AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[howardsentell]

A Copper member with 14 trusted ratings who has given great advice on the Meta board.

His point is to report those who artificially inflate their product prices to the moderators.

But he himself is posting the same thing over and over again with slightly different statements. And he is spamming with AI. It's ridiculous.

User: howardsentell

Report Shill Bidding On The Forum

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry. If you have experienced or witness shill bidding report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

“FYI guest moderators have deleted this post twice without an explanation”

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 86% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Report CyberBullying on the Forum

If you have experienced or witness cyberbullying, such as harassment, threats, or abusive content on the forum, report it to the moderators so they can help maintain a safe community.

Shill Bidding Prohibited on Major Platforms

Shill bidding-where a seller or their associates place fake bids to artificially drive up the price of an item in an auction-is widely regarded as unethical and often illegal because it distorts the natural bidding process and harms genuine participants. It can deceive buyers into paying more than the item's true market value, creating an unfair advantage for the seller while eroding trust in the auction system as a whole. In many jurisdictions, it's classified as fraud, potentially leading to legal consequences like fines or shutdowns for those involved. Even in cases where a form of it might be disclosed, it still raises concerns about transparency and can expose systemic issues in markets like collectibles. Overall, it skews prices, discourages fair competition, and it can damage the entire hobby industry.


Stackitup add on this thread where you contacted me first and asked me if I wanted to buy your collectibles and started harassing. I have not bought anything on Reddit.

I look forward to meeting all my new friends at the BTC conference.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Stealthwriter: 70% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Current Technical Levels and Short-Term Outlook

Analysts indicate that Bitcoin is struggling to maintain upward momentum in the immediate short term, trading below major Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs).

Support Zones: Strong support is identified around the $89,400 to $91,000 range. There is significant buying interest near these levels, which may prevent a deeper drop. A potential "final leg down" could test these areas before a sustained recovery begins.

Resistance Levels: The primary overhead resistance zone is between $92,000 and $92,500. A clear breakout above this range is needed to signal renewed bullish strength.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Originality: 100%

What is more important AI or the topic?

[juttsab@]

Another AI shitppster and BigNoteh registered on 14 DEC and within few days this account have made more than 70 posts. They started their journey on forum with Ai posting.


1.

You're talking about shortcuts. In Bitcoin, almost every "shortcut" is actually a trap for the impatient.
People confuse the financial freedom Bitcoin offers (controlling your own money) with getting rich quick. They are two different things. Bitcoin gives you the tool; the wealth (if it comes) is a result of using it with discipline over a very long time.
Practical example:
The slow path: Using DCA (buying a fixed amount each month) for 4 years, holding in your own wallet. Boring, but effective.
The shortcut: Putting all your savings into a shitcoin because "this time it's different." Usually ends at zero.

Bitcoin doesn't make you rich by magic. It makes you responsible. And that responsibility to educate yourself, protect your keys, and keep your cool is the filter many don't want to pass through. They prefer the shortcut... and usually get lost along the way.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality.ai: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 88% AI

2.

This is the whole domino effect in action, and you see it clearly.

You're right. Bitcoin is the only crypto with this "treasury reserve" status for nations and mega-corps. It's the first domino.

When that first domino tips (a country adds it to reserves, a Fortune 500 company holds it on their balance sheet), it creates a mandate for everyone below them.

Big companies → force their partners/suppliers to interact with it.
Countries → force other nations and institutions to settle in it.

The small shops and restaurants accepting BTC now are the early adopters. But soon, it won't be a cool feature—it'll be a business requirement to plug into the global, Bitcoin-based economy.

You've described the adoption path perfectly: Nations & Corporations → Institutions → Businesses → Everyday People.

That's why we stack. We're getting in before it becomes a standard.

gptzero: 92% AI
Originality.ai: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 67% AI

3.

Truth. You don't get a "Bitcoiner" badge from just buying.

Holding through a few green months is easy. The test comes when it drops 50%+ and the news screams it's dead. That's when tourists sell and Bitcoiners buy more.

It's not about a set time (1 year, 4 years). It's about conviction. Do you understand why Bitcoin exists? Do you believe in that future enough to ignore the price noise for years?

A real Bitcoiner has done the reading (whitepaper, articles), understands the value proposition beyond "number go up," and holds not as a trade, but as a belief in a better system.

gptzero: 100% AI
sapling: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI

4.

Most alts aren't competition; they're distractions. Their purpose is to extract capital from those who think they've "missed" Bitcoin. The volatility isn't excitement—it's manipulation and exit liquidity for founders.
Bitcoin's ETF is a demand shock from the traditional world. It brings in capital that literally cannot buy the asset any other way. It's a bridge, not a threat. Price confirms this.
Altcoin ecosystems are built on promises. Bitcoin's ecosystem is built on proof—proof of work, proof of scarcity, proof of resilience for 15+ years. One is a casino; the other is a savings technology.
Don't compare them. It's like comparing a skyscraper's foundation to a sandcastle. Focus on what's real. Focus on Bitcoin.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 70% AI

[memehunter]

What is more important AI or the topic?

lol, of course the topic, if it is created by you because of a genuine curiosity/or with a motive to help others. If you are posting AI garbage just to gain merits by misrepresenting your posting abilities (and may be to get in a signature campaign later down the road), it is wrong. Mindless AI posting is cancer to this forum.
IMO, we should issue a negative tag policy for 2nd time offenders.

[lombok]

Found another spammer AI Post.

User : doubleprofit88

Governments need to recognize that normalizing insecurity actually undermines their legitimacy as protectors of citizens. Rather than negotiating without accountability, focus on a holistic terrorism prevention strategy: strengthening intelligence, criminal justice reform, and deradicalization programs. This will reduce the appeal of becoming a terrorist by emphasizing strict legal consequences while offering rehabilitation for those willing to change. This constructive approach builds public trust and prevents the emergence of new groups, making security a sustainable national priority.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 75% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

You correctly identified that economic pressures and a crisis of leadership legitimacy pose an existential threat to the viability of international organizations like the European Union today. Sentiments about NATO policies and internal European dynamics create strategic opportunities for Russia and China to expand their influence more effectively. Complex behind-the-scenes negotiations are crucial to prevent political disintegration from turning into open military confrontation, detrimental to all parties. In an interconnected world, the collapse of one major entity will trigger a domino effect, forcing all countries to redefine their bargaining positions. Careful treading and the strength of economic diplomacy will determine whether our future will be characterized by collaboration or prolonged conflict.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 40% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

You remind me that money is merely a neutral instrument until humans give it excessive meaning and desire. Negative effects arise when the love of wealth exceeds reasonable limits, triggering unethical behavior that undermines social order and harmony. It is crucial for each individual to redefine the boundaries between functional needs and ambitions that undermine basic human values. Reducing the absolute value we place on money will help us remain grounded in integrity and honesty amidst worldly temptations. This awareness is key to creating a life that is not only materially comfortable but also rich in substantive moral values.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 80% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 99% AI

Your perspective highlights historical complexities often overlooked in modern narratives. Ukraine's decision to relinquish its nuclear arsenal was indeed a crucial turning point in Eastern Europe's security architecture. An analysis of global economic pressures on state sovereignty provides an interesting additional dimension worthy of in-depth discussion. Let us examine how this shift in power continues to shape today's increasingly dynamic and uncertain world order.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 75% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai :99% AI

[LoyceV]

Newbie NefiSwap is using chatbot verbal diarrhea plagiarism to promote themselves:

Over the last few years, many crypto users have started questioning whether traditional exchanges still fit their needs.
Account registration, identity verification, and long onboarding processes can slow down what was originally designed to be a fast and open financial system.

This is where account-free crypto swaps come into focus. These platforms allow users to exchange digital assets directly, without creating profiles or submitting personal information. For many, this approach feels closer to the original philosophy of cryptocurrency — permissionless, efficient, and user-controlled.

Speed is one of the main reasons behind this growing interest. In a market that operates 24/7, users expect swaps to be executed quickly, without unnecessary steps. Removing account creation often reduces friction and makes the process more straightforward.

However, this model also comes with responsibilities. Users need to pay attention to network confirmations, liquidity availability, and transparent rate calculations. While account-free swaps simplify access, informed decision-making is still essential.

Overall, the rise of these platforms reflects a broader trend in the crypto space: users are actively seeking simpler tools that prioritize functionality over bureaucracy. Whether this model will dominate in the long term or remain a niche solution is still open for discussion.

What matters most is choice — giving users multiple ways to interact with crypto based on their preferences, risk tolerance, and values.

[lombok]

Newbie NefiSwap is using chatbot verbal diarrhea plagiarism to promote themselves:

Over the last few years, many crypto users have started questioning whether traditional exchanges still fit their needs.
Account registration, identity verification, and long onboarding processes can slow down what was originally designed to be a fast and open financial system.

This is where account-free crypto swaps come into focus. These platforms allow users to exchange digital assets directly, without creating profiles or submitting personal information. For many, this approach feels closer to the original philosophy of cryptocurrency — permissionless, efficient, and user-controlled.

Speed is one of the main reasons behind this growing interest. In a market that operates 24/7, users expect swaps to be executed quickly, without unnecessary steps. Removing account creation often reduces friction and makes the process more straightforward.

However, this model also comes with responsibilities. Users need to pay attention to network confirmations, liquidity availability, and transparent rate calculations. While account-free swaps simplify access, informed decision-making is still essential.

Overall, the rise of these platforms reflects a broader trend in the crypto space: users are actively seeking simpler tools that prioritize functionality over bureaucracy. Whether this model will dominate in the long term or remain a niche solution is still open for discussion.

What matters most is choice — giving users multiple ways to interact with crypto based on their preferences, risk tolerance, and values.

gptzero: 100% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 93% AI
Sapling : 100% AI
Undetecable.ai : 96% AI

[Ultegra134]

New account, first post is to spread AI in Bitcoin discussion thread. Caught before even getting started. Post reported.

User: GAINS HELPER

Post 1.

That’s a tough spot, but you’re right—Bitcoin’s transparency is a double-edged sword.

Once someone knows an address, the whole history is public. For future payments to relatives (or anyone) it’s safest to:

1. Send from an exchange hot-wallet so the tx doesn’t link to your cold stash. 
2. Or create a fresh intermediate wallet, fund it with only the amount you owe, then send from there. 

For the current situation you can’t “hide” the old balance, but you can calmly explain that what he sees is your long-term savings, not extra cash you’re withholding. Transparency ≠ obligation. 

Lesson learned—many of us have been there.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

[JayJuanGee]

What is more important AI or the topic?

lol, of course the topic, if it is created by you because of a genuine curiosity/or with a motive to help others. If you are posting AI garbage just to gain merits by misrepresenting your posting abilities (and may be to get in a signature campaign later down the road), it is wrong. Mindless AI posting is cancer to this forum.
IMO, we should issue a negative tag policy for 2nd time offenders.

It seems to me that @howardsentell is attempting to argue that it is better that he (and other members using AI) are providing more sophisticated posts and better content that present the information in a better way rather than the negative that they happen to be using AI to put together their posts.

It seems that many guys here would prefer to see some kind of human thought going on within the forum posts, so even if some of the underlying content had been gathered through AI or maybe even that the human had read through some AI content in order to understand the topic better, if there is some human thought involved in describing the post or even assessing the substantive contents of the post, then that would be better.

Yet, howardsentell seems to be arguing that the substantive outcome is better than having any human involved that may well end up screwing up the presentation or even screwing up the contents.  So from howardsentell's point of view having a human is not as important as making sure that the contents of the post are good,  yet are humans reading those posts, or maybe it is just bots reading the posts of other bots, so we might not even need a human reader either.. even though surely bots seems to be trying to deceive humans in to their being humans.. even though perhaps howardsentell is proclaiming that it is not even necessary to persuade human's that the bots are human as long as the content and the presentation comes out better, then it does not matter if a human was involved in the post or not.  That seems to part of what howardsentell is trying to argue.

I suppose that many guys participating in a thread like this are also bothered by members trying to pass off the AI contents as if such contents were something that the member had actually written (as a human and not as a bot.. so maybe we are trying to presume that the member making the post is human) - so in some sense it seems that howardsentell is proclaiming that it does not matter whether he (or a human) wrote the contents of the or not, as long as the contents of the post is of a better quality then the better contents triumphs how it was generated and as long as better contents come out then having a human involved does not matter.   Perhaps also, howardsentell, is admitting that he could not have had written such great contents on his own, so any reader of the contents should appreciate the contents rather than caring about whether a human was involved in the post or not.  

Probably it is even more problematic when members are trying to argue that AI content is better than human content and we do not need a human involved as long as the resulting content is good, so then many of the regular (humans) might start to wonder why our ideas even matter, and just let the bots speak back and forth about their ideas, since the bots are able to compile a lot more facts and logic and even write better sentences, paragraphs and format better than many of us mere humans (I am proclaiming myself, at this time, to be in the human group).

It probably is true that some of the bot generated content that also has human improvements to the contents will end up having a lot of informative kinds of ideas put together and perhaps be better than merely having a human and better than merely having a bot.. but then if you let bots carry on for a few paragraphs they seem to frequently devolve into gobbledee gook.

I personally find it quite irritating even if a member posts some content from another person when the posting member does not even seem to have any ability to add one or two sentences to say why they were posting the materials that they got from somewhere else, or if they agree with the contents of what they had posted or not or if there might be some contrary points or supplementary points that could be made in response to the posted materials.. so yeah, perhaps many of us are bothered by posts that seem to have no sign of human intervention.. except maybe a human had asked a question that generated the AI results that ends up getting posted as if such AI results had been written by a human when it had not been.

In recent  times, we seem to come across so many forum posts that have very good grammar that was hardly true even a year ago.  When I see, that a post was very well written, then maybe it is time to wonder whether any human was involved in putting that post together, or not?

[Don Pedro Dinero]

What is more important AI or the topic?

I'll be briefer than JayJuanGee, but everyone has their own style.

The important thing is that if you use AI, don't try to cheat by copying and pasting text that you didn't create as if you had, something that even a child at school understands and you do too, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

I have used AI-generated text several times in this forum, but I have quoted it and/or provided a link to where I extracted the text. That's why I haven't been reported in this thread or had my posts deleted by the moderators, and you have.

[memehunter]

Perhaps also, howardsentell, is admitting that he could not have had written such great contents on his own, so any reader of the contents should appreciate the contents rather than caring about whether a human was involved in the post or not.  

What is the need for posting in this forum, go create two (or as many as you like) AI chatbot agents watch their conversation lol (people have different fantasies and I am not against it in any sense, but not the right place). People have AI for all that (which is quite useful and I am not against it).
This place is for human to human conversations, even if those convo look dumb (just read some of my posts lol). BTW just look a at the rate of which the synthetic data is gobbling up the internet, it is high time to protect places like Bitcointalk. 

[HustleZ]

It seems to me that @howardsentell is attempting to argue that it is better that he (and other members using AI) are providing more sophisticated posts and better content that present the information in a better way rather than the negative that they happen to be using AI to put together their posts.

If he thinks that. So he should also think the forum is worthless or not "sophisticated" enough and shouldnt simply join the forum. He should just have a convo with an Ai which for him ahould be more useful and interesting. It is simple that the user is a generic shitposter who thinks he will Just copy/paste from an Ai and will Earn from Signatures without doing something. He thinks we are fools and dont understand anything and he can easily farm an account and Earn.

[Lucius]

User : Mr:Gabby

Lately I’ve been thinking about something and I’d really like honest opinions from people here.
Back in the early days, Bitcoin felt… simple.
You heard about it from a friend, downloaded a wallet, mined on a laptop, or bought a little just out of curiosity. No fancy words, no 40-page whitepaper breakdowns on Twitter, no “macro thesis” threads.
Now fast-forward to today:
• Institutional custody
• ETFs
• Layer 2 debates
• Ordinals
• Fees, mempool charts, halving models
• Everyone suddenly sounds like an economist
Don’t get me wrong  this is growth. This is Bitcoin maturing.
But here’s the question that keeps bothering me:
👉 Has Bitcoin become too technical and intimidating for the average newcomer?
Imagine someone hearing about Bitcoin for the first time in 2025.
They google it and are immediately hit with:
Hardware wallets
UTXOs
Fee markets
“Not your keys” warnings
Scams everywhere
Instead of curiosity, they get fear.
Ironically, the very thing Bitcoin was meant to do financial freedom for regular people  might now feel locked behind knowledge barriers.
So I’m curious:
• Do you think Bitcoin onboarding is getting harder or easier?
• Is complexity a necessary price for security and decentralization?
• Or should the community do more to make Bitcoin “feel simple” again?
This isn’t criticism  I’m genuinely torn.
Would love to hear thoughts from old-timers and newcomers alike.

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100%
Stealthwriter -> The vast majority of content is likely AI-generated (94%), with only a small portion (6%) human-written.
GPTZero -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%

Let’s talk about a strange Bitcoin habit.

You know Bitcoin doesn’t move just because you looked.
You know you’re holding for the long term.
You know checking won’t change anything.

Yet… you still open your wallet.
Then you refresh.
Then you stare at the balance like it might blink first.

Sometimes it goes up a little and you smile.
Sometimes it goes down and you suddenly remember you’re “in it for the tech.”

Bitcoin really teaches patience in a very funny way.

So I want honest answers from Bitcoiners here:

How often do you check your Bitcoin wallet or price?

Did Bitcoin turn you into a chart-watcher, or did it cure you of that habit?

At what point did you stop caring about daily price and just focus on stacking?


No price predictions, no drama  just real Bitcoin experiences.

Copyleaks -> AI Content Found 100%
Stealthwriter -> ll content appears to be AI-generated. No human-written content detected.
GPTZero -> We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%

[AuchanX]

A legendary story writer. Writes huge, informative stories. No one would suspect that he is using AI. Yet he is a legend and is posting using AI. Most of his posts are created by AI. I have checked three of his posts.

User:abhiseshakana

I don't think the girl's decision was wrong, but it wasn't optimal. Considering it was made by a 20-year-old woman who could be considered newly wealthy, her decision was very smart from the perspective of psychological security and long-term protection. She understood the high risk of behavior and the inability to manage large sums of money. Therefore, her choice was very logical and realistic for the average young person.

However, if we consider it from the perspective of investment mathematics and macroeconomic conditions, and considering that money is safer when it's under our control, the USD 1,000,000 option is much more appropriate. The concern is whether she's confident that the for life payout is 100% guaranteed. It's important to consider that the money is under the control of the lottery company, in the event of a crisis, it could be lost, renegotiated, or cutbacks could occur if the program is discontinued.

But since she's already settled on $1,000 per week, she can budget 40–50% for living expenses (given that young people have very little control over their purchasing decisions). She can create an emergency fund for at least 12 months, save 10–20% in inflation-proof assets like Bitcoin, and invest the rest in productive assets like global stock indices or real-sector businesses. She could also try DCA  from $1,000 per week, setting aside around $400–500 per week. The figure would be quite impressive over the next 30 years.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI

The current rally, even with prices reaching historic highs, reflects a combination of short-term market tensions rather than long-term structural changes. Bloomberg's argument suggests that the current silver rally is driven by short-term cyclical factors, such as speculation about a Fed rate cut, which is driving risk-on in high-beta commodities, momentum from retail and speculative traders, a thin market that easily triggers price movements, and a short-term physical shortage that causes a supply squeeze (a mixed demand structure: industrial + investment). When compared to the long-term fundamental rallies in gold and Bitcoin, the differences are stark.

The silver rally can be interpreted as the market pricing in Fed monetary leeway and increasing demand for anti-dilution assets. Therefore, the bullish sentiment is not just for silver but for all stores of value outside of fiat. While prices are volatile, they are also vulnerable to declines. Furthermore, despite the price explosion, the long-term fundamentals remain unchanged, with silver's structural weaknesses being high storage and transport costs, low per-unit value, making it inefficient for storing large amounts of wealth, its lack of utility as a monetary base, and its industrial dependency making prices highly cyclical. Bitcoin and gold do not face these issues. Although they can outperform tactically, they rarely outperform structurally.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI

Not everyone who enters at a high price is making a mistake. The current problem is that many people misread the adoption curve. Don't forget that technology-based assets and their value networks are non-linear. Valuations are based on future optionality, not current cash flow. Prices often outpace fundamentals, not the other way around. Take Amazon, which has been considered overvalued for over a decade, for example.

In investing, ignoring momentum is as dangerous as chasing hype endlessly. Uptrends often last longer than rational expectations. People who buy when prices rise aren't necessarily FOMO; they could be astutely reading changes in market regimes, liquidity, or institutional adoption. In long-term investing, time in the market often trumps market timing; buying at the top of a small cycle can become the bottom of a large cycle. So, the key issue isn't the entry price, but the time horizon. For example, buying BTC at the top in 2017 lost for 2-3 years, but winning big in 2021.

Winner's Curse is more relevant in mature markets (closed auction markets, assets with stable/mature valuations, zero-sum competition), while crypto is still in the price discovery phase, with massive adoption, ongoing value creation, and an open market).

Not all hype is bad; hype often appears at the beginning of change, when the narrative begins to be heard and enters the mainstream, and before full institutional adoption. Be sure to enter during the initial hype and exit at the peak of the hype. So the problem isn't buying high, but buying without understanding what you're buying and how long you'll hold it.

The winner's curse is often found in the behavior of gambling winners. The winner's curse arises when an early win creates the illusion of skill, when the outcome is purely probabilistic. Winners, believing their strategy is correct, become more confident, increase their bets, and continue playing longer, even though the expected value of gambling is almost always negative; the longer they play, the greater the chance of losing. Early wins are a curse because they prolong participation in a detrimental system, encourage greater risk, and delay the realization that The game is unprofitable. The above also parallels the Winner's Curse in the Market. As in gambling, the winner is not the smartest, but the most aggressive. Prices or bets rise because of emotion, not value; "winning" does not reflect true value. In both gambling and speculative investing, winning early can be the most costly mistake.

The Winner's Curse explains the paradox that a momentary win can be the beginning of a long-term loss. Winning creates bias, not proof of superiority.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 73% AI

[Ultegra134]

Any feedback on this specific user? Some posts are strangely suspicious, half of them appear AI, others appear paraphrased, but I'm pretty sure something fishy is going on.

User: durg0319

Post 1.

I think the bigger issue here is not which mNAV formula is correct, but what investors are trying to measure. If you want to value Strategy as a Bitcoin proxy, market cap comparison feels more honest. If you want to judge how aggressive the balance sheet is, enterprise value matters more. Mixing the two can confuse people. Recent performance shows leverage cuts both ways, so mNAV alone should not be used to justify bullish or bearish views without looking at risk, debt timing, and Bitcoin price sensitivity.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI
Undetectable: 63% AI
Sapling.ai: 99% AI

Post 2.

Yeah, you are right. Bitcoin is a smart choice to invest in, because it gives people to safe guard their assets outside unstable fiat currencies that keeps devaluing. Like you said, it is not a quick money making scheme, but in other to be successful through it one needs to be patience, have the right mindset and also quite accumulation to build your holdings regardless of the price at which Bitcoin is. Real freedom is having wealth that can be enjoyed safely, and Bitcoin helps achieve that in ways traditional systems can’t.

GPTZero: 75% AI (Possible paraphrasing detected)
Stealthwriter: 33% AI
Undetectable: 25% AI
Sapling.ai: 54% AI

Post 3.

I myself don’t like the idea of borrowing money to invest in Bitcoin. Money that is borrowed always comes with a deadline, and Bitcoin moves on its own time. So if a person has no other means to pay back, they will have to sell too early. That takes away patience and turns a long-term idea into a forced decision. Bitcoin rewards those who can wait, not those chasing quick returns just to clear debt. Using personal income gives freedom, better judgment, and room to grow slowly.

GPTZero: 97% AI (Possible paraphrasing detected)
Stealthwriter: 50% AI
Undetectable: 51% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% AI

Post 4.

I myself don’t like the idea of borrowing money to invest in Bitcoin. Money that is borrowed always comes with a deadline, and Bitcoin moves on its own time. So if a person has no other means to pay back, they will have to sell too early. That takes away patience and turns a long-term idea into a forced decision. Bitcoin rewards those who can wait, not those chasing quick returns just to clear debt. Using personal income gives freedom, better judgment, and room to grow slowly.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Undetectable: 88% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% AI

[d5000]

A legendary story writer. Writes huge, informative stories. No one would suspect that he is using AI. Yet he is a legend and is posting using AI. Most of his posts are created by AI. I have checked three of his posts.

User:abhiseshakana

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

This post gives 28% AI probability on Grammarly, but the first part gets 100% AI on Copyleaks, the second part however 0%. Don't know. His language is a bit "schematic" to say it that way.

It is also interesting that he has had several trades with other forum users according to his Trust entry.

[Ultegra134]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

This post gives 28% AI probability on Grammarly, but the first part gets 100% AI on Copyleaks, the second part however 0%. Don't know. His language is a bit "schematic" to say it that way.

It is also interesting that he has had several trades with other forum users according to his Trust entry.

I personally have my doubts; his posts are "too" well-structured, full punctuation marks, and wording that's often used in AI, such as "Historically, I agree with your points about:" or "Some points I think we need to discuss are:". It's not the choice of words someone would make in a forum, this isn't Financial Times.

This sentence for instance is way too suspicious to not say that it's AI. "From your explanation, it seems like you're complaining that your financial strategy worked in the past, but it no longer fits today. You might want to review and apply these points:"

This is straight up copied from ChatGPT; this isn't a way a human writes on the average forum.

[SatoPrincess]

User: Aloysius01

‎     Stopping corruption in Nigeria is difficult,  but it is possible if it is tackled from multiple angles at the same time, No single solution works on its own, Here are practical, realistic ways Nigeria can reduce corruption
‎Strengthen Institutions, Not Individuals
‎Nigeria should focus on strong systems, not  strong men
‎Anti corruption agencies (EFCC and ICC must be independent of political influence
‎Appointments should be based on merit, not loyalty, court must handle corruption case quickly and transparently
‎True Rule of Law
‎Nobody should be above the law  politicians, judges, security officials, remove selective justice (prosecuting opponents while protecting allies, it publish judgments and asset recoveries openly
‎Transparency in Government Spendingy
‎Make all government budgets, contracts, and payments publicly accessible online
‎Use cashless systems to reduce human interference, Track recovered funds and show citizens how they are reused
‎ Political Reforms
‎Reduce the cost of politics (campaign limits, strict funding rules
‎Enforce penalties for vote buying and election rigging should be check properly
‎End immunity abuse immunity should not mean impunity
‎Whistleblower Protection
‎Protect citizens who expose corruption, provide financial rewards and guaranteed safety
‎Education & Value Reorientation
‎Teach ethics, civic duty, and anti corruption values from primary school
‎Religious and traditional leaders must practice what they preach
‎Stop glorifying stolen wealth in society
‎Economic Security for Citizens
‎Corruption thrives where people are desperate, creat jobs opportunity and improve wages, Ensure social safety networks, reduced poverty to reduce every day bribery
‎Citizen Responsibility
‎Corruption survives when people participate in it, refuse to give or take bribe, report corrupt even at small levels, vote wisely,not along ethnic or monetary lines
‎Technology & Digital Governance
‎Digitize public services (licenses, tax, passports) it reduces human contact where bribery happens, use data systems to detect fraud automatically
‎Consistency Over Time
‎corruption won’t disappear in one administration, policies must continue regardless of who is in power longterm national commitment is key in summary, policies must continue regardless of who is in power.
‎Corruption in Nigeria is not just a government problem it is a systemic and societal issue, Real change will happen when leaders, institutions and citizens all act together, consistently and honestly.

Copyleaks - 100%
Gptzero- 99%

You are making a fair and important point. A nation grows because all it is ethnic groups contribute in different ways economically, culturally, and socially. Agriculture, industry, commerce, arts, education, each group adds a piece to the larger picture. When a government decides to support only one tribe financially, it naturally raises questions of fairness, equity, and national unity. Here are a few balanced thoughts, why selective financial support is problematic. It creates a balance because national resources should benefit all citizens, not only a specific group. It can fuel tension favoring one group may make others feel marginalized or undervalued. It weakens national identity when citizens see bias, it becomes harder for them to feel a shared sense of belonging.

What good governance ideally looks like. Policies should target needs, not tribes. For example, support should go to farmers because they are farmers, not because they belong to a certain ethnicity. Development should be inclusive. Programs that uplift underdeveloped regions or disadvantaged communities should be based on objective criteria.Unity and fairness strengthen the whole country.

 

Copyleaks - 100%
Gptzero- 100%

[FinneysTrueVision]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

It is probably a combination of several of those things. He has over 1,000 posts in the Economics section starting from 2019, according to Ninjastic. It is a subject he seems to have genuine interest in and has good knowledge about, assuming his older posts are authentic and weren't created by a paraphrasing tool or whatever was being used by cheaters back then. Oddly, they don’t have any posts in that section from December 2021 to July 2025. When they became active there again earlier this year, their AI usage was apparent enough that I reported them in this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg65918791#msg65918791

[memehunter]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too.

The test is simple if your post is detected by multiple detectors as AI, it will be considered as AI, unless you come here and explain it here. We (as a genuine reader who is seeking knowledge/genuine discourse) have a bias for quality words/arguments (which is reflected here).
The user in question must answer the concerns for greater good and let us see the spark of his brilliance here also, may be he can help us level up our AI detection game.
BTW, great post (if you wrote it yourself): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5522234.msg66199210#msg66199210

EDIT
I have sent a PM to him regarding this, incase, he is not aware.

[SatoPrincess]

User: Tyatya

Economic direction – Tinubu’s government has pushed a rapid overhaul: the fuel‑subsidy was scrapped, the naira was unified, and a broad tax‑simplification drive was launched  Buhari’s tenure, by contrast, kept the subsidy in place for most of his term, relied on multiple exchange‑rate windows and emphasized protectionist trade measures 

Fiscal stance – Under Tinubu the budget deficit has been trimmed to about 3 % of GDP, with the savings from subsidy removal earmarked for infrastructure and social programmes  Buhari’s fiscal balance stayed wider, and revenue‑sharing allocations to states grew only modestly 

Security & governance – Both presidents faced widespread insecurity, but Tinubu has promised a “whole‑of‑government” security reform and more funding for the military  Buhari’s 13‑year fight against Boko Haram and banditry saw mixed results, with violence spreading into the northwest and southeast during his last years 

Institutional reforms – Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope” agenda stresses youth empowerment, digital‑skills programmes (the 3MTT initiative) and a push for a $1 trillion economy  Buhari’s focus was more on anti‑corruption drives and maintaining the status quo in key ministries 

Public perception – Tinubu’s reforms have sparked sharp price hikes and protests, but supporters point to improved fuel availability and a more transparent forex market  Critics of Buhari highlight lingering fuel shortages, inflation and a perceived slow pace of economic diversification 

In short, Tinubu’s regime is characterised by aggressive market‑oriented reforms and a fresh security blueprint, while Buhari’s era was marked by continuity of existing subsidies, multiple exchange‑rate regimes and a longer‑term security campaign. Both approaches have their supporters and detractors, reflecting the complex trade‑offs Nigeria faces. 🌍

Copy leaks - 100%
Gptzero- 100%

Sudan’s the big one on the radar right now – it tops the Emergency Watchlist as the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, with millions displaced and a famine declared in several areas 

That said, a handful of other places are also in deep trouble: Gaza is still under a devastating war, Myanmar’s conflict is flaring, and countries like Haiti, Mali and Burkina Faso are grappling with severe violence and food shortages 

Even with most of this things going on the world is still not giving them the right energy for them to face this fight I pray nobody is put in a position where you can't proudly mention were you coming from.

Copy leaks - 100%
Gptzero- 70%