AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Cypra]

Looking at the reputable users on the forum who gave merits, it seems that they would not normally give merits to posts made with (AI) like this. Anyway, I don't know how they gave so many merits, but normally this is not something expected from reputable members like them. However, it seems this happened by mistake because reputable members normally do not do this.

Lol a bullshit story, probably he deleted this cause it was a fake story. He could have atleast tell the truth express his own feelings about his losses but it seems like he has just created a fake story to get some sympathy from forum members at the same time some merits. Idk if he is into merit or something bigger like raising crowd funding.

[ryzaadit]

Idk if he is into merit or something bigger like raising crowd funding.

More likely sympathy and asking for some funds using the tragedy. What's merits for on those accounts? Joined a signcamp? Surely with the name itself already flagged some campaign manager. The name itself intended for bringing sympathy for the post he was going to made asking some help by putting a story + his address as well. Unless the name with some random name probably chasing sympaty + merits.

[nutildah]

This is an example of an account that should be outright banned for AI use, IMO:

suhadi88

They've been quietly AI shitposting under the radar for a long time and recently decided to step it up and explore other boards, which proved to be a mistake.

Most detectors might have missed these when they were first published but they don't now:

#1

Effort and prayer always go hand in hand, and knowledge is the real key. Without knowledge, everything tends to fall apart because we don’t actually know what we’re doing. When we understand our actions and direction, the chances of things working out are naturally much higher.

The market itself is the best form of natural selection. Those who move without understanding or a solid foundation are eventually washed out, while those who can read where the market is heading are able to navigate it with far more ease. Everything happens for a reason, and it usually comes back to the same core elements: knowledge, consistency, effort, and prayer. May every effort be blessed by the One who provides our sustenance.

Sapling: 100% Fake
Winston: 0% Human
GPTZero: 99% Mixed (AI polished)

#2

Someone will eventually lose control if everything is constantly forced, because when things are pushed too hard, the outcome often turns out unexpected. Luck doesn’t always show up and it may come only once in a while, and sometimes in ways that don’t even make sense. Even the meaning of “luck” itself is temporary.

I believe bet size should always match our own capability. If we’re still using standard playing methods, it’s better not to take excessive risks. If someone is more skilled, taking bigger risks can still make sense, because what people are really chasing isn’t the amount of money they put in, but the profit they aim to achieve. The principle stays the same in my view the capital should always be balanced with profit.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 80% Mixed (AI polished)
Winston: (I ran out of free scans)

#3

This sector plays a meaningful role in absorbing labour and, in doing so, contributes to the broader economic activity of the community. For entrepreneurs who can maintain consistency, it also functions as a long-term investment, since housing remains a fundamental human need—surpassed only by food and clothing. Its value, therefore, extends beyond short-term gains and into the essential infrastructure of daily life.

For individuals seeking stable employment, it becomes important to work with reputable companies under balanced and fair conditions, as both sides depend on one another. Established firms, whether government-linked or private, typically maintain networks that secure a continuous flow of projects throughout the year. As skilled workers, we are able to support these projects effectively, provided we meet the required standards and verification processes. In that sense, the relationship between trained labour and reliable employers forms a mutually sustaining foundation within the sector.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 80% Mixed (AI polished)
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

[Slimzeee]

Hi everyone, greetings to you all. I remain Slimzeee on the forum and my attention has being drawn to the alleged AI Content accusation against me.

I commend the work everyone in this reputation board put in to trace these things and ensure we have a clean forum. My journey here haven’t being smooth, each step tells a story, at least for me and the forum has taught me the much I know today of Bitcoin and challenged me to research more on it.

Notes:
I am not actively working in any signature campaign, though it would have being nice to be in one.

I have only worked in one signature campaign as far back as 14th of March, 2025 while I was still a member.

I have made about 82 posts in the past 230 days which averages, 3 posts per day approximately.

There isn’t a motive for me to be involved in activities that would bring my account to ruin after only attaining the Full member rank around March this year, despite to have spent 4years of being off and on, in the forum.

I would like to reaffirm that, I didn’t use AI in my post creation, not in it’s entirety or in parts or tried to humanize it. I don’t know the best means to present my case so, I have to look at the tools that have being used on this thread for the purpose of cross examining myself on the posts of interest. Tools like:

Gptzero,
Sapling,
Stealthwriter,
Originality

Would be used for this exercise.

Accusation by user: FinneysTruevision

Original Version (First post before edit):

I will say much of it is due to privacy and staying anonymous.

Think about it this way: people don’t feel too comfortable linking their fiat bank accounts and constantly withdrawing from gambling, because it might not reflect well on them. But with crypto, they can create an account solely for that purpose, and it may not be directly traceable to them. In some sense, this creates a kind of freedom.

Edit(1):

I will say much of it is due to privacy and staying anonymous.

Think about it this way: people don’t feel too comfortable linking their fiat bank accounts and constantly withdrawing for gambling, because it might not reflect well on them. But with crypto, they can create an account solely for that purpose, and it may not be directly traceable to them. In some sense, this creates a kind of freedom.

Gptzero: AI = 26%, Mixed = 0%, Human = 74%
Stealthwriter: Human = 0% (detected as AI)
Sapling: Fake = 99.9%
Originality: AI Exceeds= 15%

Edit(2):

One major reason crypto became popular in gambling is privacy and anonymity.

Think about it, most people don’t feel comfortable linking their fiat bank accounts and constantly withdrawing for gambling, it doesn’t look good and can raise questions. With crypto, they can set up an account solely for that purpose, and it’s not easily traceable back to them. That separation creates a sense of freedom.

But here’s the change in dynamics,  many platforms NOW require KYC  verification. This reduces the level of anonymity YET Still, the appeal remains strong because crypto offers more flexibility and independence compared to traditional banking

Gptzero: AI = 100%, Mixed = 0%, Human = 0%
Stealthwriter: Human = 0% (Detected as AI)
Sapling: Fake = 22.7%
Originality: AI Exceeds= 15%

Explanation: After writing my first post, I edited to add more context and correct the English, hence you find same lines making same meaning with few alterations and subsequently adding more context to it as the ideas came.

2.

The “I have missed my chance” mindset is very common, especially among people who knew about Bitcoin before it became as popular as it is today. I’m talking about those who heard about it, understood the vision, and saw the project when it was worth only a few dollars.

Many of them believe it’s now too late to invest because the price is much higher than it was back then. They feel the best time to get in has already passed and that the opportunity is long gone.

But the truth is, investing in Bitcoin is never too late. Whenever you decide to invest is a valid time to start. What matters most is taking action instead of continuously missing opportunities and repeating the same history.

Gptzero: AI = 3%, Mixed = 97, Human = 0%
Stealthwriter: Human = 0% (Detected as AI)
Sapling: Fake = 99.9%
Originality: AI Exceeds= 15%

3.

User adoption is one of the most notable keys characteristics  of Bitcoin that will keep making it stronger over time. People tend to use it more often compared to previous years, and every day many new individuals come to the knowledge of it, accepting its usefulness.

If you look at the trend of Bitcoin across the years, you will notice steady growth. Around 2011 (two years after its release), adoption was still in its infancy. By 2016, about 12 million people had adopted Bitcoin. Fast forward to 2021, the number had surged to around 106 million. Now, projecting to 2026, we see about 360 million people adopting Bitcoin.

This clearly shows strong signs that the future holds immense potential. In the coming years, we will witness frequent transactions from these individuals, which will further increase total confidence in Bitcoin as a subject matter.

Bitcoin adoption is not slowing down it is accelerating. Each new wave of users strengthens the network, builds trust, and brings us closer to a world where Bitcoin becomes a mainstream financial tool.

Originality: AI Below = 15%
Gptzero: AI = 100%, Mixed = 0%, Human = 0%
Sapling: Fake = 0%
Stealthwriter: Human = 73% (Detected as Human)

Accusation by user: Nutildah

A financially disciplined individual is someone who is able to manage their resources effectively and, over time, will build wealth regardless of the investment sector they choose. Financial discipline does not only apply to Bitcoin investment; it cuts across all aspects of life.

A properly structured financial plan is essential. This involves clearly allocating your income covering your basic needs, setting aside savings, and identifying your discretionary income, which can then be used for investments like Bitcoin. Understanding your cash flow helps you stay consistent and avoid spending money meant for investment on unnecessary wants.

It is also important to understand that Bitcoin is not a “rush in and rush out” type of investment. It rewards patience, consistency, and a long-term mindset. To succeed, you must stay disciplined in your finances, avoid emotional decisions, and remain consistent with your investment strategy even during market volatility.

Gptzero: AI = 100%, Mixed = 0%, Human = 0%
Originality: AI Exceeds = 15%
Sapling: Fake = 100%
Stealthwriter: Human = 0% (Detected as AI)

Explanation: I would like to note it that, ther versions I used in cross examining myself on these accusations are free versions, took me a couple of days to look at these and I’m very much surprised at the results given that, these were posts I indeed come up with.

From the results and the much interpretations that was given, certain sentences and phrases in respect to how they are used created the discrepancies for an AI score on a text. It does appear to be more when you utilize statistics and dates with words like “fast forward”, “projecting to” and more of it’s like.

The result as in the case of Nutildah does appear to be consistent and on that, I clearly don’t know what to explain here but, I would have loved that my word of mouth would stand as true even though, I can imagine that you would like to work with what you’ve got as tools and the results they give.

As in the result of FinneysTruevision the results were inconsistent as certain tools feel below and above what could have being regarded as its threshold.

I’m just an ordinary user trying to make better myself and doing my utmost to be a good forum user. I try my best to ensure I don’t rush to make posts, edit errors and correct my English if possible before or after posting. I avoid having to use AI but somehow, the results depicts otherwise. I suppose it’s the consequences for trying to be good in English and to post what would be seen as up to standard. Even then, I would plead that based on the inconsistencies as presented, the verdict in my case be looked at.

Thank you.

[nutildah]

I would like to reaffirm that, I didn’t use AI in my post creation, not in it’s entirety or in parts or tried to humanize it.

Well, you're lying. Almost every post you write comes back 70-100% Fake in Sapling even if they aren't caught by the other detectors. This post was already shown to be 100% AI in Sapling and GPTZero. This doesn't just happen by accident.

The fact that several of your old posts contain emdashes is a dead giveaway:

The idea of Bitcoin being a Ponzi scheme is one of the most widespread misconceptions, largely because Ponzi schemes were associated with online payments in the past. A proper lecture on the purpose of Bitcoin and how it operates could clear up these doubts—but only for a willing mind.

You are using AI for the sake of offering generic advice to no one in particular, which is not a worthy cause. You should really be banned completely.

There's no way you can lie your way out of this, sorry.

[Dark.Look]

User: suhadi88

Difficulties arise not because we failed to plan, but because monetary values ​​no longer align with our expectations. While general expenses and income are accounted for, circumstances often force us to incur additional costs—drawing from our emergency funds—for needs that are both critical and urgent.

These situations most frequently arise regarding healthcare costs and our children's education expenses, not to mention the various social obligations that are part of daily life.

gptzero: 94% Mix
sapling: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
quillbot: 100% AI
undetectable: 99% AI

Indeed, there are no guarantees, even when dealing with a friend. Progress often goes unmonitored, and purchasing decisions lack focus or long-term viability. At first glance, entrusting your money to someone skilled seems promising—the hope is for profits and a mutually agreed-upon share of the returns.

In reality, however, it often leads to conflict. One party wants a profit, while the other has to wait patiently for the market to recover; if urgent financial needs arise, they may be forced to cut their losses.

gptzero: 100% Mix
sapling: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
quillbot: 100% AI
undetectable: 99% AI

You are right; the best approach right now is to keep accumulating assets rather than constantly staring at your phone screen, watching charts, and waiting for a "perfect" price point that never arrives. The reality is that we almost always lose to the market—whether in spot or futures trading—largely due to emotions; the end result is consistently a loss, a scenario that seems all too common for everyone, often leading to a setback in one's standing.

gptzero: 87% Mix
sapling: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
quillbot: 100% AI


I see he has already reported by @nutildah

[nutildah]

I'm requesting that this account be banned for AI slop posting:

Numan467

As we've been discussing for the last 10 pages or so, LLMs have evolved to the point where its possible to fool most of the free detectors most of the time. Hundreds of posts like this (minus that top line) are currently going unreported:

{ variant =  chat _ message if= 58271}
Yeah , I know what you are looking for.
Some miners focus on over locking because they're pursuing maximum hashrate, but under locking can actually make more sensible when power is limited or electricity costs are a concern.

Some ASICs can be under locked by bringing down the frequency and voltage through custom firmware or built in  settings, depending on the model. In fact,  under locking often improves efficiency watts per TH and their by reduces heat and noise, which can be a huge advantage for a small solo mining setup
Your reasoning of running at full power during the day and lowering consumption at night is practical if your power supply is constrainted .
The most important thing here is to find a miner and firmware combination that allows flexible power profiles rather than focusing solely on maximum hashrate. At the long run , a miner running a continues within your power budget is far good than one constantly pushed to its limits.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 60% AI/GPT
Sapling: 0% Fake
Quillbot: 0% AI
Winston: 100% Human

Thanks to the code print in the top line, we can all agree this is an AI post, right? So why does Sapling, the strictest detector, mark it as 0% Fake? Because the grammar, spacing and punctuation has been intentionally mangled as part of the LLM output process. GPTZero, arguably the best and fairest detector, catches it straight away. After fixing some basic grammar and spelling errors:

Yeah, I know what you are looking for.

Some miners focus on overclocking because they're pursuing maximum hashrate, but underclocking can actually be more sensible when power is limited or electricity costs are a concern.

Some ASICs can be underclocked by bringing down the frequency and voltage through custom firmware or built-in settings, depending on the model. Underclocking often improves efficiency watts per TH, thereby reducing heat and noise, which can be a huge advantage for a small solo mining setup.

Your reasoning of running at full power during the day and lowering consumption at night is practical if your power supply is constrained.

The most important thing is to find a miner and firmware combination that allows flexible power profiles rather than focusing solely on maximum hashrate. In the long run, a miner running within your power budget is far better than one constantly pushed to its limits.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT
Sapling: 99.2% Fake
Quillbot: 100% AI-generated
Winston: 0% Human

The two posters who appealed their AI sigban above were doing the same thing, as is Numan467:

This post by itself comes back as 0% Fake:

There are several big central bank decisions this week, as well as profit reports from companies that are deeply connected to crypto industry. Many traders expect increased price swings around these events.

Surprisingly, Bitcoin was first introduced as an option to traditional financial system, but today, many market players are interested in following interest rates, cash flow conditions and even company profits to figure out what Bitcoin will do next.

Is Bitcoin becoming more and more economy dependent, or is it just a short term trend that won't impact its long term value promise?

But once I make 3 small corrections (adding 2 necessary words and removing 1 unnecessary word), the detector jumps up to 99.4% Fake:

There are several big central bank decisions this week, as well as profit reports from companies that are deeply connected to the crypto industry. Many traders expect increased price swings around these events.

Surprisingly, Bitcoin was first introduced as an option to the traditional financial system, but today, many market players are interested in following interest rates, cash flow conditions and even company profits to figure out what Bitcoin will do next.

Is Bitcoin becoming more and more economy dependent, or is it just a short term trend that won't impact its long term value promise?

#2

Original:

I can see why you take that view, but it does not seem like Bitcoin growing connection with big economic events always means that its main use has been lost.

If you ask me, there is a difference between what moves price of Bitcoin, and what makes Bitcoin valuable to begin with. While interest rates, available cash and government policies may have an impact on demand in short term, they do not change fact that Bitcoin is still ruled by same rules that were in place before the big companies came along. Just because big financial players are trading the network does not mean that it is more controlled centrally.

What is interesting to me is that much of those traditional players have been playing Bitcoin for profit, but they have also been helping to add available cash, systems and public awareness. That might not be beliefs of early buyers, but it has helped Bitcoin get to the scale that it would have been hard to do otherwise.

So maybe question is not so much if Bitcoin is now macro asset, but if an asset can be affected by the traditional financial system without truly changing. I do not believe this debate is at all finished.

Sapling: 0% Fake

After fixing punctuation & grammar:

There is a difference between what moves price of Bitcoin and what makes Bitcoin valuable to begin with. While interest rates, available cash and government policies may have an impact on demand in the short term. They do not change fact that Bitcoin is still ruled by same rules that were in place before the big companies came along. Just because big financial players are trading the network does not mean that it is more centralized.

Many of those traditional players have been playing Bitcoin for profit, but have also been helping to add available cash, systems and public awareness. That might not be the beliefs of early buyers, but it has helped Bitcoin get to the scale that would have been hard to do otherwise.

The question is not so much if Bitcoin is now macro asset, but if an asset can be affected by the traditional financial system without truly changing. I do not believe this debate is at all finished.

Sapling: 100% Fake

Keep in mind that Sapling only produces false positives when it doesn't have enough text to perform an accurate analysis. That is not the case for this post. Its literally impossible to change the results for a post of this length from "human" to "AI" unless it was already AI to begin with.

#3

Original:

The thing is, randomness bug was there since March 2021. Five years of users creating wallets, believing that they were safe, and seed phrases were being secretly guessed. Attacker did not have to hack anyone, simply to copy the numbers the device was generating all along and that were easy to guess.
It is about Karma here, but in real life, these coins are already onchain marked. All exchanges are aware of the addresses. Only thing that matters is whether the jamming player can be smart enough not to make a mistake at the exit point and most of them eventually make mistakes.

If anyone own a Coldcard Mk3, Mk4, Mk5 or Q and have not yet done 50 dice rolls to create your seed, transfer your funds to new wallet (cold or hot) now. Do not wait for the check by Coinkite to be finished.

GPTZero: 6% AI, 94% Human

Corrected for grammar & punctuation:

The thing is, the randomness bug was there since March 2021. Five years of users creating wallets, believing that they were safe, and seed phrases secretly being guessed. The attacker did not have to hack anyone but simply copy the numbers the device was generating all along and that were easy to guess.
It is about Karma here, but in real life, these coins are already marked on-chain. All exchanges are aware of the addresses. The only thing that matters is whether the jamming player can be smart enough not to make a mistake at the exit point, and most of them eventually make mistakes.

If anyone owns a Coldcard Mk3, Mk4, Mk5 or Q and has not yet done 50 dice rolls to create your seed, transfer your funds to a new wallet (cold or hot) now. Do not wait for the check by Coinkite to be finished.

GPTZero: Possible AI Paraphrasing (100% AI) - "We are highly confident this text was originally AI, but rewritten by AI or a human"

In this instance we have the best free detector making a declarative statement about the origins of the post. I don't think we should take the evidence lightly just because its from a single detector -- GPTZero (and Sapling sometimes) is the only free detector that accounts for this method of detector evasion via "humanization".

TL;DR: this is not a one-off mistake and the detector results cannot be replicated with posts from a non-AI poster. What this poster is doing is intentional.

Ultimately, I think anyone sufficiently aware of the issue should be able to look at this user's posts and come to the same conclusions. This person isn't posting their own words very often, and everything they do is a manipulative ploy to rank up. Letting them continue sets a bad precedent for the others following in their footsteps, IMHO. And there are a lot of them.