AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

Alex077

The results I got for this user were inconsistent due to them likely using a humanizer to methodically insert minor errors into their posts. It should be obvious to anybody who sees their profile that they are using AI to post in every sports thread to meet the high quota for their campaign. It’s unrealistic that anybody is organically interested in so many different leagues and sports.

Good catch. The account looks like it was purchased but it has been owned by a Russian since the beginning so its difficult to say for sure. Their post history is chock full of AI posts, however. Here's a few more.

Yeah, Fundora looked like a monster against Tszyu — he used his reach perfectly and even in close exchanges he was the one dictating the pace. Tszyu just couldn’t figure him out, and that says a lot. If Fundora comes in with the same sharpness, I agree, Thurman’s in serious danger.
The biggest issue for Thurman is that inactivity. Three years without a real fight at the elite level is no joke, and ring rust is almost guaranteed. Add to that the fact he’s facing a tall, awkward, high-volume fighter like Fundora — it’s a nightmare matchup for someone making a comeback.

Unless Thurman can land something huge early and disrupt Fundora’s rhythm, I don’t see him winning this. Personally, I’m leaning the same way as you: Fundora by late KO or a wide unanimous decision. Thurman’s name is big, but his timing couldn’t be worse for this fight.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

As for the matchup, I respect Crawford for stepping up. Moving up in weight against someone like Canelo is no joke, and it shows Bud isn’t afraid of the risk. But styles make fights – Canelo’s power and size advantage are real factors here, while Crawford has speed, accuracy, and IQ on his side.
If it goes to the scorecards and it’s tight, history tells us judges tend to lean Canelo’s way. That’s why Crawford probably needs to win rounds very clearly or even go for a stoppage.

Sapling: 99% Fake
GPTZero: 95% AI generated

  Honestly, that Osasuna game wasn’t great from Madrid, but let’s be real — it’s only the first round. Mbappé missed a sitter, Vinícius tried, and yeah, without the penalty they probably drop points.
But people already crying that “Madrid is finished” are overreacting. Xabi Alonso just landed, give the man some time to settle in. You can’t expect peak chemistry in game one.
Barça smashing in their opener means nothing, it’s a marathon, not a sprint. Madrid’s squad is stacked, and once things click, they’ll be scary again.
Just my opinion, but I wouldn’t write Madrid off yet.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

I get your point — F1 has ,,always,, been about innovation, and sure, not every regulation or tech update was a success. Some things stuck, others were rolled back. That’s natural for a sport that evolves as fast as F1.

But honestly, I think what a lot of fans miss isn’t ,,just,, the noise. It’s the whole package — the rawness, the edge-of-your-seat unpredictability, and yes, the engine sound was a big part of that. Fake noise might technically be possible, but it won’t bring back the same feeling.
People loved F1 because it was an authentic mix of speed, danger, and pure racing spirit, not just a show. You can’t really fake that, even if technology allows you to. But hey, that’s just my personal opinion — some fans might feel differently, and that’s what keeps the debate alive.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

Sapling and GPTZero see through the "humanization" but Copyleaks and ZeroGPT do not, interestingly enough.

[lovesmayfamilis]

Good catch. The account looks like it was purchased but it has been owned by a Russian since the beginning so its difficult to say for sure. Their post history is chock full of AI posts, however. Here's a few more.

The account still belongs to a Russian user. Most likely, he writes in Russian but uses an AI translator to translate into English, which is why his posts are recognized as written by an AI. His writing style is similar in both languages. Perhaps he should be invited to this thread so that he can clarify the

[Alex077]

  Naturally, the account isn’t bought — it has belonged to me from the very beginning, for over 11 years, and I’ve been honestly contributing to the crypto community all this time.
I’m a moderator under the same nickname Alex077 on several forums, for example on cryptotalk, and on altcoinstalk my account was teleported from Bitcointalk, which happened quite a long time ago. I usually post similar topics across different forums - that’s very easy to verify, and if needed I can provide links.

I do use AI mainly to search for information, but I always write my posts myself. Since English is not my native language, there may be some inaccuracies in spelling or phrasing, though most of my posts I naturally write in Russian.
As for AI detectors - they are simply inaccurate by definition. Practically anything they check gets flagged as AI-written. I can take most of the posts in this section, run them through a detector, and it will still show a 70–90% “AI match.”

Alex077

The results I got for this user were inconsistent due to them likely using a humanizer to methodically insert minor errors into their posts. It should be obvious to anybody who sees their profile that they are using AI to post in every sports thread to meet the high quota for their campaign. It’s unrealistic that anybody is organically interested in so many different leagues and sports.

Good catch. The account looks like it was purchased but it has been owned by a Russian since the beginning so its difficult to say for sure. Their post history is chock full of AI posts, however. Here's a few more.....

  For example, this post....:

 

  Or this one from the latest posts…

 

 I’d like to point out that two different AI detectors were used on the last two posts. If you carefully read how AI detection actually works, you’ll understand that any person who writes a lot can easily be flagged as generating AI content.

  

[memehunter]

Since English is not my native language, there may be some inaccuracies in spelling or phrasing, though most of my posts I naturally write in Russian.

Are you using paid version of Grammarly? In some grammar correction tools they are using AI to completely change the structure. It is one thing to correct is/am /are (we all would agree on that) but it is not accepted to make posts in a manner which is not representing your true ability. I am sure you know much more than I do regarding this.

[lovesmayfamilis]

 I’d like to point out that two different AI detectors were used on the last two posts. If you carefully read how AI detection actually works, you’ll understand that any person who writes a lot can easily be flagged as generating AI content.

  

You use detectors that are different from those that users use to check posts on this forum.

sidekicker.ai
justdone.com/ai-detector

I am convinced that your two sites are purely commercial; I can even assume a fraudulent company. They allegedly verify sites that are used here, in particular Originality.ai, GPTZero, and Copyleaks, and yes, every text, even written by a person, is identified as written by AI. I think each of us understands perfectly well why this is done. Then comes the offer to humanize the text, and even further, they do not show the result, but ask to pay for a new text that is supposedly undetectable by the detector. Not only do I doubt they can humanize human-written text, but I also doubt you can trust them to pay.


Users showed you examples of the AI ​​detector on sites that have already passed the check of not even a dozen posts, but more, so there is no need to prove here that all tools recognize texts as written by bots. But you should change the way you write so that you don't get your posts deleted anymore.

1. GPTZero
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector
3. Sapling AI Detector
4. Quillbot
5. Zerogpt
6. StealthWriter
7. Originality.ai
8. Undetectable.ai

you can compare your posts here

 .....Torino isn’t exactly a pushover, they’re the type of side that thrives on discipline and defensive structure, which can frustrate teams like Inter if they don’t find an early breakthrough. If Chivu experiments too much with tactics, that could backfire in matches like this.

Personally, I don’t doubt Inter has the quality to win — they still have depth and proven players. But the real question is consistency. If Chivu can balance tactical tweaks without overcomplicating things, Inter should handle Torino. If not, yeah, a surprise result isn’t impossible.

For me, Inter should still edge it, but I wouldn’t expect a dominant win. Something like 2–1 or even a late grind-it-out result feels realistic.

The text was most likely written by a generative AI model.
https://developers.sber.ru/portal/products/gigacheck

One of the new ones, but the most popular in the Russian segment.

[Alex077]

 I’d like to point out that two different AI detectors were used on the last two posts. If you carefully read how AI detection actually works, you’ll understand that any person who writes a lot can easily be flagged as generating AI content.

You use detectors that are different from those that users use to check posts on this forum.
sidekicker.ai
justdone.com/ai-detector
I am convinced that your two sites are purely commercial; I can even assume a fraudulent company...

 I understand what you mean....., and that’s why I check the same post with three different AI detectors from your list. As you can see, the results are completely opposite, which is why I’m simply emphasizing that no AI detector gives an accurate result. To really understand this, you just need to look at the principles on which the check is based. Our intuition is the only truly reliable detector of content writing....

  I’ll try to switch up my writing style a bit, not sure how good it’s gonna turn out tho…)) But honestly, thinking that I’m not writing my own thoughts or that everything I post here is AI-generated just doesn’t make sense. Anyway, thanks for pointing it out — at least now I can work on my mistakes.

  1.

  2.

  3.

[Swordsoffreedom]

I was surprised to observe Alex's prior & post-campaigning writing style.
He got accepted into CryptopreneurBrainboss -TonStation campaign on the 8th of this month.
Before that, his posts were completely his own writing & after reading those posts, I could understand that he is very frequent in gambling & sports.

----These are his prior-campaigning writing style----

Yes, ETH is not Xabi Alonso. But how could anyone deny that he is a proven winner! Don't forget about his 3 league titles & cups with Ajax, & now he is going to give his footstep on Leverkusen through mid‑2027. You know the Werkself is still be proud with league top scorer Patrik Schick, also Florian Wirtz is remaining under contract. This Patrik Schick netted 21 Bundesliga goal last season.
Also remember Die Werkself finished 2nd to Bayern last season with only a midteen point gap. So effective squad groundwork is underway, it is so much sensible talk to challenge Dortmund for the top two, it is not wishful thinking at all. So, betting against them would be such a naive decision.

Origin Gptzero- 99% Human

Honestly , casinos arent here to be your sugar daddy, they rule ""slot multiplier"" competitions and freeroll poker tournaments to boost turnover and sweep, garner attention and hold players spinning under a built in house edge so most players suffer a loss in general. The slot competitions arent just, they are cunning marketing playing dopamine circle and UX. Freeroll poker may seem free but it functions as a funnel, operators built in , pull sweep from converting players later on and profit from your future action. Rewards arent charity, they are ads with payback.

Recently, I've played daily 24‑hour BTC prize‑race contests on a reputable casino, they run such contests not only for slots but also for sportsbook, which seems quite good to me.

Origin Gptzero- 94% Human
.
.
.
.

Raphinha and Yamal are in their best form now. An experienced coach like Hansi Flick will never make a big mistake like leaving these two players out of the squad. I can say for sure that Yamal and Raphinha will be in Barcelona's starting XI.

Barcelona's contract with Lewandowski is going to end next season. Now Barcelona is looking for a worthy replacement for Lewandowski. And I think that is why Barcelona is going to bring Rashford to the squad on loan. Hansi Flick will experiment with Rashford this season. And if he can adapt himself well to Barcelona's squad, Barcelona will decide to buy Rashford. And FLick will probably try to use Rashford as a replacement for Lewandowski. I guess Hansi Flick is probably going with this plan

Origin Gptzero- 100% Human

I don't think so dude, there is no doubt Rashford is a player who is talented and hardworking. If he gets enough support from teammates, especially in the midfield area, he has the capability to net bunches of goals. if you look over his fitness it is also kinda good, in the 2022-23 season, we saw Rashford score 17 goals with 6 potential assists in Premier League. So if he could adapt with skill with Barcelona players, he will also play well for Barcelona.

afaik he has long wanted to play in Barcelona. so there is no doubt He will try his best to perform well with Barcelona. If Rashford somehow able prove his ability then there is a possibility they will buy him next season, if his performance somehow decrease then I think Barcelona will not buy him.

However, Rashford's chances of getting a place in the starting XI are low. If Rafinha or Lewandowski do not get injured then probably we will not see Rashford in the starting XI. with this short playtime on field oI don't know how much Rashford can prove his ability in such a situation.

Origin Gptzero- 99% Human
----These are his prior-campaigning writing style----


But as soon as he got accepted into the campaign, he started using AI to fill the 30 weekly posts requirement.
Because his campaign max 5 posts will be counted on the local board.
And reading these posts, it is clear that these are 100% automated shit posts.

----These are his post-campaigning writing style----

Tbh, I was 100% sure Rodrigo was packing his bags this summer — the gossip was non-stop, and the club wasn’t exactly defending him in the press. Looked like classic “thanks for your service, now find a new home” vibes.
But football’s all about plot twists, sometimes the “look for another club” line is just the board trying to shake you up. If he’s smashing it in pre-season and actually fits the new formation, the gaffer might just keep him in the XI.
Still, it’s a risky game, one bad run or a new shiny signing, and boom — he’s back warming the bench. But hey, stranger things have happened, could be one of those seasons where a guy dodges the transfer axe and suddenly becomes a key man.

Origin Gptzero- 100% AI

Bayern may not always lift the trophy, but they’re frequent semi-finalists or quarter-finalists — a far cry from teams that don’t even consistently qualify. For instance, in 2024-25 they reached the quarter-finals again.
Joshua Kimmich  flagged injuries during crucial UCL stages as a major stumbling block — not poor quality, just bad timing and squad depth issues.

Yes, Bayern steamroll the Bundesliga — but that doesn’t mean they can’t go deep in Europe. Their infrastructure, transfer capability, and experience keep them competitive at the highest level. Just gotta pray to the injury gods sometimes.

Origin Gptzero- 100% AI
.
.
.
.

  Honestly, you’ve got a fair point here. Giannis with Greece in FIBA never really looked as dominant as he does in the NBA — partly because international rules are different, partly because the supporting cast just isn’t deep enough. And yeah, this year the Greek bench looks paper-thin. One injury or foul trouble and suddenly the whole system collapses.
As for Slovenia, people kinda sleep on them because aside from Luka, the squad doesn’t look stacked. Prepelic is decent, but they don’t have the same firepower they had with the Dragic brothers or Tobey/Randolph in their prime. Still, having Doncic alone can turn a game upside down. If he catches fire, Slovenia can upset anyone, even without a deep bench.

For me, Serbia and Germany are still top favorites, but I wouldn’t completely write off Greece or Slovenia — both can be “wildcards” depending on how their stars perform.

Origin Gptzero- 100% AI

Yeah, I kinda get your point here. Draymond’s trash talk is part of who he is, but sometimes it goes too far and hurts the team more than it helps. That whole Durant situation really left a mark — hard to just brush it off, especially now that KD is in Houston. If the Rockets and Warriors meet in the playoffs, it could easily turn into one of the spiciest series of the season.

As for the $100M contract, I also scratched my head when it happened. His numbers don’t justify it in the box score, but I guess the Warriors’ management value his defense, locker room presence, and chemistry with Steph and Klay more than just stats. Still, it’s a gamble — if Green can’t keep his emotions in check, then Houston with Durant might just expose that weakness hard.

Origin Gptzero- 100% AI
----These are his post-campaigning writing style----

So it seems very intentional AI use to fill weekly quota, I think. not only for translation purposes...
Sorry to mention CryptopreneurBrainboss, i think he might get interest  about it.

[nutildah]

I’d like to point out that two different AI detectors were used on the last two posts. If you carefully read how AI detection actually works, you’ll understand that any person who writes a lot can easily be flagged as generating AI content.

If you carefully read how AI detection actually works, you'd understand that the sample sizes you fed the detectors aren't big enough to come to accurate conclusions. You only included snippets of the aforementioned posts in your analysis. It seems you are using AI to do translations for you, which falls into a gray area and I wouldn't tag an account over this. You can keep doing this if you want but your posts will keep getting deleted as AI spam.

Our intuition is the only truly reliable detector of content writing....

I started this thread 2 years ago & my intuition says you are using AI to write your posts for you. As a native English speaker, I recognize that there are some telltale signs of AI generated text; many of which have found their way into your posts.

[Ultegra134]

I understand what you mean....., and that’s why I check the same post with three different AI detectors from your list. As you can see, the results are completely opposite, which is why I’m simply emphasizing that no AI detector gives an accurate result. To really understand this, you just need to look at the principles on which the check is based. Our intuition is the only truly reliable detector of content writing....

  I’ll try to switch up my writing style a bit, not sure how good it’s gonna turn out tho…)) But honestly, thinking that I’m not writing my own thoughts or that everything I post here is AI-generated just doesn’t make sense. Anyway, thanks for pointing it out — at least now I can work on my mistakes.

Well, you claim that English isn't your first language, so you're mentioning that you're using grammar correctors for your English posts, how do you explain that your Russian posts also show up as AI generated? I'm not sure if you're using AI, but there are strong indications. Phrasly, a new tool I recently introduced into this thread, because it produces quite accurate results, and it detects signs of AI in your posts. Completely coincidentally, your newer posts, after 24th of August, do not.

This might be irrelevant but this punctuation mark (—) is often used by grammar correction tools, such as Grammarly or Quillbot. I personally use the usual (-) even though it's not grammatically correct, as most people do, I don't even know the shortcut on the keyboard to write the other one, which from my perspective, might indicate that you're using some kind of software for your posts, whether that's AI or the previous ones I mentioned.

[MRY]

[...] altcoinstalk.com(https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile) my account was teleported from Bitcointalk, which happened quite a long time ago. I usually post similar topics across different forums — that’s very easy to verify, and if needed I can provide links.

I do use AI mainly to search for information, but I always write my posts myself. Since English is not my native language, there may be some inaccuracies in spelling or phrasing, though most of my posts I naturally write in Russian.
[...]

Well, when you mention about altcoinstalks, you've actually been in a similar situation.

Until you finally decided to change your writing style on December 02, 2024, 12:06:29 PM,

But unfortunately, on Bitcointlak you've been caught again using your old habit of using AI tools to create English text and make your text detected by AI.
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=62494.msg1676445#msg1676445

[LoyceV]

My gut feeling tells me bounty spammer Newbie Morkel12 with 662 Activity and 0 Merit must be using a chatbot or just plagiarism (hoping to get Merit). I'd appreciate it if someone can find the smoking gun (the post got deleted right before I clicked quote):

Today I will show you how you can keep your Bitcoin safe using Electrum Wallet. I have created this tutorial in simple language for beginners. I hope it will be useful for everyone.

🔐 Step 1: Download and Install Electrum Wallet
Go to Electrum's official website: https://electrum.org
Download the correct version according to your OS (Windows, Linux, Mac).
After downloading, be sure to verify the GPG signature so that you are not using a fake version.
🧾 Step 2: Create Wallet and Note Seed Phrase
Select “Standard Wallet”.
You will be given a 12-word seed phrase when creating your wallet.
Never screenshot this seed phrase or save it to the cloud. Write it down by hand and save it offline.
✅ Anyone with this seed can access your entire fund — so keep it very private.
🔐 Step 3: Set a Strong Password
If you want to encrypt your wallet, you must enter a strong password.
Remember, if you forget this password, you cannot unlock your wallet.

🛡️ Step 4: Create a Cold Storage or Watch-Only Wallet
If you want, you can create a watch-only wallet by keeping the seed phrase separate and only for viewing your balance.
This will help you use your private key without leaking it.
⚠️ Additional security tips:
You can use two wallets – one for Daily use (small amounts), the other for Cold Storage (large funds)
Electrum never sends your private key over the internet, but still try to use a trusted server.

Beware of phishing sites.
📚 Conclusion:
Electrum Wallet is a lightweight and secure Bitcoin wallet, but security largely depends on your usage style. Hopefully, by following the steps above, you can create a secure wallet environment.

[Ultegra134]

My gut feeling tells me bounty spammer Newbie Morkel12 with 662 Activity and 0 Merit must be using a chatbot or just plagiarism (hoping to get Merit). I'd appreciate it if someone can find the smoking gun (the post got deleted right before I clicked quote):

Good catch. This account has been posting on so-called bounty threads for years, which is how he got such a high activity and why he was caught just now. It seems that his bounty campaigns haven't been going too well and thought he could simply use AI as a shortcut to merit and ranking up, in hopes that one day, he'll join an actual, signature campaign. I'm hoping his account gets nuked, despite the major activity, he's still a newbiw that doesn't contribute anything on the forum but spam.

[Free Market Capitalist]

My gut feeling tells me bounty spammer Newbie Morkel12 with 662 Activity and 0 Merit must be using a chatbot or just plagiarism (hoping to get Merit). I'd appreciate it if someone can find the smoking gun (the post got deleted right before I clicked quote):

Well I've run the text through three detectors and two of them give me a 0% AI generated result. Only Quillbot says it's 41% AI generated. I don't know if he found a way to bypass the detectors or if 41% is a false positive (halfway). But with this data, it's not nearly enough for an AI spammer tag. He could perhaps be tagged as a low-quality poster, but his profile says it all, with that activity and 0 merit, I don't think anything else needs to be said.

[Alex077]

[...] altcoinstalk.com(https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?action=profile) my account was teleported from Bitcointalk, which happened quite a long time ago. I usually post similar topics across different forums — that’s very easy to verify, and if needed I can provide links.

I do use AI mainly to search for information, but I always write my posts myself. Since English is not my native language, there may be some inaccuracies in spelling or phrasing, though most of my posts I naturally write in Russian.
[...]

Well, when you mention about altcoinstalks, you've actually been in a similar situation.

Until you finally decided to change your writing style on December 02, 2024, 12:06:29 PM,...

 You guys mixed everything up. On Altcoinstalk didn’t even bother to check text properly and accused me of plagiarism without noticing the links in the text, and that was about posts in Russian, not English. AI has nothing to do with this. After they actually saw the links, even the forum president himself apologized and I was reinstated in the signature campaign. This is clearly visible even on your own screenshot....
 

I understand what you mean....., and that’s why I check the same post with three different AI detectors from your list. As you can see, the results are completely opposite, which is why I’m simply emphasizing that no AI detector gives an accurate result. To really understand this, you just need to look at the principles on which the check is based. Our intuition is the only truly reliable detector of content writing....

Well, you claim that English isn't your first language, so you're mentioning that you're using grammar correctors for your English posts, how do you explain that your Russian posts also show up as AI generated?..

 What kind of "AI use in Russian sections" are you talking about....?
I’ve been writing articles for leading crypto media in the Russian segment since 2015 — my work has been published on Bits.media, BitNovosti, Forklog... On forums, I usually share links to news and my own articles.

Besides that, I’ve managed forum threads for major projects like Free TON (Everscale) and Paxful, as well as organized signature campaigns and contests for forum members.

[LoyceV]

Well I've run the text through three detectors and two of them give me a 0% AI generated result. Only Quillbot says it's 41% AI generated. I don't know if he found a way to bypass the detectors or if 41% is a false positive (halfway). But with this data, it's not nearly enough for an AI spammer tag.

Thanks!

I noticed 2 more Newbies: Hridyansh Labs and TokenTikas, both registered a week ago, both obviously hunting for Merit, and both rehashing what has been said already in this topic on the tech board within 10 minutes from each other. I don't know if it's some language model chatbot, but I have a very hard time believing they're genuine users:

So im syncing a full node of Bitcoin Knots (I don't know where to ask about this so im asking here and hopefully it's ok since it's just a fork) and unless im tripping, it closed itself with no error at all. Where can I find the log that would help trying to find out what happened there?

This kind of problem sometimes occurs when syncing a full node. If you ever see that both Bitcoin Knots or Bitcoin Core sometimes suddenly crash or close on their own, especially during syncing. If you want to find out exactly where the problem is, you need to look at the logs. Sometimes this happens because of problems with the logs. Usually, there are logs like this:

Code:

Linux/Mac: ~/.bitcoin/debug.log

Code:

Windows: C:\Users\<YourUsername>\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\debug.log

Since Knots is built on Core, it also keeps logs in the same place. By opening that file, you will understand at which stage it crashed or closed. And you can find the solution to the problem from there.

it closed itself with no error at all.

Did you start it from console? If not, try it: leave the console open to see if it outputs anything there when it closes.

When running from the console, sometimes when the program crashes or closes on its own, some error messages are displayed directly in the terminal. The terminal error board helps determine which location is causing the problem. So, once the console is open, launch Bitcoin Knots. If any (output/error) code appears, debugging will be much easier. Also, be sure to check the (debug.log file).

[Free Market Capitalist]

I noticed 2 more Newbies: Hridyansh Labs and TokenTikas, both registered a week ago, both obviously hunting for Merit, and both rehashing what has been said already in this topic on the tech board within 10 minutes from each other. I don't know if it's some language model chatbot, but I have a very hard time believing they're genuine users:

I assume you reported those posts, because I can't see them; I imagine they've been deleted. I've looked at his post history for both accounts, one with considerably more posts than the other, and at first glance, the posts don't appear to be AI-generated. Just to be sure, I checked one post from each account, this one and this one, and they appear to be 0% AI.

[libert19]

User: rasagamer

1)

India’s Parliament approved this bill on August 21, 2025, effectively banning real-money online games, including fantasy sports, to combat addiction and financial harm. The law targets unregulated platforms and advertisements, raising concerns for industry giants like Dream11 and MPL.

Passed in August, this law brings sweeping reforms to how India’s national sports bodies operate. It establishes ethical governance frameworks, athlete safety protocols, and dispute resolution mechanisms—including a National Sports Board and tribunal—to align with Olympic Charter standards.

Offshore betting sites (Parimatch, 1xBet, etc.) are racing to capture the displaced Indian audience. Some operators (Dream Sports, Gameskraft) opted not to legally challenge the legislation, pivoting to other ventures.

What do you think? Does banning real-money games protect consumers, or just send users underground? Let’s discuss.

Sapling AI: 100% Fake
Quillbot: 86% AI

2)

You’re absolutely right. Gambling addiction can destroy finances, relationships, and mental health. Counseling and awareness are crucial, but people also need strong support systems and self-exclusion tools to regain control. some of the NGO institutions are there 'beware of gamble' like that.

Sapling AI: 73.9% Fake
Quillbot: 100% AI

3)

With the Indian government tightening regulations around online gaming and betting, many local platforms face stricter rules. However, offshore betting sites and crypto casinos are becoming popular among Indian players. Do you think these platforms are filling a gap, or are they adding more legal and financial risks for users?

Sapling AI: 100.0% Fake
Quillbot: 100% AI

4)

Online betting can be safe, but only if you use licensed and trusted platforms. The key things to check are secure payment methods, fast withdrawals, customer support, and transparency in odds. While laws in India are still evolving, millions of people already use international betting exchanges safely. Always gamble responsibly and stick to platforms that prioritize user protection.

Sapling AI: 100% Fake
Quillbot: 100% AI


PS: I take no credit for this. User was flagged for using AI on altcoinstalks, I am just reporting here since he has crossposted topics on both forums.

[Lucius]

User : Miramax12

I think ordinals are a bit of a double edged sword when it comes to the Bitcoin ecosystem. On one hand, they bring a wave of innovation and open up new ways to use the Bitcoin blockchain beyond just financial transactions. People are experimenting with art, NFTs, and even data storage directly on chain, which some might say adds value or relevance to Bitcoin in a more creative context.
But on the other hand, this comes at a cost. Ordinals increase block space usage and drive up transaction fees, which could push out regular users who just want to send or receive BTC. It also raises concerns about Bitcoin’s original purpose  some feel it’s straying too far from being a peer-to-peer cash system.
So, are they good or bad? I’d say it depends on how much you value innovation versus purity. Some see it as Bitcoin evolving, others see it as a distraction. The debate’s far from over and that’s probably a good thing. It means the community still cares deeply about where things are heading

Copyleaks : AI Content Found Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100%
GPTZero : We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%
Sapling : Fake: 99.9%
Undetectable : LIKELY 62% AI
Stealthwriter : About 80% of the content is likely human-written, while 20% appears AI-generated.
Originality : We are 99% confident that text is original
ZeroGPT : 100% is written by a human

What to conclude in a case like this where half of the tool detects AI, the other half says that the content was created by humans - is it possible that the content was generated with AI and then humanized or is it something else?

[nutildah]

Copyleaks : AI Content Found Percentage of text that may be AI-generated 100%
GPTZero : We are highly confident this text was AI generated 100%
Sapling : Fake: 99.9%
Undetectable : LIKELY 62% AI
Stealthwriter : About 80% of the content is likely human-written, while 20% appears AI-generated.
Originality : We are 99% confident that text is original
ZeroGPT : 100% is written by a human

What to conclude in a case like this where half of the tool detects AI, the other half says that the content was created by humans - is it possible that the content was generated with AI and then humanized or is it something else?

Well, you have 3 detectors saying its AI, and 1 that says its probably or mostly AI, that is good enough. Organic text might trigger 1 detector but it won't trigger 4 of them. I think most of the detectors err on the side of caution, with the one that famously doesn't being Sapling. IMO Copyleaks is the gold standard. So if Copyleaks says AI, then chances are Sapling will and a few others as well.

To more firmly establish the likelihood of AI being used, we should look at some of the account's other posts.

Education should be the foundation for everyone’s growth, but the system and environment around us make it so hard to fully benefit from it. It’s frustrating when graduates struggle to find decent jobs despite their hard work, and sometimes it feels like connections matter more than skills. I totally agree that learning goes beyond just getting a job—it shapes how we see the world and helps us grow as individuals. Hopefully, things will change for the better soon, because the potential of our youth is too big to be wasted. Thanks for sharing this real talk.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

Too many people jump into Bitcoin thinking it’s a quick ticket to riches, but miss the bigger picture understanding the asset, its fundamentals, and the long-term game. It’s not about daily price watching or chasing dips  it’s about patience, education, and consistent accumulation. Especially for newcomers, starting small and building over time beats waiting endlessly for the perfect dip that might never come. The key is commitment, not speculation

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

The consistent devaluation of the naira has made it increasingly difficult for average Nigerians to preserve their wealth, save meaningfully, or even plan long-term financially. In this economic climate, Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in general present a potential alternative route toward financial freedom, especially for the tech-savvy and youth population.
First, Bitcoin can act as a store of value. Unlike the naira, which loses purchasing power over time due to inflation and poor monetary policies, Bitcoin has a capped supply of 21 million coins. This scarcity makes it resistant to inflation and attractive to individuals looking to protect the value of their earnings.
Second, Bitcoin opens doors to the global economy. With just a smartphone and internet connection, Nigerians can participate in global trade, freelance for international clients, and get paid in Bitcoin, bypassing traditional banking limitations and unstable exchange rates. This is particularly beneficial in a country where access to foreign currencies is tightly regulated and often unreliable.
Moreover, Bitcoin offers an alternative to the broken remittance system. Nigerians in the diaspora can send funds home faster and at lower fees using Bitcoin or stablecoins, sidestepping the often expensive and bureaucratic traditional channels like Western Union or bank wire transfers.
However, this is not without challenges. Volatility remains a major concern Bitcoin's price can swing wildly in short periods, making it risky as a day-to-day currency. There’s also the issue of government regulations. The Central Bank of Nigeria has taken a cautious, sometimes hostile stance toward crypto, which creates uncertainty for investors and users.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

[Ultegra134]

 You guys mixed everything up. On Altcoinstalk didn’t even bother to check text properly and accused me of plagiarism without noticing the links in the text, and that was about posts in Russian, not English. AI has nothing to do with this. After they actually saw the links, even the forum president himself apologized and I was reinstated in the signature campaign. This is clearly visible even on your own screenshot....

What kind of "AI use in Russian sections" are you talking about....?
I’ve been writing articles for leading crypto media in the Russian segment since 2015 — my work has been published on Bits.media, BitNovosti, Forklog... On forums, I usually share links to news and my own articles.

Besides that, I’ve managed forum threads for major projects like Free TON (Everscale) and Paxful, as well as organized signature campaigns and contests for forum members.

I used the detector mentioned previously, but nutildah if I'm not mistaken. Is it accurate? That's something I'm not familiar with, and I'm taking this findings with a grain of salt. However, there's definitely a discrepancy between your newer and your older posts. Is it 100% AI? That's something no one can say with 100% confidence, but are you using some kind of software/platform you name it, certainly yes. I'm not straight-up accusing you, but it's no secret that your posts do look suspicious, and with your recent ones not being detected by AI, it looks like a red-flag.