The most liquid companies in the gambling industry

[LUCKMCFLY]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

I think that most likely it is not very easy to determine which casino ranks second, third, and generally several of these most prestigious places. 
First of all, because how will you evaluate the work as a whole, financial turnover, the quality of fulfillment of obligations to clients, players and contractors, financial reserves, pending legal disputes, and so on and so forth.  The fact is that there are many such parameters and therefore I don’t really understand what criteria should be used to determine the sequence of such places in the ratings.  In my opinion, given the conditionally first place you have determined for this casino, there are at least 6 - 8 largest casinos, which are all in the group conditionally occupying second place. 
And I think this will be true in relation to each of the casinos that are conditionally included in this group of the most famous casinos in general in the gambling market

Well, you always get a lot of things when you talk about the top 5, the best places are always the casinos that are most popular and have the highest reputation, personally I have always seen that stake.com has sim, pre first place, they are very rarely placed in 2nd place, much less in third place, for me the criteria that are most taken into consideration are those of the best casino, those that treat customers the best, when they have the highest index of volume of people in the casino, also when it becomes evident that the reputation of the casino is quite high, also if everyone has noticed, when there is a millionaire player and he wins big, they publish it with great pride in the thread Ann, not like Other casinos that when a millionaire wins try to silence him and offer a payment method, or they look for some "buts" to not pay, either with KYC, or they look for some type of suspicious activity, I have seen these things on many occasions, and The truth is that they are casinos that are difficult to trust, they reveal many things.

For these things, casinos like stake.com are an example of a good casino, totally reliable, authentic and can generate very good profits, so when we compare the casinos by pure inspection, we realize that things They are like that, so as time Goes by we could say that what is done is good, the top5 casinos are the ones that one should trust , but it would be excellent if the reviewers agreed that they were all in the top, because I have seen many that They make Shilling that they only advertise so that they can generate Publicity in the forum , something that many of us quickly become aware of, of course those accounts are mostly newbies and it is understood that they enter for that, which is not bad, but a legitimate caisno should have its Own Thread Ann and that they can have a lot of visibility here in the Forum , with the opinion of the DT members on the judgment they Have.

[o48o]

Amounts like that also underlines the reason why we have KYCs these days at exchanges and casinos. Without regulations and volume like that, it would be rather easy make money laundering more opacue. As one could launder insane amounts of money just in a day and it most likely wouldn't even show up as more volume.

I know some people try to fight this right to the end, but Most likely there will be even more money involved in the future, and fear for getting your identification papers stolen will be gone, after we move to a zero knowledge id solution.

[Yatsan]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

Liquid companies as far as I know are ones which has the money and power to pay any debt. Thus, liquid gambling sites are more likely ones which are popular and I agree with Stake’s advertisement as I saw its logo with Salt Papi which gave me an impression that it has now the power to go mainstream and to cross different industry aside from this one we are interacting of. With this, gambling sites which could be considered as most liquid are more likely ones which are reputable or ones which have established their name already, giving them the power to go outside this industry for promotional matters.I also agrees that luquidity of a company adds credibility on its name. It could give an idea to new ones that “this platform won’t destroy its name for a few dime”.

[Lanatsa]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

Liquid companies as far as I know are ones which has the money and power to pay any debt. Thus, liquid gambling sites are more likely ones which are popular and I agree with Stake’s advertisement as I saw its logo with Salt Papi which gave me an impression that it has now the power to go mainstream and to cross different industry aside from this one we are interacting of. With this, gambling sites which could be considered as most liquid are more likely ones which are reputable or ones which have established their name already, giving them the power to go outside this industry for promotional matters.I also agrees that luquidity of a company adds credibility on its name. It could give an idea to new ones that “this platform won’t destroy its name for a few dime”.

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

[Ziskinberg]

Amounts like that also underlines the reason why we have KYCs these days at exchanges and casinos. Without regulations and volume like that, it would be rather easy make money laundering more opacue. As one could launder insane amounts of money just in a day and it most likely wouldn't even show up as more volume.

I know some people try to fight this right to the end, but Most likely there will be even more money involved in the future, and fear for getting your identification papers stolen will be gone, after we move to a zero knowledge id solution.

You know, it's kind of inevitable, buddy. As the crypto gambling industry keeps growing, more money is going to flow in. We're already talking about a billion-dollar industry, and that's like a gold mine for money launderers if they want to clean up their ill-gotten gains.

The most liquid ones are the reputable ones, and that's important because it guarantees they won't have trouble paying out winners and can handle big bets, which boosts their popularity among high rollers.

In the crypto world, we've got our own list, and I've got a few gambling sites in mind that I think are the giants of the industry.

Now, I might be a tad biased since I've promoted them in the past, but I'm being honest here.

Stake
Duelbets
FortuneJack

[slapper]

~snip~

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

Number-wise, traditional gaming enterprises are huge. They've created trust and performance over time. However, isn't crypto altering the game fascinating? You're right about stake. Isn't their marketing budget huge? Unless they earned more, why would they spend so much? It shows their success

It's smart for Stake to use celebrities and renowned individuals for promotions, right? Not only money, but strategy. They invest in their brand in addition to spending. Returns? Their popularity and revenue are rising. Really, only traditional corporations are big players anymore? Is it time to recognize that platforms like Stake succeed rather than compete?

[delfastTions]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

I think that most likely it is not very easy to determine which casino ranks second, third, and generally several of these most prestigious places. 
First of all, because how will you evaluate the work as a whole, financial turnover, the quality of fulfillment of obligations to clients, players and contractors, financial reserves, pending legal disputes, and so on and so forth.  The fact is that there are many such parameters and therefore I don’t really understand what criteria should be used to determine the sequence of such places in the ratings.  In my opinion, given the conditionally first place you have determined for this casino, there are at least 6 - 8 largest casinos, which are all in the group conditionally occupying second place. 
And I think this will be true in relation to each of the casinos that are conditionally included in this group of the most famous casinos in general in the gambling market

Well, you always get a lot of things when you talk about the top 5, the best places are always the casinos that are most popular and have the highest reputation, personally I have always seen that stake.com has sim, pre first place, they are very rarely placed in 2nd place, much less in third place, for me the criteria that are most taken into consideration are those of the best casino, those that treat customers the best, when they have the highest index of volume of people in the casino, also when it becomes evident that the reputation of the casino is quite high, also if everyone has noticed, when there is a millionaire player and he wins big, they publish it with great pride in the thread Ann, not like Other casinos that when a millionaire wins try to silence him and offer a payment method, or they look for some "buts" to not pay, either with KYC, or they look for some type of suspicious activity, I have seen these things on many occasions, and The truth is that they are casinos that are difficult to trust, they reveal many things.

For these things, casinos like stake.com are an example of a good casino, totally reliable, authentic and can generate very good profits, so when we compare the casinos by pure inspection, we realize that things They are like that, so as time Goes by we could say that what is done is good, the top5 casinos are the ones that one should trust , but it would be excellent if the reviewers agreed that they were all in the top, because I have seen many that They make Shilling that they only advertise so that they can generate Publicity in the forum , something that many of us quickly become aware of, of course those accounts are mostly newbies and it is understood that they enter for that, which is not bad, but a legitimate caisno should have its Own Thread Ann and that they can have a lot of visibility here in the Forum , with the opinion of the DT members on the judgment they Have.

Perhaps you correctly note that if a millionaire player openly reports that he won a large sum of money and the casino provided him with this large win without any problems, this of course tells us that the casino is reliable and worthy of the highest places in the ranking. 
however, such public announcements of the largest winnings in some cases may be made for advertising purposes, although all people know that big money is almost always transferred quite secretly for the fairly obvious reason of ensuring the safety of its owners.  So such a criterion as open publications about the largest winnings most likely still cannot be considered a weighty argument in compiling ratings of the   best and most reliable casinos. 

But this is what I think, maybe it’s not entirely objective, I admit.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

Number-wise, traditional gaming enterprises are huge. They've created trust and performance over time. However, isn't crypto altering the game fascinating? You're right about stake. Isn't their marketing budget huge? Unless they earned more, why would they spend so much? It shows their success

It's smart for Stake to use celebrities and renowned individuals for promotions, right? Not only money, but strategy. They invest in their brand in addition to spending. Returns? Their popularity and revenue are rising. Really, only traditional corporations are big players anymore? Is it time to recognize that platforms like Stake succeed rather than compete?

Well, nothing less can be said, Stake.com will always be an Example for many casinos worldwide, because things when it comes to stake.com can be considered the best in the world, because basically things are quite good, there are always the best contests , they have the best Influencers , I think that at stake.com everyone does their part very well, so in this Order of Ideas Things are very Competitive , all the caisnos try to reach the level of stake.com, Well, I Understand them because they have the best reputation, they have the highest Security , even though at one point there was a robbery, the Funds of the most prominent players and Celebrities were never Compromised , these Types of things are what every Player you should see , what I like the most is that the Small Followers are as Important as the big ones, they all get good Treatment, the VIP Levels are working to their maximum, they have many to be sponsors in boxing, UFC, In fútbol, the casino is Among the world's elite of the best.

Now hasn't made much progress, but I think they want to do something very good with poker, a good platform, something different , that's what they want, as they are they can do Something very spectacular, that's what we're used to at stake, .com, then based on all these wonders it is normal that other casinos wanted to imitate them, because things are quite strong Because stake.com is like a titan of the casinos, it is difficult to compare to them, so in this order of Ideas we as Players are always going to choose the best casinos that have more security and Confidence , I personally can say that when you need to have the best of the casinos Without a Doubt I would go for and Choose stake.com , in this order of ideas I would say That the casinos follow because they can Make casino reviewers Available , Who in the beginning will tell the truth, those who are quite Reliable.

[delfastTions]

~snip~

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

Number-wise, traditional gaming enterprises are huge. They've created trust and performance over time. However, isn't crypto altering the game fascinating? You're right about stake. Isn't their marketing budget huge? Unless they earned more, why would they spend so much? It shows their success

It's smart for Stake to use celebrities and renowned individuals for promotions, right? Not only money, but strategy. They invest in their brand in addition to spending. Returns? Their popularity and revenue are rising. Really, only traditional corporations are big players anymore? Is it time to recognize that platforms like Stake succeed rather than compete?

Well, nothing less can be said, Stake.com will always be an Example for many casinos worldwide, because things when it comes to stake.com can be considered the best in the world, because basically things are quite good, there are always the best contests , they have the best Influencers , I think that at stake.com everyone does their part very well, so in this Order of Ideas Things are very Competitive , all the caisnos try to reach the level of stake.com, Well, I Understand them because they have the best reputation, they have the highest Security , even though at one point there was a robbery, the Funds of the most prominent players and Celebrities were never Compromised , these Types of things are what every Player you should see , what I like the most is that the Small Followers are as Important as the big ones, they all get good Treatment, the VIP Levels are working to their maximum, they have many to be sponsors in boxing, UFC, In fútbol, the casino is Among the world's elite of the best.

Now hasn't made much progress, but I think they want to do something very good with poker, a good platform, something different , that's what they want, as they are they can do Something very spectacular, that's what we're used to at stake, .com, then based on all these wonders it is normal that other casinos wanted to imitate them, because things are quite strong Because stake.com is like a titan of the casinos, it is difficult to compare to them, so in this order of Ideas we as Players are always going to choose the best casinos that have more security and Confidence , I personally can say that when you need to have the best of the casinos Without a Doubt I would go for and Choose stake.com , in this order of ideas I would say That the casinos follow because they can Make casino reviewers Available , Who in the beginning will tell the truth, those who are quite Reliable.

It's hard to disagree with you.  Indeed, this casino seems to be such a giant in the gambling industry and many people praise the ease of use of this casino, the huge selection of different games and entertainment.  And of course, their budget and turnover are also huge, and these latest hacking troubles went unnoticed by the players, which clearly speaks of a well-organized business and the sustainability of this casino. 

But many players still sometimes get bored with the same casino.  And there are many others, maybe not very large, but also with their own charm and interesting offers. 
For example, the Duelbits.com casino, which has also been present on the gambling market for a long time and is generally successfully used by many players.  And there are also no negative reviews about this casino.  In any case, I have not seen such reviews about any offended players.

[Crypt0Gore]

Damn, this is a lot of work, writing all these up isn't easy and unfortunately it's not going to be useful for anyone on here because all these casinos are offline based, I can't leave my country down to another to gamble, they are all good casinos but those who are living close to the casinos or at least in the same country will be easier to pay a visit.

The term king of liquidity sounds like the success behind these casinos, well I think you are right, because every casinos have their weakness and problems, in my country even location based casinos don't pay winners, if the money is very big they always find it hard to pay, the thing is majority of casinos have problems too we just don't see it cos we really can't.

The best successful casinos are online casinos, this is what I believe, because it's been proven in those covid lock down days, many people start trying out online gambling platforms, loads of money are moving into online casinos and location based casinos where shut down, the casino that I really respect the most is stake.com, I believe that this is one of the most successful of them all.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

I think that most likely it is not very easy to determine which casino ranks second, third, and generally several of these most prestigious places. 
First of all, because how will you evaluate the work as a whole, financial turnover, the quality of fulfillment of obligations to clients, players and contractors, financial reserves, pending legal disputes, and so on and so forth.  The fact is that there are many such parameters and therefore I don’t really understand what criteria should be used to determine the sequence of such places in the ratings.  In my opinion, given the conditionally first place you have determined for this casino, there are at least 6 - 8 largest casinos, which are all in the group conditionally occupying second place. 
And I think this will be true in relation to each of the casinos that are conditionally included in this group of the most famous casinos in general in the gambling market

Well, you always get a lot of things when you talk about the top 5, the best places are always the casinos that are most popular and have the highest reputation, personally I have always seen that stake.com has sim, pre first place, they are very rarely placed in 2nd place, much less in third place, for me the criteria that are most taken into consideration are those of the best casino, those that treat customers the best, when they have the highest index of volume of people in the casino, also when it becomes evident that the reputation of the casino is quite high, also if everyone has noticed, when there is a millionaire player and he wins big, they publish it with great pride in the thread Ann, not like Other casinos that when a millionaire wins try to silence him and offer a payment method, or they look for some "buts" to not pay, either with KYC, or they look for some type of suspicious activity, I have seen these things on many occasions, and The truth is that they are casinos that are difficult to trust, they reveal many things.

For these things, casinos like stake.com are an example of a good casino, totally reliable, authentic and can generate very good profits, so when we compare the casinos by pure inspection, we realize that things They are like that, so as time Goes by we could say that what is done is good, the top5 casinos are the ones that one should trust , but it would be excellent if the reviewers agreed that they were all in the top, because I have seen many that They make Shilling that they only advertise so that they can generate Publicity in the forum , something that many of us quickly become aware of, of course those accounts are mostly newbies and it is understood that they enter for that, which is not bad, but a legitimate caisno should have its Own Thread Ann and that they can have a lot of visibility here in the Forum , with the opinion of the DT members on the judgment they Have.

Perhaps you correctly note that if a millionaire player openly reports that he won a large sum of money and the casino provided him with this large win without any problems, this of course tells us that the casino is reliable and worthy of the highest places in the ranking. 
however, such public announcements of the largest winnings in some cases may be made for advertising purposes, although all people know that big money is almost always transferred quite secretly for the fairly obvious reason of ensuring the safety of its owners.  So such a criterion as open publications about the largest winnings most likely still cannot be considered a weighty argument in compiling ratings of the   best and most reliable casinos. 

But this is what I think, maybe it’s not entirely objective, I admit.

Yes, of course, now the marketing, and everything that has great chances of winning, that if you see and be very curious so that many clients are attracted, I admit the truth is how they are capable of doing that type of marketing, because it is true in many Cases. They cause a lot of inspiration, others say that it could be a lie, but at this point a casino like stake.com to make or tell lies I don't think so, however it is good when there are big winners because it is the only way they can see more of them and That they do pay, not like other casinos that always look for many options such as being able to pay the winnings of some players, which seems bad to me, because a player chooses a casino so that he can do things well, and play, lose, but when it comes to winning they have to pay, that is what it should be, because I have not seen that in a casino when a player loses, the casino returns the money, because it considers that the casino had a bug and that is why the casino You should return it, because I am sure that even if a bug has been presented and the money is lost , it will be difficult for the casino to return money, that is something that is difficult to present or do...

For me, a casino that is honest and can present its marketing in a more detailed way, such as through social networks, through a signature campaign, is the safest, because first it is investing in something that at any time will not give money, and secondly eprsona pays because a job is given to it, the traffic that is obtained in a forum like this is unique, it is comprehensive and it is completely legal, it is not traffic through bos or anything like that, it is something that can Normally give good results and obviously the moment you start the results are seen, and that means that marketing in a long-term casino is guaranteed profits in the short, medium and long term, it is something normal and will always happen, which Which seems to me to be Completely legal and should be made as transparent as possible.

[EarnOnVictor]

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Stake.com Crypto Casino Reportedly Hacked for $41.3 Million - https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/stake-com-crypto-casino-reportedly-hacked-for-41-3-million/

Well, a serious amount of money, and it seems like Stake didn't even notice it. I think it speaks to how serious a casino Stake is, and we can only assume how liquid they are when they covered this without any problems. I guess we can say that Stake is the most liquid crypto casino around... but who is in second place, and how far they are from Stake can be interesting to find out.

It's hard to determine which is the most liquid, as we don't have data on the crypto casinos' liquid assets. However, Stake is undoubtedly a major gambling site. The fact that they have been sponsoring big events, such as boxing and even UFC matches, suggests that they have a lot of money to invest. This, in turn, attracts more gamblers.

As a gambling site becomes more popular and reputable, it also instills confidence in high rollers who choose to use the site for their gambling activities.

Liquid companies as far as I know are ones which has the money and power to pay any debt. Thus, liquid gambling sites are more likely ones which are popular and I agree with Stake’s advertisement as I saw its logo with Salt Papi which gave me an impression that it has now the power to go mainstream and to cross different industry aside from this one we are interacting of. With this, gambling sites which could be considered as most liquid are more likely ones which are reputable or ones which have established their name already, giving them the power to go outside this industry for promotional matters.I also agrees that luquidity of a company adds credibility on its name. It could give an idea to new ones that “this platform won’t destroy its name for a few dime”.

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

[wallet4bitcoin]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

[delfastTions]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Financial information in business is often quite unreliable. 
There are many reasons why various organizations associated with financial flows hide the true state of affairs in their finances.  Almost all casinos can be classified not only as part of the gambling industry, but also as financial organizations.  Therefore, information about liquidity itself can also be included.  And it may not be reliable.  And it is absolutely impossible to verify this without an independent audit.  And it is not a fact that the casino, even when conducting some kind of audit, will not hide from the auditors some of its serious and secret financial obligations.  Fo this reason, I believe that liquidities that are publicly reported by casinos may not be a 100% guarantee of fair business practices. 
And a guarantee of paying out a big win to some lucky player. 
Rather, liquidity is something that simply informs you of how the casino chooses to present its financial position to the public. 
And you can only guess for yourself whether this is true or not.

[BenCodie]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Financial information in business is often quite unreliable. 
There are many reasons why various organizations associated with financial flows hide the true state of affairs in their finances.  Almost all casinos can be classified not only as part of the gambling industry, but also as financial organizations.  Therefore, information about liquidity itself can also be included.  And it may not be reliable.  And it is absolutely impossible to verify this without an independent audit.  And it is not a fact that the casino, even when conducting some kind of audit, will not hide from the auditors some of its serious and secret financial obligations.  Fo this reason, I believe that liquidities that are publicly reported by casinos may not be a 100% guarantee of fair business practices. 
And a guarantee of paying out a big win to some lucky player. 
Rather, liquidity is something that simply informs you of how the casino chooses to present its financial position to the public. 
And you can only guess for yourself whether this is true or not.

The premise of what you're saying is correct. Off-topic: Use some BBCode to better structure your post, and that would have been a good one! On-topic: Being clandestine is an attribute of casino operations. As delfastTions said, any public information about the liquidity of a casino should be taken with a grain of salt, as the real balance sheet is probably not the one that is publicly displayed.

It'd be good to know how liquid a casino is if you can verify the numbers on-chain, at least for online/crypto casinos could probably do they if they wanted too.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~snip~

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

Number-wise, traditional gaming enterprises are huge. They've created trust and performance over time. However, isn't crypto altering the game fascinating? You're right about stake. Isn't their marketing budget huge? Unless they earned more, why would they spend so much? It shows their success

It's smart for Stake to use celebrities and renowned individuals for promotions, right? Not only money, but strategy. They invest in their brand in addition to spending. Returns? Their popularity and revenue are rising. Really, only traditional corporations are big players anymore? Is it time to recognize that platforms like Stake succeed rather than compete?

Well, nothing less can be said, Stake.com will always be an Example for many casinos worldwide, because things when it comes to stake.com can be considered the best in the world, because basically things are quite good, there are always the best contests , they have the best Influencers , I think that at stake.com everyone does their part very well, so in this Order of Ideas Things are very Competitive , all the caisnos try to reach the level of stake.com, Well, I Understand them because they have the best reputation, they have the highest Security , even though at one point there was a robbery, the Funds of the most prominent players and Celebrities were never Compromised , these Types of things are what every Player you should see , what I like the most is that the Small Followers are as Important as the big ones, they all get good Treatment, the VIP Levels are working to their maximum, they have many to be sponsors in boxing, UFC, In fútbol, the casino is Among the world's elite of the best.

Now hasn't made much progress, but I think they want to do something very good with poker, a good platform, something different , that's what they want, as they are they can do Something very spectacular, that's what we're used to at stake, .com, then based on all these wonders it is normal that other casinos wanted to imitate them, because things are quite strong Because stake.com is like a titan of the casinos, it is difficult to compare to them, so in this order of Ideas we as Players are always going to choose the best casinos that have more security and Confidence , I personally can say that when you need to have the best of the casinos Without a Doubt I would go for and Choose stake.com , in this order of ideas I would say That the casinos follow because they can Make casino reviewers Available , Who in the beginning will tell the truth, those who are quite Reliable.

It's hard to disagree with you.  Indeed, this casino seems to be such a giant in the gambling industry and many people praise the ease of use of this casino, the huge selection of different games and entertainment.  And of course, their budget and turnover are also huge, and these latest hacking troubles went unnoticed by the players, which clearly speaks of a well-organized business and the sustainability of this casino. 

But many players still sometimes get bored with the same casino.  And there are many others, maybe not very large, but also with their own charm and interesting offers. 
For example, the Duelbits.com casino, which has also been present on the gambling market for a long time and is generally successfully used by many players.  And there are also no negative reviews about this casino.  In any case, I have not seen such reviews about any offended players.

You are very right, for me Duelbits is a casino that has grown too fast in a short time, and its growth is integral, that is, when these casinos rise in level they do not go down because their growth is not based on effort, doing things well and doing things better. This is so that they can generate more profits, better treatment with their players and obviously things turn out to be excellent when it comes to having and having a good experience, that's why in these cases, the caisnos like the ones I have normed, are very good, I had seen a problem there with Duelbits regarding the fact that they were called that they had taken a coin from a player something like that, but things in casinos are usually like that, first they invent things to make the casino look bad, but there are too many trolls, things With the trolls it is impressive, I personally don't want to sign this type of accusations when there is no evidence, when there are screenshots or something like that one says that things could be real, but it is not like that, there are many times trolls who denounce that the casinos give them money for nothing.

And this is a very common practice, it seems to me that when it comes to how to have the best experience in a casino, they base it because they feel more comfortable, and because they can't do everything but just play, some players have a game in particular and they can take it as something that can make a difference, then based on this, as a player I could say that it is preferable to go for the old caisno, but why? because they are trustworthy, and because they have a high reputation, that is very impressive to me, among the caisno that I consider to be reliable and that are not that old, obviously Duelbits appears on my radar, in fact I always like to speak well of that caisno oprqeu I have never had any problems with them, I like to praise their support and their way of doing things to please their clients by giving them the best of all treatment.

[delfastTions]

~snip~

Very common that those traditional gambling companies are really being known when it comes to numbers which considering that everything is something that could really be traced up on which means that they would really be placed up basing up on the ranking but eventually if we do compared it out to those casinos that we do have long time running in crypto space. We cant really be able to say that they arent having that match when it comes to overall revenue and just like as you mentioned which is on Stake on having that kind of big budget when it comes to marketing and this is something that cant be denied basing on what we are seeing. A certain platform that could really go into a certain extent when it comes to marketing which does basically shows that they are earning that much on which they could really be able to spend up that
big when it comes to having ambassadors or having those kind of exposure using up some celebs or known people.

Number-wise, traditional gaming enterprises are huge. They've created trust and performance over time. However, isn't crypto altering the game fascinating? You're right about stake. Isn't their marketing budget huge? Unless they earned more, why would they spend so much? It shows their success

It's smart for Stake to use celebrities and renowned individuals for promotions, right? Not only money, but strategy. They invest in their brand in addition to spending. Returns? Their popularity and revenue are rising. Really, only traditional corporations are big players anymore? Is it time to recognize that platforms like Stake succeed rather than compete?

Well, nothing less can be said, Stake.com will always be an Example for many casinos worldwide, because things when it comes to stake.com can be considered the best in the world, because basically things are quite good, there are always the best contests , they have the best Influencers , I think that at stake.com everyone does their part very well, so in this Order of Ideas Things are very Competitive , all the caisnos try to reach the level of stake.com, Well, I Understand them because they have the best reputation, they have the highest Security , even though at one point there was a robbery, the Funds of the most prominent players and Celebrities were never Compromised , these Types of things are what every Player you should see , what I like the most is that the Small Followers are as Important as the big ones, they all get good Treatment, the VIP Levels are working to their maximum, they have many to be sponsors in boxing, UFC, In fútbol, the casino is Among the world's elite of the best.

Now hasn't made much progress, but I think they want to do something very good with poker, a good platform, something different , that's what they want, as they are they can do Something very spectacular, that's what we're used to at stake, .com, then based on all these wonders it is normal that other casinos wanted to imitate them, because things are quite strong Because stake.com is like a titan of the casinos, it is difficult to compare to them, so in this order of Ideas we as Players are always going to choose the best casinos that have more security and Confidence , I personally can say that when you need to have the best of the casinos Without a Doubt I would go for and Choose stake.com , in this order of ideas I would say That the casinos follow because they can Make casino reviewers Available , Who in the beginning will tell the truth, those who are quite Reliable.

It's hard to disagree with you.  Indeed, this casino seems to be such a giant in the gambling industry and many people praise the ease of use of this casino, the huge selection of different games and entertainment.  And of course, their budget and turnover are also huge, and these latest hacking troubles went unnoticed by the players, which clearly speaks of a well-organized business and the sustainability of this casino. 

But many players still sometimes get bored with the same casino.  And there are many others, maybe not very large, but also with their own charm and interesting offers. 
For example, the Duelbits.com casino, which has also been present on the gambling market for a long time and is generally successfully used by many players.  And there are also no negative reviews about this casino.  In any case, I have not seen such reviews about any offended players.

You are very right, for me Duelbits is a casino that has grown too fast in a short time, and its growth is integral, that is, when these casinos rise in level they do not go down because their growth is not based on effort, doing things well and doing things better. This is so that they can generate more profits, better treatment with their players and obviously things turn out to be excellent when it comes to having and having a good experience, that's why in these cases, the caisnos like the ones I have normed, are very good, I had seen a problem there with Duelbits regarding the fact that they were called that they had taken a coin from a player something like that, but things in casinos are usually like that, first they invent things to make the casino look bad, but there are too many trolls, things With the trolls it is impressive, I personally don't want to sign this type of accusations when there is no evidence, when there are screenshots or something like that one says that things could be real, but it is not like that, there are many times trolls who denounce that the casinos give them money for nothing.

And this is a very common practice, it seems to me that when it comes to how to have the best experience in a casino, they base it because they feel more comfortable, and because they can't do everything but just play, some players have a game in particular and they can take it as something that can make a difference, then based on this, as a player I could say that it is preferable to go for the old caisno, but why? because they are trustworthy, and because they have a high reputation, that is very impressive to me, among the caisno that I consider to be reliable and that are not that old, obviously Duelbits appears on my radar, in fact I always like to speak well of that caisno oprqeu I have never had any problems with them, I like to praise their support and their way of doing things to please their clients by giving them the best of all treatment.

It seems to me that in general the online crypto casino market itself is now quite highly structured.
 There is a small group of casinos that have been successfully operating in this market for a long time, and complaints from players in such casinos are rare and often these complaints are not fair because the player himself does not fully understand the rules of operation of this casino. 
Another group of medium-sized casinos are those who are perhaps the most active in promoting their games and actively fight for their players.  It is in these casinos that you can probably get the maximum bonuses and play them relatively safely. 
And finally, those casinos that have just appeared on the market and that are very actively trying to find their players and are actively recruiting players from the first two classes that I listed. 
So: all players can choose their priorities among these casino groups, and the criterion is the player’s character itself.  An important factor when choosing is one’s risk tolerance, because playing in new and untested casinos is always a risky action.
 And the probability of simply losing money without even losing increases many times over.

[Fiatless]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Financial information in business is often quite unreliable.  
There are many reasons why various organizations associated with financial flows hide the true state of affairs in their finances.  Almost all casinos can be classified not only as part of the gambling industry, but also as financial organizations.  Therefore, information about liquidity itself can also be included.  And it may not be reliable.  And it is absolutely impossible to verify this without an independent audit.  And it is not a fact that the casino, even when conducting some kind of audit, will not hide from the auditors some of its serious and secret financial obligations.  Fo this reason, I believe that liquidities that are publicly reported by casinos may not be a 100% guarantee of fair business practices.  
And a guarantee of paying out a big win to some lucky player.  
Rather, liquidity is something that simply informs you of how the casino chooses to present its financial position to the public.  
And you can only guess for yourself whether this is true or not.

Undoubtedly there are many strong and reliable casinos that have high reputations. However, the crypto gambling sector is a free market that is not well regulated. Some of the licencing nations or organisations only give authority to run a casino but they don't engage in regulations. In some cases, these casinos are not mandated by regulators to present audited financial statements. There have been cases where casinos issue doctored or fake financial reports to cover up their negative financial position.

We use casinos based on trust and not by rating from diverse bodies or websites. Even some of these reports might also be faulty because the process of gathering these data might not be reliable or valid. We shouldn't also forget that these casinos can also give researchers fake data just to deceive customers. Gamblers should always stake only what they can afford to lose and should always use casinos in the forum. This is because you will have genuine feedback about casinos that is present here.

[Hamphser]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Financial information in business is often quite unreliable.  
There are many reasons why various organizations associated with financial flows hide the true state of affairs in their finances.  Almost all casinos can be classified not only as part of the gambling industry, but also as financial organizations.  Therefore, information about liquidity itself can also be included.  And it may not be reliable.  And it is absolutely impossible to verify this without an independent audit.  And it is not a fact that the casino, even when conducting some kind of audit, will not hide from the auditors some of its serious and secret financial obligations.  Fo this reason, I believe that liquidities that are publicly reported by casinos may not be a 100% guarantee of fair business practices.  
And a guarantee of paying out a big win to some lucky player.  
Rather, liquidity is something that simply informs you of how the casino chooses to present its financial position to the public.  
And you can only guess for yourself whether this is true or not.

Undoubtedly there are many strong and reliable casinos that have high reputations. However, the crypto gambling sector is a free market that is not well regulated. Some of the licencing nations or organisations only give authority to run a casino but they don't engage in regulations. In some cases, these casinos are not mandated by regulators to present audited financial statements. There have been cases where casinos issue doctored or fake financial reports to cover up their negative financial position.

We use casinos based on trust and not by rating from diverse bodies or websites. Even some of these reports might also be faulty because the process of gathering these data might not be reliable or valid. We shouldn't also forget that these casinos can also give researchers fake data just to deceive customers. Gamblers should always stake only what they can afford to lose and should always use casinos in the forum. This is because you will have genuine feedback about casinos that is present here.

In general idea on which on the time that you dos sent out funds into other wallets which you dont possess its keys then  you should really be considering about on the risky move that you have done.
Once things becomes messy then there's no way that could really be able to get those funds back. This is why for now we dont really have no choice but to entrust since we are really that needing something from them on which the service that they do give on which we do decide on making some play or engagement which it would really be giving out that kind of not assured or safety with those funds but since
those would really be that be spent on gambling then it wont really matter much but it would really be still different if you are really that dealing with a legit thing rather than
into those weren't.

[Dunamisx]

I was actually surprised when I read the liquid stuff here but on the second thought anything that has to do with money is liquid but this is rarely used in casinos and sportsbooks. However, one thing I will caution about is for us to avoid believing that liability makes up the integrity of a gambling company. A less liquid gambling company might pay you while the one with higher liquidity dupes you, it happens daily all around us, which is why we should look before liquidity in selecting our casinos and sportsbooks. A good example is the 1xbit that which people were quick to tag their campaigners with a negative trust score. My research of the casinos shows that it's a very well-capitalised ones, but at the same time, they are well known for not paying bettors gains.

Strongly Agree!
The need for trust in a gambling firm is beyond the degree of liquidity in the firm's financials. There are loads of illiquid company's who were once liquid, more liquid than the ones currently waving the flag of liquidity. Some liquid companies also with-hold payments through hidden policies and make you feel like you are not deserving of your wins.

I know liquidity is essential as it convinces you that your wins can be paid out but its not the only feature to look out for in gambling firms.

Once we have made a decision for going i to gambling, then we have also signed the agreement for taking a risk as am endorsement because we cannot be sure in knowing the true nature or motive of a gambling platform until we have their experience, wether they are most liquid or not, this talks more about having a trust in them than in what they delivers and how they have been consistent in doing that for years, money or no money we need an approval of their trust.