ukrainian war, where the Russian side was very dependent on rebel militias (DNR/LNR), private mercenaries (PMC Wagner) and ethnic minorities from within the Russian Federation (Chechens, Daghestanis, Tuvinians, Kalmyks, Ossetians, Buryats.etc).

What nonsense are you talking about? Japan has no armed forces at all, only self-defense forces. Japan has a fairly strong navy, but no nuclear weapons. Russia and Japan are countries from different weight categories militarily. Based on the limited military special operation in Ukraine, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the combat effectiveness and strength of the Russian army as a whole.

[Smartprofit]

Russia certainly has a great chance to become a super power country, the world's largest country with increasing military and economic power so that it can become a super power country, besides that citizens' loyalty is the main key to making the country more optimistic.

Russia had no chance of becoming the dominant superpower even without a real war with Ukraine. 

This is due to the fact that Russia has only 140 million people, and this is not enough to achieve the status of a superpower.  The dominant superpower must have a population of at least 300-500 million people. 

Such a population ensures the profitability of its own production (at the expense of the domestic market) and a sufficient number of scientists, engineers and programmers for the country's technological development. 

Russia needed to pursue a very balanced and cautious foreign policy in order to remain at least a regional superpower.  It was necessary to establish normal relations with neighbors, in particular with Poland and the Baltic countries.  These countries will never become friends of Russia, but it was necessary to set a goal so that they would not perceive Russia as an enemy.  Under no circumstances should the main gas pipelines be used as a weapon in economic wars! 

And even more so, in no case was it possible to get involved in a real war (especially with Ukraine).

[DrBeer]

A superpower is a country that can exert a great influence on other countries globally. For now the superpowers are still held by America and China, the two countries are a barometer for other countries to catch up in terms of economy and technology. The Russian state is currently planning the will to make it a superpower with everything it has. ranging from natural resources including natural gas which supplies more than 50% of natural gas to European countries and the Russian military which is included in the top 10 countries with the strongest military in the world can be Russia's main capital to achieve its goals. With the achievement of Russia becoming the next superpower, we hope that cryptocurrencies in the future can be widely accepted in various countries.

Russia can't be termed as a superpower, either in terms of military capability or economic capability. It is true that they are among the leading exporters of natural resources, but it will not count as long as they need to import the finished products. USSR was the 2nd superpower until its disintegration in 1992. But Russia never reached that level. They still have top-notch military technology, but the lack of manpower resources is a big concern (and it is quite evident during the recent conflict in Ukraine as well). And as far as I know, their population is getting decreased by ~1 million per year.

Until recently, they were the "leading exporters of natural resources." Yes, a country with a large area, with a resource economy, in general, an appendage of a more developed world. These are perhaps all the achievements that Russia has achieved over the past 20 years ...
But this year, Russia messed up even in this, becoming from a country of a raw material appendage, into an unsuccessful economic terrorist, and the same unsuccessful war criminal-terrorist.

PS And when you write about "first-class military equipment" - you must add before that:
- I think, but I'm not sure exactly
or
- for a third world country, and for the 20th century,

it will look realistic and not humorous

And a small excerpt from typical Russian news, for the consciousness of "Russian greatness"
About Siberia - the largest and richest region of Russia:
"Almost half of the families mobilized in the Siberian region were below the subsistence level
26 Oct 2022, 13:55
The authorities of Khakassia have compiled social portraits of the families of those who had to be mobilized by decree of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Almost half of them were below the subsistence level.
“The analysis showed that out of the total number of families of mobilized citizens, 46% of families have an average per capita income below the subsistence level,” the Ministry of Labor of Khakassia calculated. 

[Argoo]

As predicted earlier, after the military defeat of the Russian troops in Ukraine and the announcement of mobilization in Russia, the national liberation movement of the peoples oppressed by Russia and the nationalities that are part of the Russian Federation has sharply increased. Previously, it was believed that Chechnya (the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria) and Dagestan might be the first to try to secede from the Russian Federation.

However, on October 27, the text of the declaration "On the State Independence of the Republic of Kalmykia" appeared. The Declaration of Independence of Kalmykia was drawn up and signed by members of the representative body of the Kalmyks - the Congress of the Oirat-Kalmyk People, Idel.Realii reports. Among the authors and signatories are the ex-director of the Center for the Development of the Kalmyk Language Arslang Sandzhiev, the leader of the regional branch of the Yabloko party Batyr Boromangnaev, ethno-linguistic and political activists Vladimir Dovdanov, Erentsen Dolyaev, Albert Sharapov and others.
The declaration of the Congress lists the main claims against the current Russian regime, which prompted the authors of the document to proclaim the beginning of the struggle for independence. Among them are “the insane centralization and militarization of the country”, “the Kremlin’s total attack on the cultures and languages ​​of the non-Russian peoples conquered by Russia”, “the commission of international crimes” and five more points referring to the authoritarian and imperialist nature of Russian politics.

The authors of the declaration separately note the ignorance of the rights of repressed citizens - victims of the deportation of Kalmyks and the problem of "illegally seized lands" - territorial disputes that arose between the Astrakhan region and Kalmykia as a result of the abolition of the latter by Stalin's decree of 1943. Earlier, one of the members of the Congress, Dolyaev, argued that the entire territory of the Astrakhan region should be part of independent Kalmykia as a historical area of ​​settlement of Kalmyks.

Expressing disagreement with the policy pursued by the Kremlin, the Congress of the Oirat-Kalmyk People “declares the need for the complete liberation of the Oirat-Kalmyk people from colonial dependence on Russia” and “declares its determination to seek the withdrawal of the Republic of Kalmykia from the Russian Federation, the proclamation and creation of a sovereign independent states".

The eight-year hybrid war in Ukraine and the beginning of a large-scale invasion of Russian troops into Ukraine was justified by the need to support the LDR and the DPR in their desire to secede from Ukraine and their right to self-determination. Now the same thing will happen in Russia itself, but on a larger scale. The Russian Federation may soon break up into 26-30 independent entities. Only part of the territory up to the Urals, where there are practically no oil and gas deposits, can remain in Russia. This is a striking answer to the question of whether it will be a superpower.

[Sithara007]

Russia has difficulties and successes in the demographic problem, but I do not think that you are setting priorities correctly. The quality of the population is more important than its quantity - for any population of moderate scale. Quantity becomes a priority only for very small (because a small number directly becomes a threat to the survival of an ethnic group) and very large populations (for example, like India and China, because in a large population it is easy to select the right amount of high quality people in different areas of activity due to natural biodiversity). India and China have very large human capital, but there are problems with the shortage of raw materials and energy.

In theory, the quality of population is more important than its quantity. But in practice, we have seen the other way around. Take the case of Kosovo. In defense capabilities, one Serb is equal to 10 Shqips. But then what happened? After their proportion went below a certain threshold, Serbs were driven away from Kosovo. One major reason why the US is still the undisputed military superpower is because they have a large population (330 million), which is growing at a rate of at least 1 million per year.

[be.open]

Russia has difficulties and successes in the demographic problem, but I do not think that you are setting priorities correctly. The quality of the population is more important than its quantity - for any population of moderate scale. Quantity becomes a priority only for very small (because a small number directly becomes a threat to the survival of an ethnic group) and very large populations (for example, like India and China, because in a large population it is easy to select the right amount of high quality people in different areas of activity due to natural biodiversity). India and China have very large human capital, but there are problems with the shortage of raw materials and energy.

In theory, the quality of population is more important than its quantity. But in practice, we have seen the other way around. Take the case of Kosovo. In defense capabilities, one Serb is equal to 10 Shqips. But then what happened? After their proportion went below a certain threshold, Serbs were driven away from Kosovo. One major reason why the US is still the undisputed military superpower is because they have a large population (330 million), which is growing at a rate of at least 1 million per year.

I can give many examples from practice that refute your thesis. For example, the population of Bangladesh is larger than the population of Russia, but this does not make Bangladesh stronger than Russia. The population of India is ten times larger than the population of Russia, but in the event of a direct confrontation, I would also probably bet on Russia. By itself, the rapid growth of the population in the modern world usually means that we are talking about a developing agrarian country with an unacceptable level of poverty.

[Sithara007]

I can give many examples from practice that refute your thesis. For example, the population of Bangladesh is larger than the population of Russia, but this does not make Bangladesh stronger than Russia. The population of India is ten times larger than the population of Russia, but in the event of a direct confrontation, I would also probably bet on Russia. By itself, the rapid growth of the population in the modern world usually means that we are talking about a developing agrarian country with an unacceptable level of poverty.

OK.. let's take the case of a war between Bangladesh and Russia. Population is roughly equal, but the former can easily afford up to 10 million deaths. Russia on the other hand can't even afford a few tens of thousands of military deaths. So even in case Bangladesh suffers 50x casualties when compared to Russia, they will be having the upper hand in case the war goes on for a few years. Bangladesh may be a poor example, since their military tech is still from the stone age. Pakistan would be a better comparison.

[be.open]

I can give many examples from practice that refute your thesis. For example, the population of Bangladesh is larger than the population of Russia, but this does not make Bangladesh stronger than Russia. The population of India is ten times larger than the population of Russia, but in the event of a direct confrontation, I would also probably bet on Russia. By itself, the rapid growth of the population in the modern world usually means that we are talking about a developing agrarian country with an unacceptable level of poverty.

OK.. let's take the case of a war between Bangladesh and Russia. Population is roughly equal, but the former can easily afford up to 10 million deaths. Russia on the other hand can't even afford a few tens of thousands of military deaths. So even in case Bangladesh suffers 50x casualties when compared to Russia, they will be having the upper hand in case the war goes on for a few years. Bangladesh may be a poor example, since their military tech is still from the stone age. Pakistan would be a better comparison.

It doesn't matter, even Bangladesh, even Pakistan - in direct confrontation with Russia, they have no chance. Simply because Russia has the Strategic Missile Forces. The forces of the nuclear triad in combat tone are precisely what is needed to deter any possible aggression towards Russia and maintain territorial integrity even in conditions of low population density.

When you have the biggest excavator in the world, you can even dig a hole on your own faster than a hundred people with shovels.

[DrBeer]

What nonsense are you talking about? Japan has no armed forces at all, only self-defense forces. Japan has a fairly strong navy, but no nuclear weapons. Russia and Japan are countries from different weight categories militarily. Based on the limited military special operation in Ukraine, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the combat effectiveness and strength of the Russian army as a whole.

Japan nominally has no army. But their army is called the Japan Self-Defense Force. It's the same joke as Russia called the terrorist attack on Ukraine a "Special Military Operation" But let's get back to Japan:
1. Japanese military policy is based on the following principles:
non-aggression
Non-use of nuclear weapons
Public control over the activities of the armed forces
Cooperation with the United States (cooperation means participation in joint exercises, the deployment of the US military contingent in Japan since 2010, the deployment of elements of the American missile defense system in Japan)
2. As of the beginning of 2011, the armed forces consisted of:
- 247,746 people
- reserve - 41.8 thousand people, not counting the coast guard and other paramilitary formations;
- mobilization resource was estimated at 29.2 million people

- ground forces: 151.6 thousand people, consisting of 5 army headquarters, 1 tank and 8 motorized infantry divisions, 15 brigades, 2 training regiments, 2 artillery groups, 4 air defense groups and a special operations group, armed with 100 tactical launchers missiles "type 88"; 850 main battle tanks (including 320 Type 90 and 517 Type 74); 70 infantry fighting vehicles; 100 combat reconnaissance vehicles; 780 armored personnel carriers; 210 self-propelled artillery guns; 470 pcs. 155 mm FH-70 howitzers; 100 MLRS; 1130 pcs. mortars of calibers 81, 107 and 120 mm; 690 ATGM launchers, 70 anti-aircraft artillery guns; 290 MANPADS; 12 LR-1 and LR-2 aircraft, as well as 430 army aviation helicopters (of which 185 are combat)

- air force: 47,123 people,
equipped with: 87 F2 aircraft; 202 F-15J and F-15DJ "Eagle"; 72 F-4EJ "Phantom-2"; 13 RF-4E and RF-4EJ; one Kawasaki EC-1; ten EC-2 "Hawkeye"; 4 Boeing-767 AWACS; 20 C-1; 10 C-130H; 11MU-2; 10 U-4; 20 U-125A; 10 U-125-800; 10T-3; 170T-4; 20 F-2B; 40T-7; 10 T-400; 10 YS-11E; 10 CH-47J helicopters; 12 KV-107 and 40 UH-60J

- naval forces: 45,518 people (of which 9.8 thousand serve in naval aviation), 16 submarines, 4 helicopter destroyers, 37 URO destroyers, 6 URO frigates, 12 landing craft, 6 landing hovercraft, 2 Uraga floating bases, 28 mine-sweeping ships, two oceanographic research vessels, 4 hydrographic vessels, 2 experimental vessels, 4 training ships, 2 training submarines, up to 60 auxiliary vessels and 20 tugs, as well as 179 aircraft and 139 naval aviation helicopters

- Coast Guard: 12,636 people, 45 large, 39 medium and 34 small patrol ships, more than 220 patrol boats, 13 hydrographic boats, 5 fire boats, 4 fire boats, up to 130 service and support vessels, 25 aircraft and 46 helicopters.

Moreover, Japan has military bases outside the country: in 2011, the first Japanese military base after the end of World War II was opened in Djibouti.

You can check the information in this source, in your native language

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BE%D0 %B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8B_%D0%AF%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8

[be.open]

What nonsense are you talking about? Japan has no armed forces at all, only self-defense forces. Japan has a fairly strong navy, but no nuclear weapons. Russia and Japan are countries from different weight categories militarily. Based on the limited military special operation in Ukraine, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the combat effectiveness and strength of the Russian army as a whole.

Japan nominally has no army.
...

Yep, you can go no further. Japan is a US vassal and does not have much independent weight in international politics. In general, there are now four established sovereign centers of power in the world - the United States, Russia, India and China. There used to be Brussels, but with the UK leaving the European Union and the current anti-Russian sanctions policy, Brussels has driven itself into an energy hole and lost its status as a sovereign center of power. Now it is also just a US vassal.

[DrBeer]

What nonsense are you talking about? Japan has no armed forces at all, only self-defense forces. Japan has a fairly strong navy, but no nuclear weapons. Russia and Japan are countries from different weight categories militarily. Based on the limited military special operation in Ukraine, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the combat effectiveness and strength of the Russian army as a whole.

Japan nominally has no army.
...

Yep, you can go no further. Japan is a US vassal and does not have much independent weight in international politics. In general, there are now four established sovereign centers of power in the world - the United States, Russia, India and China. There used to be Brussels, but with the UK leaving the European Union and the current anti-Russian sanctions policy, Brussels has driven itself into an energy hole and lost its status as a sovereign center of power. Now it is also just a US vassal.

I love your subtle humor

Xi Jinping delivered his speech in which he pointed out that the world is BIPOLAR, and only two great countries - the United States and China, should ensure world order and resolve the problems that have arisen in recent times. Together, mutually beneficial.

No multipolar world, as the bald-headed Kremlin terrorist deceives himself. And not a word about Russia at all. Russia, in the reality of China, is an empty place, at best, a Chinese raw material appendage There is also no India in this bipolar world.
It seems that India will also become a disputed territory between Pakistan (part of India - the historical territories of Pakistan), and China - which does not need a competitor at hand.

At the same time, China expresses quite undisguised dissatisfaction with the antics of the Kremlin terrorists, which ultimately led to the rallying of the West, the strengthening of the NATO bloc, and the cessation of the policy of "persuasion" and "soft agreement" with terrorists and other "hyperactive" regimes. And now China can no longer set conditions for the West, because this scheme stopped working precisely "thanks" to Russia.

The PS "Japan is a vassal" sounds funny, especially from the country of a miserable raw material appendage of the world

[be.open]

I love your subtle humor

Is it any wonder that Europe is going to cunt when a former gynecologist is at the helm?

The PS "Japan is a vassal" sounds funny, especially from the country of a miserable raw material appendage of the world

Yep, Japan is a US vassal. It abandoned the army after a crushing defeat in World War II and has numerous US military bases on its territory, occupying approximately 10% of Japan's habitable territory.