AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Danish Ali]

I dont know if anyone reported him/her before, but he/she use AI constantly and woke up after two years.


Fantazy999

Don’t let it get to you—time will tell who’s right and who’s wrong! People on Twitter laughed at me too when I said back in October that a bear market had begun—but then they started keeping a very close eye on me!! Whether you’re a believer or a skeptic, the chart is always the same; it repeats itself!!! That’s why you’ll spend years just talking about it instead of actually trading!! Right now, I’ve been shorting Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, Gram, and ZEC—I’ve seen an ROI of over 1000% on each of them over the past month... all in the same direction!! Meanwhile, you can just keep holding your spot positions and watch your money melt away before your very eyes.

Sapling: 100% AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% Mix

What does how long I’ve been on the forum have to do with anything?? I started trading actively in 2020, and I’ve made far more from speculation than I ever would have just by holding. I’ve shorted Ripple alone about 20 times, with gains of 5,000–6,000% each time. I’m not interested in "holding"—it’s just not profitable! Your logic seems to be: "If only you’d started back in 2018..." But you clearly didn’t think this way in 2018, so don’t try to lecture me about the past! Tell me what’s happening right now.

Sapling: 96.5 % AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 99% Mix

Holding stocks in 2026—that’s just absurd... How much would you even need to invest in this illiquid crap to actually make a profit??? And look, unless you have trading experience—or access to a skilled trader (a *real* trader, not some con artist)—you’re unlikely to see any success. The algorithms keep stock prices stuck in the same range for years; you’d be better off trading crypto—at least there’s some volatility there... Don’t worry, though—exchange bots won’t let the price drop or climb too drastically.

Sapling: 99 % AI
Pangram: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

As a speculator who once reached the top 4 in ROI on Binance, I can tell you one thing: It is always more profitable to be a speculator! In spot trading, you’ll never have enough capital to keep averaging down. And perhaps the most interesting point is that 90% of the coins that existed in 2023–2024 have already been delisted! Eventually, another 90% will face the same fate—delisting. If you buy at the wrong time, you could end up losing 10x your investment—so, in what way is spot trading actually advantageous? Only speculators make money in this market! As for "holders"—just look at how they wait 2–3 years, hoping to at least break even! Take the XRP "cult," for instance—they waited 8 years just to get back to their entry price! Spot trading is like a prostitute: the money is technically yours, but everyone else gets to use it—except for you. All you’re left with are the coins you’re holding.

Sapling: 99 % AI
Pangram: 70% AI
Gptzero: 100% MIX

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Yorubasrm?

In October 2026, two incidents caught my attention in the crypto community. On October (21–22), BitcoinTalk was temporarily shut down after a serious security vulnerability in (PHP) was disclosed. The administrator decided to update the server and conduct security checks considering the potential risks. Before that, there had been several attack attempts but Cloudflare prevented them. No evidence of a successful hack was found in the subsequent investigation.

On the other hand: Binance faced a major security incident in the same month.

Here comes my question: If BitcoinTalk can make the decision to temporarily shut down in advance considering potential risks, then couldn't major exchanges like Binance also take similar precautionary measures if they detected early signs of security risks?

Of course, the technical situations of the two incidents are not the same and not claiming that the hacking could have been prevented for sure if Binance had been temporarily shut down.

However, one thing is clear that the way hackers are improving their techniques nowadays, the security systems of platforms also need to become faster and more effective. In my opinion, temporarily shutting down operations may create some inconvenience for users but that inconvenience is much better than facing a major security breach.

What do you think? In the case of crypto platforms, should preventive measures be more important than compensation and recovery after a hacking incident?

My gut feeling tells me this Newbie from the usual local board is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on Meta.

[Shishir99]

What's the verdict on Newbie Yorubasrm?

In October 2026, two incidents caught my attention in the crypto community. On October (21�22), BitcoinTalk was temporarily shut down after a serious security vulnerability in (PHP) was disclosed. The administrator decided to update the server and conduct security checks considering the potential risks. Before that, there had been several attack attempts but Cloudflare prevented them. No evidence of a successful hack was found in the subsequent investigation.

On the other hand: Binance faced a major security incident in the same month.

Here comes my question: If BitcoinTalk can make the decision to temporarily shut down in advance considering potential risks, then couldn't major exchanges like Binance also take similar precautionary measures if they detected early signs of security risks?

Of course, the technical situations of the two incidents are not the same and not claiming that the hacking could have been prevented for sure if Binance had been temporarily shut down.

However, one thing is clear that the way hackers are improving their techniques nowadays, the security systems of platforms also need to become faster and more effective. In my opinion, temporarily shutting down operations may create some inconvenience for users but that inconvenience is much better than facing a major security breach.

What do you think? In the case of crypto platforms, should preventive measures be more important than compensation and recovery after a hacking incident?

Pangram 100% AI
Originality - 65% Likely AI

However, I checked his other posts, which seem to be human-written. This might be the first post he generated using AI.

[Yorubasrm]

My gut feeling tells me this Newbie from the usual local board is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on Meta.

I have tried to express my own opinion and wanted to know about the matter. If asking to know something is also mixed up with a chatbot, I have nothing more to say here.

However, I checked his other posts, which seem to be human-written. This might be the first post he generated using AI.

Hello generally, I tried to write the texts by myself. I also tested them with the few checkers that give accurate answers, they do not detect them as ai-generated write.

[LoyceV]

Newbie AstraQuant is posting chatbot verbal diarrhea on the tech board:

Two separate things are worth keeping apart here. The last few characters of a legacy address are a checksum, so a mistyped address is normally rejected, but that tells you nothing about whether you hold the keys. A readable ending is possible by chance, though a four-letter word at the end is rare enough that it is also what a deliberately generated vanity address looks like, so I would not treat it as proof of anything either way. The practical test is to write down the seed phrase on paper, then restore it in a well-known open-source wallet and check that the same address appears. Until that matches, do not send anything meaningful to it, and if you do test, use a very small amount first. Never type your seed phrase into a website or give it to anyone who messages you, and keep the paper backup offline.