AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[AuchanX]

A strange fake storyteller. One who copies other people's stories exactly. And posts them using AI.

User: Orpa200

Last night, I experienced one of the most unexpected and unforgettable moments of my life. At 12:30 AM, my first child was born at a clinic about 800 meters away from my house. At the time of delivery, I didn’t have any cash, although I had planned to withdraw some from the ATM. However, the ATM was quite far, and no one was available to accompany and support my wife during the delivery.
As my primary concern was my wife’s safety, I quickly took her to the clinic. When we arrived, I was a bit worried about the delivery fee since I had no cash on hand. After reaching the clinic, the doctor took off his robe and was wearing a t-shirt with a small Bitcoin logo on it. Surprised, I asked, "Do you use Bitcoin?" He replied, "Yes, I am involved with Bitcoin."
Spontaneously, I asked, "Can I pay the delivery fee with Bitcoin?" In the end, I paid the fee using 0.007 BTC (around $210). It was my first time making a payment with Bitcoin, and I didn’t even realize how it happened.
I am very grateful that both my wife and baby are doing well, and this experience of paying with Bitcoin will always remain unforgettable. My son's name is "Sadiq" (male), and he was born on January 20, 2026, at 12:30 AM. It was an unforgettable experience, and this is my first time posting about it.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 8% AI
Zerogpt: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% Mixed

What you’re experiencing is actually very common and completely human. In online communities like Bitcointalk, social comparison bias often kicks in—we tend to compare our own progress with the visible achievements of others, without seeing their full background.
One important fact to remember is this:
forum join date ≠ starting point of knowledge. Many users join Bitcointalk after spending years learning about blockchain, coding, trading, or economics elsewhere. What you see in their posts is the result, not the process.
Another reality is that Bitcointalk is not a race or a ranking platform; it is a knowledge archive and discussion forum. Long-term growth here comes from consistency and quality, not speed. Even many well-known senior members started with simple questions and small contributions.
A few practical steps that may help:
Focus on the content, not the author’s profile
Measure your progress against your own past self (over months, not days)
Aim for small but well-reasoned and informative posts
If you stay patient, keep learning, and contribute with logic and clarity, confidence and recognition will come naturally over time. In this forum, patience is one of the most valuable skills.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 77% AI
Zerogpt: 72% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

This is a very thoughtful concern. In reality, there is no universal “right time” to sell Bitcoin, because that moment depends more on personal life context than on the market itself. History does show long-term appreciation, but Memento Mori reminds us that time is finite and life does not run on infinite holding strategies.
The rational approach is neither all-in nor all-out, but planned, gradual decision-making. Taking partial profits to secure real-world stability, health, family needs, or future opportunities is not a failure—it is risk management. Holding Bitcoin that you do not currently need makes sense, but refusing to realize value when it meaningfully improves your life does not.
Bitcoin is not only a store of value; it is a tool for converting time and risk into freedom and optionality. Ultimately, the right time to sell is not defined by price charts, but by when Bitcoin starts serving your life instead of dominating it.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 65% AI
Zerogpt: 24% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

[Ultegra134]

This user caught spammed the forum with AI.

User: BlockSyntaxs

I almost reported him, but I then saw your post. I left him a neutral tag to prevent this in the future.

Also, I just spotted a user with unusual behaviour, some of the posts show up as AI, but others don't. I'm guessing it's because they're likely to be messing their posts on purpose. Check post 2., random capitalization of world "Gamble" perfect text, but instead of saying "odds" it says "olds" which masks its detection on Quillbot. "designed so that the olds always". The phrase "when they Gamble" seems to be written by the user, and not the AI.

Also, does anyone know why Stealthwriter's AI detection isn't working? It was a great tool.

User: Yeesha

Post 1.

Understanding financial management is important, but it is not most crucial factor when it comes to achieving financial stability and success. What truly matters is the ability to put that understanding into consistent practice. Many people are well aware of the principles of financial management, they know the importance of budgeting, saving, and avoiding unnecessary debt. But despite this knowledge, they still find themselves struggling financially because they fail to apply these principles in their everyday lives.

Knowledge without action has little or no value. Practicing good financial habits on a daily basis is what transforms financial knowledge into real results. Consistently tracking expenses, planning for emergencies, setting financial goals, and making informed spending decisions are essential steps toward financial growth. Over time, these habits build stability, reduce financial stress, and create opportunities for personal growth and economic advancements.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Undetectable: 100% AI

Post 2.

Gambling does not genuinely require mathematical or arithmetical knowledge in a way that can guarantee success or prevent loss. If gambling were something that could be controlled or mastered through calculations, formulas, or advanced knowledge, then many people would use such skills to protect themselves from losing money in gambling. But in reality, gambling is fundamentally built on chance or luck, randomness, and uncertainty. Most gambling systems are carefully designed so that the olds always favor the operator or house, and not the player. Well basic mathematical understanding may help individuals to recognize probabilities, or understand how the games work, this knowledge does not change the outcome in the long run. Even people who are highly educated, intelligent, and mathematically skilled still experience losses sometimes, when they Gamble. This is because no strategy, prediction, or calculation can fully overcome the elements of luck that governs gambling activities.  

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Quillbot: 57% AI

Post 3.

Understanding financial management is important, but it is not most crucial factor when it comes to achieving financial stability and success. What truly matters is the ability to put that understanding into consistent practice. Many people are well aware of the principles of financial management, they know the importance of budgeting, saving, and avoiding unnecessary debt. But despite this knowledge, they still find themselves struggling financially because they fail to apply these principles in their everyday lives.

Knowledge without action has little or no value. Practicing good financial habits on a daily basis is what transforms financial knowledge into real results. Consistently tracking expenses, planning for emergencies, setting financial goals, and making informed spending decisions are essential steps toward financial growth. Over time, these habits build stability, reduce financial stress, and create opportunities for personal growth and economic advancements.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Quillbot: 55% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI

[TopT3ns]

Another user generate post the forum with AI.

User: Coreintellect

Your vision touches on the heart of what is often referred to as mental "hyperbitcoinization," a state in which individuals transcend the illusion of stability offered by fiat currencies that are actually silently depreciating. Valuing Bitcoin in dollars is like trying to understand the third dimension through a two-dimensional shadow on a wall; you will always miss the essence of a higher truth due to the limitations of the measuring tools you use in everyday life. The courage to let go of attachment to the dollar denominator is an intellectual rebellion against the mainstream economic narrative that enforces consumption through systematic and structured currency devaluation. If we consider money as a language for communicating value, then switching to the BTC standard means learning a new grammar based on cryptographic honesty and the laws of digital thermodynamics that cannot be compromised by any political interest. Ultimately, this transition demands that we redefine wealth not as a pile of paper that can be printed infinitely, but as a fixed percentage of ownership in a system that is fair, transparent, and unchangeable by greedy human hands.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 100%
undetectable.ai: 99%

Your argument touches on an existential paradox crucial to Bitcoin's long-term sustainability, particularly regarding its supposed shift from block subsidies to transaction fee-based revenue in the future. Despite the price reaching $126,000, the stagnation of on-chain activity with gas fees below 1 sat/vb reflects cannibalization of activity by Layer 2 solutions or centralized exchanges, which in turn draws liquidity away from the base layer. If this trend persists, miners' incentives will be drastically eroded after several halvings, potentially weakening the network's defenses against external attacks due to the low economic value at stake per block. We need real utility that compels users back to the main chain, whether through protocol innovation or mass adoption, to make Bitcoin not just static digital gold but an economic engine capable of self-funding its security without relying on the ever-depleting emission of new coins every four years.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 100%
undetectable.ai: 99%

Your argument is spot-on in distinguishing between corporate infrastructure failure and the integrity of mathematical protocols; Binance is indeed licensed in multiple jurisdictions, but regulation has proven to be no safety net against unforeseen technical anomalies. The exchange's October 10th crash was a stark reminder of the risks of centralization, where human or systemic error can disable access without compromising the security of the Bitcoin ledger itself, which remains autonomous. While the public often confuses the exchange entity with its assets, educated market participants understand that turmoil on intermediary platforms does not alter Bitcoin's fundamental role as decentralized hard money. Pursuing justice in court may be an avenue for aggrieved consumers, but proving intentionality in a system failure is a formidable and complex legal challenge. Ultimately, true financial sovereignty can only be achieved when users stop relying on third parties and begin holding their own private keys, in accordance with the original philosophy established by Satoshi Nakamoto.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 64%
undetectable.ai: 99%

Your analysis is very accurate in distinguishing between the marketing promises of altcoins and the fundamental reality of Bitcoin. History has proven that the "better Bitcoin" narrative through hard forks is merely a mirage that fails to maintain value due to the loss of the essence of decentralization and network effects. These forked coins are often trapped in fragile development centralization, so that when speculative interest fades, their communities collapse, leaving assets without real utility, a stark contrast to Bitcoin's continued organic evolution through global consensus. The inability of altcoins, or "shitcoins," to replicate Bitcoin's security lies in the blockchain trilemma, where they pursue low fees at the expense of censorship resistance, a compromise that leaves them vulnerable to regulatory pressure and internal manipulation by development entities. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's current on-chain cost efficiency is proof that payment adoption is not just about transaction speed, but rather about legal certainty and trust in the most secure underlying layer. Ultimately, Bitcoin's resilience amidst a storm of competitive innovation confirms that absolute decentralization is not an optional feature, but rather a fundamental prerequisite for a global currency that hopes to survive market trends often driven by panic and short-term speculation.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 64%
undetectable.ai: 99%

Your appreciation of the depth of meaning behind this noise is deeply touching, for you astutely understand that rudderless anger is simply wasted energy amidst the hustle and bustle of a world that constantly pulls our attention in all directions. Choosing to transform frustration into focus through calm discipline is the most elegant form of rebellion against a system designed to keep us reacting without ever truly building anything of lasting value. Small victories and mastery of real skills may seem slow on the surface, but systemically, they are how we build a foundation of self-sovereignty that cannot be shaken by market noise or the often-temporary fluctuations of mass emotion. Slow but consistent movement is far more powerful than aimless speed, for with each disciplined step, you are planting seeds of integrity that will grow into trees of strength when the storms of uncertainty return. Keep building quietly, for in the stillness of focus, the voice of your truth will be heard louder than even the loudest shouts out there today.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Quilbot : 100%
undetectable.ai: 99%

[macson]

This user just registered and spammed the forum by creating multiple posts using AI.

User: Kenzb1

From an economic standpoint, Gen Z’s behavior is a rational response to distorted incentives. Real wages have lagged inflation, asset prices have outpaced income growth, and traditional savings vehicles deliver negative real returns. When the expected value of ‘playing safe’ is structurally low, individuals reallocate toward higher-risk, higher-variance assets. That’s not treating the economy like a casino, it’s optimizing under constrained and deteriorating economic conditions.

Michael Saylor has been one of my role models in Bitcoin investing. He didn’t accumulate over 200,000 BTC worth billions because he’s a gambler or reckless risk-taker. He identified an emerging asset class with asymmetric upside, limited downside relative to a potential multi-trillion-dollar ROI. That’s not gambling; that’s strategic capital allocation based on conviction, fundamentals, and long-term vision. History shows that great investors are often misunderstood early on, just like Warren Buffett was in his formative years. What looks like ‘high risk’ to the crowd is often simply high insight.

In my opinion, while quantum computing does present a theoretical threat to Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations, the practical risk is often overstated.
Yes, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break certain cryptographic schemes used today. However, the assumption that such a machine would first be used to attack Bitcoin ignores economic, strategic, and technical realities.
1. Bitcoin Is Not a Soft Target
Bitcoin does not run on a single centralized server, database, or national infrastructure. It is:
Fully decentralized, distributed across tens of thousands of nodes globally ,secured by cryptographic keys tied to a public blockchain

Even if early quantum computers emerge, attacking Bitcoin would require:
Identifying exposed public keys, acting within a narrow transaction time window, competing against a transparent and auditable global network
This is far more complex than breaking into centralized systems.
2. Real Quantum Power Will Be State-Level
Any entity capable of building a cryptographically relevant quantum computer will almost certainly be:
A nation-state, or a highly funded military and industrial group
Such actors are strategic, not opportunistic.
If I owned a quantum computer with that level of power, Bitcoin would be one of my least attractive targets.

3. More Valuable Targets Exist

From a cost-benefit perspective, far easier and more profitable targets exist:
Military and defense systems, Intelligence communications, Central banking infrastructure, Encrypted government databases, Centralized financial institutions
These systems:
Rely heavily on centralized cryptography, Often depend on legacy encryption, Offer geopolitical leverage and real-world power

Compared to that, attacking Bitcoin:
Offers limited anonymity, Triggers immediate global scrutiny, and risks destabilizing markets in ways that reduce profitability

4. Bitcoin Can Adapt; Centralized Systems Struggle

Bitcoin is not static, neither is any crypto with high value and huge capitalization It can:

Migrate to post-quantum cryptographic schemes and introduce new address formats via soft forks, encourage users to move funds proactively

Centralized systems, on the other hand:

Depend on slow bureaucratic upgrades, require trust in a single authority, and have massive single points of failure

Ironically, centralized systems are far more vulnerable to quantum attacks than Bitcoin.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

[Ninja Primes]

User: MarekJendral

#post 1

I think Bitcoin’s original vision as a peer-to-peer currency is still alive, but its role has clearly evolved over time. On the base layer, Bitcoin is simply not optimized for everyday coffee payments, and that’s unlikely to change without sacrificing decentralization or security.

Where I do see potential is in layered solutions like Lightning. If these systems become easier to use, more reliable, and widely integrated into wallets and payment apps, Bitcoin could work as a spending medium in certain contexts. But that requires massive UX improvements and stronger merchant incentives.

Realistically, I think Bitcoin’s primary role will remain a store of value and a hedge against monetary debasement, similar to digital gold. Payments may become a secondary use case rather than the main one. In short: possible, but not its dominant function.

GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI Detector: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%


#post 2

I think a lot of people overestimate how much a government can “kill” crypto. It’s true that exchanges and banks can be restricted, making it harder to buy or sell, but the blockchain itself is decentralized and global—there’s no single point to shut down. Even with strict local bans, people can still hold coins in wallets or use peer-to-peer networks. Regulation makes more sense than outright bans because it provides consumer protection without destroying the network. Education and guidance, like your guide, really help cut through the fear. More info here: https://kryptomagazin.sk/

GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI Detector: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 50%


#post 3

Absolutely, this highlights the importance of using stop-loss orders effectively. Market volatility, especially during unexpected news like tariff changes, can lead to massive liquidations, as we saw with over $9 billion lost. By setting stop-loss limits, traders can protect their capital and avoid panic-driven decisions. Greed and carelessness often amplify losses, but disciplined risk management ensures you stay in control. It’s not about predicting every market movement, but about safeguarding your position and locking in profits where possible. Everyone trading should prioritize risk management tools to minimize sudden losses and survive market shocks.

GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI Detector: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 90% .


#post 4

If Satoshi Nakamoto truly owns around 1 million Bitcoins, and with the current price sitting at $115,000 per BTC, that’s roughly $115 billion in total value. That’s about three times less than Elon Musk’s net worth, which Forbes estimates at $342 billion. So right now, Satoshi isn’t the richest person on earth. However, if Bitcoin’s price were to rise above $350,000 per coin, Satoshi’s holdings would surpass Musk’s fortune. The real question is whether those coins will ever move — if they stay untouched forever, Satoshi might be the richest ghost investor in history.

GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI Detector: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 0%.

#post 5

I consider Bitcoin a long-term investment asset due to its unique combination of scarcity, decentralization, and growing adoption. With a fixed supply of 21 million coins, Bitcoin is inherently deflationary, making it resistant to inflationary pressures that affect traditional currencies.

Over time, institutional interest and regulatory clarity have strengthened its legitimacy as a digital store of value. Additionally, Bitcoin’s decentralized network ensures security and transparency, which are crucial for long-term confidence. While short-term volatility is high, historical trends show consistent growth over years, making it a strategic asset for wealth preservation and long-term portfolio diversification.

GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI Detector: 100%
Originality Ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%.

Ninja~  

[HustleZ]

Caught Another Ai shitposter.

User: The Bitcoin Act

Post 1

Governments can (and do) impose geographical bans or restrictions within their own borders. These typically include:

- Banning exchanges, brokers, or payment processors from operating legally in the country.
- Prohibiting banks and financial institutions from handling crypto-related transactions.
- Outlawing mining activities.
- Making it illegal for citizens/residents to buy, sell, hold, or use Bitcoin (with penalties like fines or imprisonment).

Examples include China (which has maintained one of the strictest bans since around 2021, targeting trading, mining, and financial institutions), and several others like Egypt, Algeria, or Nepal with outright bans. In places like India or Nigeria, there have been waves of restrictions, crackdowns on P2P trading, or banking prohibitions, but enforcement varies.

These bans are jurisdiction-specific, they only apply within that country's legal territory and to people under its authority. They do not stop:

- Transactions happening on the blockchain itself (which is borderless).
- People in other countries from sending/receiving Bitcoin to or from anyone, including those in the banning country (via wallets that don't rely on local regulated services).
- Underground or peer-to-peer usage within the banning country (using VPNs, decentralized exchanges, privacy tools, in-person trades, etc.).

In practice, even in heavily restricted places like China, Bitcoin usage and trading have continued...

GPTzero: 100% Ai Generated
ZeroGPT: 90.5% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Post 2

We already have:

FATCA, which forces foreign banks and institutions to report U.S. persons’ accounts or face exclusion from U.S. financial markets.

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework), which is the global crypto analogue, automatic exchange of crypto transaction data between tax authorities. The U.S. has NOT formally adopted CARF yet. But U.S. platforms may still collect CARF-style data if operating in CARF countries. Under CARF, platforms are required to collect and report user identity information such as legal name, address, jurisdictions of tax residence, taxpayer identification numbers, and date of birth, along with account details like wallet addresses or platform account identifiers linked to that user. They must also report transaction-level data, including transfers in and out (even when interacting with self-custody wallets), the type of crypto-asset involved, and the date and fiat-value of each transaction, plus counterparty information where available, such as the receiving or sending platform or jurisdiction. That information is then automatically exchanged between participating countries’ tax authorities.

CRS (Common Reporting Standard): Global bank and financial account data exchange between tax authorities. Most countries participate. The U.S. does not, it uses FATCA instead. The key difference is scope and data type: CRS focuses on custodial financial accounts and financial income, such as account balances, interest, dividends, and proceeds from the sale of financial assets, reported by banks and brokers. It does not require the granular, transaction-by-transaction transfer reporting or wallet address linkage that CARF introduces for crypto. In other words, CRS tracks where money is held and what income it generates, while CARF tracks how crypto moves and between whom.

GPTzero: 73% Ai Generated
ZeroGPT: 68.5% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

Other posts are too small to Detect if it's Ai, Keeping in mind he has only been active 2 days on the Forum from 24Jan-26Jan and how much he has shown he is going to use Ai.