AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

User: CageMabok

This one is pretty straight forward.

Understanding volatility is crucial, as it is an inherent, daily reality of the Bitcoin market. Yet, some people remain hesitant to buy Bitcoin when prices drop; in fact, those who lack the courage to buy during a dip are often the quickest to sell off their existing holdings when prices fall. This is counterintuitive, as a price drop is precisely the moment to buy or to hold onto assets previously acquired rather than sell. Selling during a downturn is rarely the best course of action for anyone, especially for investors who have held Bitcoin for some time. Currently, Bitcoin's price has not yet surged significantly and remains stagnant around the $64,000 level, offering an opportunity for anyone wishing to buy and capitalize on future market volatility.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Mixed (AI polished)

Here's another obvious example:

The perspective you shared is deeply meaningful; I view investing more in terms of consistency rather than as a race—even though, historically and currently, everyone seems to be racing to invest in Bitcoin. What is important to understand is that one should simply focus on being consistent in purchasing Bitcoin for oneself, without fixating on the holdings of others—though there is certainly no harm in keeping an eye on the assets of major investors who buy in large volumes. Fundamentally, however, every investor should view themselves as executing their own plan rather than competing with others. I fully agree with this mindset, as it helps maintain the motivation to keep buying Bitcoin without the burden of feeling like one is in a race.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Undetectable: 81% AI / GPT

Not only is the AI use obvious, the author is not using it for the sake of expressing themselves or communicating with other people. They are just timestamping generic LLM advice, forever into the ether. Its my opinion (and I don't think I'm alone) that accounts like this should be banned outright.

[Dark.Look]

User: dansus021

China’s household savings rate is among the highest in the world, yet consumer confidence has stayed depressed because people got burned by the property sector crash as I seen in the news, local debt issues, and uncertain employment prospects.

To answer your question about where the balance lies, the problem isn't that people save, it's that fear turns those savings into dead capital. In a healthy setup, savings get lent out to productive enterprises, but in an uncertain environment, banks are too scared to lend and businesses are too nervous to borrow. Governments often try to force spending by cutting rates or pushing cheap debt, but that only builds credit bubbles and real inflation, productive investment only comes back when people regain genuine confidence in their money, property rights, and the broader economy.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 66.1%
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI
originality: 100% AI

The answer of your question is Yes, governments should invest far more in disaster prevention and mitigation rather than relying on reactive disaster recovery. From an economic perspective, waiting to rebuild after a disaster is the single most expensive and inefficient way to manage national infrastructure and public finance. Studies by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) demonstrate that every $1 invested in disaster mitigation saves $6 in avoided damages and cleanup costs.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 99.7%
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

Hardware wallets are still vastly superior to keeping funds on internet-connected phones or computers, but the ColdCard RNG issue proves that relying on a single device, vendor, or internal generator leaves a single point of failure.
In my opinion the best takeaway for anyone serious about security is to take entropy into your own hands by rolling physical dice, adding a strong BIP-39 passphrase, and moving toward a multi-vendor multisig setup so a single software or firmware bug never puts your entire stack at risk. Combine keys from two or three different hardware manufacturers Even if one hardware manufacturer ships flawed firmware or a compromised RNG, an attacker holding a single compromised key cannot spend your funds without a second signature from an unaffected device made by a completely different team.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 96%
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI
originality: 100%

Modern betting apps use real-time odds, push notifications, and live cash-out offers to trigger FOMO and keep you glued to your screen, which quickly leads to mental fatigue and impulsive decisions.

While using Auto Cash-Out helps remove the emotional stress of constantly checking the app, it is important to remember that sportsbooks build a hidden margin into cash-out offers that discounts your expected payout. The healthiest way to protect your capital and peace of mind is simply setting your profit targets beforehand, placing your wager, and closing the app until the match is over.

gptzero: 100%
sapling: 96%
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

[nutildah]

User: dansus021

This guy started getting lazy about trying to fool the detectors. I looked through some of his earlier posts and the AI was a bit more well-hidden in some of them. But not all of them. Here is a post I found at random from a couple months back:

simple answer the government always need money to fuel their economy, so they need a good school, healtcare and lot other social things but all of that need money and just like startup its looks good on paper but we didnt know when reached profitable business. That's the anology.

total worldwide debt is currently knocking on the door of $350 trillion. According to the OECD’s latest Global Debt Report, an astonishing 78% of all sovereign bond issuance is used strictly to refinance old maturing debt. Governments aren't clearing their tabs; they are just rolling the principal forward into new bonds, and because interest rates remain structurally elevated, the cost of just servicing that interest is eating national budgets alive.

INFLATION is one of the effect of lot of borrowing money or creating money by continuously expanding the money supply, they erode the value of the currency. It allows them to structurally cheat the system by paying back decades-old debt with newly printed, heavily debased money.

Sapling: 98.8% Fake
StealthWriter: 0% Human

Here's another one for good measure:

Modern betting apps use real-time odds, push notifications, and live cash-out offers to trigger FOMO and keep you glued to your screen, which quickly leads to mental fatigue and impulsive decisions.

While using Auto Cash-Out helps remove the emotional stress of constantly checking the app, it is important to remember that sportsbooks build a hidden margin into cash-out offers that discounts your expected payout. The healthiest way to protect your capital and peace of mind is simply setting your profit targets beforehand, placing your wager, and closing the app until the match is over.

Sapling: 100% Fake
StealthWriter: 0% Human

[TokenTikas]

This guy started getting lazy about trying to fool the detectors. I looked through some of his earlier posts and the AI was a bit more well-hidden in some of them. But not all of them.

Really surprised when I get posts written by (AI) from such high rank accounts. Legendary rank accounts have a different reputation and the posts of these accounts must be high quality posts because they generally have more experience and others try to learn from their informative posts.

I saw the previous history of the account and there was a (manual backup and recovery of the account and then the password and email were changed). Later, according to the type of post, such (AI) related posts are now very suspicious. What is the reason why the accounts are not able to maintain the reputation according to their rank and instead ruin their reputation by posting (AI)?

[lovesmayfamilis]

This guy started getting lazy about trying to fool the detectors. I looked through some of his earlier posts and the AI was a bit more well-hidden in some of them. But not all of them.

Really surprised when I get posts written by (AI) from such high rank accounts. Legendary rank accounts have a different reputation and the posts of these accounts must be high quality posts because they generally have more experience and others try to learn from their informative posts.

I saw the previous history of the account and there was a (manual backup and recovery of the account and then the password and email were changed). Later, according to the type of post, such (AI) related posts are now very suspicious. What is the reason why the accounts are not able to maintain the reputation according to their rank and instead ruin their reputation by posting (AI)?

Have you decided to prove to everyone that you know how to spell the word “reputation” correctly? You’re making progress👍. Then explain the rest of this topic. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591212.msg67046318#msg67046318

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie Olesia Hulych?

This is what I got:

That Trezor rebuilding the same wallet is the proof you were after, not something to worry about. Two different things are getting tangled here.

The 24 words are your BIP39 seed. Those come from the fixed 2048-word list and carry a checksum, which is why a Ledger can only ever make BIP39 ones.

Your passphrase (the 25th-word feature) sits on top and works differently. It's an arbitrary string: any letters, any case, spaces included, and it's not meant to come from the BIP39 list at all. So your "custom English words" passphrase is completely normal. Nothing non-standard is happening.

The two get fed together through the same PBKDF2 step on any BIP39 wallet, and that spits out one specific set of keys. Same 24 words plus the same passphrase gives the same keys on a Ledger, a Trezor, or Electrum. That's why the Trezor came back with the identical balance and history. You've already shown you can restore it on other hardware, which was your original question.

Worth sitting with the fake-passphrase test you ran. It "didn't succeed" because a wrong passphrase never errors out, it quietly opens a different wallet that's empty. The passphrase carries no checksum and nothing to validate it against, so any string you type opens some valid wallet, just not yours. That makes it the one piece you can't afford to lose or mistype: if the 24 words survive but the exact passphrase doesn't, the coins are gone, and a 12-word custom phrase like yours can't be brute-forced back. Back it up character for character, case and spacing included, same care as the seed.

Then keep verifying the way you just did: rebuild on a second device and confirm the first receive address matches. The seed and passphrase always produce the same keys, but a wallet only shows the same addresses if it uses the same derivation path, so that address match is the real check.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 59% AI/GPT

Thank you — the story is real, and it happens more often than people think. Many do need help after losing their seed phrase or password. But you rarely hear someone say, “I got my 10 BTC recovered.” Most prefer to stay quiet to avoid unwanted attention and the risks that come with it. What people do talk about openly is being scammed. This silence naturally contributes to the bias against recovery services.

This message is simply a reminder: don’t lose hope, and keep searching for your wallet backups.

As I understand, direct advertising is not allowed here. Still, we’d like to become part of this forum community, just as Dave did. He also faced a lot of criticism at first, but over time, he managed to establish himself here.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 40%
Undetectable: 46% AI/GPT

nc50lc's read fits: a padding error means those ckeys sit under a different master key, not a wrong IV (a wrong IV still pads clean and just mismatches the pubkey), so it's a half-finished passphrase change. Note that btcrecover and john only ever test the mkey, so you cracked the password to one master key, never proof the funded keys decrypt. The one shot without an old backup is that the old mkey may still be in the file: wallet.dat is Berkeley DB and it doesn't zero overwritten records, so on a copy, dig through it with db_dump or a hex editor for a second mkey-like record in the free pages (pywallet's --recover scans raw space for key structures but has no dedicated mkey carving, so it's a long shot on its own). Pull any extra mkey candidate and brute it with the same wordlist. If there's no old backup, no second mkey anywhere, and no memory of the old password, those keys are gone.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

It's a lot to write, but I will try.

Your raw Base58 numbers are right, but they aren't the interval you hand Kangaroo. The last 4 bytes of the payload are the Base58Check checksum, and in both your cases that checksum sits entirely inside the unknown suffix. It's a double-SHA256 of the key, so it's fully determined the moment the key is fixed, which means it carries no search entropy at all. Drop those 32 bits and case A is a ~50-bit interval, case B ~62 bits, not 82 and 94.

Derivation that gives you exact bounds:

1. Take your known prefix. Decode prefix + "1"*N and prefix + "z"*N as plain Base58 integers, not Base58Check. Those two strings have invalid checksums, so a checked decode will just reject them. Call the results W_min and W_max.
2. Strip version and checksum:
   k_min = (W_min - (0x80 << 288)) >> 32
   k_max = (W_max - (0x80 << 288)) >> 32
   The subtraction removes the 0x80 version byte, the >>32 drops the 4 checksum bytes.
3. range = k_max - k_min + 1, which lands at about 58^N / 2^32.

Yes, it's effectively one continuous interval. The true W sits in [W_min, W_max] and the subtract-and-shift is monotonic, so the real key is always inside [k_min, k_max] by construction. I enumerated one full interval end to end and every key in it reproduces the fixed prefix, bar a single key at each boundary, so it's one contiguous block. The 2^32 for the checksum is already baked into the interval width, so it doesn't strip anything further out inside the range.

The checksum is not a filter you apply while searching. Kangaroo solves against the pubkey, so it walks straight to the key inside the interval and never touches the checksum. The checksum only shows up in how you derive the bounds.

Set your Kangaroo range to the interval width, so around 50 and 62 bits, and start = k_min. Overstating range to 82 just wastes some time, but the real trap is skipping the >>32: feed it the raw W interval and your k sits ~2^32 too high, so it finds nothing and it looks like the whole method failed. Also keep every test vector strictly mainnet uncompressed, 37-byte payload, no 0x01 flag. One compressed key (52 chars) throws off both the offset and the shift.

On the 3090 both are trivial once the interval's correct. 50 bits is ~2^25 jumps, sub-second; 62 bits is ~2^31, a second or two at your 2.24 GK/s. Post the synthetic vector if you want a second pair of eyes on the bounds before you trust the derivation.

I hope you will find this information useful.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 54% AI/GPT



I also want to report this user. He was recently active and his posts were detected by AI.

User: alex.b.o

Is self-custody still the best option for holding Bitcoin long term?

Guys, just want you to know my point of view.

It can be a good option to hold Bitcoin for the long term, but it comes with more responsibility.

The benefit is controlling the private keys on your own rather than relying on a custodian.

I also recommend offline or hardware wallets for savings.

The risk is losing or exposing your seed phrase unintentionally. If someone gets it, they can potentially take your BTC; if you lose it, recovery may not be possible.

So, my view: for long-term Bitcoin, self-custody makes sense if you’re willing to learn basic security and keep your backup offline and secure.

I also want your opinion. Why do you think, guys?

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 50%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

I agree that storing Bitcoin across multiple wallets can reduce the risk of losing everything if one wallet is compromised. However, I don’t think changing wallet addresses every few years is necessary by itself. Good security practices, such as protecting your seed phrase, using wallets that security is high, and avoiding phishing links, are more important. I personally use Oppi Wallet for keeping some of my Bitcoin separate from other holdings.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 65% AI/GPT

I think buy-and-hold is probably the simplest approach for a small investor. Bitcoin can still have major price swings. Trading, lending, or other strategies may offer additional benefits, but they also come with more risk. Personally, I’d keep things simple and only invest what I’m comfortable holding for the long term.

But guys, can you tell me which wallet I should use to keep my bitcoin?

I have using one right now!

pangram: 70%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 83% AI/GPT


This user is the same. He seems to be in such a rush to create a post so he can report it and earn merit that he doesn't care that it's AI-generated.

User: Ethan151

I agree with this. The search function is more useful than many new members realize. Before starting a thread, I think it is worth checking not only the title but also a few related keywords, because an older discussion may already contain the answers or experiences you are looking for.
It also helps us contribute something new instead of repeating the same points. Sometimes the best way to start a good discussion is to search first, learn from what has already been shared, and then add a fresh perspective. I believe that habit can make the forum more useful for everyone.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

This is a good example of why beginners like me should take wallet security seriously. A seed phrase is not something to type or display casually, especially in a public place where someone could be watching.

I think many people focus on learning how to buy or use Bitcoin but don't spend enough time learning how to protect it. Simple habits like keeping your seed phrase private and being aware of your surroundings can prevent a serious loss.

Sometimes, being careful with the basics is more important than knowing everything about crypto.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

As a beginner, I’m learning that Bitcoin isn't just about buying and making money. Security, carefulness, and having the right information are very important.
Some key lessons I’ve learned:

•Always protect your wallet and recovery information.
•Double-check wallet addresses before sending.
•Be careful with scams and unrealistic promises.
•Never invest money you cannot afford to lose.
•Do your own research before making decisions.

I’m still learning, so I’d appreciate any additional safety tips from experienced members.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

I don't think changing a wallet address every 3–8 years should be treated as a security rule. It can be useful for privacy, especially when an address has been used repeatedly, but it does not automatically make the funds more secure.
If the seed phrase or private key has been compromised, simply generating a new address from the same wallet will not solve the problem. In that situation, the important step is to move the funds to a completely secure wallet with a new seed.
For long-term holders, I think the priority should be protecting the seed phrase, using a properly secured wallet, keeping reliable backups, and avoiding unnecessary transactions. Address changes should mainly be considered from a privacy perspective rather than as a fixed 3–8 year security routine.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT